12 year old cancer patient Parker Jensen has nutty parents

The parents of Parker are either so traumatized by his cancer diagnosis
that they can't think straight, or else they are nuts to start off with.

With every day they delay getting Parker treatment, his chances of surviving
diminish.

Their first argument, that he doesn't really have cancer doesn't stand up to
the light of science, despite repeated visits to reputable physicians.

Their second argument, that because they are Parker's parents, they should
have the ultimate say in his future, is a maneuver to avoid the reality of
the first. Why argue that their rights trump the state's rights if there is
no cancer?

If they agreed that Parker has cancer, then their second argument might seem
reasonable.

But put together, these arguments are evidence of an insanity coming from
(as it appears to me) the mother.
It would not surprise me if more evidence of this family's strangeness
surfaces.

The boy already suffered leukemia when he was 3yo.

nO SPAM TRUMPETED:

>Subject: 12 year old cancer patient Parker Jensen has nutty parents
>From: "Good!" Nospamplease@nospamplease.com
>Date: 9/17/2003 3:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <-R2dnYmvjJYfmvWiXTWJhA@comcast.com>
>
>The parents of Parker are either so traumatized by his cancer diagnosis
>that they can't think straight, or else they are nuts to start off with.
>
>With every day they delay getting Parker treatment, his chances of surviving
>diminish.
>
>Their first argument, that he doesn't really have cancer doesn't stand up to
>the light of science, despite repeated visits to reputable physicians.
>
>Their second argument, that because they are Parker's parents, they should
>have the ultimate say in his future, is a maneuver to avoid the reality of
>the first. Why argue that their rights trump the state's rights if there is
>no cancer?
>
>If they agreed that Parker has cancer, then their second argument might seem
>reasonable.
>
>But put together, these arguments are evidence of an insanity coming from
>(as it appears to me) the mother.
>It would not surprise me if more evidence of this family's strangeness
>surfaces.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

	#1
Good!	12 year old cancer patient Parker Jensen has nutty parents The parents of Parker are either so traumatized by his cancer diagnosis that they can't think straight, or else they are nuts to start off with. With every day they delay getting Parker treatment, his chances of surviving diminish. Their first argument, that he doesn't really have cancer doesn't stand up to the light of science, despite repeated visits to reputable physicians. Their second argument, that because they are Parker's parents, they should have the ultimate say in his future, is a maneuver to avoid the reality of the first. Why argue that their rights trump the state's rights if there is no cancer? If they agreed that Parker has cancer, then their second argument might seem reasonable. But put together, these arguments are evidence of an insanity coming from (as it appears to me) the mother. It would not surprise me if more evidence of this family's strangeness surfaces.

	#2
Fern5827	Re: 12 year old cancer patient Parker Jensen has nutty parents The boy already suffered leukemia when he was 3yo. nO SPAM TRUMPETED: >Subject: 12 year old cancer patient Parker Jensen has nutty parents >From: "Good!" Nospamplease@nospamplease.com >Date: 9/17/2003 3:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time >Message-id: <-R2dnYmvjJYfmvWiXTWJhA@comcast.com> > >The parents of Parker are either so traumatized by his cancer diagnosis >that they can't think straight, or else they are nuts to start off with. > >With every day they delay getting Parker treatment, his chances of surviving >diminish. > >Their first argument, that he doesn't really have cancer doesn't stand up to >the light of science, despite repeated visits to reputable physicians. > >Their second argument, that because they are Parker's parents, they should >have the ultimate say in his future, is a maneuver to avoid the reality of >the first. Why argue that their rights trump the state's rights if there is >no cancer? > >If they agreed that Parker has cancer, then their second argument might seem >reasonable. > >But put together, these arguments are evidence of an insanity coming from >(as it appears to me) the mother. >It would not surprise me if more evidence of this family's strangeness >surfaces. > > > > > > > >