bradguth@gmail.com

As long as you don't run yourself out of ice cold beer and pizza, I
don't see all that much of a problem.

As long as you've got way more spare/renewable energy at your disposal
than you could possibly know what to do with, and having that nifty
thermal suit made by Ovglove, where's the big-ass insurmountable
problem with taking that hot-foot of a toasty stroll on Venus?

CO2-->CO/O2 is not hardly a technical problem, hasn't been for a good
decade or more.

Pure H2O as easily extracted from those somewhat cool nighttime acidic
clouds (above the S8 layer) is simply another mission positive win-
win.

The 65 kg/m3 worth of buoyancy as working along with the 90.5% gravity
is offering a couple of other nifty factors that'll work rather well
for your composite rigid airship (just like on behalf of those
Venusian composite rigid airships).

If you're any damn good at PhotoShop, goto:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
or best you start with your very own look-see at the following
official image site:
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

The 36 look per pixel of that GIF image format starts getting
interesting at being 3X resampled, and then giving it all the best
PhotoShop or whatever else you can muster, although the original GIF
1:1 image was actually good enough for my PhotoShop configured brain
to deductively interpret upon what's most likely artificial as opposed
to what's perfectly natural. 36 looks per pixel is offering a lot of
truthworthy image data to start with, so it's a good one to stick with
rather than dealing with their individual 75 meter/pixel versions as
having combined but four looks per pixel.

Don't try to process the entire image unless you've got one heck of a
nifty PC or MAC. Try clipping out only the small portion of the total
image that's roughly a third up from the bottom and just to the right
of center, as we're talking about utilizing less than 10% or perhaps
even as little as 5% of that primary GIF image, and to process upon
just that much shouldn't traumatise your memory or performance PC or
MAC.

I'll review each of your results, that by rights should become a whole
lot better than mine. Obviously anyone can over/under force those
PhotoShop refinements, well past the point of no return, so don't do
that. My extremely old version of PhotoShop can't accomplish much
better than 8X resampling without losing ground, and besides, we don't
actually require much better than 6X for most others to see most
clearly what I'd interpreted from the original 1:1 format.

Thanks once again to 'tomcat' for also having posted this updated page
of Venus images.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

It's image No.17 from the top left being the one that so happens to
include the robust, sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTH
Venus'.
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif
-
Brad Guth

Phineas T Puddleduck

In article <1175731634.122284.181120@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups .com>,
bradguth@gmail.com wrote:

> As long as

you keep posting this nonsense, we won't stop laughing

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

chatnoir

On Apr 5, 10:33 am, Art Deco <e...@caballista.org> wrote:
> <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Too bad that "cam.misc" is basically another wussy NG that can't
> >possibly think for itself. They too must be deathly afraid of those
> >Jewish MIB, as well as afraid of more than a few of their very own
> >shadows.
>
> >Looking at their index of topics is nearly always indicating at
> >something above 10th grade. However, reading through some of those
> >topic replies is indicating at times less than 5th grade intelligence.
>
> >I see they have their very own Third Reich version of "PLEASE DO NOT
> >FEED THE TROLL". It must be their anti-truth enforcement. Hijackings
> >and otherwise forced tagging the original topic is about what I'd
> >expect of a 5th grader.
>
> >Obviously "cam.misc" group is getting itself stealth moderated on
> >behalf of being 100% pro GW Bush, and otherwise remaining pro upon
> >damn near anything Jewish, as much as otherwise being anti upon most
> >anything that's the least bit Jewish negative.
>
> >What would happen if those Venusian ETs were Jewish, or perhaps
> >Muslim?
>
> >Silly me, I was expecting some perfectly good arguments on behalf of
> >our doing Venus.
>
> Poor Brad; so misunderstood, so oppressed.
>

Art Deco viewed his latest pickup as too hot to handle:

http://westvillage.punt.nl/upload/april2006/cake.jpg

bradguth@gmail.com

On Apr 4, 5:10 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> In article <1175731634.122284.181...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups .com>,
>
> bradg...@gmail.com wrote:
> > As long as
>
> you keep posting this nonsense, we won't stop laughing

You're quick, and silly at the same time, arnt you.
-
Brad Guth

bradguth@gmail.com

On Apr 5, 11:09 am, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> In article <1175796331.670553.170...@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
>
> bradg...@gmail.com wrote:
> > OOPS! Now I've gone and
>
> spouted another load of incoherent screed?
>

Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of Third Reich
(aka Skull and Bones) brown-nosed minionship?

