My Forum About > Science > Paranormal > Psychic
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
  #1
Jon G.
 
Default about the uK

the uK is this.

They clip the top stem off a pine tree, then dig up the roots and clip off
the bottom of the taproot, discard the rest, and think they've got it made.

"LOOK! WE'VE FOUND IT! THE BEGINNING AND THE END! WE OWN THE UNIVERSE!"
they boast... kind of like plucking out one of their greasy hairs by the
root, cutting off the tips with a scalpel, and earning a PhD from Cambridge
for it. Their countrymen endorse the recognition for the degree.

The fact of the matter is, the uK knows JACK SH*T.

The United States is important to the uK, because it is composed of the
population base they need to yo-yo their fundamental discoveries of
comparative proctology/psychiatry. That is, they need to fool enough people
to believe the whole tree is there (they have the top stem and the root tip
to prove it), to drive the crusade home.

They gather intelligence from terrorists and intelligence from the Vatican.
Then they use the information to play them against each other like a game,
to manipulate societies to play into their hands and get their way, when in
the beginning all they really ever knew was that terrorists had weapons and
the Pope preached a sermon. See? That's how they work.

They're all sociopaths. Every one of them. Selfish, haughty, arrogant,
manipulative, and the third of them homicidal. When you find one that's
humble, it's only for appearances to solicit undeserving admiration for it.

The people hate each other and sabatoge their nation themselves to get even.
Their petty grievances turn into back-stabbing fights where they kill
themselves off. They're control freaks who can't tolerate not being able to
play God in all aspects of life.

So they're funny in a plastic way. They are phonies who craft their
conversation so everything turns out their way.

So that's the uK. The shi*bowl capital of the world.


 
  #2
John
 
Default Re: about the uK

Evil Noodle wrote:

<snip>

Most on the other group to which this was posted manage to ignore those
of whom you complain. Were you to try to do likewise you might find
life more pleasant.
--
John
"Who is John Galt?"
 
  #3
Evil Noodle
 
Default Re: about the uK


"John" <john@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:5evm07F3altufU1@mid.individual.net...
> Evil Noodle wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> Most on the other group to which this was posted manage to ignore those
> of whom you complain. Were you to try to do likewise you might find
> life more pleasant.
> --
> John


My apologies to all in the Quaker group, I'm afraid my irritation with this
character meant I didn't perform my normal editing of which groups my post
went to.

I usually manage to ignore him without much problem, but wasn't impressed
with his delusional rant against those of us from the UK and turning the
other cheek is a trait I perhaps need more patience to acquire.
Either way, I'll make sure I trim your group from future replies.


 
  #4
John
 
Default Re: about the uK

Evil Noodle wrote:

> My apologies to all in the Quaker group, I'm afraid my irritation with
> this character meant I didn't perform my normal editing of which groups
> my post went to.
>

I'm sure all here will understand, a) we're not all 'Quakers', and, b) we
are all human.
>
> I usually manage to ignore him without much problem, but wasn't impressed
> with his delusional rant against those of us from the UK and turning the
> other cheek is a trait I perhaps need more patience to acquire.
> Either way, I'll make sure I trim your group from future replies.


Its not so much, "turning the other cheek", as seeing with a selectively
blind eye.
--
John
"Who is John Galt?"
 
  #5
m II
 
Default Re: about the uK

Xtatic wrote:

>> Hardly, I reply to very few of his posts.
>>

> Why reply to enny of them ? Xtatic.
>
>


In my own case, it is a rare opportunity to mock the insane without
public outrage ensuing...




mike
 
  #6
m II
 
Default Re: about the uK

Evil Noodle wrote:

>> Why reply to enny of them ? Xtatic.

>
> Because we reply to posts as the whim takes us, was there any particular
> urge on your part to reply to my post?



Noodle..we all get ..ahem..cough..cough..urges..once in a while..it's
perfectly normal...yes...normal..


cough cough...






mike
 
  #7
Evil Noodle
 
Default Re: about the uK


"m II" <c@in.the.hat> wrote in message
news:mI8ji.28270$xk5.19969@edtnps82...
> Evil Noodle wrote:
>
>>> Why reply to enny of them ? Xtatic.

>>
>> Because we reply to posts as the whim takes us, was there any particular
>> urge on your part to reply to my post?

>
>
> Noodle..we all get ..ahem..cough..cough..urges..once in a while..it's
> perfectly normal...yes...normal..
>
>
> cough cough...


Sorry Mike, but chickens and a rubber suit will never be normal in my eyes,
Jon's maybe but not mine...


 
  #8
Jon G.
 
Default Re: about the uK


"John" <john@deism.org> wrote in message
news:5f02jvF3bbutlU1@mid.individual.net...
> Evil Noodle wrote:
>
>> My apologies to all in the Quaker group, I'm afraid my irritation with
>> this character meant I didn't perform my normal editing of which groups
>> my post went to.
>>

> I'm sure all here will understand, a) we're not all 'Quakers', and, b) we
> are all human.
>>
>> I usually manage to ignore him without much problem, but wasn't impressed
>> with his delusional rant against those of us from the UK and turning the
>> other cheek is a trait I perhaps need more patience to acquire.
>> Either way, I'll make sure I trim your group from future replies.

>
> Its not so much, "turning the other cheek", as seeing with a selectively
> blind eye.
> --
> John
> "Who is John Galt?"


uK people aren't happy unless they can control and manipulate the world to
turn out to their own selfish advantage. When they are exposed with their
scam, they revert to calling names and force.

