Malcolm

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 23:02:59 +0100, "Zakhar" <nospam@donotuse123.com>
wrote:

>
>"Malcolm Kane" <malcolm@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>newsSIX27FIRJB$Ew9n@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk...
>> In message <L8ZMa.46779$xd5.2380781@stones.force9.net>, Zakhar
>> <nospam@donotuse123.com> writes
>> >>
>> >> Kill QUICKLY. Their goal is not to cause pain, and most hunters I know
>> >> go out of their way to insure a fast kill.
>> >
>> >They want a fast kill. They don't care about the pain they inflict.
>> >
>> >> They also don't like causing pain, regardless of your impious
>assertions.
>> >
>> >They aim is to kill. Pain is not a consideration.
>> >
>> I am not a hunter but anyone with any knowledge of meat knows that meat
>> from unstressed animals is preferable to meat from a stressed animal.
>
>Then why do some beat dogs before killing them for food?
>
>> \the result is therefore bound to be that a hunter wants to kill quickly
>> the pain an animal is suffering is lowering the quality of their meal.
>> It is in their interest to kill quickly.
>
>Utter rubbish. What about snares? What about whales being electrocuted? What
>about hunting dear with dogs? What about shellfish, where the aim is to keep
>them alive for as long as possible, before they are boiled? No consideration
>of pain is made, none. A hunter will never think, "What action shall I take
>to minimise pain?"

Guess that shatters his delusions again, it's amazing despite tonnes
of evidence, these goons still believe their own spin.

Then again Kane was never the brightest.


--




















So, you dont like reasoned,
well thought out, civil debate?

I understand.

/´¯/)
/¯../
/..../
/´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
/'/.../..../......./¨¯\
('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
\.................'...../
''...\.......... _.·´
\..............(
\.............\..

Zakhar

"Malcolm" <Malcolm@malcsplace.com> wrote in message
news:275eb80c8561762295f26b38386890dd@free.teranew s.com...
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 23:02:59 +0100, "Zakhar" <nospam@donotuse123.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Malcolm Kane" <malcolm@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> >newsSIX27FIRJB$Ew9n@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk...
> >> In message <L8ZMa.46779$xd5.2380781@stones.force9.net>, Zakhar
> >> <nospam@donotuse123.com> writes
> >> >>
> >> >> Kill QUICKLY. Their goal is not to cause pain, and most hunters I
know
> >> >> go out of their way to insure a fast kill.
> >> >
> >> >They want a fast kill. They don't care about the pain they inflict.
> >> >
> >> >> They also don't like causing pain, regardless of your impious
> >assertions.
> >> >
> >> >They aim is to kill. Pain is not a consideration.
> >> >
> >> I am not a hunter but anyone with any knowledge of meat knows that meat
> >> from unstressed animals is preferable to meat from a stressed animal.
> >
> >Then why do some beat dogs before killing them for food?
> >
> >> \the result is therefore bound to be that a hunter wants to kill
quickly
> >> the pain an animal is suffering is lowering the quality of their meal.
> >> It is in their interest to kill quickly.
> >
> >Utter rubbish. What about snares? What about whales being electrocuted?
What
> >about hunting dear with dogs? What about shellfish, where the aim is to
keep
> >them alive for as long as possible, before they are boiled? No
consideration
> >of pain is made, none. A hunter will never think, "What action shall I
take
> >to minimise pain?"
>
> Guess that shatters his delusions again, it's amazing despite tonnes
> of evidence, these goons still believe their own spin.

They still belive in the Disney book of hunting.

"OK Pluto, lets go huntin"
http://www.animationusa.com/picts/wdpict/goofy.jpg


>
> Then again Kane was never the brightest.
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> So, you dont like reasoned,
> well thought out, civil debate?
>
> I understand.
>
> /´¯/)
> /¯../
> /..../
> /´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
> /'/.../..../......./¨¯\
> ('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
> \.................'...../
> ''...\.......... _.·´
> \..............(
> \.............\..