| #1 | |
|
|
Third citing:
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?I...ry=Environment -- Ken "Buddhism elucidates why we are sentient." "Buddhism follows thought throughout the Universe." "Karma means that you don't get away with anything." |
| #2 | |
|
|
On Wed, 23 May 2007 08:08:49 -0500, "Ken Kubos" <kubos@execpc.com>
wrote: >Third citing: > >http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?I...ry=Environment It's some sort of communication device but I reckons it should have something to hold it up - like a balloon. Steve -- Steve Wolstenholme Neural Planner Software Ltd EasyNN-plus. The easy way to build neural networks. http://www.easynn.com |
| #3 | |
|
|
not
|
| #4 | |
|
|
"Spaz" <yea@right.com> wrote in message news:r_OdnaVWMbUVR8nbnZ2dnUVZ_oipnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > not Sources? Links for your position? |
| #5 | |
|
|
"MostWanted" <mostwanted@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse news d95i.2688$u56.2149@newssvr22.news.prodigy.ne t...> > "Spaz" <yea@right.com> wrote in message > news:r_OdnaVWMbUVR8nbnZ2dnUVZ_oipnZ2d@comcast.com. .. >> not This definetely doesn't look like an alien craft. Still, I would like to know if anybody can identify it. It doesn't look like a manipulated photo. To me, it looks like a real object hanging in the air. No photo shop. It could have been created for a movie picture and then been tested for genuine looks here. I certainly don't know, but what I'm sure about, is it's too "earthly" looking for being an alien craft. I'm also sure that the person making these pictures public, has the explanation! |
| #6 | |
|
|
I keep waiting for someone to jump up and yell "gotcha! I made the fake!".
But it has been several weeks and nothing but speculation... going to take the wait and see attitude for now. MW. "RK" <at@at> wrote in message news:4655c440$0$184$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk. .. > > "MostWanted" <mostwanted@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse > news d95i.2688$u56.2149@newssvr22.news.prodigy.ne t...>> >> "Spaz" <yea@right.com> wrote in message >> news:r_OdnaVWMbUVR8nbnZ2dnUVZ_oipnZ2d@comcast.com. .. >>> not > > This definetely doesn't look like an alien craft. Still, I would like to > know if anybody can identify it. It doesn't look like a manipulated photo. > To me, it looks like a real object hanging in the air. No photo shop. It > could have been created for a movie picture and then been tested for > genuine looks here. I certainly don't know, but what I'm sure about, is > it's too "earthly" looking for being an alien craft. I'm also sure that > the person making these pictures public, has the explanation! > |
| #7 | |
|
|
"Ken Kubos" <kubos@execpc.com> wrote in message news:1358f75sfbib6e0@corp.supernews.com... > Third citing: > > http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?I...ry=Environment > Seems to have no means of propulsion? If real, then a UFO it is. Aliens exist - I have no doubt - but whether this is theirs, I do not know. > > Ken > > "Buddhism elucidates why we are sentient." > "Buddhism follows thought throughout the Universe." > "Karma means that you don't get away with anything." > > |
| #8 | |
|
|
"MostWanted" <mostwanted@hotmail.com> wrote in message news d95i.2688$u56.2149@newssvr22.news.prodigy.ne t...> > "Spaz" <yea@right.com> wrote in message > news:r_OdnaVWMbUVR8nbnZ2dnUVZ_oipnZ2d@comcast.com. .. >> not > > > Sources? Links for your position? > > > How do you link common sense and experience? AC |
| #9 | |
|
|
Fwd: Electrostatic Alien UFO Warp Drive? & The Bulgarian
Posted by: "Jack Sarfatti" Sarfatti@PacBell.net jack_sarfatti Thu May 24, 2007 1:29 pm (PST) Hi, Jack & all the rest; Nice to hear from you once again. It's been a while. On the "alien probe" photos, I agree; this looks like some very imaginative model and photoshopwork. While I was working for General Dynamics and the special effects company Introvision back in the early 1980's, I had occasion to work in photo retouching, matte painting, as well as create scale models that were photographed with the intention of making them look like actual, full-sized weapons systems. (Among other things). Christopher Ross, the brother of my college room mate, worked as a model builder for Industrial Light & Magic. I saw the original models for the Enterprise starship for the first Star Trek feature film as it neared completion along with its scaled "space dock". I have seen the best people in the motion picture industry at work, have visited their studios on multiple occasions, and closely examined their model work. This is amateurish by comparison. Heck, it even uses the exact same tone of flat, gray gel coat that model builders use in their fiberglass mockups! The uniformity of the exterior color is one clue to the fact that this is a model. There are no seams, slight variations in surface color or texture as one would expect from a thirty to sixty foot craft constructed of multiple panels to develop the surface. I believe that it is probably no larger than six to seven feet in its longest dimension. Size would have to be limited to be able to string it up with 90 pound fishing line! LOL Another give-away is the brightly illuminated underside, while retaining a nice, perfectly exposed sky. I have spent twenty seven years photographing military aircraft, (both from the back seat of F-15's, F-4's,F-16's, and the A-7K and on the ramp) as well as painting illustrations of them, and I can tell you that a large vehicle, (as this "craft" alleges to be) would have had its ventral surface (belly) completely blacked out in shadow in order to have such a perfectly exposed sky while hovering above treetop level. Conversely, had the underside been so beautifully exposed, the much brighter level of light from the sky should have been washed out and almost white. But in order to satisfy the light exposure as shown, one COULD accomplish that by having a six foot model photographed from about six feet off the ground in broad daylight. With the secondary light source of the ground in such proximity, one might actually be able to balance the two light sources: the sky and the ventral surface illuminated by reflected light from the ground. This all says "MODEL" loud and clear to me. In support of this theory, note that there is a slight warmth to the ventral lighting suggesting a nearby reflected lightsource, such as the tan-colored, dried grass seen elsewhere in the photos. That sort of reflected light could never balance with nor overpower the lightsource of the sky from thirty to seventy feet off the ground passing over the trees. And to have another guy jump in with an additional set of shots of a remarkably similar craft only says "conspiracy" in my book. Note the vegetation. It's the same in both sets even though the photos are supposed to have been taken miles apart on different days. Bottom line: I SAY THEY'RE FAKE! Warm Regards to All, Mark McCandlish -- Ken "Buddhism elucidates why we are sentient." "Buddhism follows thought throughout the Universe." "Karma means that you don't get away with anything." "Ken Kubos" <kubos@execpc.com> wrote in message news:1358f75sfbib6e0@corp.supernews.com... | Third citing: | | http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?I...ry=Environment | | -- | | Ken | | "Buddhism elucidates why we are sentient." | "Buddhism follows thought throughout the Universe." | "Karma means that you don't get away with anything." | | |
| #10 | |
|
|
"Ken Kubos" <kubos@execpc.com> wrote in message news:1358f75sfbib6e0@corp.supernews.com... > Third citing: > > http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?I...ry=Environment > > -- > > Ken > > "Buddhism elucidates why we are sentient." > "Buddhism follows thought throughout the Universe." > "Karma means that you don't get away with anything." > > I believe is fake. In one of the photos there is a discontinuity in one of the cables. See the magnified image below http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/3...fakeufomc9.jpg Of course this is my opinion. These pictures should get examined by experts in digital imaging and photography in order to be marked as genuine or fake Best regards |