Liberals Are Idiots

Who do you think al Qaeda would support in November???????????????????

Terrorists for Kerry

By Neal Boortz
March 15, 2004

192 DEAD; 1,200 WOUNDED. SO, WAS IT AL-QAEDA?

Have you seen those images on television yesterday? Did you see those
trains in Spain blown to bits? Now ... can you picture that same
scene somewhere in the United States ... maybe in the Northeast
corridor or in
Chicago where tens of thousands of people commute by rail?

So, you think this election is about jobs and health care? There are
about 200 people in Spain who will no longer benefit from any health
care, and another 1,200 who probably won't be going to work for today
.... or for a while ... or maybe never. Is al-Qaeda back? Maybe they
never left! The supposedly peaceful religion of Islam has struck
again, brutally murdering 192 people, and wounding more than 1,200. If
you think the war on terror isn't important, then it's time to get
your head out of the sand, or whatever dark region you have it stored.

Unless you have been living under a rock, by now you have heard what
happened. Ten backpack bombs exploded within a 15-minute span,
starting at about 7:40 a.m. yesterday aboard commuter trains. Police
also detonated three more bombs. A stolen van was found near Madrid
containing seven detonators and an Arabic tape with Koran verses on
it. The Spanish government initially pointed the finger at a
separatist group, but then a letter was faxed to Reuters by an
al-Qaeda-backed group. They referred to the attack as "operation death
trains." The attack occurred 911 days after September 11th. Another
letter was faxed to the Associated Press office in Cairo warning that
America was next. That's right; al-Qaeda says America is
next.

You have a role to play here. You have a decision to make ... and that
decision will be made on November 2nd. You will decide who is going to
lead this country in this time of peril ... this era of Islamic
terrorism. Maybe you'll want to chose someone who has proven that he
will use the American military and whatever resources are available to
him to hunt these terrorists down and kill them. Or maybe you'll want
to chose the man who says that this is all a law enforcement problem;
someone who, if he does manage to catch these Islamic predators with
his glorified police force, will then turn them over to some
international tribunal for trial. As the great Og Mandino once said,
"Use wisely your power of choice."

Who do you think the thousands of people who have died at the hands of
al-Qaeda would choose? And who do you think the al-Qaeda supporters
and sympathizers in the United States will chose?

SMChristenson

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:37:51 -0700, Liberals Are Idiots wrote:

> Who do you think al Qaeda would support in November???????????????????

My goodness! Has it been another month? Time to post this again?

I thought we had thoroughly discussed that Al-Queda issued a statement
that they support BUSH:

WE WANT BUSH TO WIN

The statement said it supported U.S. President George W. Bush in his
reelection campaign, and would prefer him to win in November rather than
the Democratic candidate John Kerry, as it was not possible to find a
leader "more foolish than you (Bush), who deals with matters by force
rather than with wisdom."

In comments addressed to Bush, the group said:

"Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats
have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and
Muslim nation as civilisation."

"Because of this we desire you (Bush) to be elected."

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/040317/325/eotq9.html

JGB

Ralph Nader. He's of Lebanese stock and wouldn't invite SHaron to the
WHite House. But then, being a Christian, I don't know if he'd invite
Arafat either knowing how many Christians were massacred in Lebanon
during the civil war. Maybe he'd invite Usama.




