Indeterminant convergence

So much for the Victor's failed effort to perfect psychic homicide. I guess
everyone else who died, died of coincidence, and not because of him and his
superhuman powers.

The death of Number 7 was supposed to be his crowning achievement, and the
homicide that would bring it all together with success, Renaissance, and
Rapture.

Like I said, you can't invent an invariant and force it to be invariant
under all transformations.

You simply cannot invent truth just by convincing the masses to believe it
is truth. One way or another, Number 7 is not going to die for the Victor
of Deception.

Wrapped up as a mummy or otherwise.

Jon G. wrote:

> Wrapped up as a mummy or otherwise.

Otherwise?

Wrapped up as a DUMMY, as in your case?

Dear alt.math.recreational users:

The author of this post, "Jon G." has been harassing the
soc.religion.quaker newsgroup by attempting to flood it with
crossposted threads. He tried this with uk.rec.psychic, but
they caught on to him and reguse to cooperate.

If you reply to Jon G. PLEASE post your reply to alt.math.recreational
ONLY. To trim the Newsgroups line, use your mouse to ckick on the
newsgroups box at the top of your reply and then use your delete key
to trim any newsgroups that mave nothing to do with math.

Thanks!

	#1
Jon G.	Indeterminant convergence So much for the Victor's failed effort to perfect psychic homicide. I guess everyone else who died, died of coincidence, and not because of him and his superhuman powers. The death of Number 7 was supposed to be his crowning achievement, and the homicide that would bring it all together with success, Renaissance, and Rapture. Like I said, you can't invent an invariant and force it to be invariant under all transformations. You simply cannot invent truth just by convincing the masses to believe it is truth. One way or another, Number 7 is not going to die for the Victor of Deception. Wrapped up as a mummy or otherwise.

	#2
m II	Re: Indeterminant conceit Jon G. wrote: > Wrapped up as a mummy or otherwise. Otherwise? Wrapped up as a DUMMY, as in your case?

	#3
Engineer	Re: Indeterminant convergence Dear alt.math.recreational users: The author of this post, "Jon G." has been harassing the soc.religion.quaker newsgroup by attempting to flood it with crossposted threads. He tried this with uk.rec.psychic, but they caught on to him and reguse to cooperate. If you reply to Jon G. PLEASE post your reply to alt.math.recreational ONLY. To trim the Newsgroups line, use your mouse to ckick on the newsgroups box at the top of your reply and then use your delete key to trim any newsgroups that mave nothing to do with math. Thanks!