| #1 | |
|
|
Do you think anyone proof reads the magazine before it goes out. The July
Events section was such a glaring error. The website should have at least have an up to date error page Steve |
| #2 | |
|
|
Steven Gill wrote:
> Do you think anyone proof reads the magazine before it goes out. The July > Events section was such a glaring error. > > The website should have at least have an up to date error page > > Steve > > Hi Steve, I bought this subject up last month and got no response whatsoever! Regards, John. |
| #3 | |
|
|
Steven Gill wrote:
> Do you think anyone proof reads the magazine before it goes out. The July > Events section was such a glaring error. > > The website should have at least have an up to date error page > > Steve > > Hi Steve, I bought this subject up last month and got no response whatsoever! Regards, John. |
| #4 | |
|
|
Hi John
It just seems to be the British magazines. I also mentioned about Astronomy Now and its awful typos and mistakes. I have subscribed to the American "Astronomy" magazine for 4 years and have noticed just one error. I really want to read a British magazine but these constant blobs just really put me off! Steve |
| #5 | |
|
|
Hi John
It just seems to be the British magazines. I also mentioned about Astronomy Now and its awful typos and mistakes. I have subscribed to the American "Astronomy" magazine for 4 years and have noticed just one error. I really want to read a British magazine but these constant blobs just really put me off! Steve |
| #6 | |
|
|
Steven Gill wrote:
> Hi John > > It just seems to be the British magazines. I also mentioned about Astronomy > Now and its awful typos and mistakes. > > I have subscribed to the American "Astronomy" magazine for 4 years and have > noticed just one error. > > I really want to read a British magazine but these constant blobs just > really put me off! > > Steve > > It's all very annoying Steve, but what can you do if even the magazine doesn't bother answering queries! Regards, John. |
| #7 | |
|
|
Steven Gill wrote:
> Hi John > > It just seems to be the British magazines. I also mentioned about Astronomy > Now and its awful typos and mistakes. > > I have subscribed to the American "Astronomy" magazine for 4 years and have > noticed just one error. > > I really want to read a British magazine but these constant blobs just > really put me off! > > Steve > > It's all very annoying Steve, but what can you do if even the magazine doesn't bother answering queries! Regards, John. |
| #8 | |
|
|
I might get in touch and offer to proof read it for them!
|
| #9 | |
|
|
Steven Gill wrote:
> I might get in touch and offer to proof read it for them! > > Good idea Steve and let us know how it goes. Regards, John. |
| #10 | |
|
|
"Steven Gill" <sfg@arctic.karoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:3qOdnfYKr55SIgnbRVnyuQA@eclipse.net.uk... > Do you think anyone proof reads the magazine before it goes out. The July > Events section was such a glaring error. > > The website should have at least have an up to date error page > what was the error? |