earthlink_nut_430@yahoo.com (Liberals Are Idiots) wrote in message news:<d12c9977.0404222137.28684fcb@posting.google. com>...
> Who do you think al Qaeda would support in November???????????????????
>
> Terrorists for Kerry
>
> By Neal Boortz
> March 15, 2004
>
> 192 DEAD; 1,200 WOUNDED. SO, WAS IT AL-QAEDA?
>
> Have you seen those images on television yesterday? Did you see those
> trains in Spain blown to bits? Now ... can you picture that same
> scene somewhere in the United States ... maybe in the Northeast
> corridor or in
> Chicago where tens of thousands of people commute by rail?
>
> So, you think this election is about jobs and health care? There are
> about 200 people in Spain who will no longer benefit from any health
> care, and another 1,200 who probably won't be going to work for today
> ... or for a while ... or maybe never. Is al-Qaeda back? Maybe they
> never left! The supposedly peaceful religion of Islam has struck
> again, brutally murdering 192 people, and wounding more than 1,200. If
> you think the war on terror isn't important, then it's time to get
> your head out of the sand, or whatever dark region you have it stored.
>
> Unless you have been living under a rock, by now you have heard what
> happened. Ten backpack bombs exploded within a 15-minute span,
> starting at about 7:40 a.m. yesterday aboard commuter trains. Police
> also detonated three more bombs. A stolen van was found near Madrid
> containing seven detonators and an Arabic tape with Koran verses on
> it. The Spanish government initially pointed the finger at a
> separatist group, but then a letter was faxed to Reuters by an
> al-Qaeda-backed group. They referred to the attack as "operation death
> trains." The attack occurred 911 days after September 11th. Another
> letter was faxed to the Associated Press office in Cairo warning that
> America was next. That's right; al-Qaeda says America is
> next.
>
> You have a role to play here. You have a decision to make ... and that
> decision will be made on November 2nd. You will decide who is going to
> lead this country in this time of peril ... this era of Islamic
> terrorism. Maybe you'll want to chose someone who has proven that he
> will use the American military and whatever resources are available to
> him to hunt these terrorists down and kill them. Or maybe you'll want
> to chose the man who says that this is all a law enforcement problem;
> someone who, if he does manage to catch these Islamic predators with
> his glorified police force, will then turn them over to some
> international tribunal for trial. As the great Og Mandino once said,
> "Use wisely your power of choice."
>
> Who do you think the thousands of people who have died at the hands of
> al-Qaeda would choose? And who do you think the al-Qaeda supporters
> and sympathizers in the United States will chose?

W. Syme

On 22 Apr 2004 22:37:51 -0700, earthlink_nut_430@yahoo.com (Liberals
Are Idiots) wrote:

>Who do you think al Qaeda would support in November???????????????????

Bush. Osama never was so popular.

--
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
W. Syme (pseudonym), European, non-native English speaker, "soft" atheist.
Email will not be read.

Siva

earthlink_nut_430@yahoo.com (Liberals Are Idiots) wrote in message news:<d12c9977.0404222137.28684fcb@posting.google. com>...
> Who do you think al Qaeda would support in November???????????????????

Bush, obviously.
>
> Terrorists for Kerry
>
> By Neal Boortz
> March 15, 2004
>
> 192 DEAD; 1,200 WOUNDED. SO, WAS IT AL-QAEDA?
>
> Have you seen those images on television yesterday? Did you see those
> trains in Spain blown to bits? Now ... can you picture that same
> scene somewhere in the United States ... maybe in the Northeast
> corridor or in
> Chicago where tens of thousands of people commute by rail?

Exactly, and I can picture Condi's remark afterwards: "NO SILVER
BULLET that this would have happened!"
>
> So, you think this election is about jobs and health care? There are
> about 200 people in Spain who will no longer benefit from any health
> care, and another 1,200 who probably won't be going to work for today
> ... or for a while ... or maybe never. Is al-Qaeda back? Maybe they
> never left! The supposedly peaceful religion of Islam has struck
> again, brutally murdering 192 people, and wounding more than 1,200. If
> you think the war on terror isn't important, then it's time to get
> your head out of the sand, or whatever dark region you have it stored.
>
> Unless you have been living under a rock, by now you have heard what
> happened. Ten backpack bombs exploded within a 15-minute span,
> starting at about 7:40 a.m. yesterday aboard commuter trains. Police
> also detonated three more bombs. A stolen van was found near Madrid
> containing seven detonators and an Arabic tape with Koran verses on
> it. The Spanish government initially pointed the finger at a
> separatist group, but then a letter was faxed to Reuters by an
> al-Qaeda-backed group. They referred to the attack as "operation death
> trains." The attack occurred 911 days after September 11th. Another
> letter was faxed to the Associated Press office in Cairo warning that
> America was next. That's right; al-Qaeda says America is
> next.

And with Mr. "the FBI warnings were no big deal" at the helm, they
will succeed.
>
> You have a role to play here. You have a decision to make ... and that
> decision will be made on November 2nd. You will decide who is going to
> lead this country in this time of peril ... this era of Islamic
> terrorism. Maybe you'll want to chose someone who has proven that he
> will use the American military and whatever resources are available to
> him to hunt these terrorists down and kill them.

