| #1 | |
|
|
Well as a keen CB enthusiast and user over the years i am pleased to see that our absurd CB license has finally been scrapped as of from today, i am not sure it will make much difference now and it is something that should have been done years ago, however it might, i say might just get a few more breakers back on air, i hope so, meanwhile may i wish everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year from the sunny south. Tim Madman 27/81 since 1984 You are number 6.....welcome to Bognor Regis. |
| #2 | |
|
|
i am not a number
i'm nearly a free man "djcomputersystems.co.uk" <atlanticsound@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1165542927.655295.255470@l12g2000cwl.googlegr oups.com... > > Well as a keen CB enthusiast and user over the years i am pleased to > see that our absurd CB license has finally been scrapped as of from > today, i am not sure it will make much difference now and it is > something that should have been done years ago, however it might, i say > might just get a few more breakers back on air, i hope so, meanwhile > may i wish everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year from the > sunny south. > > Tim > > Madman 27/81 since 1984 > > You are number 6.....welcome to Bognor Regis. > |
| #3 | |
|
|
"DB01" <eugene.osullivan@virgin.net> wrote in message news:9Cbeh.101$v4.85@newsfe3-win.ntli.net... >i am not a number > i'm nearly a free man > > > "djcomputersystems.co.uk" <atlanticsound@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:1165542927.655295.255470@l12g2000cwl.googlegr oups.com... >> >> Well as a keen CB enthusiast and user over the years i am pleased to >> see that our absurd CB license has finally been scrapped as of from >> today, i am not sure it will make much difference now and it is >> something that should have been done years ago, however it might, i say >> might just get a few more breakers back on air, i hope so, meanwhile >> may i wish everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year from the >> sunny south. >> >> Tim >> >> Madman 27/81 since 1984 >> >> You are number 6.....welcome to Bognor Regis. >> > > > You might have a few more radio amateurs on the CB bands because I for one refused to pay another 15 quid for the CB licence on top of the 15 quid amateur radio licence. Now it's all free it might be another band that you can discuss other issues that you cant do on the amateur radio band. Andy |
| #4 | |
|
|
"djcomputersystems.co.uk" <atlanticsound@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1165542927.655295.255470@l12g2000cwl.googlegr oups.com... > > Well as a keen CB enthusiast and user over the years i am pleased to > see that our absurd CB license has finally been scrapped as of from > today, i am not sure it will make much difference now and it is > something that should have been done years ago, however it might, i say > might just get a few more breakers back on air, i hope so, meanwhile > may i wish everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year from the > sunny south. > > Tim > > Madman 27/81 since 1984 > > You are number 6.....welcome to Bognor Regis. > And back atcha, Tim. I don' celebrate Christmas myself but may you have a good one. |
| #5 | |
|
|
"deBaser" <a1debaser@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news 3ceh.992$1W1.685@newsfe4-win.ntli.net...> > "DB01" <eugene.osullivan@virgin.net> wrote in message > news:9Cbeh.101$v4.85@newsfe3-win.ntli.net... >>i am not a number >> i'm nearly a free man >> >> >> "djcomputersystems.co.uk" <atlanticsound@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:1165542927.655295.255470@l12g2000cwl.googlegr oups.com... >>> >>> Well as a keen CB enthusiast and user over the years i am pleased to >>> see that our absurd CB license has finally been scrapped as of from >>> today, i am not sure it will make much difference now and it is >>> something that should have been done years ago, however it might, i say >>> might just get a few more breakers back on air, i hope so, meanwhile >>> may i wish everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year from the >>> sunny south. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> Madman 27/81 since 1984 >>> >>> You are number 6.....welcome to Bognor Regis. >>> >> >> >> > > You might have a few more radio amateurs on the CB bands because I for one > refused to pay another 15 quid for the CB licence on top of the 15 quid > amateur radio licence. Now it's all free it might be another band that > you can discuss other issues that you cant do on the amateur radio band. Amatuer license is free also now. You still have to have a license but it doesn't cost anything. If you think you can't discuss any isssues you want, you should listen to some of the G3s on HF. > > Andy > |
