| #1 | |
|
|
Could we see the return of active suspension??
|
| #2 | |
|
|
Re: Could we see the return of active suspension??
"Knight who says \"NI!\"" <no@spam.required> wrote in
news:45fa60f4$1@nntp.onyx.net: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/sport...la_one/6447171 > .stm That old chestnut again... So what if they do - these journalists always try to make out that it entirely removes the contribution from the driver. It's utter bo**ocks. We've had all sorts of technologies before, and do so now: And yet we see team mates performing differently, and cars leaving the track (as we always have). Why not go back to cars from the 1950's and be done with it? The only possible exception to this argument is launch control. And the only argument really worth considering when discussing technologies IMHO? Driver's lives. -- Regards, Dave email: dave_ryman@hotmailNOSPAM.com My Homepage: http://homepages.tesco.net/david.ryman/ The F1 travel guide: http://www.zdp06.ukgateway.net/f1_travel.htm |
| #3 | |
|
|
Re: Could we see the return of active suspension??
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:31:13 GMT, Dave Ryman
<dave_rymanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote: >"Knight who says \"NI!\"" <no@spam.required> wrote in >news:45fa60f4$1@nntp.onyx.net: > >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/sport...la_one/6447171 >> .stm > >That old chestnut again... > >So what if they do - these journalists always try to make out that it >entirely removes the contribution from the driver. It's utter bo**ocks. >We've had all sorts of technologies before, and do so now: And yet we see >team mates performing differently, and cars leaving the track (as we always >have). Why not go back to cars from the 1950's and be done with it? > >The only possible exception to this argument is launch control. > >And the only argument really worth considering when discussing technologies >IMHO? Driver's lives. Much rather see active suspension if it meant they'd remove traction control. -- to respond via email, visit: http://tinyurl.com/e48z9 |
