ZZZPK

agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:

: DC offset from the Open Key, I assume. I wasn't at the transmitter so I
: don't know.

ah well then.... that explains it all !!!

case closed !!

ZZZPK

agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:

: First time I've ever considere a fellow ham to be a xxxxxxx!

not the first time i've found a cb'er to be foul-mouthed.

The Magnum

"ZZZPK" <zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom .es.it.net> wrote
in message news:41f98778.8324742@news.iol.ie...
> agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:
>
> : First time I've ever considere a fellow ham to be a xxxxxxx!
>
> not the first time i've found a cb'er to be foul-mouthed.
>

Anyone can be foul mouthed if you push the right buttons...... im sure youve
also uttered a few expletives in your time...

ZZZPK

"The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

:
: "ZZZPK" <zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom .es.it.net> wrote
: in message news:41f98778.8324742@news.iol.ie...
: > agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:
: >
: > : First time I've ever considere a fellow ham to be a xxxxxxx!
: >
: > not the first time i've found a cb'er to be foul-mouthed.
: >
:
: Anyone can be foul mouthed if you push the right buttons...... im sure youve
: also uttered a few expletives in your time...

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm doubt it.

may have reposted a few.
(cant remember any right now)

unless you call "try to pass the morse test" an expletive

The Magnum

"ZZZPK" <zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom .es.it.net> wrote
in message news:41fd4e89.20242304@news.iol.ie...
> "The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> :
> : "ZZZPK" <zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom .es.it.net>
wrote
> : in message news:41f98778.8324742@news.iol.ie...
> : > agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:
> : >
> : > : First time I've ever considere a fellow ham to be a xxxxxxx!
> : >
> : > not the first time i've found a cb'er to be foul-mouthed.
> : >
> :
> : Anyone can be foul mouthed if you push the right buttons...... im sure
youve
> : also uttered a few expletives in your time...
>
> hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm doubt it.
>
> may have reposted a few.
> (cant remember any right now)
>
> unless you call "try to pass the morse test" an expletive
>

Is the Morse test where you have to sit and watch endless repeats of
Inspector morse and try to work out who the culprit is before the end of the
show?? or is it something else that i know vey little about.. dot dot dot...
dash dash dash.. dot dot dot.. ? ;o)

ZZZPK

"The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

: Is the Morse test where you have to sit and watch endless repeats of
: Inspector morse and try to work out who the culprit is before the end of the
: show?? or is it something else that i know vey little about.. dot dot dot...
: dash dash dash.. dot dot dot.. ? ;o)

err..no...

the morse test is where you see 2500 b-licensees run out the door and run
away to do the COMPULSORY morse assessment !

Micky Taker

ZZZPK wrote:
> "The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> : Is the Morse test where you have to sit and watch endless repeats of
> : Inspector morse and try to work out who the culprit is before the end of the
> : show?? or is it something else that i know vey little about.. dot dot dot...
> : dash dash dash.. dot dot dot.. ? ;o)
>
> err..no...
>
> the morse test is where you see 2500 b-licensees run out the door and run
> away to do the COMPULSORY morse assessment !
>

Paul, That Horse is really dead, honest!

Micky

--
E&OE (C) 2005 Micky Taker
Micky Taker accepts no responsibility for any personal injury or
emotional distress that may occur as a result of reading the contents of
this message.

ZZZPK

Micky Taker <micky.t@ker> wrote:

: Paul, That Horse is really dead, honest!
:
: Micky


if this horse is allowed to die, then the next horse will be shot and
no-one will notice.

if you want to hold onto to SOME standards and stop being the test-bed for
multi-band cb then do something.

to do nothing is not an option.
you have already seen and heard the lowering of standards on the radio and
i dont mean the ''errr...emmm...i dont know what to say next''

i mean the qrm-ing, the tuner-uppers, the mic-blowrs and the
foul-mouthed anonymous b-licence chickens who hide in the shadows and
attack those who got up off their backsides and made a bit of effort to
pass a simple 5wpm morse test instead of sitting there
howling/wailing/moaning.

time was when you EARNED what you HAD.