| #6 | |
|
|
In article <1165542927.655295.255470@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups .com>,
atlanticsound@hotmail.com (djcomputersystems.co.uk) wrote: > *From:* "djcomputersystems.co.uk" <atlanticsound@hotmail.com> > *Date:* 7 Dec 2006 17:55:27 -0800 > > Well as a keen CB enthusiast and user over the years i am pleased to > see that our absurd CB license has finally been scrapped as of from > today, i am not sure it will make much difference now and it is > something that should have been done years ago, however it might, i > say > might just get a few more breakers back on air, i hope so, meanwhile > may i wish everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year from the > sunny south. And the bit that everyone missed is that 27/81 kit is NOT permitted under the new regime! MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. -- Paul Cummins **FREE** mobile phones, with FREE line rental http://www.gstgroup.co.uk/ |
| #7 | |
|
|
"Paul Cummins" <agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk> wrote in message news:memo.20061213073904.3308A@admin.vlaad.co.uk.. . SNIP > And the bit that everyone missed is that 27/81 kit is NOT permitted > under the new regime! > > MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. I believe that it is. Looking at the OfCom site it lists what is allowed and the markings. 27/81 is still there for "it's useful life" however long that may be. Dave |
| #8 | |
|
|
"Dave" <dave.barwickns@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:HNSdneA3RZuQXeLYnZ2dnUVZ8sa3nZ2d@eclipse.net. uk... > > "Paul Cummins" <agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk> wrote in message > news:memo.20061213073904.3308A@admin.vlaad.co.uk.. . > SNIP > > And the bit that everyone missed is that 27/81 kit is NOT permitted > > under the new regime! > > > > MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. > > I believe that it is. Looking at the OfCom site it lists what is allowed and > the markings. 27/81 is still there for "it's useful life" however long that > may be. > > Dave > > Don't like replying to myself but the link here confirms http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/i...binfosheet.pdf Dave |
| #9 | |
|
|
"Paul Cummins" <agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk> wrote in message news:memo.20061213073904.3308A@admin.vlaad.co.uk.. . > In article <1165542927.655295.255470@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups .com>, > atlanticsound@hotmail.com (djcomputersystems.co.uk) wrote: > MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. > > -- > Paul Cummins I studied computer studies with someone called Paul Cummings about 10-14 years ago. Were you ever at northi Lincs college at that time? > > **FREE** mobile phones, with FREE line rental > http://www.gstgroup.co.uk/ |
| #10 | |
|
|
Dave wrote: > "Paul Cummins" <agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk> wrote in message > news:memo.20061213073904.3308A@admin.vlaad.co.uk.. . > SNIP > > And the bit that everyone missed is that 27/81 kit is NOT permitted > > under the new regime! > > > > MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. > > I believe that it is. Looking at the OfCom site it lists what is allowed and > the markings. 27/81 is still there for "it's useful life" however long that > may be. > FWIW My Magpie radio [27/81] is 20 yrs old. I see that one went on fleabay for £89. - - |
| #11 | |
|
|
In article <E9Tfh.1936$1W1.582@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>,
a4bedaser@ntlworld.com (Malkavian) wrote: > I studied computer studies with someone called Paul Cummings about > 10-14 years ago. Were you ever at northi Lincs college at that > time? No G... -- Paul Cummins **FREE** mobile phones, with FREE line rental http://www.gstgroup.co.uk/ |
