| #1 | |
|
|
Eng win toss, will bet, Collingwood in. (NT)
-- ButIstillneedtoknowwhat'sinthere! Thekeytoanysecurity systemishowit'sdesigned! Thatdependsonwhyitwasdesigned! Ihavetoknowwhatwhoeverdesigneditwastryingtoprotect ! (Blakes 7, City on the Edge of the World - Vila in typical panic mode) |
| #2 | |
|
|
Re: Eng win toss, will bet, Collingwood in. (NT)
Vaughan seems not to have inherited Hussain's knack of losing tosses....! Richard |
| #3 | |
|
|
Re: Eng win toss, will bet, Collingwood in. (NT)
Luke Curtis <mfll78@dsl.pipex.com> wrote in
news:81a0i1t3r18vmng8i4ahd6mo1rhgp9metd@4ax.com: > Should be juicy after lunch, Pietersen vs Warne. =:-) Juicy for the Australians... |
| #4 | |
|
|
Re: Eng win toss, will bet, Collingwood in. (NT)
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:02:24 +0100, Luke Curtis <mfll78@dsl.pipex.com>
wrote: >Should be juicy after lunch, Pietersen vs Warne. =:-) Well there turned out to be very little juice, didn't there?! |
| #5 | |
|
|
Re: Eng win toss, will bet, Collingwood in. (NT)
In article <3oad91F4vpikU2@individual.net>,
Richard Dixon <richard.dixon1975@blueyonder^spam^.co.uk> writes: > >Vaughan seems not to have inherited Hussain's knack of losing tosses....! I think that Lady Luck has had it in for Ponting with regard to the toss ever since he put England in at Edgbaston. -- John Hall "Hard work often pays off after time, but laziness always pays off now." Anon |
| #6 | |
|
|
Re: Eng win toss, will bet, Collingwood in. (NT)
"John Hall" <nospam_nov03@jhall.co.uk> wrote in message
news:AjXxKaHyWIIDFw08@jhall.demon.co.uk... > In article <3oad91F4vpikU2@individual.net>, > Richard Dixon <richard.dixon1975@blueyonder^spam^.co.uk> writes: >> >>Vaughan seems not to have inherited Hussain's knack of losing tosses....! > > I think that Lady Luck has had it in for Ponting with regard to the toss > ever since he put England in at Edgbaston. I'm not sure that he'll be cursing his luck too much tonight. -- David North Email to this address will be deleted as spam Use usenetATlaneHYPHENfarm.fsnet.co.uk |
| #7 | |
|
|
Re: Eng win toss, will bet, Collingwood in. (NT)
In article <3obkvcF51n7jU1@individual.net>,
David North <dnorth@abbeymanor.fsbusiness.co.uk> writes: >"John Hall" <nospam_nov03@jhall.co.uk> wrote in message >news:AjXxKaHyWIIDFw08@jhall.demon.co.uk... >> In article <3oad91F4vpikU2@individual.net>, >> Richard Dixon <richard.dixon1975@blueyonder^spam^.co.uk> writes: >>> >>>Vaughan seems not to have inherited Hussain's knack of losing tosses....! >> >> I think that Lady Luck has had it in for Ponting with regard to the toss >> ever since he put England in at Edgbaston. > >I'm not sure that he'll be cursing his luck too much tonight. We won't know how important the toss was until the match is over. It's plausible that if Australia had batted first they might have been something like 340-5 at the end of the day. But it seems likely that conditions over the next few days will be more favourable for conventional swing than today has been (more cloud and higher humidity), so it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that England will not be punished for their inadequate total today. -- John Hall "Hard work often pays off after time, but laziness always pays off now." Anon |
