| #1 | |
|
|
Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!!
http://www.tencommandments.org/ We know that no Atheist has the ability to author them "Honor your father and your mother..." "You shall not murder." "You shall not steal." "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor" (Exodus 20:12-13,15,16). Those are just four of God's holy TEN COMMANDMENTS which He has made every person of mankind responsible to obey (Romans 3:19). Atheists foolishly deny that God is the Author of the TEN COMMANDMENTS. They say that they were authored by a human. Some atheists even deny that the TEN COMMANDMENTS exist (Romans 2:14-15). So, lets assume (in order to prove a point here) that atheists are right. If a human author them (and I speak as if insane), then we know for sure that no atheist, agnostic nor any other unbeliever had sense enough to author them. Why is that so? Because atheists are OPPOSED to GOD and His Holy COMMANDMENTS. And again, some even say the TEN COMMANDMENTS don't exist. So if a human authored them, it was a person who had far more intelligence than any atheist, agnostic or unbeliever. However, the deep wisdom contained in the TEN COMMANDMENTS is far beyond human capabilities. The deep wisdom and righteousness contained in them proves their Divine authorship. |
| #2 | |
|
|
On 2 May 2004 00:10:49 -0700, hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com (Hitlery KKKlinton)
wrote: >Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! Who the hell do you think your calling a liberal! --------- Archdeacom Levy Oates On behalf of the Prophet Eric Peabody (pbuh) Basingstoke, England http://www.angelfire.com/alt/bumblism/ |
| #3 | |
|
|
Post this were it belongs, in the religious whack job groups.
"Hitlery KKKlinton" <hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c37153c5.0405012310.25ea71ec@posting.google.c om... > Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! > > > http://www.tencommandments.org/ > > We know that no Atheist has the ability to author them "Honor your > father and your mother..." "You shall not murder." "You shall not > steal." "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor" > (Exodus > 20:12-13,15,16). Those are just four of God's holy TEN COMMANDMENTS > which He has made every person of mankind responsible to obey (Romans > 3:19). > > Atheists foolishly deny that God is the Author of the TEN > COMMANDMENTS. They say that they were authored by a human. Some > atheists even deny that the TEN COMMANDMENTS exist (Romans 2:14-15). > > So, lets assume (in order to prove a point here) that atheists are > right. If a human author them (and I speak as if insane), then we know > for sure that no atheist, agnostic nor any other unbeliever had sense > enough to author them. > > Why is that so? Because atheists are OPPOSED to GOD and His Holy > COMMANDMENTS. And again, some even say the TEN COMMANDMENTS don't > exist. So if a human authored them, it was a person who had far more > intelligence than any atheist, agnostic or unbeliever. > > However, the deep wisdom contained in the TEN COMMANDMENTS is far > beyond human capabilities. The deep wisdom and righteousness contained > in them proves their Divine authorship. |
| #4 | |
|
|
Hitlery KKKlinton wrote:
> Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! By far the most liberals are religious. And not all atheists are liberals. RS |
| #5 | |
|
|
On 2 May 2004 00:10:49 -0700, hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com (Hitlery
KKKlinton) wrote: >I speak as if insane Certainly. |
| #6 | |
|
|
On 2 May 2004 00:10:49 -0700, hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com (Hitlery
KKKlinton) wrote: >I speak as if insane Certainly. |
| #7 | |
|
|
On Sun, 02 May 2004 08:26:41 +0100, Levy Oates
<levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote: >On 2 May 2004 00:10:49 -0700, hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com (Hitlery KKKlinton) >wrote: > >>Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! > >Who the hell do you think your calling a liberal! Speaking as a Republican atheist, I agree! Doug |
| #8 | |
|
|
"Doug Haxton" <dlhaxton@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gdf9905m9gbjcq2f1bdi0kbht8irctgjfn@4ax.com... > On Sun, 02 May 2004 08:26:41 +0100, Levy Oates > <levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >On 2 May 2004 00:10:49 -0700, hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com (Hitlery KKKlinton) > >wrote: > > > >>Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! > > > >Who the hell do you think your calling a liberal! > > Speaking as a Republican atheist, I agree! Too many people have a few buckets where they think have to drop everyone. We're all human. We're all more complex than that. |
