| #1 | |
|
|
|
| #2 | |
|
|
"jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:4yj9h.29144$Xh3.26871@newsfe6-win.ntli.net... > QUALITY ITEM > > http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...8743&rd=1&rd=1 > icom have never made a good quality item. |
| #3 | |
|
|
" bongo" <deeeenoregistrar@hotmail.co.uk.no> wrote in message news:Vck9h.57698$Ib.17899@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net... > > "jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > news:4yj9h.29144$Xh3.26871@newsfe6-win.ntli.net... >> QUALITY ITEM >> >> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...8743&rd=1&rd=1 >> > > icom have never made a good quality item. > > > > > suppose you are a yaesu man then ............. |
| #4 | |
|
|
"jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:4yj9h.29144$Xh3.26871@newsfe6-win.ntli.net... > QUALITY ITEM > > http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...8743&rd=1&rd=1 OOh is it the hand trapping type produced around 1980? As you go to tune the dial they leap on your hand......... Yes...... I have been reading the other group ;o) Graham -- -- ...-- -.-- ... ..- Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life... 73/51 - Hem-Free (www.open-channel.co.uk) Franklin Radio Group (www.farc.co.uk) |
| #5 | |
|
|
> > Yes...... I have been reading the other group ;o) > > Graham pucknose |
| #6 | |
|
|
" bongo" <deeeenoregistrar@hotmail.co.uk.no> wrote in message news:Vck9h.57698$Ib.17899@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net... > > "jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > news:4yj9h.29144$Xh3.26871@newsfe6-win.ntli.net... >> QUALITY ITEM >> >> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...8743&rd=1&rd=1 >> > > icom have never made a good quality item. > > > > > So what to you it a good manufacture? What do you think are wrong with Icom? No built in roger bleep? Icom are really good in the amateur radio market. I swear by my Icom 756 Pro. Andy |
| #7 | |
|
|
> So what to you it a good manufacture? What do you think are wrong with > Icom? > No built in roger bleep? Icom are really good in the amateur radio > market. I swear by my Icom 756 Pro. > > Andy CBrs can't see past their armature radgo YEASOOS.....well sort after............ |
| #8 | |
|
|
"jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:4yj9h.29144$Xh3.26871@newsfe6-win.ntli.net... > QUALITY ITEM > > http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...8743&rd=1&rd=1 > Questions from other members Question & AnswerAnswered On Q:Hi, I'm in Gourock, would collection be ok? 23-Nov-06 A:yes you can jim Why not ask a question on your own auction. So, planing on buying your own item Jim? Not too far to collect from then. Anyway, one for UK.R.A, don't want them to miss out on a bargain. |
| #9 | |
|
|
> Why not ask a question on your own auction. So, planing on buying your own > item Jim? Not too far to collect from then. > > Anyway, one for UK.R.A, don't want them to miss out on a bargain. You would make a good MM3.....aff yur heed........ |
| #10 | |
|
|
> Anyway, one for UK.R.A, don't want them to miss out on a bargain. > > they didn't...I posted it on the 23rd ........... |
| #11 | |
|
|
jim's laptop wrote:
>> Anyway, one for UK.R.A, don't want them to miss out on a bargain. >> >> > they didn't...I posted it on the 23rd ........... Your 'test' txt arrived, Jim btw. -- huLLy 07976 123278 Two suicide bombers walk into a bar. Boom Boom! |
| #12 | |
|
|
"huLLy" <spamin99@hully.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:5fCdnS1Vis36nfXYnZ2dnUVZ8sydnZ2d@giganews.com ... > jim's laptop wrote: >>> Anyway, one for UK.R.A, don't want them to miss out on a bargain. >>> >>> >> they didn't...I posted it on the 23rd ........... > > > > Your 'test' txt arrived, Jim btw. > > > -- > huLLy ta much ! ........... |
| #13 | |
|
|
P.S. This road hog person seems a bit of a thicko......I thought they all
lived around here as well.........! |
| #14 | |
|
|
"jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:KSV9h.27728$yz3.26995@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net... > P.S. This road hog person seems a bit of a thicko......I thought they > all lived around here as well.........! Oh you'll have to do better than that Jim. By the way, are you on your third or fourth can of Super Tennants by now. |
| #15 | |
|
|