NOW ? RA/OFCOM/RSGB give you hf for sitting there doing NOTHING.

Philip de Cadenet

ZZZPK,

>i mean the qrm-ing, the tuner-uppers, the mic-blowrs and the
>foul-mouthed anonymous b-licence chickens who hide in the shadows and
>attack those who got up off their backsides and made a bit of effort to
>pass a simple 5wpm morse test instead of sitting there
>howling/wailing/moaning.

I and my friends in the early 80's had our own way of dealing with the
above QRM.

Unfortunately it was not legal, but it did have the desired effect:

http://www.extremecb.com/Amps_4.jpg
--
Philip de Cadenet G4ZOW
Transmitters 'R' Us
http://www.transmittersrus.com

ZZZPK

Philip de Cadenet <Philstheboss@thebbc.fslife.co.uk> wrote:

: http://www.extremecb.com/Amps_4.jpg

yes seen this website.

very nice gear.

Peter

"The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote...
>
> Is the Morse test where you have to sit and watch endless repeats of
> Inspector morse and try to work out who the culprit is

Any "real" Amateur knows that you just blame CBers for everything :~)


Regards,

Peter
http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/

ZZZPK

"Peter" <braìnbuster@lineone.net> wrote:

: "The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote...
: >
: > Is the Morse test where you have to sit and watch endless repeats of
: > Inspector morse and try to work out who the culprit is
:
: Any "real" Amateur knows that you just blame CBers for everything :~)
:

nowadays, thanks to the ra/ofcom, there is no difference.

The Magnum

"Peter" <braìnbuster@lineone.net> wrote in message
news:42086d09.0@entanet...
> "The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote...
> >
> > Is the Morse test where you have to sit and watch endless repeats of
> > Inspector morse and try to work out who the culprit is
>
> Any "real" Amateur knows that you just blame CBers for everything :~)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
> http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/
>
>
Heheheeee ... it would seem that way. Morse code though.. i wonder if its
ever going to make a comeback . Anyone remember that comedy war film which
name escapes me where the chicken was pecking something on the other side of
the barn wall and the radio guy thought it was morse and was trying to work
out what the message was... oooh how we laughed..
Still. If morse is an important part of his life i guess amateur radio is
where it should be and if hes proud of it then thats fine too... Still,
accusing people of being inferior in some way because they are only M3 seems
a bit uppety. Im sure most people who go M3 will make descent Amateurs even
if they dont use morse. And as for suggesting that all CB'ers are foul
mouthed music playing dum dums (or words to that effect) shows how silly he
is. Some people on Cb are like that but its a minority. The shame is people
like him only remember the minority.
As long as the "hobby" continues its all good.
Regards,
Graham

ZZZPK

"The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

:
: "Peter" <braìnbuster@lineone.net> wrote in message
: news:42086d09.0@entanet...
: > "The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote...
: > >
: > > Is the Morse test where you have to sit and watch endless repeats of
: > > Inspector morse and try to work out who the culprit is
: >
: > Any "real" Amateur knows that you just blame CBers for everything :~)
: >
: >
: > Regards,
: >
: > Peter
: > http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/
: >
: >
: Heheheeee ... it would seem that way. Morse code though.. i wonder if its
: ever going to make a comeback . Anyone remember that comedy war film which
: name escapes me where the chicken was pecking something on the other side of
: the barn wall and the radio guy thought it was morse and was trying to work
: out what the message was... oooh how we laughed..
: Still. If morse is an important part of his life i guess amateur radio is
: where it should be and if hes proud of it then thats fine too... Still,
: accusing people of being inferior in some way because they are only M3 seems
: a bit uppety. Im sure most people who go M3 will make descent Amateurs even
: if they dont use morse. And as for suggesting that all CB'ers are foul
: mouthed music playing dum dums (or words to that effect) shows how silly he
: is. Some people on Cb are like that but its a minority. The shame is people
: like him only remember the minority.
: As long as the "hobby" continues its all good.
: Regards,
: Graham
:
:
:


wrong (as usual)


the morse test proved its worth EVEN AT 5WPM it kept 2500 people WOULDNT
EVEN TRY off hf where if they had made a bit of effort they could have
joined in long ago.