| #9 | |
|
|
"Hitlery KKKlinton" <hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c37153c5.0405012310.25ea71ec@posting.google.c om... > Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! > What's foolish denial? We all have the right to doubt. Without differing ideas there would be no diversity in this world. > > http://www.tencommandments.org/ > > We know that no Atheist has the ability to author them "Honor your Who's we? This seems to be known or believed only by christians. There are many very smart and moral people in this world but christians trash everyone else's intelligence and morals just because they don't believe in their 'holey' doctrine. > father and your mother..." "You shall not murder." Anyone with more than two brain cells will know that it's bad to kill someone. > "You shall not > steal." "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor" Anyone with an IQ higher than yogurt will know that those activities will lead to bad consequences. > (Exodus > 20:12-13,15,16). Those are just four of God's holy TEN COMMANDMENTS > which He has made every person of mankind responsible to obey (Romans > 3:19). They are all rather basic and not too difficult to think up for someone who has more moral fibre than a banker manager. > > Atheists foolishly deny that God is the Author of the TEN > COMMANDMENTS. They say that they were authored by a human. Some > atheists even deny that the TEN COMMANDMENTS exist (Romans 2:14-15). > > So, lets assume (in order to prove a point here) that atheists are > right. If a human author them (and I speak as if insane), then we know > for sure that no atheist, agnostic nor any other unbeliever had sense > enough to author them. Why not? You're either very narrow minded and bigoted or you're a troll who's just trying to generate debate for your own amusement. > > Why is that so? Because atheists are OPPOSED to GOD and His Holy > COMMANDMENTS. Rubbish. You don't have to be a fan of God to know what's right and wrong. > And again, some even say the TEN COMMANDMENTS don't > exist. I've never heard anyone say that. > So if a human authored them, it was a person who had far more > intelligence than any atheist, agnostic or unbeliever. Or christian. If christians were so smart and moral then they wouldn't need religion in the first place. > > However, the deep wisdom contained in the TEN COMMANDMENTS is far > beyond human capabilities. Lol! > The deep wisdom and righteousness contained > in them proves their Divine authorship. It proves nothing. It only sounds deep and wise to those who are morally and intellectually devoid. -- Andrew Werner. "If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you..." ~ Jesus. The Gospel of Thomas. Religion Exposed! http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner |
| #10 | |
|
|
"Hitlery KKKlinton" <hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c37153c5.0405012310.25ea71ec@posting.google.c om... > Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! > <take two> What's foolish about denial? We all have the right to doubt. Without differing ideas there would be no diversity in this world. > > http://www.tencommandments.org/ > > We know that no Atheist has the ability to author them "Honor your Who's we? This seems to be known or believed only by christians. There are many very smart and moral people in this world but christians trash everyone else's intelligence and morals just because they don't believe in their 'holey' doctrine. > father and your mother..." "You shall not murder." Anyone with more than two brain cells will know that it's bad to kill someone. > "You shall not > steal." "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor" Anyone with an IQ higher than yogurt will know that those activities will lead to bad consequences. > (Exodus > 20:12-13,15,16). Those are just four of God's holy TEN COMMANDMENTS > which He has made every person of mankind responsible to obey (Romans > 3:19). They are all rather basic and not too difficult to think up for someone who has more moral fibre than a banker manager. > > Atheists foolishly deny that God is the Author of the TEN > COMMANDMENTS. They say that they were authored by a human. Some > atheists even deny that the TEN COMMANDMENTS exist (Romans 2:14-15). > > So, lets assume (in order to prove