I mean, obviously you and others of your silly kind are supposedly all-
knowing clowns, yet somewhat unable to constructively contribute or
much less sharing anything in scientific specifics, other than your
infomercial spewed crapolla that's more Old Testament thumping or
otherwise Jewish faith-based than not.

How much of Hitler is within your DNA/RNA? (or is that a clown's
secret?)
-
Brad Guth

Art Deco

Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck@gmail.com> wrote:

>In article <1175731634.122284.181120@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups .com>,
> bradguth@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> As long as
>
>you keep posting this nonsense, we won't stop laughing

He'll never understand.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert

bradguth@gmail.com

Too bad that "cam.misc" is basically another wussy NG that can't
possibly think for itself. They too must be deathly afraid of those
Jewish MIB, as well as afraid of more than a few of their very own
shadows.

Looking at their index of topics is nearly always indicating at
something above 10th grade. However, reading through some of those
topic replies is indicating at times less than 5th grade intelligence.

I see they have their very own Third Reich version of "PLEASE DO NOT
FEED THE TROLL". It must be their anti-truth enforcement. Hijackings
and otherwise forced tagging the original topic is about what I'd
expect of a 5th grader.

Obviously "cam.misc" group is getting itself stealth moderated on
behalf of being 100% pro GW Bush, and otherwise remaining pro upon
damn near anything Jewish, as much as otherwise being anti upon most
anything that's the least bit Jewish negative.

What would happen if those Venusian ETs were Jewish, or perhaps
Muslim?

Silly me, I was expecting some perfectly good arguments on behalf of
our doing Venus.
-
Brad Guth

Phineas T Puddleduck

In article <1175882282.480154.234900@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups .com>,
bradguth@gmail.com wrote:

> Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of

your amazing talent for self deception....

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

bradguth@gmail.com

On Apr 6, 11:02 am, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> In article <1175882282.480154.234...@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups .com>,
>
> bradg...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of
>
> your amazing talent for self deception....

So, you are the son of Hitler, or perhaps of whatever's worse.

Your topic/author stalking profile is rather to the point, isn't it.

Can you name a soul that you've assisted in getting past go? (didn't
think so)
-
Brad Guth

Phineas T Puddleduck

In article <1175883401.316631.203960@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups .com>,
bradguth@gmail.com wrote:

> So, you are

sick of hearing your BS? Yes.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

Art Deco

<bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:

>Too bad that "cam.misc" is basically another wussy NG that can't
>possibly think for itself. They too must be deathly afraid of those
>Jewish MIB, as well as afraid of more than a few of their very own
>shadows.
>
>Looking at their index of topics is nearly always indicating at
>something above 10th grade. However, reading through some of those
>topic replies is indicating at times less than 5th grade intelligence.
>
>I see they have their very own Third Reich version of "PLEASE DO NOT
>FEED THE TROLL". It must be their anti-truth enforcement. Hijackings
>and otherwise forced tagging the original topic is about what I'd
>expect of a 5th grader.
>
>Obviously "cam.misc" group is getting itself stealth moderated on
>behalf of being 100% pro GW Bush, and otherwise remaining pro upon
>damn near anything Jewish, as much as otherwise being anti upon most
>anything that's the least bit Jewish negative.
>
>What would happen if those Venusian ETs were Jewish, or perhaps
>Muslim?
>
>Silly me, I was expecting some perfectly good arguments on behalf of
>our doing Venus.