Most of them are just bored. Without my posts for them to rant and rave
about, they'd have to face their own, and that is a pain for them beyond all
possible relief.

I have to give the uK credit for fake tanks in WWII, but sometimes a
light-weight high-speed steam roller just won't do the trick.


 
  #9
m II
 
Default Re: about the uK

Evil Noodle wrote:

>> cough cough...

>
> Sorry Mike, but chickens and a rubber suit will never be normal in my eyes,
> Jon's maybe but not mine...



That pink rubber suit leads me to think he's tending towards deviancy.
Mind you, judging by his posts, he may be prone to incontinence on a
massive scale therefore needing a secure, waterproof wrapping.






mike
 
  #10
m II
 
Default Re: about the uK

Jon Giffen. wrote:

more garbage...



Stop posting here, moron.
 
  #11
downsizingmylife
 
Default Re: about the uK

On Jul 3, 12:31 am, "Jon G." <jon8...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> the uK is this.
>
> They clip the top stem off a pine tree, then dig up the roots and clip off
> the bottom of the taproot, discard the rest, and think they've got it made.
>
> "LOOK! WE'VE FOUND IT! THE BEGINNING AND THE END! WE OWN THE UNIVERSE!"
> they boast... kind of like plucking out one of their greasy hairs by the
> root, cutting off the tips with a scalpel, and earning a PhD from Cambridge
> for it. Their countrymen endorse the recognition for the degree.
>
> The fact of the matter is, the uK knows JACK SH*T.
>
> The United States is important to the uK, because it is composed of the
> population base they need to yo-yo their fundamental discoveries of
> comparative proctology/psychiatry. That is, they need to fool enough people
> to believe the whole tree is there (they have the top stem and the root tip
> to prove it), to drive the crusade home.
>
> They gather intelligence from terrorists and intelligence from the Vatican.
> Then they use the information to play them against each other like a game,
> to manipulate societies to play into their hands and get their way, when in
> the beginning all they really ever knew was that terrorists had weapons and
> the Pope preached a sermon. See? That's how they work.
>
> They're all sociopaths. Every one of them. Selfish, haughty, arrogant,
> manipulative, and the third of them homicidal. When you find one that's
> humble, it's only for appearances to solicit undeserving admiration for it.
>
> The people hate each other and sabatoge their nation themselves to get even.
> Their petty grievances turn into back-stabbing fights where they kill
> themselves off. They're control freaks who can't tolerate not being able to
> play God in all aspects of life.
>
> So they're funny in a plastic way. They are phonies who craft their
> conversation so everything turns out their way.
>
> So that's the uK. The shi*bowl capital of the world.


ok jon this is not a nice post at all, can you not find something
upbeat to post about??? i hate to say this jon but i don't think i
would want to have a cup of coffee with you even if i liked coffee
which i don't as you are i hate to tell you a downer...if you were put
in a bottle as a med. for sick people they would not get well...when i
was shopping the other day i saw brand new play dough which made me
smile and made me think to be a better person to others but i'll be
damn if you don't take the cake...you are that one piece of straw that
just may break something in this newsgroup and its not pretty...my
next to the last post to jon ever and a day....f.

 
  #12
Engineer
 
Default Re: about the uK




Note to uk.rec.psychic users; "downsizingmylife" is a really sweet
senior citizen lady accessing Google Groups through a WebTV box
and who has ZERO clue as to how newsgroups work, It's up to the
rest of us to fight Jon G's plot to fill soc.religion.quaker with
crossposts. "downsizingmylife" will never get it.

 
  #13
Engineer
 
Default Re: about the uK




m II wrote:
>
>Evil Noodle wrote:
>
>>> cough cough...

>>
>> Sorry Mike, but chickens and a rubber suit will never be normal in my eyes,
>> Jon's maybe but not mine...

>
>That pink rubber suit leads me to think he's tending towards deviancy.
>Mind you, judging by his posts, he may be prone to incontinence on a
>massive scale therefore needing a secure, waterproof wrapping.


You owe deviants and incontinents an apology for comparing them to Jon G.


 
  #14
m II
 
Default Re: about the uK

Engineer wrote:
> m II wrote:
>> Evil Noodle wrote:
>>
>>>> cough cough...
>>> Sorry Mike, but chickens and a rubber suit will never be normal in my eyes,
>>> Jon's maybe but not mine...

>> That pink rubber suit leads me to think he's tending towards deviancy.
>> Mind you, judging by his posts, he may be prone to incontinence on a
>> massive scale therefore needing a secure, waterproof wrapping.

>
> You owe deviants and incontinents an apology for comparing them to Jon G.
>
>


My humblest apologies. The devil made me do it.




mike
 
  #15
downsizingmylife
 
Default Re: about the uK

On Jul 6, 5:33 pm, Engineer <inva...@example.com> wrote:
> Note to uk.rec.psychic users; "downsizingmylife" is a really sweet
> senior citizen lady accessing Google Groups through a WebTV box
> and who has ZERO clue as to how newsgroups work, It's up to the
> rest of us to fight Jon G's plot to fill soc.religion.quaker with
> crossposts. "downsizingmylife" will never get it.



engineer, thank you so very much for your kind help but i am not a
senior citizen nor am i posting on a webtv and have not posted that
way in some time. i use a webtv addy still after all this time so not
to get unwanted e mail.if you could take the time to look at my
headers that may be a help to you. faith

 
Reply
Thread Tools


Powered by vBulletin

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.