| #1 | |
|
|
I agree with you to a point, but with the full transcript it's hard
not to reach the same conclusions as the writer. And what would constitute objectivity in this case - not reaching any conclusion? Not making any statement? Not having any opinion about what is obviously taking place - a scam? I don't know, I feel it maybe time to start objecting to this kind of fraud, which it objectively is. Gabriel |
| #2 | |
|
|
"Gabriel" <charlesmoa@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:a7dd7cd2.0501151127.45b40d85@posting.google.c om... > I agree with you to a point, but with the full transcript > it's hard not to reach the same conclusions as the writer. > And what would constitute objectivity in this case - not > reaching any conclusion? Not making any statement? > Not having any opinion about what is obviously > taking place - a scam? I don't know, I feel it maybe > time to start objecting to this kind of fraud, which it > objectively is. > > Gabriel Object away, but no one forced the audience there, the gullibility of mankind isn't likely to go away anytime soon, but equally it would be arrogant in the extreme to dismiss mediumship on the strength of Colin Fry's dismal performance that night. "it is apparent that Fry is in the process of increasing his share of the Swedish market of fantasy-prones." "may be disturbing to the older segments of the Swedish woo-woo audience." Would you say that is evidence of unbiased reporting or indicative of the writers bias and prejudice? personally speaking I'd say any worthwhile exploration of mediumship would require something more than reading that article. |