| #1 | |
|
|
Havenport has the muscle, but lacks the smarts. Powelson has the smarts,
but lacks the muscle. All that amounts to is a Reece's Peanut Butter Cup tucked neatly in my shirt pocket for my final ride. How can I complain? I was the one who introduced them to each other. Havenport and Powelson are alike in that they kill people in such a fashion that it is difficult to trace the homicides back to them. Havenport plans the hit in advance and is good with physical evidence. The scene lacks evidence of the truth and produces evidence of the deception. Powelson does the hit first and is good with swaying the investigation. He uses suggestion and persuasion. The jury lacks a presentation of the facts and hears arguements of sophisticated thought and explanation. Powelson is a mind-f*ucker. Havenport is more of a tank transmission. Each of them worked 30 years and retired. But since they've killed people, there is something lacking in their retirement. That's all the work they owe the people they killed. Their debts are unforgiveable. What's more, they live free lives in comforts, never prosecuted for the murders they did. Meanwhile other men who have killed are in prison, some on Death Row. What makes Havenport and Powelson so special? [satire] Of course, Powelson is indispensable for the course of human destiny. Of course, Havenport has all important people under the gun with is 9mm cannon, so comply or die. [end satire]. "Okay. I made a mistake, but it was because of you that I made it. Therefore, it was really your mistake, and you should serve the sentence for what I did." Havenport nurses a beer while Powelson stuffs his ego with feedback. Create a clone existence up to the time they killed their victims, and next time refrain from killing them. It took forever to make this place. It's going to take them forever to duplicate it. More that 30 years of pushing buttons and pulling levers on coal machines, or 30 years of lecturing and writing books, Havenport and Powelson have their work cut out for them, AND IT WILL NEVER END. If anyone has the urge to kill someone, kill yourself. It will free up more of the world's resources for the rest of us. |
| #2 | |
|
|
Jon G. wrote:
> If anyone has the urge to kill someone, kill yourself. It will free up more > of the world's resources for the rest of us. > > Care to show us how it's done? You know you want to. Even the Quakers want you dead, so let's get to it, you loon. mike |
| #3 | |
|
|
"m II" <c@in.the.hat> wrote in message news:2Wmai.12169$vT6.914@edtnps90... > Jon G. wrote: > >> If anyone has the urge to kill someone, kill yourself. It will free up >> more of the world's resources for the rest of us. > > Care to show us how it's done? You know you want to. Even the Quakers want > you dead, so let's get to it, you loon. > > Even I want him dead and I love everyone! |
| #4 | |
|
|
On 9 Jun, 03:08, "seon ferguson" <s...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> "m II" <c...@in.the.hat> wrote in messagenews:2Wmai.12169$vT6.914@edtnps90... > > Jon G. wrote: > > >> If anyone has the urge to kill someone, kill yourself. It will free up > >> more of the world's resources for the rest of us. > > > Care to show us how it's done? You know you want to. Even the Quakers want > > you dead, so let's get to it, you loon. > > Even I want him dead and I love everyone! Jon G must be stopped. Why is it such a problem? This group should be moderated, is that possible? |
| #5 | |
|
|
"Malcolm" <malcolmrichards@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:1181435932.958977.322340@h2g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com... > On 9 Jun, 03:08, "seon ferguson" <s...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >> "m II" <c...@in.the.hat> wrote in >> messagenews:2Wmai.12169$vT6.914@edtnps90... >> > Jon G. wrote: >> >> >> If anyone has the urge to kill someone, kill yourself. It will free >> >> up >> >> more of the world's resources for the rest of us. >> >> > Care to show us how it's done? You know you want to. Even the Quakers >> > want >> > you dead, so let's get to it, you loon. >> >> Even I want him dead and I love everyone! > > > Jon G must be stopped. Why is it such a problem? This group should be > moderated, is that possible? > I don't think half these newsgroups have moderators. He'll keep posting even when every member of this group tells him to shut up. What's his problem anyway? |
| #6 | |
|
|
Malcolm wrote: Malcolm, please post only to the newsgroup you read. By letting Jon G. decide where your posts go you are helping him to be disruptive. >Jon G must be stopped. Why is it such a problem? This group should be >moderated, is that possible? No. Not possible. There are sound technical reasdons why an unmoderated newsgroup cannot become a moderated newsgroup. The oversimplified explanation is that some folks will be on systems that think it is unmoderated and others on systems that think that it is moderated, causing loss of posts. |
| #7 | |
|
|
seon ferguson wrote: >He'll keep posting even when every member of this group tells him to shut >up. What's his problem anyway? Mental illness. He has posted about it several times. You are part of the problem when you respond. |
| #8 | |
|
|
<invalid@example.com> wrote in message news:yeGdnXmPtfIUIfbb4p2dnA@giganews.com... > > > > seon ferguson wrote: > >>He'll keep posting even when every member of this group tells him to shut >>up. What's his problem anyway? > > Mental illness. He has posted about it several times. > > You are part of the problem when you respond. > you dont have to worry about that anymore another user taught me how to block someone when you use outlook express. |