| #1 | |
|
|
uh-oh 67 for 2
That'll soon be 67-3 when Bell gets another duck
|
| #2 | |
|
|
Re: uh-oh 67 for 2
Tids wrote:
> That'll soon be 67-3 when Bell gets another duck I honestly posted this BEFORE Bell came out !!! |
| #3 | |
|
|
Re: uh-oh 67 for 2
"Tids" <carroll@REMOVETOREPLYwaihi.co.uk> wrote in message
news:43255545$0$76678$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net... > That'll soon be 67-3 when Bell gets another duck Watching the highlights, I was relieved to confirm that Vaughan had not decided to bat left-handed. 22.4 McGrath to Vaughan, OUT: fullish, on the off, Vaughan feels for that one outside the off, it's a thick edge, Gilchrist flies across to his left, that orange glove extending as full as possible and pouches a magnificent catch! -- David North Email to this address will be deleted as spam Use usenetATlaneHYPHENfarm.fsnet.co.uk |
| #4 | |
|
|
Re: uh-oh 67 for 2
"David North" <dnorth@abbeymanor.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote in message news:3om5geF69gt1U1@individual.net... > "Tids" <carroll@REMOVETOREPLYwaihi.co.uk> wrote in message > news:43255545$0$76678$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net... > > That'll soon be 67-3 when Bell gets another duck > > Watching the highlights, I was relieved to confirm that Vaughan had not decided > to bat left-handed. > > 22.4 McGrath to Vaughan, OUT: fullish, on the off, Vaughan feels for > that one outside the off, it's a thick edge, Gilchrist flies > across to his left, that orange glove extending as full as > possible and pouches a magnificent catch! > > Nor was Gilchrist standing in a slightly unorthodox just wide of second slip position. David |
