| #1 | |
|
|
Collingwood or Anderson?
Given the forecast, I'd be tempted to play both and leave out Giles...
|
| #2 | |
|
|
Re: Collingwood or Anderson?
On 7 Sep 2005 02:02:02 -0700, "Fred" <longhop2005@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Given the forecast, I'd be tempted to play both and leave out Giles... Given the forecast, I'd be tempted to play both and leave out Bell... -- ButIstillneedtoknowwhat'sinthere! Thekeytoanysecurity systemishowit'sdesigned! Thatdependsonwhyitwasdesigned! Ihavetoknowwhatwhoeverdesigneditwastryingtoprotect ! (Blakes 7, City on the Edge of the World - Vila in typical panic mode) |
| #3 | |
|
|
Re: Collingwood or Anderson?
Luke Curtis wrote: > On 7 Sep 2005 02:02:02 -0700, "Fred" <longhop2005@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Given the forecast, I'd be tempted to play both and leave out Giles... > > Given the forecast, I'd be tempted to play both and leave out Bell... > I'd be tempted to play both and see if anyone notices that there are 12 players. |
| #4 | |
|
|
Re: Collingwood or Anderson?
In news:1126106868.705334.234690@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com,
davidflin@supanet.com <davidflin@supanet.com> typed: > Luke Curtis wrote: >> On 7 Sep 2005 02:02:02 -0700, "Fred" <longhop2005@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Given the forecast, I'd be tempted to play both and leave out >>> Giles... >> >> Given the forecast, I'd be tempted to play both and leave out Bell... >> > > I'd be tempted to play both and see if anyone notices that there are > 12 players. I like your style. Dave |
| #5 | |
|
|
Re: Collingwood or Anderson?
Every time Ponting tries to count them, we could confuse him by
bringing on a few subs... Luke, I wouldn't want to drop Bell - he's a class act, just struggling to find his feet a bit. He's going to be a fixture for England over the next decade. |
| #6 | |
|
|
Re: Collingwood or Anderson?
On 7 Sep 2005 09:04:23 -0700, "Fred" <longhop2005@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Every time Ponting tries to count them, we could confuse him by >bringing on a few subs... > >Luke, I wouldn't want to drop Bell - he's a class act, just struggling >to find his feet a bit. He's going to be a fixture for England over >the next decade. I agree with you, just in this particularly test with a apparently a great batting pitch and more than likely lots of bowling to be done then Collingwood's medium pacers could be a useful diversion to break up the predictability of the attack and possibly nicking a wicket as Ponting did to Vaughan last time. -- ButIstillneedtoknowwhat'sinthere! Thekeytoanysecurity systemishowit'sdesigned! Thatdependsonwhyitwasdesigned! Ihavetoknowwhatwhoeverdesigneditwastryingtoprotect ! (Blakes 7, City on the Edge of the World - Vila in typical panic mode) |
| #7 | |
|
|
Re: Collingwood or Anderson?
"Luke Curtis" <mfll78@dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message news:rrlvh19d4kl34lgahjrl7qv6mgiq0ocml4@4ax.com... > On 7 Sep 2005 09:04:23 -0700, "Fred" <longhop2005@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Every time Ponting tries to count them, we could confuse him by >>bringing on a few subs... >> >>Luke, I wouldn't want to drop Bell - he's a class act, just struggling >>to find his feet a bit. He's going to be a fixture for England over >>the next decade. > > I agree with you, just in this particularly test with a apparently a > great batting pitch and more than likely lots of bowling to be done > then Collingwood's medium pacers could be a useful diversion to break > up the predictability of the attack and possibly nicking a wicket as > Ponting did to Vaughan last time. If there's lots of bowling to be done, I'd like a bowler on the pitch, rather than a part-time bowler. Graybags |
| #8 | |
|
|
Re: Collingwood or Anderson?
> Luke, I wouldn't want to drop Bell - he's a class act, just struggling > to find his feet a bit. He needs to be told that they are at the end of his legs. He's going to be a fixture for England over > the next decade. So is Sven-Goran Eriksson, but that's because it would cost £15m to break his contract. |