fact:
the only extra privileges between a b-licence and an m3 is access to hf.

therefore it can be clearly understood why so many b-licences who for
years sat there doing their 50mhz and up suddenly ran away to sit a morse
assessment whilst some of the openly rejected the idea that morse code was
the way to grant access to hf.

even a high-official of no-code international sat a morse assessment !!!


the joke is there for all to see.

the morse test did its job well.
it kept lazy people off hf (including many a cb'er)

MW0GUV

You want f*ckwits Paul just go and visit uk.radio.amateur it's full of them

Andy MW0GUV

MW0GUV

> wrong (as usual)
>
>
> the morse test proved its worth EVEN AT 5WPM it kept 2500 people WOULDNT
> EVEN TRY off hf where if they had made a bit of effort they could have
> joined in long ago.
>
>
> fact:
> the only extra privileges between a b-licence and an m3 is access to hf.
>
> therefore it can be clearly understood why so many b-licences who for
> years sat there doing their 50mhz and up suddenly ran away to sit a morse
> assessment whilst some of the openly rejected the idea that morse code was
> the way to grant access to hf.
>
> even a high-official of no-code international sat a morse assessment !!!
>
>
> the joke is there for all to see.
>
> the morse test did its job well.
> it kept lazy people off hf (including many a cb'er)
>

God this is boring....Listen mate, it's YOU and your moronic mates all
singing the anti- M3 tune that is giving us Amateurs a bad name...

As I have said before, I don't want the bands to be like CB I want standards
retained, however it will only happen if the older hams support and offer
guidance to M3's...Sitting here griping all day with nothing positive to say
just makes you look like what you are Arrogant and Ignorant!

As for Morse who cares...it's just one of many 'modes' available to
us...Stop looking back and look forward....Many many hams are re-discovering
morse anyway so I don't see your problem..

Andy MW0GUV

ZZZPK

"MW0GUV" <me@nospam.net> wrote:

: us...Stop looking back and look forward....Many many hams are re-discovering
: morse anyway so I don't see your problem..
:
: Andy MW0GUV

typical attitude.


it is impossible to have a future wihout having a past.

ZZZPK

"MW0GUV" <me@nospam.net> wrote:

: You want xxxxxxxx Paul just go and visit uk.radio.amateur it's full of them
:
: Andy MW0GUV

typical attitude.

i suppose you know it all then ?

MW0GUV

"ZZZPK" <zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom .es.it.net> wrote
in message news:420f361b.137362234@news.iol.ie...
> "MW0GUV" <me@nospam.net> wrote:
>
> : us...Stop looking back and look forward....Many many hams are
re-discovering
> : morse anyway so I don't see your problem..
> :
> : Andy MW0GUV
>
> typical attitude.
>
>
> it is impossible to have a future wihout having a past.
>

Really? well that's a fantastic statement..How does that work exactly with
Apprentices, trainees, New Born children etc..

Andy MW0GUV

ZZZPK

"MW0GUV" <me@nospam.net> wrote:

: "ZZZPK" <zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom .es.it.net> wrote
: in message news:420f361b.137362234@news.iol.ie...
: > "MW0GUV" <me@nospam.net> wrote:
: >
: > : us...Stop looking back and look forward....Many many hams are
: re-discovering
: > : morse anyway so I don't see your problem..
: > :
: > : Andy MW0GUV
: >
: > typical attitude.
: >
: >
: > it is impossible to have a future wihout having a past.
: >
:
: Really? well that's a fantastic statement..How does that work exactly with
: Apprentices, trainees, New Born children etc..

simple really...i thought that evn you would understand.

apprentices are taught the ways of their trade by the people they work
under/with/for

trainees - see apprentice

new born are taught and learn from and observe, the people around them.



see?
its simple.

you have learned from me as i did from someone else.

the past teaches the future....but then again your attitude on this
newsgroup and on uk.r.a doesnt fill me with much confidence.