a point here) that atheists are > right. If a human author them (and I speak as if insane), then we know > for sure that no atheist, agnostic nor any other unbeliever had sense > enough to author them. Why not? You're either very narrow minded and bigoted or you're a troll who's just trying to generate debate for your own amusement. > > Why is that so? Because atheists are OPPOSED to GOD and His Holy > COMMANDMENTS. Rubbish. You don't have to be a fan of God to know what's right and wrong. > And again, some even say the TEN COMMANDMENTS don't > exist. I've never heard anyone say that. > So if a human authored them, it was a person who had far more > intelligence than any atheist, agnostic or unbeliever. Or christian. If christians were so smart and moral then they wouldn't need religion in the first place. > > However, the deep wisdom contained in the TEN COMMANDMENTS is far > beyond human capabilities. Lol! > The deep wisdom and righteousness contained > in them proves their Divine authorship. It proves nothing. It only sounds deep and wise to those who are morally and intellectually devoid. -- Andrew Werner. "If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you..." ~ Jesus. The Gospel of Thomas. Religion Exposed! http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner |
| #11 | |
|
|
On Sun, 02 May 2004 09:08:07 GMT in alt.atheism, raven1 (raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism >On 2 May 2004 00:10:49 -0700, hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com (Hitlery >KKKlinton) wrote: > >>I speak as if insane > >Certainly. Oh come now. I think there's grounds s to take issue with the words "as if". -- "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." - Attrib: Pauline Reage. Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion? See: <http://www.Video2CD.com>. 35.00 gets your video on DVD. all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read. ** atheist poster child #1 ** #442. |
| #12 | |
|
|
"Hitlery KKKlinton" <hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c37153c5.0405012310.25ea71ec@posting.google.c om... > Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! > Not only that, but we also laugh at ignorant fools like you! So much energy wasted on a fantasy. |
| #13 | |
|
|
Let's discuss this topic: American Conservatives: Latter-Day Pharisees |
| #14 | |
|
|
On Sun, 02 May 2004 09:22:06 GMT, Doug Haxton <dlhaxton@comcast.net>
wrote: >On Sun, 02 May 2004 08:26:41 +0100, Levy Oates ><levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>On 2 May 2004 00:10:49 -0700, hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com (Hitlery KKKlinton) >>wrote: >> >>>Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! >> >>Who the hell do you think your calling a liberal! > >Speaking as a Republican atheist, I agree! > >Doug Boy, is that a bad combination. |
| #15 | |
|
|
On Sun, 02 May 2004 09:14:27 -0500, Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote:
>>>>Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! >>> >>>Who the hell do you think your calling a liberal! >> >>Speaking as a Republican atheist, I agree! >> >>Doug > >Boy, is that a bad combination. Oh, I'll grant you that I'm less than thrilled with the Republican stand on many social issues....but I'm largely in agreement with them on guns, foreign policy, tax policy, and military spending. Doug |
| #16 | |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 02 May 2004 16:10:57 GMT, a stranger
called by some Doug Haxton <dlhaxton@comcast.net> came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism >Oh, I'll grant you that I'm less than thrilled with the Republican >stand on many social issues....but I'm largely in agreement with them >on guns, foreign policy, tax policy, and military spending. Which is why I'm a Conservative Democrat. I simply cannot abide the current GOP attitudes on, well, the legitimacy of my life. -- Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5 Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows" |
| #17 | |
|
|
On Sun, 02 May 2004 16:10:57 GMT, Doug Haxton <dlhaxton@comcast.net>
wrote: >On Sun, 02 May 2004 09:14:27 -0500, Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote: > >>>>>Atheists & liberals foolishly deny God!! >>>> >>>>Who the hell do you think your calling a liberal! >>> >>>Speaking as a Republican atheist, I agree! >>> >>>Doug >> >>Boy, is that a bad combination. > >Oh, I'll grant you that I'm less than thrilled with the Republican >stand on many social issues....but I'm largely in agreement with them >on guns, foreign policy, tax policy, and military spending. > >Doug What forgeign policy? Bush doesn't have any foreign policy. The chimp still don't know who he's handing Iraq over to on 6/30. Neither does anyone else. Laughable. |