"Road_HogŪ" <sales@2U.co.uk> wrote in message news:456830d4$0$1492$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk... > > "jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > news:KSV9h.27728$yz3.26995@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net... >> P.S. This road hog person seems a bit of a thicko......I thought they >> all lived around here as well.........! > > Oh you'll have to do better than that Jim. By the way, are you on your > third or fourth can of Super Tennants by now. > Fair play if Jim can still type after drinking 4 cans of Tennants Super. Try mixing it with Blackthorne Super Cider and then you have got a real mans drink ![]() Andy |
| #16 | |
|
|
"Road_HogŪ" <sales@2U.co.uk> wrote in message news:456830d4$0$1492$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk... > > "jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > news:KSV9h.27728$yz3.26995@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net... >> P.S. This road hog person seems a bit of a thicko......I thought they >> all lived around here as well.........! > > Oh you'll have to do better than that Jim. By the way, are you on your > third or fourth can of Super Tennants by now. > you would like me to be a booze hound like the rest of you ...wouldn't you? ......... too bad that I don't drink........shame that try again........ |
| #17 | |
|
|
"jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:goY9h.31043$GX2.16956@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net... > > "Road_HogŪ" <sales@2U.co.uk> wrote in message > news:456830d4$0$1492$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk... >> >> "jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message >> news:KSV9h.27728$yz3.26995@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net... >>> P.S. This road hog person seems a bit of a thicko......I thought they all >>> lived around here as well.........! >> >> Oh you'll have to do better than that Jim. By the way, are you on your third or >> fourth can of Super Tennants by now. >> > you would like me to be a booze hound like the rest of you ...wouldn't you? > ........ too bad that I don't drink........shame that try again........ > Up pops the Sheep S*****r from west wails muttering something about pitying some one who doesn't drink DieSea |
| #18 | |
|
|
"jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:goY9h.31043$GX2.16956@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net... > > "Road_HogŪ" <sales@2U.co.uk> wrote in message > news:456830d4$0$1492$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk... > > > > "jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > > news:KSV9h.27728$yz3.26995@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net... > >> P.S. This road hog person seems a bit of a thicko......I thought they > >> all lived around here as well.........! > > > > Oh you'll have to do better than that Jim. By the way, are you on your > > third or fourth can of Super Tennants by now. > > > you would like me to be a booze hound like the rest of you ...wouldn't you? > ........ too bad that I don't drink........shame that try again........ How about a nice hot cup of Earl Grey ;o) Graham -- -- ...-- -.-- ... ..- Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life... 73/51 - Hem-Free (www.open-channel.co.uk) Franklin Radio Group (www.farc.co.uk) |
| #19 | |
|
|
"DieSea" <DieSea.NoSpamPlease@nnttwlwoorrlldd.ccoomm> wrote:
> from west wails muttering something about pitying some > one who doesn't drink from where ???????? |
| #20 | |
|
|
> Q:Hi, I'm in Gourock, would collection be ok? > 23-Nov-06 > A:yes you can jim > > > > Why not ask a question on your own auction. So, planing on buying your own > item Jim? Not too far to collect from then. > > > he was in Gourock... he won and is coming to collect it....your point was ? .......... |
| #21 | |
|
|
"jim's laptop" <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> wrote...
> > " bongo" <deeeenoregistrar@hotmail.co.uk.no> wrote... > > > > icom have never made a good quality item. > > > suppose you are a yaesu man then ............. Maybe a Fidelity Man? Anyhow, if the item you are selling is an Amateur radio, this is the wrong group. This is a CB group, and it is illegal to use Amateur radio equipment to transmit on CB frequencies. If the item in question is an Icom CB, then I have to agree with the comment about quality. Icom 1050, SMC Oscar, Lowe TX40... Amateur radio companies should not have soiled their names on such crap. Can the names ever be taken seriously after they appeared on equipment that was, even by CB standards, crap? Regards, Peter. |
| #22 | |
|
|
"deBaser" <a1debaser@ntlworld.com> wrote...