| #12 | |
|
|
"Malkavian" <a4bedaser@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> I studied computer studies with someone called Paul Cummings about 10-14 > years ago. Were you ever at northi Lincs college at that time? dont think so. ask him if he renewed his first aid cert august last year ? |
| #13 | |
|
|
In article <memo.20061213073904.3308A@admin.vlaad.co.uk>, Paul Cummins
<agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk> writes >In article <1165542927.655295.255470@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups .com>, >atlanticsound@hotmail.com (djcomputersystems.co.uk) wrote: > >> *From:* "djcomputersystems.co.uk" <atlanticsound@hotmail.com> >> *Date:* 7 Dec 2006 17:55:27 -0800 >> >> Well as a keen CB enthusiast and user over the years i am pleased to >> see that our absurd CB license has finally been scrapped as of from >> today, i am not sure it will make much difference now and it is >> something that should have been done years ago, however it might, i >> say >> might just get a few more breakers back on air, i hope so, meanwhile >> may i wish everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year from the >> sunny south. > >And the bit that everyone missed is that 27/81 kit is NOT permitted >under the new regime! > >MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. > Not so: "In summary, CB radio equipment that has formerly been type approved, and will necessarily comply with the minimum requirements of the relevant UK Interface Requirement (IR 2027), may continue to be used. Such equipment will have been type approved to MPT 1320, MPT 1333, MPT 1382 or ETS 300 135. Please note that specifications MPT 1320 (27/81 equipment) and MPT 1333 have been withdrawn but equipment type approved to these specifications may continue to be used for the lifetime of the equipment." -- **** john@evenlode.demon.co.uk **** http://www.evenlode.demon.co.uk John Mann -- Hook Norton -- Oxfordshire -- UK |
| #14 | |
|
|
In article <$hZ16gDWf6gFFwr1@evenlode.demon.co.uk>,
john@evenlode.demon.co.uk (John Mann) wrote: > > > >MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. > > > Not so: Try reading the latest licence-free specification... -- Paul Cummins **FREE** mobile phones, with FREE line rental http://www.gstgroup.co.uk/ |
| #15 | |
|
|
"Paul Cummins" <agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk> wrote in message news:memo.20061216130307.2504A@admin.vlaad.co.uk.. . > In article <$hZ16gDWf6gFFwr1@evenlode.demon.co.uk>, > john@evenlode.demon.co.uk (John Mann) wrote: > >> > >> >MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. >> > >> Not so: > > Try reading the latest licence-free specification... > > > > -- > Paul Cummins > No glasses on your list to Santa this methinks. Please note that specifications MPT 1320 (27/81 equipment) and MPT 1333 have been withdrawn but equipment type approved to these specifications may continue to be used for the lifetime of the equipment. |
| #16 | |
|
|
"HammerChewer"
<pkearnisadipstickwhostickshisnosein@thingsofnocon cerntohim.com> wrote in message news:PcXgh.17040$HV6.14349@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net... > > "Paul Cummins" <agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk> wrote in message > news:memo.20061216130307.2504A@admin.vlaad.co.uk.. . > > In article <$hZ16gDWf6gFFwr1@evenlode.demon.co.uk>, > > john@evenlode.demon.co.uk (John Mann) wrote: > > > >> > > >> >MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. > >> > > >> Not so: > > > > Try reading the latest licence-free specification... > > > > > > > > -- > > Paul Cummins > > > No glasses on your list to Santa this methinks. > > Please note that specifications MPT 1320 (27/81 > equipment) and MPT 1333 have been withdrawn but equipment type approved > to these specifications may continue to be used for the > lifetime of the equipment. I believe Mr Hammer to be correct. Although they have withdrawn the specification and 27/81 equipment can no longer be made (legally) they have allowed the continued use of said existing equipment for it's useful lifetime (which could mean anything). Rumours have it though that by 2010 the band itself will be withdrawn just like the 934 band was, but that is speculation only at this point. 73' Graham -- -- ...-- -.-- ... ..- Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life... 73/51 - 2EO e0 e000h Franklin Radio Group (www.farc.co.uk) |
