| #1 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in
news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: > In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, > lyttlec@e.goais.net says... > >> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy is >> not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or download a >> copy. The process is to have one master copy from which all install >> dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are identical with >> identical versions and builds of all software. QA has to stamp all dvds > > It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something > that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on? > Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
| #2 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
Phil Kyle wrote:
> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in > news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: > >> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >> >>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy is >>> not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or download a >>> copy. The process is to have one master copy from which all install >>> dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are identical with >>> identical versions and builds of all software. QA has to stamp all dvds >> >> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something >> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on? >> > > Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. > Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" Thx. -- ah |
| #3 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
Phil Kyle wrote:
> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in > news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: > >> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >> >>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy is >>> not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or download a >>> copy. The process is to have one master copy from which all install >>> dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are identical with >>> identical versions and builds of all software. QA has to stamp all dvds >> >> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something >> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on? >> > > Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. > Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" Thx. -- ah |
| #4 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in
news:45a6e1db$0$18339$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: > Phil Kyle wrote: >> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in >> news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: >> >>> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >>> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >>> >>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy >>>> is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or >>>> download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which >>>> all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are >>>> identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA has >>>> to stamp all dvds >>> >>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something >>> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on? >>> >> >> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. >> > > Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" > > Thx. Why would you want to sue them anyway? -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
| #5 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in
news:45a6e1db$0$18339$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: > Phil Kyle wrote: >> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in >> news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: >> >>> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >>> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >>> >>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy >>>> is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or >>>> download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which >>>> all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are >>>> identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA has >>>> to stamp all dvds >>> >>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something >>> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on? >>> >> >> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. >> > > Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" > > Thx. Why would you want to sue them anyway? -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
| #6 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
Phil Kyle wrote:
> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in > news:45a6e1db$0$18339$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: > >> Phil Kyle wrote: >>> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in >>> news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: >>> >>>> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >>>> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >>>> >>>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy >>>>> is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or >>>>> download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which >>>>> all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are >>>>> identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA has >>>>> to stamp all dvds >>>> >>>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something >>>> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on? >>>> >>> >>> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. >>> >> >> Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" >> >> Thx. > > Why would you want to sue them anyway? Novell has very deep pockets... -- ah |
| #7 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
Phil Kyle wrote:
> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in > news:45a6e1db$0$18339$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: > >> Phil Kyle wrote: >>> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in >>> news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: >>> >>>> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >>>> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >>>> >>>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy >>>>> is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or >>>>> download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which >>>>> all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are >>>>> identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA has >>>>> to stamp all dvds >>>> >>>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something >>>> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on? >>>> >>> >>> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. >>> >> >> Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" >> >> Thx. > > Why would you want to sue them anyway? Novell has very deep pockets... -- ah |
| #8 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in
news:45a9b2e7$0$24874$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: > Phil Kyle wrote: >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in >> news:45a6e1db$0$18339$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: >> >>> Phil Kyle wrote: >>>> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in >>>> news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: >>>> >>>>> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >>>>> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >>>>> >>>>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a >>>>>> copy is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or >>>>>> download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which >>>>>> all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are >>>>>> identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA >>>>>> has to stamp all dvds >>>>> >>>>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something >>>>> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining >>>>> on? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. >>>> >>> >>> Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" >>> >>> Thx. >> >> Why would you want to sue them anyway? > > Novell has very deep pockets... Are you implying Novell play pocket billiards? -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
