| #1 | |
|
|
Replies to email address given in post below are bouncing.
> Care to sell the smaller ones? (They're HO scale, correct for 16.5mm > gauge.) - Yes! And Kevin Martin is wrong - he's confusing it with yet another scale. mikebrayshaw[at]ntlworld.com "Wolf" <ElLoboViejo@ruddy.moss> wrote in message news:4698d6c2$0$13436$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.co m... > Mike Brayshaw wrote: >> Can anyone kindly advise: >> I have acquired some Lima rolling stock, supposedly all OO gauge, but >> some are distinctly smaller than others - for instance mark 2 (I think it >> is) Inter-City carriages some 264 mm long and some 232 mm long (and >> corresponding width & height). Track gauge is the same. >> How come different scales? >> Thanks > > > Care to sell the smaller ones? (They're HO scale, correct for 16.5mm > gauge.) > > -- > Wolf > 'Just because it's true doesn't mean it's the right answer.' |
| #2 | |
|
|
I'll top post to follow you. Wolf is quoting the following as his email
addy: Email to wolfkir - at thingy - sympatico - li'l dot - ca "Mike Brayshaw" <mikebrayshaw1@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:hZini.2$g51.0@newsfe1-win.ntli.net... > Replies to email address given in post below are bouncing. > >> Care to sell the smaller ones? (They're HO scale, correct for 16.5mm >> gauge.) > > - Yes! And Kevin Martin is wrong - he's confusing it with yet another > scale. > > mikebrayshaw[at]ntlworld.com > > "Wolf" <ElLoboViejo@ruddy.moss> wrote in message > news:4698d6c2$0$13436$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.co m... >> Mike Brayshaw wrote: >>> Can anyone kindly advise: >>> I have acquired some Lima rolling stock, supposedly all OO gauge, but >>> some are distinctly smaller than others - for instance mark 2 (I think >>> it >>> is) Inter-City carriages some 264 mm long and some 232 mm long (and >>> corresponding width & height). Track gauge is the same. >>> How come different scales? >>> Thanks >> >> >> Care to sell the smaller ones? (They're HO scale, correct for 16.5mm >> gauge.) >> >> -- >> Wolf >> 'Just because it's true doesn't mean it's the right answer.' > > |
| #3 | |
|
|
Mike Brayshaw wrote:
> Replies to email address given in post below are bouncing. > >> Care to sell the smaller ones? (They're HO scale, correct for 16.5mm >> gauge.) > > - Yes! And Kevin Martin is wrong - he's confusing it with yet another > scale. > > mikebrayshaw[at]ntlworld.com [...] wolfkir - at - sympatico - dot - ca. Reply To address in posts is a spamfoiler. > -- Wolf 'Just because it's true doesn't mean it's the right answer.' |