| #18 | |
|
|
On Sun, 02 May 2004 16:44:25 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote: >Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 02 May 2004 16:10:57 GMT, a stranger >called by some Doug Haxton <dlhaxton@comcast.net> came forth and told >this tale in alt.atheism > >>Oh, I'll grant you that I'm less than thrilled with the Republican >>stand on many social issues....but I'm largely in agreement with them >>on guns, foreign policy, tax policy, and military spending. > >Which is why I'm a Conservative Democrat. I simply cannot abide the >current GOP attitudes on, well, the legitimacy of my life. Well, we all have our "hot-button" issues...mine is guns. To be fair, though, aren't you exaggerating the GOP position on homosexuality (I presume that's what you're speaking of)? Doug |
| #19 | |
|
|
On Sun, 02 May 2004 11:52:57 -0500, Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote:
>>Oh, I'll grant you that I'm less than thrilled with the Republican >>stand on many social issues....but I'm largely in agreement with them >>on guns, foreign policy, tax policy, and military spending. >> >>Doug > >What forgeign policy? Bush doesn't have any foreign policy. The chimp >still don't know who he's handing Iraq over to on 6/30. Neither does >anyone else. Laughable. I'm sorry, I was under the impression that you wanted to discuss the issues rather than engage in mindless insults. My mistake. Doug |
| #20 | |
|
|
hitlery_klinton3@yahoo.com (Hitlery KKKlinton) wrote in message
> However, the deep wisdom contained in the TEN COMMANDMENTS is far > beyond human capabilities. The deep wisdom and righteousness contained > in them proves their Divine authorship. No. No human could have ever thought of them. (Rolls Eyes). Listen. The fact is us mere mortals *have* thought of better "commandments". We call them "Laws" and our laws are infinately more detailed, precise, and encompassing than the two-bit laundry list of "chores" your "Divine Author" left us with. Yeah, your "Divine Being" was really deep and prophetic when He handled down those 10 doozies. He didn't even have the wits to explicitly address the status of a fetus, the culpability of minors who commit crimes, or slavery, to name a few. We had to do all that ourselves. No, He took on such vexing issues such as whether murder is right or wrong. What a real groundbreaker your "Divine Author" was. Yeah, like we didn't have that one figured out before the Ten Commandments showed up. The laws authored by human beings make the Ten Commandments look like a "Things To Do" list. I think the solution to people like you, who want the 10 Commandments hanging in every school, is for every atheist to propose, as a better and alternate suggestion, that the laws of each state be placed in public schools with the accompanying punishment for breaking them. If theists, such as yourself really don't have a religious agenda, and truly only want to improve the moral climate, you won't object to this better alternate. But I suspect you will object because your all about pushing God and blame, not realistic solutions. And btw, count me in the list of non-liberal atheists posting in this thread, as well. |
| #21 | |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 02 May 2004 17:11:12 GMT, a stranger
called by some Doug Haxton <dlhaxton@comcast.net> came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism >On Sun, 02 May 2004 16:44:25 GMT, Douglas Berry ><penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote: > >>Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 02 May 2004 16:10:57 GMT, a stranger >>called by some Doug Haxton <dlhaxton@comcast.net> came forth and told >>this tale in alt.atheism >> >>>Oh, I'll grant you that I'm less than thrilled with the Republican >>>stand on many social issues....but I'm largely in agreement with them >>>on guns, foreign policy, tax policy, and military spending. >> >>Which is why I'm a Conservative Democrat. I simply cannot abide the >>current GOP attitudes on, well, the legitimacy of my life. > >Well, we all have our "hot-button" issues...mine is guns. To be fair, >though, aren't you exaggerating the GOP position on homosexuality (I >presume that's what you're speaking of)? Not really. I'm a gun owner myself. I support *freedom*, period. wether it be gays marrying or some artist who wants to slap blood on a canvas and call it art. As long as what you do doesn't cause hard to another (without consent), you should be free to do so. The current GOP mood is to let Christian fanatics write legislation. This would infringe on my life in several ways. That is wrong. -- Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5 Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows" |