Poor Brad; so misunderstood, so oppressed.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert

Phineas T Puddleduck

In article <050420071033202805%erfc@caballista.org>,
Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote:

> >Silly me, I was expecting some perfectly good arguments on behalf of
> >our doing Venus.
>
> Poor Brad; so misunderstood, so oppressed.

Photoshop: Not just for airbrushing porn, eh Brad?

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

bradguth@gmail.com

OOPS! Now I've gone and insulted the Ovgolve cult of mindless
morons. Sorry about that.

Perhaps Venus is simply too freaking hot to touch, even with the
Ovglove.

Within an average of having been losing 20.5 w/m2, this represents
that some areas of the Venus surface are perhaps worth less than a w/
m2, with other areas radiating at perhaps 200 w/m2, and of course more
than a few active mud, lava and gas vents contributing their energy at
many thousands of watts per square meter.

So, the Ovglove applications are at best spotty, and along with the IR
CCD or most likely using of some other thermally tolerant instrument
of such technology at hand, there's no good reason to think of our
having to walk on those extra toasty locations where the heat of
what's geothermally forced is excessively pushing the limits of those
EVA Ovglove suits as intended and thus configured for keeping their
folks cool.

Technically it is much tougher to get rid of surplus heat than it is
for insulating yourself from the cold. However, the double IR/FIR
environment of our daytime moon that's physically dark and nasty in
more ways than passive heat, such as for benefiting those sorts of
robust robotic instruments that'll have to survive the solar IR plus
all of the locally reflected IR and of the secondary/recoil worth of
the mid and far infrared(FIR), should more than apply to this
application of such robotics and perhaps a few brave souls safely
accomplishing Venus. In fact the moon's secondary/recoil worth of
what's near, mid and far infrared combined is likely worth every bit
as much as the solar influx, though fortunately our Venus surface by
season of nighttime is without solar IR to begin with, and even by day
there's not all that much solar IR that ever reaches that S8 and
acidic h2o cloud protected surface.

There's obviously more to behold and appreciate about all the NIR, MIF
and FIR spectrums of our universe than there is from our biologically
limited if not evolution deprived visual spectrum (there are bugs,
more than a few other significant species including birds that
actually see much better than us humans)
http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/Outreach...irregions.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared

Our seeing by night while exploring or otherwise doing our business of
depositing or extracting whatever from Venus is not the least bit of a
compromise, or is it outside of most any thermal environment spec.
Cruising Venus by way of a suitable composite rigid airship is just
downright nifty, and rather energy efficient to boot.
-
Brad Guth

Phineas T Puddleduck

In article <1175796331.670553.170020@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
bradguth@gmail.com wrote:

> OOPS! Now I've gone and

spouted another load of incoherent screed?

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

bradguth@gmail.com

Where's all the supposed "right stuff"?

Isn't there even some of Usenet's wussy stuff to spare?

Is Usenet's brain back in lock-down nondisclosure mode once again?
-
Brad Guth

chatnoir

On Apr 5, 10:33 am, Art Deco <e...@caballista.org> wrote:
> <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Too bad that "cam.misc" is basically another wussy NG that can't
> >possibly think for itself. They too must be deathly afraid of those
> >Jewish MIB, as well as afraid of more than a few of their very own
> >shadows.
>
> >Looking at their index of topics is nearly always indicating at
> >something above 10th grade. However, reading through some of those
> >topic replies is indicating at times less than 5th grade intelligence.
>
> >I see they have their very own Third Reich version of "PLEASE DO NOT
> >FEED THE TROLL". It must be their anti-truth enforcement. Hijackings
> >and otherwise forced tagging the original topic is about what I'd
> >expect of a 5th grader.
>
> >Obviously "cam.misc" group is getting itself stealth moderated on
> >behalf of being 100% pro GW Bush, and otherwise remaining pro upon
> >damn near anything Jewish, as much as otherwise being anti upon most
> >anything that's the least bit Jewish negative.
>
> >What would happen if those Venusian ETs were Jewish, or perhaps
> >Muslim?
>
> >Silly me, I was expecting some perfectly good arguments on behalf of
> >our doing Venus.
>
> Poor Brad; so misunderstood, so oppressed.
>

Art Deco viewed his latest pickup as too hot to handle:

http://westvillage.punt.nl/upload/april2006/cake.jpg

bradguth@gmail.com

On Apr 5, 11:09 am, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> In article <1175796331.670553.170...@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
>
> bradg...@gmail.com wrote:
> > OOPS! Now I've gone and
>
> spouted another load of incoherent screed?
>

Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of Third Reich
(aka Skull and Bones) brown-nosed minionship?