| #9 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in
news:45a9b2e7$0$24874$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: > Phil Kyle wrote: >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in >> news:45a6e1db$0$18339$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: >> >>> Phil Kyle wrote: >>>> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in >>>> news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: >>>> >>>>> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >>>>> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >>>>> >>>>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a >>>>>> copy is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or >>>>>> download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which >>>>>> all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are >>>>>> identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA >>>>>> has to stamp all dvds >>>>> >>>>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something >>>>> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining >>>>> on? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. >>>> >>> >>> Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" >>> >>> Thx. >> >> Why would you want to sue them anyway? > > Novell has very deep pockets... Are you implying Novell play pocket billiards? -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
| #10 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
Phil Kyle wrote:
> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in > news:45a9b2e7$0$24874$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: > >> Phil Kyle wrote: >>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in >>> news:45a6e1db$0$18339$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: >>> >>>> Phil Kyle wrote: >>>>> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in >>>>> news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >>>>>> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a >>>>>>> copy is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or >>>>>>> download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which >>>>>>> all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are >>>>>>> identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA >>>>>>> has to stamp all dvds >>>>>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something >>>>>> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining >>>>>> on? >>>>>> >>>>> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. >>>>> >>>> Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" >>>> >>>> Thx. >>> Why would you want to sue them anyway? >> Novell has very deep pockets... > > Are you implying Novell play pocket billiards? Let me say this: they are exemplars in the digital. |
| #11 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
Phil Kyle wrote:
> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in > news:45a9b2e7$0$24874$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: > >> Phil Kyle wrote: >>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in >>> news:45a6e1db$0$18339$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: >>> >>>> Phil Kyle wrote: >>>>> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in >>>>> news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >>>>>> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a >>>>>>> copy is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or >>>>>>> download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which >>>>>>> all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are >>>>>>> identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA >>>>>>> has to stamp all dvds >>>>>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something >>>>>> that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining >>>>>> on? >>>>>> >>>>> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. >>>>> >>>> Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" >>>> >>>> Thx. >>> Why would you want to sue them anyway? >> Novell has very deep pockets... > > Are you implying Novell play pocket billiards? Let me say this: they are exemplars in the digital. |
| #12 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in
news:45ad6585$0$20888$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: > Phil Kyle wrote: >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in >> news:45a9b2e7$0$24874$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: >> >>> Phil Kyle wrote: >>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in >>>> news:45a6e1db$0$18339$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: >>>> >>>>> Phil Kyle wrote: >>>>>> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in >>>>>> news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >>>>>>> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a >>>>>>>> copy is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy >>>>>>>> or download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from >>>>>>>> which all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all >>>>>>>> installs are identical with identical versions and builds of all >>>>>>>> software. QA has to stamp all dvds >>>>>>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find >>>>>>> something that fits your license requirements and buy it rather >>>>>>> than whining on? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. >>>>>> >>>>> Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" >>>>> >>>>> Thx. >>>> Why would you want to sue them anyway? >>> Novell has very deep pockets... >> >> Are you implying Novell play pocket billiards? > > Let me say this: they are exemplars in the digital. > They haven't even got to decimal yet, LAM0RZ D00D! -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
| #13 | |
|
|
Re: Licenses for 10.2?
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in
news:45ad6585$0$20888$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: > Phil Kyle wrote: >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in >> news:45a9b2e7$0$24874$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: >> >>> Phil Kyle wrote: >>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in >>>> news:45a6e1db$0$18339$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com: >>>> >>>>> Phil Kyle wrote: >>>>>> Craig Oldfield <craig@craigoldfield.co.uk> verbally sodomised in >>>>>> news:MPG.2005ea5ad8d6f8ce989680@news.ntlworld.com: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <ltWdnWDTacwWVgfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@pghconnect.com >, >>>>>>> lyttlec@e.goais.net says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a >>>>>>>> copy is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy >>>>>>>> or download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from >>>>>>>> which all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all >>>>>>>> installs are identical with identical versions and builds of all >>>>>>>> software. QA has to stamp all dvds >>>>>>> It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find >>>>>>> something that fits your license requirements and buy it rather >>>>>>> than whining on? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Because then you'd have nothing to whine about. >>>>>> >>>>> Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse" >>>>> >>>>> Thx. >>>> Why would you want to sue them anyway? >>> Novell has very deep pockets... >> >> Are you implying Novell play pocket billiards? > > Let me say this: they are exemplars in the digital. > They haven't even got to decimal yet, LAM0RZ D00D! -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