Yep, we saw how well he proved this the days before 9/11, when he made
Iraq, NOT al Qaeda, a priority, in spite of a memo entitled "bin Laden
determined to attack the U. S."

Or maybe you'll want
> to chose the man who says that this is all a law enforcement problem;
> someone who, if he does manage to catch these Islamic predators with
> his glorified police force, will then turn them over to some
> international tribunal for trial. As the great Og Mandino once said,
> "Use wisely your power of choice."

Which man is that, Dan Quayle?
>
> Who do you think the thousands of people who have died at the hands of
> al-Qaeda would choose? And who do you think the al-Qaeda supporters
> and sympathizers in the United States will chose?

Bush, obviously.

Charles R Ward

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 05:37:51 UTC, earthlink_nut_430@yahoo.com
(Liberals Are Idiots) wrote:

> Who do you think al Qaeda would support in November???????????????????

Bush, easily for his assistence in recruiting.

Charles R Ward

--
"I do live among my fellow atheists. I also happen to live
among Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Pagans, Satanists
and followers of various other religions -- all of which
have a perfect right to live in the United States without
interference because of their religion or lack thereof no
matter how much it irks you." Liz

Lord Samuel

On 28 Apr 2004 15:18:01 -0700, gardibolt@yahoo.com (gardibolt) wrote:

>Osama bin Laden hated the secular Iraqi state


http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conten...jgqyi.asp?pg=2
And there are reports of more direct links between the Iraqi regime
and bin Laden. Farouk Hijazi, former Iraqi ambassador to Turkey and
Saddam's longtime outreach agent to Islamic fundamentalists, has been
captured. In his initial interrogations, Hijazi admitted meeting with
senior al Qaeda leaders at Saddam's behest in 1994. According to
administration officials familiar with his questioning, he has
subsequently admitted additional contacts, including a meeting in late
1997. Hijazi continues to deny that he met with bin Laden on December
21, 1998, to offer the al Qaeda leader safe haven in Iraq. U.S.
officials don't believe his denial.

For one thing, the meeting was reported in the press at the time. It
also fits a pattern of contacts surrounding Operation Desert Fox, the
series of missile strikes the Clinton administration launched at Iraq
beginning December 16, 1998. The bombing ended 70 hours later, on
December 19, 1998. Administration officials now believe Hijazi left
for Afghanistan as the bombing ended and met with bin Laden two days
later.

Earlier that year, at another point of increased tension between the
United States and Iraq, Hussein sought to step up contacts with al
Qaeda. On February 18, 1998, after the Iraqis repeatedly refused to
permit U.N. weapons inspectors into sensitive sites, President Bill
Clinton went to the Pentagon and delivered a hawkish speech about
Hussein's weapons of mass destruction and his links to "an unholy axis
of terrorists, drug traffickers, and organized international
criminals." Said Clinton: "We have to defend our future from these
predators of the 21st century. . . . They will be all the more lethal
if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and
biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot
allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat
than Saddam Hussein."

The following day, February 19, 1998, according to documents unearthed
in Baghdad after the recent war by journalists Mitch Potter and Inigo
Gilmore, Hussein's intelligence service wrote a memo detailing
upcoming meetings with a bin Laden representative traveling to
Baghdad. Each reference to bin Laden had been covered with Liquid
Paper. The memo laid out a plan to step up contacts between Iraq and
al Qaeda. The Mukhabarat, one of Saddam's security forces, agreed to
pay for "all the travel and hotel costs inside Iraq to gain the
knowledge of the message from bin Laden and to convey to his envoy an
oral message from us to bin Laden." The document set as the goal for
the meeting a discussion of "the future of our relationship with him,
bin Laden, and to achieve a direct meeting with him." The al Qaeda
representative, the document went on to suggest, might be "a way to
maintain contacts with bin Laden."

stoney

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 04:50:44 +0000 (UTC), "Charles R Ward"
<crward@netins.net>, Message ID:
<BJdXYSLdRyH7-pn2-Lzrhwubc1HN1@localhost> wrote in alt.atheism;

>On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 05:37:51 UTC, earthlink_nut_430@yahoo.com
>(Liberals Are Idiots) wrote:
>
>> Who do you think al Qaeda would support in November???????????????????
>
>Bush, easily for his assistence in recruiting.

Indeed. Bush is their million man recruiter.

>Charles R Ward




Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"

When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert

alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}