I mean, obviously you and others of your silly kind are supposedly all-
knowing clowns, yet somewhat unable to constructively contribute or
much less sharing anything in scientific specifics, other than your
infomercial spewed crapolla that's more Old Testament thumping or
otherwise Jewish faith-based than not.

How much of Hitler is within your DNA/RNA? (or is that a clown's
secret?)
-
Brad Guth

Phineas T Puddleduck

In article <1175882282.480154.234900@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups .com>,
bradguth@gmail.com wrote:

> Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of

your amazing talent for self deception....

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

bradguth@gmail.com

On Apr 6, 11:02 am, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> In article <1175882282.480154.234...@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups .com>,
>
> bradg...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of
>
> your amazing talent for self deception....

So, you are the son of Hitler, or perhaps of whatever's worse.

Your topic/author stalking profile is rather to the point, isn't it.

Can you name a soul that you've assisted in getting past go? (didn't
think so)
-
Brad Guth

Phineas T Puddleduck

In article <1175883401.316631.203960@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups .com>,
bradguth@gmail.com wrote:

> So, you are

sick of hearing your BS? Yes.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

bradguth@gmail.com

Where's all the supposed "right stuff"?

Isn't there even some of Usenet's wussy stuff to spare?

Is Usenet's brain back in lock-down nondisclosure mode once again?
-
Brad Guth

Art Deco

<bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 5, 11:09 am, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> In article <1175796331.670553.170...@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
>>
>> bradg...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > OOPS! Now I've gone and
>>
>> spouted another load of incoherent screed?
>>
>
>Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of Third Reich
>(aka Skull and Bones) brown-nosed minionship?

In GuthWorld:

Not replying to Brad's nonsense means that he is being suppressed by
NI6/NSA.

Replying to Brad's nonsense means that he is being subjected to
topic/author stalking.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen

Art Deco

<bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 5, 11:09 am, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> In article <1175796331.670553.170...@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
>>
>> bradg...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > OOPS! Now I've gone and
>>
>> spouted another load of incoherent screed?
>>
>
>Can I use your topic/author stalking as any indication of Third Reich
>(aka Skull and Bones) brown-nosed minionship?

In GuthWorld:

Not replying to Brad's nonsense means that he is being suppressed by
NI6/NSA.

Replying to Brad's nonsense means that he is being subjected to
topic/author stalking.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen

bradguth@gmail.com

On Apr 6, 5:16 pm, bradg...@gmail.com wrote:

> Where's all the supposed "right stuff"?
>
> Isn't there even some of Usenet's wussy right stuff to spare?
>
> Is Usenet's brain back in lock-down/nondisclosure mode once again?
> -
> Brad Guth

Why is Venus (unless it's simply not nearly as old as Earth) so
geothermally hot and otherwise toasty from the core?

What about all the atmospheric S8, as honestly interpreted by John
Ackerman?
-
Brad Guth

bradguth@gmail.com

On Apr 6, 5:16 pm, bradg...@gmail.com wrote:

> Where's all the supposed "right stuff"?
>
> Isn't there even some of Usenet's wussy right stuff to spare?
>
> Is Usenet's brain back in lock-down/nondisclosure mode once again?
> -
> Brad Guth

Why is Venus (unless it's simply not nearly as old as Earth) so
geothermally hot and otherwise toasty from the core?