: Andy MW0GUV

MW0GUV

"ZZZPK" <zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom .es.it.net> wrote
in message news:420f4153.140235208@news.iol.ie...

> 1.
> less of your language there

Who are you to dictate to me

> 2.
> your attitude to your hobby indicates that you do not hold your "hobby"
> in much regard.

By encouraging the hobby to grow by bringing in new operators (with
guidance) this will stop repeaters from being taken off air, it will perhaps
help protect our part of the Spectrum from the vultures that would sell it
off...How is it you think I don't hold the hobby in high regard? It seems to
me it is you that is piling scorn on the hobby, the license and the
organisations that regulate us.

> there are people around you who will think your dismissive attitude to
> amateur radio is one that serves to display your attitude that amateur
> radio is just cb but with a licence and many more bands.

You are talking out of your ar*e
>
> if this is the case then i think that you will soon become a cb'er like
> others before you.

What are you talking about?
>
> unfortunately for you, there are many others around you who believe that
> amateur radio is much more serious that you apparently think.

Why is that unfortunate for me?
>
> that to me is a good thing, lest others like you lose the run of
> themselves and ruin what it left of amateur radio.

Mate, wise up you are sounding very silly

> hobby or not -
> it is a legislated hobby with rules,requirements & regulations.

To which I respect and ahere.

>
> i suggest you and others remember that.
>

I suggest you get off of your high horse.....

And whilst you are here lording it amongst those you seem to despise, why
don't you have the courage to identify yourself with a callsign...and before
you state the same repetitive drivel, I know you are not required to but you
make allot of noise...Make yourself known

Andy MW0GUV

ZZZPK

"MW0GUV" <me@nospam.net> wrote:

: "ZZZPK" <zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom .es.it.net> wrote
: in message news:420f4153.140235208@news.iol.ie...
:
: > 1.
: > less of your language there
:
: Who are you to dictate to me

well laddie...if you dont want the advice..fine... use all the bad
language you want and while yer at it...continue to post your callsign
too.

:
: > 2.
: > your attitude to your hobby indicates that you do not hold your "hobby"
: > in much regard.
:
: By encouraging the hobby to grow by bringing in new operators (with
: guidance) this will stop repeaters from being taken off air, it will perhaps
: help protect our part of the Spectrum from the vultures that would sell it
: off...How is it you think I don't hold the hobby in high regard? It seems to
: me it is you that is piling scorn on the hobby, the license and the
: organisations that regulate us.
:
: > there are people around you who will think your dismissive attitude to
: > amateur radio is one that serves to display your attitude that amateur
: > radio is just cb but with a licence and many more bands.
:
: You are talking out of your ar*e
: >
: > if this is the case then i think that you will soon become a cb'er like
: > others before you.
:
: What are you talking about?
: >
: > unfortunately for you, there are many others around you who believe that
: > amateur radio is much more serious that you apparently think.
:
: Why is that unfortunate for me?
because those around you will associate with you or not based upon what
they think of you.

: >
: > that to me is a good thing, lest others like you lose the run of
: > themselves and ruin what it left of amateur radio.
:
: Mate, wise up you are sounding very silly

ohhhh in about 5years you might jut understand.

:
: > hobby or not -
: > it is a legislated hobby with rules,requirements & regulations.
:
: To which I respect and ahere.
:
: >
: > i suggest you and others remember that.
: >
:
: I suggest you get off of your high horse.....
i never had a high horse.... i always used a bike.
it didnt need any hay or overnight stable.


:
: And whilst you are here lording it amongst those you seem to despise, why
: don't you have the courage to identify yourself with a callsign...and before
ohhh that means youre not meghertz.
that is a good thing.
you might also like to know that callsigns arent required on the internet.

: you state the same repetitive drivel, I know you are not required to but you
: make allot of noise...Make yourself known
oh dear....

temper temper.


:
: Andy MW0GUV
:
:

Peter

"ZZZPK" wrote...
>
>
> see?
> its simple.
>
> you have learned from me as i did from someone else.

