| #1 | |
|
|
On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 22:08:10 GMT, usual suspect
<aboveground@earth.man> wrote: >Zakhar wrote: ><snip of broken record> >>>Of course, as fast and painless a kill as possible. >> >> Hunters don't care about how painless it is, they may care how quick for >> expeditious reasons. > >I think most hunters care about both issues. It's also fair to say >you're talking about the same thing when addressing either issue since a >wounded animal in pain is one which is going to pose problems. Every >deer hunter I've known has deeply regretted a "gut shot" which resulted >in an endless blood trail and no dead deer to be found. Such regret has >had everything to do with wounding an animal, not about not having a >dead deer. > ><snip> >> So we agree that there are hunters who don't care about the environment. > >It's safer to generalize that no group is entirely monolithic; there are >a few bad apples in every barrel. The overwhelming majority of hunters >do care about the environment. Crap, only to the extent it provides them with deviant pleasure. Pedophiles care dearly about their victims too, derek moody has often claimed this. I see a wood, I admire it for it's beauty, the sheer wonder of it all, only a weirdo would want to kill what lives in the wood, for pleasure. get real. You may fool the dumb kooks. -- So, you dont like reasoned, well thought out, civil debate? I understand. /´¯/) /¯../ /..../ /´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸ /'/.../..../......./¨¯\ ('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...') \.................'...../ ''...\.......... _.·´ \..............( \.............\.. |