pearl

"Michael Saunby" <msaunby@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:bemd9l$nrm$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> "pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
> news:bembl6$f5g$5@kermit.esat.net...
<...>
> > Why do you think so many take antacids, Michael? Wouldn't have
> > anything to do with the near constant secretion into the stomach of
> > the acid required to digest meat would it?
> >
>
> I've really no idea. I suspect it's a cultural thing, like the popping of
> vitamin suplements and a whole host of other non-prescription drugs, etc.
> I eat meat, my friends and family eat meat, we don't take antacids,

I find that very hard to believe. You wouldn't know who does.

> so it
> clearly has little if anything to do with eating meat as part of a normal,
> sensible diet.

'normal and sensible' = traditional + pathogenic.

There is high usage of antacids.

<..>

> > Did you understand anything I posted? About cobalt, about gut bacteria?
>
> I'm sure you'd be staggered if you could even imagine what I understand,
> just as I'm staggered by what you seem to believe.

I'm staggered at your delusional staggering about.

<...>
> > > Maybe the culprit is processed foods, too much sugar, soya,
> > > wheat, etc. in the diet.
> >
> > Certainly doesn't help.
> >
>
> And shouldn't be part of a sensible diet - unlike meat which doesn't do any
> harm in reasonable quantities.

How often and in what quantity do you regard as 'reasonable'?