| #1 | |
|
|
CB License
Hi. Now that the laws have changed is the situation that you don't need a
license at all for CB or is it that you still need one but no longer have to pay for it as it is on amateur radio? I can't find anything on the Ofcom website. Thanks |
| #2 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
"Malkavian" <a4bedaser@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:Agheh.1548$Dr3.908@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net... > Hi. Now that the laws have changed is the situation that you don't need a > license at all for CB or is it that you still need one but no longer have > to pay for it as it is on amateur radio? I can't find anything on the > Ofcom website. > > Thanks > license no longer needed. give it time though and they will probably ban cb radio. |
| #3 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
" banjo" <deeenoregistrar@hotmail.co.uk.no> wrote in message news:KPheh.3766$Xo6.1912@newsfe6-win.ntli.net... > > "Malkavian" <a4bedaser@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > news:Agheh.1548$Dr3.908@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net... >> Hi. Now that the laws have changed is the situation that you don't need a >> license at all for CB or is it that you still need one but no longer have >> to pay for it as it is on amateur radio? I can't find anything on the >> Ofcom website. >> >> Thanks >> > > license no longer needed. > > give it time though and they will probably ban cb radio. > > > > > > Licence no longer needed for CB radio. Amateur radio licence is free online once you passed your test HTH Andy |
| #4 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
"deBaser" <a1debaser@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:zuieh.12855$HV6.12529@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net... > > " banjo" <deeenoregistrar@hotmail.co.uk.no> wrote in message > news:KPheh.3766$Xo6.1912@newsfe6-win.ntli.net... >> >> "Malkavian" <a4bedaser@ntlworld.com> wrote in message >> news:Agheh.1548$Dr3.908@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net... >>> Hi. Now that the laws have changed is the situation that you don't need >>> a license at all for CB or is it that you still need one but no longer >>> have to pay for it as it is on amateur radio? I can't find anything on >>> the Ofcom website. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >> >> license no longer needed. >> >> give it time though and they will probably ban cb radio. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Licence no longer needed for CB radio. Amateur radio licence is free > online once you passed your test > > HTH > > Andy > Thanks Andy. I just applied for the life license for it. It takes 5 working days for the lectronic process to speed through. So much for hi speed hi-tech. You should consider taking your FL. You will get your license free now and it costs £14-20 for the exam. |
| #5 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
"Malkavian" <a4bedaser@ntlworld.com> wrote...
> > Hi. Now that the laws have changed is the situation that you don't need a > license at all for CB or is it that you still need one but no longer have to > pay for it as it is on amateur radio? I can't find anything on the Ofcom > website. There has been a whole thread or Two on the subject, with direct links to the information on the Ofcom site. At the risk of wasting bandwidth, here it is again... "Peter" <braìnbuster@lineone.net> wrote in message news:456b467d.0@entanet... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ofcom > Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 11:15 AM > Subject: Deregulation of CB Radio > > > > Today Ofcom has published two documents in relation to the Wireless > > Telegraphy (Exemption) (Amendment) Regulations 2006: > > > > > > - A Statement confirming that the Wireless Telegraphy (Exemption) > > (Amendment) Regulations 2006 will come into force on 8 December 2006 at > > which time certain low power FM transmitters will become legal to use . > > Also from that date, it will no longer be necessary to hold a Wireless > > Telegraphy (WT) Act licence in order to operate Citizens' Band Radio > > equipment, providing that it is operated in accordance with the new > > Regulations; and > > > > > > - A revised information document on the use of CB radio > > > > > > Both documents can be found at: > > > > > > http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/cond...ion/statement/ > > > > http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/i...n/information/ > > Some quick links to full documents... > > Full statement: > http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/cond.../statement.pdf > Latest CB information sheet: > http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/i...binfosheet.pdf > Legislation (Statutory Instrument): > http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/i...mption1106.pdf As the Ofcom Email above says, licence not required. That's OK, Malk... no need to thank me, just pretend you didn't see this message. That way, you don't have to provide proof of your previous suggestion... > "Malkavian" <a4bedaser@ntlworld.com> wrote... > > > > Remember your moronic comments about amatuer radio > > equipment being inferior to CB? I suppose it's easier to stick your fingers in your ears than to be man enough to either provide proof or apologise for your mistake. Merry Christmas. Peter. |
| #6 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
" banjo" <deeenoregistrar@hotmail.co.uk.no> wrote:
> license no longer needed. amstrad 901's being switched on again...all over the uk. 10-4 |
| #7 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
"zpk" <class_a_licensee_pkearn_12wpm@eircom.edu.net.co m> wrote in message news:457b1374.1261203@news.iol.ie... >" banjo" <deeenoregistrar@hotmail.co.uk.no> wrote: > >> license no longer needed. > > amstrad 901's being switched on again...all over the uk. > > > 10-4 > > Mustang version...........on |
| #8 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
"zpk" <class_a_licensee_pkearn_12wpm@eircom.edu.net.co m> wrote in message news:457b1374.1261203@news.iol.ie... >" banjo" <deeenoregistrar@hotmail.co.uk.no> wrote: > >> license no longer needed. > > amstrad 901's being switched on again...all over the uk. > Oh those led signal metres still give me nightmares. > > 10-4 > > |
| #9 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
"zpk" <class_a_licensee_pkearn_12wpm@eircom.edu.net.co m> wrote in message news:457b1374.1261203@news.iol.ie... >" banjo" <deeenoregistrar@hotmail.co.uk.no> wrote: > >> license no longer needed. > > amstrad 901's being switched on again...all over the uk. > > > 10-4 > > Do you remember the manual that told you to connect red to neg and black to pos .......? |
| #10 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
"Jim GM4DHJ" <jim.gm4dhjt@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Do you remember the manual that told you to connect red to neg and black to > pos .......? i certainly do not. ask brian. |
| #11 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
"deBaser" <a1debaser@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:zuieh.12855$HV6.12529@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net... > > " banjo" <deeenoregistrar@hotmail.co.uk.no> wrote in message > news:KPheh.3766$Xo6.1912@newsfe6-win.ntli.net... >> >> "Malkavian" <a4bedaser@ntlworld.com> wrote in message >> news:Agheh.1548$Dr3.908@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net... >>> Hi. Now that the laws have changed is the situation that you don't need >>> a license at all for CB or is it that you still need one but no longer >>> have to pay for it as it is on amateur radio? I can't find anything on >>> the Ofcom website. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >> >> license no longer needed. >> >> give it time though and they will probably ban cb radio. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Licence no longer needed for CB radio. Somewhat late in the day, big deal really, if they allowed SSB and AM plus all data modes then that would be something to talk about then again CB is long dead anyway what with 446mhz and mobiles etc et all, technology has killed it |
| #12 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
"zpk" <class_a_licensee_pkearn_12wpm@eircom.edu.net.co m> wrote in message news:457c7464.719175@news.iol.ie... > "Jim GM4DHJ" <jim.gm4dhjt@ntlworld.com> wrote: > >> Do you remember the manual that told you to connect red to neg and black >> to >> pos .......? > > > i certainly do not. > > ask brian. > he would have connected it up that way...because it was in print....I on the other hand do not read manuals........... |
| #13 | |
|
|
Re: CB License
"Jim GM4DHJ" <jim.gm4dhjt@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:mE_eh.8168$n36.4552@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net... > > "zpk" <class_a_licensee_pkearn_12wpm@eircom.edu.net.co m> wrote in message > news:457c7464.719175@news.iol.ie... >> "Jim GM4DHJ" <jim.gm4dhjt@ntlworld.com> wrote: >> >>> Do you remember the manual that told you to connect red to neg and black >>> to >>> pos .......? >> >> >> i certainly do not. >> >> ask brian. >> > > he would have connected it up that way...because it was in print....I on > the other hand do not read manuals........... > > Good man |