What about all the atmospheric S8, as honestly interpreted by John
Ackerman?
-
Brad Guth

bradguth@gmail.com

ESA's Venus EXPRESS(VIRTIS) mission is still every bit as dead as that
of our MI/NSA~NASA wants it to be dead. The thermal imaging data from
their robust PFS instrument has been entirely taboo/nondisclosure
rated (aka need to know) from the very get go.

The surface of Venus is still giving off the average of 20.5 w/m2
(roughly 256 fold greater core energy loss than Earth), and the lower
atmospheric environment of Venus has been rather nicely insulated at
that, as well as having that fairly robust S8 layer as being an extra
nifty solar isolation benefit so that damn little of the available
solar influx ever reaches that geothermally forced surface or even
contributing all that much solar energy into that dense lower
atmosphere of what's mostly S8 and CO2, that's otherwise unavoidably
made and sustained as toasty hot from the surface up.

Their mission "status reports" are all the way down to being robo
status quo. It's as though they're down to the science data sharing
dregs of a pair of soup cans and some string.

ESA's mission demise is too bad because, Venus has otherwise been so
nearby (merely 100 fold greater distance than our moon), so freaking
alive and kicking, as well as so ET accessible (except for the likes
of us village heathen idiots that still can't honestly manage to walk
upon our very own nearby moon).
-
Brad Guth

bradguth@gmail.com

ESA's Venus EXPRESS(VIRTIS) mission is still every bit as dead as that
of our MI/NSA~NASA wants it to be dead. The thermal imaging data from
their robust PFS instrument has been entirely taboo/nondisclosure
rated (aka need to know) from the very get go.

The surface of Venus is still giving off the average of 20.5 w/m2
(roughly 256 fold greater core energy loss than Earth), and the lower
atmospheric environment of Venus has been rather nicely insulated at
that, as well as having that fairly robust S8 layer as being an extra
nifty solar isolation benefit so that damn little of the available
solar influx ever reaches that geothermally forced surface or even
contributing all that much solar energy into that dense lower
atmosphere of what's mostly S8 and CO2, that's otherwise unavoidably
made and sustained as toasty hot from the surface up.

Their mission "status reports" are all the way down to being robo
status quo. It's as though they're down to the science data sharing
dregs of a pair of soup cans and some string.

ESA's mission demise is too bad because, Venus has otherwise been so
nearby (merely 100 fold greater distance than our moon), so freaking
alive and kicking, as well as so ET accessible (except for the likes
of us village heathen idiots that still can't honestly manage to walk
upon our very own nearby moon).
-
Brad Guth

Art Deco

<bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:

>ESA's Venus EXPRESS(VIRTIS) mission is still every bit as dead as that
>of our MI/NSA~NASA wants it to be dead. The thermal imaging data from
>their robust PFS instrument has been entirely taboo/nondisclosure
>rated (aka need to know) from the very get go.

Translation: Brad can't find any new images to over-process with
Photoshop.

[remaining screed dumped, unread]

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen

Art Deco

<bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:

>ESA's Venus EXPRESS(VIRTIS) mission is still every bit as dead as that
>of our MI/NSA~NASA wants it to be dead. The thermal imaging data from
>their robust PFS instrument has been entirely taboo/nondisclosure
>rated (aka need to know) from the very get go.

Translation: Brad can't find any new images to over-process with
Photoshop.

[remaining screed dumped, unread]

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen

John \C\

"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
news:080420071943465043%erfc@caballista.org...
> <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >ESA's Venus EXPRESS(VIRTIS) mission is still every bit as dead as that
> >of our MI/NSA~NASA wants it to be dead. The thermal imaging data from
> >their robust PFS instrument has been entirely taboo/nondisclosure
> >rated (aka need to know) from the very get go.
>
> Translation: Brad can't find any new images to over-process with
> Photoshop.
>
But you can sure find new teen boy victims to booger, can't you pederast
Deco!!!