> > So what to you it a good manufacture? Understand not I what saying are you. Back got just the pub from? > Icom are really good in the amateur radio market. Icom, Yaesu... what's the difference, they are all glorified CBs. Buy the radio, connect the antenna and get chatting - just like CB. When Amateurs buy their equipment, rather than get their fingers dirty, then is it any wonder that the government has made Amateur easier? Some years back, I remember being in Lowe Electronics and commenting on the sale of wire antennas, which even CBers can make, to Amateurs. The reply was, that's nothing - they are even buying patch leads rather than make them. So, who "dumbed it down" first, the government or the Amateurs? > I swear by my Icom 756 Pro. So what, I swear AT my Fidelity 1000 :~) Regards, Peter. http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/ |
| #23 | |
|
|
"Peter" <braėnbuster@lineone.net> wrote in message news:456c89fc.0@entanet... > "deBaser" <a1debaser@ntlworld.com> wrote... >> >> So what to you it a good manufacture? > > Understand not I what saying are you. Back got just the pub from? > >> Icom are really good in the amateur radio market. > > Icom, Yaesu... what's the difference, they are all glorified CBs. Buy the > radio, > connect the antenna and get chatting - just like CB. > When Amateurs buy their equipment, rather than get their fingers dirty, > then > is it any wonder that the government has made Amateur easier? > > Some years back, I remember being in Lowe Electronics and commenting on > the sale of wire antennas, which even CBers can make, to Amateurs. The > reply was, that's nothing - they are even buying patch leads rather than > make > them. > So, who "dumbed it down" first, the government or the Amateurs? > > >> I swear by my Icom 756 Pro. > > So what, I swear AT my Fidelity 1000 :~) > > > Regards, > > Peter. > http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/ > > > One or two good points Peter but Im afraid you will have to move with the times. Designing and building a radio like almost anything you can buy these days would be beyond most people in the hobby. It wouldn't be cost effective ether. I don't see the harm in buying radio's as long as we understand how they work. Buying patch leads sounds bad but you have to remember that some people in the hobby are getting on a bit and cant make their own. I prefer to make my own. Regards Andy |
| #24 | |
|
|
"deBaser" <a1debaser@ntlworld.com> wrote...
> > One or two good points Peter but Im afraid you will have to move with the > times. I don't mind moving with the times, as long as the movement is in the right direction. There does seem to be this assumption that new and modern is best, and that new technology has to replace old. Sometimes the new technology is flawed or best used for certain jobs, while the old technology may be better for some jobs. Sometimes the new technology does not last long, as they find something else. Then you are left replacing your equipment again. I wonder how the "green" brigade feel about all that electronic equipment being dumped when it works perfectly. I just heard on the news that one High Street chain is dropping CRT based TVs - even though they are still selling in the millions. Are they "moving with the times" or simply telling the customers what they *will* buy, so they can boost their profits? After the bad period in the late 1980s, I suspect that the industry is using every possible trick to keep sales going. Any new idea, any change - just to sell the customer another new version. > Buying patch leads sounds bad but you have to remember that > some people in the hobby are getting on a bit and cant make > their own. To old to solder a plug on a piece of coax? Maybe they would also like help keying the microphone. I really doubt that is what keeps the businesses going, more likely lazy gits and those who see Amateur as the new CB. > Designing and building a radio like almost anything you can buy > these days would be beyond most people in the hobby. The point is not to design to production standard, which is why bands are set aside and Amateurs are not allowed to build their own CBs, etc. Just to be able to build or modify your own equipment, for your own use, on the bands set aside for it. > It wouldn't be cost effective ether. Is a hobby supposed to be cost effective? It's not a business, and you don't have to get too complicated just to be able to communicate. >I don't see the harm in buying radio's as long as we > understand how they work. > > I prefer to make my own. I believe that anyone unwilling to do so much as their own leads and wire antennas, who just want to connect and chat, should stick to CB. That's what CB is for, chatting. Not that I would kick off old gits, just because they cannot solder any more. Just that anyone taking up Amateur should have an interest in the technical and practical side of radio and electronics. Knowing theory is fine, but that's no substitute for practical experience. Regards, Peter. http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/ |