| #22 | |
|
|
On Sun, 02 May 2004 20:47:23 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote: >>>>Oh, I'll grant you that I'm less than thrilled with the Republican >>>>stand on many social issues....but I'm largely in agreement with them >>>>on guns, foreign policy, tax policy, and military spending. >>> >>>Which is why I'm a Conservative Democrat. I simply cannot abide the >>>current GOP attitudes on, well, the legitimacy of my life. >> >>Well, we all have our "hot-button" issues...mine is guns. To be fair, >>though, aren't you exaggerating the GOP position on homosexuality (I >>presume that's what you're speaking of)? > >Not really. I'm a gun owner myself. Do you prefer the Democratic postion on gun control, then? > >I support *freedom*, period. wether it be gays marrying That's one issue on which I disagree with the Republicans, granted. > or some artist who wants to slap blood on a canvas and call it art. And who is preventing such "art" from being produced? I would point out that de-funding the NEA doesn't prevent a single piece of art from being produced...it only prevents me from having to pay for it. > As long >as what you do doesn't cause hard to another (without consent), you >should be free to do so. As a rule, I agree. For instance, if I had my way, I'd legalize virtually all drugs. Neither the GOP nor the Dems are going to do anything with that one, however. > >The current GOP mood is to let Christian fanatics write legislation. >This would infringe on my life in several ways. That is wrong. The current Democratic mood is to infringe on your gun rights and confiscate more of your property through taxation. Doug |
| #23 | |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 02 May 2004 22:01:24 GMT, a stranger
called by some Doug Haxton <hal@oa.com> came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism >On Sun, 02 May 2004 20:47:23 GMT, Douglas Berry ><penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote: >>Not really. I'm a gun owner myself. > >Do you prefer the Democratic postion on gun control, then? Of certain Democrats, yes. Some aren;t gun grabbers. >>I support *freedom*, period. wether it be gays marrying > >That's one issue on which I disagree with the Republicans, granted. >> or some artist who wants to slap blood on a canvas and call it art. > >And who is preventing such "art" from being produced? I would point >out that de-funding the NEA doesn't prevent a single piece of art from >being produced...it only prevents me from having to pay for it. The same NEA supports choirs and other forms. And art has never survived without government support. Da Vinci's "Last Supper" was commissioned by the Vatican, which at the time was a powerful governmental body. (Not to mention the Sistine Chapel) It was that sort of work that gave him the latitude to do the other great works he is known for. >> As long >>as what you do doesn't cause hard to another (without consent), you >>should be free to do so. > >As a rule, I agree. For instance, if I had my way, I'd legalize >virtually all drugs. Neither the GOP nor the Dems are going to do >anything with that one, however. True. >>The current GOP mood is to let Christian fanatics write legislation. >>This would infringe on my life in several ways. That is wrong. > >The current Democratic mood is to infringe on your gun rights and >confiscate more of your property through taxation. We pay the lowest tax rates in the industrial world. >Doug Good Gravy! I'm debating my evil twin! ![]() -- Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5 Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows" |
| #24 | |
|
|
Doug Haxton wrote:
snip,snip > > The current Democratic mood is to infringe on your gun rights and > confiscate more of your property through taxation. > > Doug > Is it better to tax and spend, the slogan of the anti Democrats, or to Borrow and spend, which is the current policy of the Bush folks? Which is the bigger evil? Who is being fiscally responsible? Cheers! W.N.(BIll) McCaw " The smallest dog can lift his leg on the tallest building!" (Hightower) |