| #17 | |
|
|
withdrawl by 2010 was in the news a while ago,
and before the rumours of licence withdrawl were about, and thats been done so who knows CB illegal in 2010... i'll still use it and so will several thousand truckers i think too.. Back to the rig thing, does this mean i still can't use my HF rig on 19 !!!! "Magnum 2E0" <magnum@mag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:4584524a$0$12899$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere .com... > "HammerChewer" > <pkearnisadipstickwhostickshisnosein@thingsofnocon cerntohim.com> wrote in > message news:PcXgh.17040$HV6.14349@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net... >> >> "Paul Cummins" <agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:memo.20061216130307.2504A@admin.vlaad.co.uk.. . >> > In article <$hZ16gDWf6gFFwr1@evenlode.demon.co.uk>, >> > john@evenlode.demon.co.uk (John Mann) wrote: >> > >> >> > >> >> >MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. >> >> > >> >> Not so: >> > >> > Try reading the latest licence-free specification... >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Paul Cummins >> > >> No glasses on your list to Santa this methinks. >> >> Please note that specifications MPT 1320 (27/81 >> equipment) and MPT 1333 have been withdrawn but equipment type approved >> to these specifications may continue to be used for the >> lifetime of the equipment. > > I believe Mr Hammer to be correct. Although they have withdrawn the > specification and 27/81 equipment can no longer be made (legally) they > have > allowed the continued use of said existing equipment for it's useful > lifetime (which could mean anything). Rumours have it though that by 2010 > the band itself will be withdrawn just like the 934 band was, but that is > speculation only at this point. > > 73' > Graham > -- > -- ...-- -.-- ... ..- > > Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life... > > 73/51 - 2EO e0 e000h > Franklin Radio Group (www.farc.co.uk) > > |
| #18 | |
|
|
"hugh.g.rekshun" <m1adu.m5adu@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:9xXgh.4356$1W1.1234@newsfe4-win.ntli.net... > **i'll still use it and so will several thousand truckers i think too..** > > Back to the rig thing, does this mean i still can't use my HF rig on 19 !!!! You can use it on 19 to your hearts content. Not legally though but looking at your previous post I doubt this will worry you much ;o) 73' Graham -- -- ...-- -.-- ... ..- Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life... 73/51 - 2EO e0 e000h Franklin Radio Group (www.farc.co.uk) |
| #19 | |
|
|
Toooooo Rue !!!
LOL.. ) such better than a murphy homebase too.."Magnum 2E0" <magnum@mag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:4584588e$0$12894$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere .com... > "hugh.g.rekshun" <m1adu.m5adu@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > news:9xXgh.4356$1W1.1234@newsfe4-win.ntli.net... > >> **i'll still use it and so will several thousand truckers i think too..** >> >> Back to the rig thing, does this mean i still can't use my HF rig on 19 > !!!! > > You can use it on 19 to your hearts content. Not legally though but > looking > at your previous post I doubt this will worry you much ;o) > > 73' > Graham > -- > -- ...-- -.-- ... ..- > > Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life... > > 73/51 - 2EO e0 e000h > Franklin Radio Group (www.farc.co.uk) > > |
| #20 | |
|
|
On 13 Dec 2006 05:43:50 -0800, "Catweazel@iee.org"
<francis.fuller@iee.org> wrote: > >Dave wrote: > >> "Paul Cummins" <agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:memo.20061213073904.3308A@admin.vlaad.co.uk.. . >> SNIP >> > And the bit that everyone missed is that 27/81 kit is NOT permitted >> > under the new regime! >> > >> > MPT1382 kit is required, not MPT1320. >> >> I believe that it is. Looking at the OfCom site it lists what is allowed and >> the markings. 27/81 is still there for "it's useful life" however long that >> may be. >> >FWIW My Magpie radio [27/81] is 20 yrs old. I see that one went on >fleabay for £89. >- - Just shows you,theres a buyer for everytihng,you just have to bide your time... |