| #1 | |
|
|
"Randy Hudson" <ime@panix.com> wrote in message news:cat7ef$e4b$1@reader2.panix.com... > In article <nzCzc.4337$IF3.3623@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, > Foxinthewhole <doug9498@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > Jefferson's statement was only meant to keep a State from forming a State > > Religion. > > If a State Religion had been allowed to be formed it would have made it legal > > to discriminate against anyone of a different faith. > > Actually, at the time Jefferson wrote that phrase, many states had official > religions. (Congregationalism was the official religion in Connecticut, for > example.) > > And it was legal under the US Constitution for a state to discriminate, > until the 14th amendment was ratified. The original constitution, and > Jefferson's comments, applied to the Federal government only. > > -- > Randy Hudson I guess since USdotSplat can't have it's own religious group, us.config needs to be used in the meantime. |
| #2 | |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:53:43 -0600, "Daryl" <dhunt@i70west.nospam.com> wrote:
> >"Randy Hudson" <ime@panix.com> wrote in message >news:cat7ef$e4b$1@reader2.panix.com... >> In article <nzCzc.4337$IF3.3623@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, >> Foxinthewhole <doug9498@bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >> > Jefferson's statement was only meant to keep a >> > State from forming a State Religion. >> > If a State Religion had been allowed to be formed >> > it would have made it legal to discriminate against >> > anyone of a different faith. >> >> Actually, at the time Jefferson wrote that phrase, >> many states had official religions. (Congregationalism >> was the official religion in Connecticut, for example.) >> >> And it was legal under the US Constitution for a state >> to discriminate, until the 14th amendment was ratified. >> The original constitution, and Jefferson's comments, >> applied to the Federal government only. <...> >I guess since USdotSplat can't have it's own religious >group, us.config needs to be used in the meantime. I tried once to steer this thread -away- from us.config, but was not successful. People continued to respond to the original newsgroups line. :-( Anyone reading this thread interested in proposing a new group for the us.* hierarchy, us.issues.religion? |
| #3 | |
|
|
Henrietta K Thomas <hkt@xnet.com> posted
<2rc6d0tc1fai6336fa7oumrtd604djksbj@4ax.com> in us.config on Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:33:04 -0500: >On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:53:43 -0600, "Daryl" <dhunt@i70west.nospam.com> wrote: > >> >>"Randy Hudson" <ime@panix.com> wrote in message >>news:cat7ef$e4b$1@reader2.panix.com... >>> In article <nzCzc.4337$IF3.3623@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, >>> Foxinthewhole <doug9498@bellsouth.net> wrote: >>> >>> > Jefferson's statement was only meant to keep a >>> > State from forming a State Religion. >>> > If a State Religion had been allowed to be formed >>> > it would have made it legal to discriminate against >>> > anyone of a different faith. >>> >>> Actually, at the time Jefferson wrote that phrase, >>> many states had official religions. (Congregationalism >>> was the official religion in Connecticut, for example.) >>> >>> And it was legal under the US Constitution for a state >>> to discriminate, until the 14th amendment was ratified. >>> The original constitution, and Jefferson's comments, >>> applied to the Federal government only. ><...> >>I guess since USdotSplat can't have it's own religious >>group, us.config needs to be used in the meantime. > >I tried once to steer this thread -away- from us.config, >but was not successful. People continued to respond >to the original newsgroups line. :-( > >Anyone reading this thread interested in proposing >a new group for the us.* hierarchy, us.issues.religion? Considering the news regarding Kerry and the Catholic Church, The Baptist schism, and some other news worthy religious items I think it might fly. I'll support it. -- K. A. Cannon kcannon at insurgent dot org (change the orgy to org to reply) mhm33x1 "Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you" - Nietzsche, From Beyond Good and Evil, (1886) "The person who stands up and says, 'This is stupid,' either is asked to `behave' or, worse, is greeted with a cheerful 'Yes, we know! Isn't it terrific!'" - Frank Zappa Tom/Mark in alt.test sez: "People like you are pure scum, K.A. Cannon." |