| #25 | |
|
|
"Peter" <braėnbuster@lineone.net> wrote in message news:4573206b.0@entanet... > "deBaser" <a1debaser@ntlworld.com> wrote... >> >> One or two good points Peter but Im afraid you will have to move with the >> times. > > I don't mind moving with the times, as long as the movement is in > the right direction. > There does seem to be this assumption that new and modern is best, > and that new technology has to replace old. Sometimes the new > technology is flawed or best used for certain jobs, while the old > technology may be better for some jobs. > > Sometimes the new technology does not last long, as they find > something else. Then you are left replacing your equipment again. I > wonder how the "green" brigade feel about all that electronic > equipment being dumped when it works perfectly. > > I just heard on the news that one High Street chain is dropping > CRT based TVs - even though they are still selling in the millions. > Are they "moving with the times" or simply telling the customers > what they *will* buy, so they can boost their profits? > > After the bad period in the late 1980s, I suspect that the industry is > using every possible trick to keep sales going. Any new idea, any > change - just to sell the customer another new version. > > >> Buying patch leads sounds bad but you have to remember that >> some people in the hobby are getting on a bit and cant make >> their own. > > To old to solder a plug on a piece of coax? Maybe they would > also like help keying the microphone. > I really doubt that is what keeps the businesses going, more likely > lazy gits and those who see Amateur as the new CB. > > >> Designing and building a radio like almost anything you can buy >> these days would be beyond most people in the hobby. > > The point is not to design to production standard, which is why > bands are set aside and Amateurs are not allowed to build their > own CBs, etc. > Just to be able to build or modify your own equipment, for your own > use, on the bands set aside for it. > >> It wouldn't be cost effective ether. > > Is a hobby supposed to be cost effective? It's not a business, and you > don't have to get too complicated just to be able to communicate. > >>I don't see the harm in buying radio's as long as we >> understand how they work. >> >> I prefer to make my own. > > > I believe that anyone unwilling to do so much as their own leads and > wire antennas, who just want to connect and chat, should stick to CB. > That's > what CB is for, chatting. > Not that I would kick off old gits, just because they cannot solder any > more. Just > that anyone taking up Amateur should have an interest in the technical and > practical side of radio and electronics. > > Knowing theory is fine, but that's no substitute for practical experience. > > > Regards, > > Peter. > http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/ > > > OK Peter, this is not the right NG for all this but how about you share some of your basic homebrew transceiver designs with us and see if we can get people up and running. Yes I know you can google for stuff like this but how about you putting something in and maybe offer some help to people who get stuck. Regards Andy |
| #26 | |
|
|
"deBaser" <a1debaser@ntlworld.com> wrote...
> > OK Peter, this is not the right NG for all this but how about you share some > of your basic homebrew transceiver designs with us and see if we can get > people up and running. Like you say, this is not really the group for homebrew designs. Designs for antennas, power supplies, etc. are not a problem for this group, as you are allowed to make or modify your own. I don't have a great deal of spare time right now, but I would like to try out a few ideas for loft antennas. Anything that I get the time for goes on the Web site, so it's available when I am not. >Yes I know you can google for stuff like this but how about you putting > something in and maybe offer some help to people who get stuck. Unfortunately, I wouldn't have the time to offer a great deal of "support". At the moment, I am kept busy sorting out local problems - mainly Windows systems constantly crashing. Sometimes, I feel like unplugging the phone. Regards, Peter. |