If all we had was what someone else taught us, and we merely followed
them, the World would stand still.
Nobody would have created radio, TV, video or computers - because
nobody taught them how to. Even the wheel would never have existed.

> the past teaches the future....

No - the past teaches us how things were, not how they will be. The
future will be what we make it, we have the power to shape the future.
We can can chose either to follow blindly, learn from past mistakes,
make changes that reflect the modern World or just create something
new.

Otherwise, we would all still believe in witchcraft, and would be burning
people because they did something we consider strange. In fact, we
would all live in caves and go out killing our food, because nobody taught
anyone to do things different.

Someone has to lead the way forward, so the sheep can follow.


Regards,

Peter
http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/

Peter

"ZZZPK" wrote...
>
> hobby or not -
> it is a legislated hobby with rules,requirements & regulations.

If you want to discuss Amateur radio, please take it to one of the
many Amateur newsgroups.
This is a CB group. those who have no real interest in CB know
where the door is.


Regards,

Peter
http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/

Ned

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:53:53 -0000, "Peter" <braìnbuster@lineone.net>
wrote:


>If you want to discuss Amateur radio, please take it to one of the
>many Amateur newsgroups.
>This is a CB group. those who have no real interest in CB know
>where the door is.

Would that be a legal CB group or a group for those who openly
advocate illegal 'freebanding'? Do the latter get shown the door too?

Paul Cummins

In article <0p04115v8f9g2c2hnknebgqng03g16m0us@4ax.com>, Nedlar
<me@privacy.net> (Ned) wrote:

> Would that be a legal CB group or a group for those who openly
> advocate illegal 'freebanding'? Do the latter get shown the door too?

Illegal by what legislation?

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981

Ned

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:39 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:

>In article <0p04115v8f9g2c2hnknebgqng03g16m0us@4ax.com>, Nedlar
><me@privacy.net> (Ned) wrote:
>
>> Would that be a legal CB group or a group for those who openly
>> advocate illegal 'freebanding'? Do the latter get shown the door too?
>
>Illegal by what legislation?


The sodding legislation that states thou shalt not transmit on
frequencies that you have no licence for ( and where one is required!)

Wireless Telegraphy 1949, 1998, and all the bloody amendments to...

HTH

ZZZPK

"Peter" <braìnbuster@lineone.net> wrote:

: "ZZZPK" wrote...
: >
: > hobby or not -
: > it is a legislated hobby with rules,requirements & regulations.
:
: If you want to discuss Amateur radio, please take it to one of the
: many Amateur newsgroups.
: This is a CB group. those who have no real interest in CB know
: where the door is.


whats the difference between
uk.rec.cb.radio and uk.amateur.radio nowadays ?

ZZZPK

Ned <Nedlar <me@privacy.net>> wrote:

: Would that be a legal CB group or a group for those who openly
: advocate illegal 'freebanding'? Do the latter get shown the door too?

and those who admit owning and operating AM or SSB on 27555 ???

Paul Cummins

In article <421262f3.3364690@news.iol.ie>,
zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_i...om. es.it.net (ZZZPK) wrote:

> and those who admit owning and operating AM or SSB on 27555 ???

Hmmm.... Do you mean 27.555MHz?

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981

Paul Cummins

In article <lkn411lktbhf53eu5c1s7f26chvk7dt7tg@4ax.com>, Nedlar
<me@privacy.net> (Ned) wrote:

> The sodding legislation that states thou shalt not transmit on
> frequencies that you have no licence for ( and where one is required!)

Ah, so not illegal per-se to transmit, merely illegal to do so without a
licence.

How do you know that freebanders don't have a licence for the frequencies
they use?

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981

ZZZPK

Ned <Nedlar <me@privacy.net>> wrote:

: Wireless Telegraphy 1949, 1998, and all the bloody amendments to...
:
: HTH


ah now NED....

thats just being TECHNICAL...

ZZZPK

agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:

: In article <lkn411lktbhf53eu5c1s7f26chvk7dt7tg@4ax.com>, Nedlar
: <me@privacy.net> (Ned) wrote:
:
: > The sodding legislation that states thou shalt not transmit on
: > frequencies that you have no licence for ( and where one is required!)
:
: Ah, so not illegal per-se to transmit, merely illegal to do so without a
: licence.

hmmmm is paul trying to start chicken or egg thread ?

