Re: Out of body experience medically reproduced?

"Ben Stevenson" <nospam@firemail.com> wrote:

>Please read back on this issue on various points made
>so far by others, that are quite conclusive

Aw, Ben, how nice of you! I mean, surely you are referring to me, too?
I never would have expected you to say that.

On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 09:38:58 -0400, "CAndersen (Kimba)"
<KimbaWLion@aol.com> wrote:

>"Ben Stevenson" <nospam@firemail.com> wrote:
>
>>Please read back on this issue on various points made
>>so far by others, that are quite conclusive
>
>Aw, Ben, how nice of you! I mean, surely you are referring to me, too?
>I never would have expected you to say that.

The best way for supposed researchers to test these things is
experiment on themselves. Unfortunately the "lab rat" methodology
seems to be the process by which most generic research is performed.
It is not a foolproof method as we already know in "pharmacological"
(is that a word?, I mean drug testing) and so why would it work in the
metaphysical. The other part of it is the trained animal concept that
one's test subjects should be able to perform on demand. My belief
though is that those who can , wont for specific reasons.

Lagartija

"CAndersen (Kimba)" <KimbaWLion@aol.com> wrote in message
news:g6ldgvojrp8igv6heoh2a2mvl9kjr3ptvn@4ax.com...
> "Ben Stevenson" <nospam@firemail.com> wrote:
>
> >Please read back on this issue on various points made
> >so far by others, that are quite conclusive
>
> Aw, Ben, how nice of you! I mean, surely you are referring to me, too?
> I never would have expected you to say that.

It took you so long to know I'm a nice guy. Man you're slowing down
these days. :-) Yes, I was referring to you too, but I can't remember on
which one :-). And you did speak often about reciprocating others, so make
sure you're nice to me from now on in return OK?

Ben

	#1
CAndersen (Kimba)	Re: Out of body experience medically reproduced? "Ben Stevenson" <nospam@firemail.com> wrote: >Please read back on this issue on various points made >so far by others, that are quite conclusive Aw, Ben, how nice of you! I mean, surely you are referring to me, too? I never would have expected you to say that.

	#2
Lagartija	Re: Out of body experience medically reproduced? On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 09:38:58 -0400, "CAndersen (Kimba)" <KimbaWLion@aol.com> wrote: >"Ben Stevenson" <nospam@firemail.com> wrote: > >>Please read back on this issue on various points made >>so far by others, that are quite conclusive > >Aw, Ben, how nice of you! I mean, surely you are referring to me, too? >I never would have expected you to say that. The best way for supposed researchers to test these things is experiment on themselves. Unfortunately the "lab rat" methodology seems to be the process by which most generic research is performed. It is not a foolproof method as we already know in "pharmacological" (is that a word?, I mean drug testing) and so why would it work in the metaphysical. The other part of it is the trained animal concept that one's test subjects should be able to perform on demand. My belief though is that those who can , wont for specific reasons. Lagartija

	#3
Ben Stevenson	Re: Out of body experience medically reproduced? "CAndersen (Kimba)" <KimbaWLion@aol.com> wrote in message news:g6ldgvojrp8igv6heoh2a2mvl9kjr3ptvn@4ax.com... > "Ben Stevenson" <nospam@firemail.com> wrote: > > >Please read back on this issue on various points made > >so far by others, that are quite conclusive > > Aw, Ben, how nice of you! I mean, surely you are referring to me, too? > I never would have expected you to say that. It took you so long to know I'm a nice guy. Man you're slowing down these days. :-) Yes, I was referring to you too, but I can't remember on which one :-). And you did speak often about reciprocating others, so make sure you're nice to me from now on in return OK? Ben