HJ

John \C\

"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
news:080420071943465043%erfc@caballista.org...
> <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >ESA's Venus EXPRESS(VIRTIS) mission is still every bit as dead as that
> >of our MI/NSA~NASA wants it to be dead. The thermal imaging data from
> >their robust PFS instrument has been entirely taboo/nondisclosure
> >rated (aka need to know) from the very get go.
>
> Translation: Brad can't find any new images to over-process with
> Photoshop.
>
But you can sure find new teen boy victims to booger, can't you pederast
Deco!!!

HJ

nuny@bid.ness

On Apr 4, 5:07 pm, bradg...@gmail.com wrote:
> As long as you don't run yourself out of ice cold beer and pizza, I
> don't see all that much of a problem.
>
> As long as you've got way more spare/renewable energy at your disposal
> than you could possibly know what to do with, and having that nifty
> thermal suit made by Ovglove, where's the big-ass insurmountable
> problem with taking that hot-foot of a toasty stroll on Venus?

Ove Gloves are woven of nomex and kevlar, both of which are
vulnerable to sulfuric acid.

But I'd buy you a suit of it and plunk you on Venus' surface if I
could just so you could finally appreciate your own ignorance.


Mark L. Fergerson

nuny@bid.ness

On Apr 4, 5:07 pm, bradg...@gmail.com wrote:
> As long as you don't run yourself out of ice cold beer and pizza, I
> don't see all that much of a problem.
>
> As long as you've got way more spare/renewable energy at your disposal
> than you could possibly know what to do with, and having that nifty
> thermal suit made by Ovglove, where's the big-ass insurmountable
> problem with taking that hot-foot of a toasty stroll on Venus?

Ove Gloves are woven of nomex and kevlar, both of which are
vulnerable to sulfuric acid.

But I'd buy you a suit of it and plunk you on Venus' surface if I
could just so you could finally appreciate your own ignorance.


Mark L. Fergerson

bradguth@gmail.com

On Apr 10, 10:29 pm, "n...@bid.ness" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ove Gloves are woven of nomex and kevlar, both of which are
> vulnerable to sulfuric acid.

The environment that's well below the robust S8 layer of them
relatively cool acidic clouds is that of an extremely dry and every
bit as harmless environment as an extremely dry old bone. Even the
most uneducated moron within ESA or NASA knows at least that much.

Of whatever's sulphur or even of CO2 is relatively harmless until it
gets inside of our wussy body, that which hasn't evolved or otherwise
mutated for the better since long before 15,000 BC.

The pun or jest of using the Ovglove is just what it is. I was simply
making the point, that applied physics of existing technology that's
currently available would make the surface of Venus humanly
accessible, though only while in a thermally and atmospheric
protective suit, and way better yet while riding within a composite
rigid airship that's serving as much pizza and ice cold beer as you
can stand.

As long as your human skin wasn't sweating like a stuck pig (at that
pressure and breathing mostly H2, it's even somewhat unlikely our skin
cells would hardly allow sweat if at all), whereas chances are even
better that a mere Ovglove protective suit would actually work.
-
Brad Guth

bradguth@gmail.com

On Apr 10, 10:29 pm, "n...@bid.ness" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ove Gloves are woven of nomex and kevlar, both of which are
> vulnerable to sulfuric acid.

The environment that's well below the robust S8 layer of them
relatively cool acidic clouds is that of an extremely dry and every
bit as harmless environment as an extremely dry old bone. Even the
most uneducated moron within ESA or NASA knows at least that much.

Of whatever's sulphur or even of CO2 is relatively harmless until it
gets inside of our wussy body, that which hasn't evolved or otherwise
mutated for the better since long before 15,000 BC.

The pun or jest of using the Ovglove is just what it is. I was simply
making the point, that applied physics of existing technology that's
currently available would make the surface of Venus humanly
accessible, though only while in a thermally and atmospheric
protective suit, and way better yet while riding within a composite
rigid airship that's serving as much pizza and ice cold beer as you
can stand.

As long as your human skin wasn't sweating like a stuck pig (at that
pressure and breathing mostly H2, it's even somewhat unlikely our skin
cells would hardly allow sweat if at all), whereas chances are even
better that a mere Ovglove protective suit would actually work.
-
Brad Gu