ZZZPK

agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:

: In article <421262f3.3364690@news.iol.ie>,
: zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_i...om. es.it.net (ZZZPK) wrote:
:
: > and those who admit owning and operating AM or SSB on 27555 ???
:
: Hmmm.... Do you mean 27.555MHz?


Paul...

anyone who understands dB will understand where 27555 is.

Road_Hog®

"ZZZPK" <zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom .es.it.net> wrote
in message news:421262ba.3307654@news.iol.ie...
> "Peter" <braìnbuster@lineone.net> wrote:
>
> : "ZZZPK" wrote...
> : >
> : > hobby or not -
> : > it is a legislated hobby with rules,requirements & regulations.
> :
> : If you want to discuss Amateur radio, please take it to one of the
> : many Amateur newsgroups.
> : This is a CB group. those who have no real interest in CB know
> : where the door is.
>
>
> whats the difference between
> uk.rec.cb.radio and uk.amateur.radio nowadays ?

We don't have the fanatical rantings of Airy R. Bean?

The Magnum

"ZZZPK" <zzzpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom .es.it.net> wrote
in message news:420d274b.2477755@news.iol.ie...
> "The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> :
> : "Peter" <braìnbuster@lineone.net> wrote in message
> : news:42086d09.0@entanet...
> : > "The Magnum" <magnum@NOSPAMmag2781.freeserve.co.uk> wrote...
> : > >
> : > > Is the Morse test where you have to sit and watch endless repeats of
> : > > Inspector morse and try to work out who the culprit is
> : >
> : > Any "real" Amateur knows that you just blame CBers for everything :~)
> : >
> : >
> : > Regards,
> : >
> : > Peter
> : > http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/
> : >
> : >
> : Heheheeee ... it would seem that way. Morse code though.. i wonder if
its
> : ever going to make a comeback . Anyone remember that comedy war film
which
> : name escapes me where the chicken was pecking something on the other
side of
> : the barn wall and the radio guy thought it was morse and was trying to
work
> : out what the message was... oooh how we laughed..
> : Still. If morse is an important part of his life i guess amateur radio
is
> : where it should be and if hes proud of it then thats fine too... Still,
> : accusing people of being inferior in some way because they are only M3
seems
> : a bit uppety. Im sure most people who go M3 will make descent Amateurs
even
> : if they dont use morse. And as for suggesting that all CB'ers are foul
> : mouthed music playing dum dums (or words to that effect) shows how silly
he
> : is. Some people on Cb are like that but its a minority. The shame is
people
> : like him only remember the minority.
> : As long as the "hobby" continues its all good.
> : Regards,
> : Graham
> :
> :
> :
>
>
> wrong (as usual)

********

Wrong??? what do you refer to??? couldnt be anything that i typed even
though you answered it. You seem to have a serious issue with CB users
matey. So strange then that you spend so much time in here trying to impress
people with your superiority. Just because someone isnt interested in morse
does not make them lazy.... Morse holds absolutely no interest for me at all
but does that make me lazy??? Nope it just means im not interested in that
particular side of radio. I just hope everyone using HF isnt the same ilk as
you... or maybe they are... in which case its no wonder your in here.

********

>
>
> the morse test proved its worth EVEN AT 5WPM it kept 2500 people WOULDNT
> EVEN TRY off hf where if they had made a bit of effort they could have
> joined in long ago.
>
>
> fact:
> the only extra privileges between a b-licence and an m3 is access to hf.
>
> therefore it can be clearly understood why so many b-licences who for
> years sat there doing their 50mhz and up suddenly ran away to sit a morse
> assessment whilst some of the openly rejected the idea that morse code was
> the way to grant access to hf.
>
> even a high-official of no-code international sat a morse assessment !!!
>
>
> the joke is there for all to see.
>
> the morse test did its job well.
> it kept lazy people off hf (including many a cb'er)
>