©¿©

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:30:50 +0100, ©¿© <icecool@isis232.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:28:41 +0100, ©¿© <icecool@isis232.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:12:43 +0100, ©¿© <icecool@isis232.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:52:31 +0100, Paul {Hamilton Rooney}
>>><craig@oilfield.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:41:24 +0100, "Jim Webster"
>>>><Jim@websterpagespabank.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" <craig@oilfield.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:hr7bf2pvi9e7cg92n0pbcgrcq1ckd6qahf@4ax.c om...
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:58:44 +0100, "Jim Webster"
>>>>>> <Jim@websterpagespabank.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >"Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" <craig@oilfield.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> >news:i72bf25qam02ku192bpdib8h2dtk5eulud@4ax.com.. .
>>>>>> >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:18:16 +0100, "Jim Webster"
>>>>>> >> <Jim@websterpagespabank.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >"Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" <craig@oilfield.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> >> >news:g60bf2pde3e1ae9pm48cterco66a3ocb95@4ax.com.. .
>>>>>> >> >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:11:31 +0100, "Jim Webster"
>>>>>> >> >> <Jim@websterpagespabank.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> >"Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" <craig@oilfield.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> >> >> >news:srvaf2hi7jl4bbtdjm2k9akq9evrp0khl0@4ax.com.. .
>>>>>> >> >> >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:55:55 +0100, Malcolm
>>>>>> >> ><Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk>
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> A simple answer to a straight question would suffice: did you
>>>>>> >> >acknowledge
>>>>>> >> >> >> Konter's work in your book?
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> >so you haven't actually read both books?
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> I haven't read either, Jim. Grebes aren't my thing. >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >so without reading either book you accuse someone of copying?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> So without reading any messages you accuse someone of accusing someone
>>>>>of
>>>>>> >> copying?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Noted - no response.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >so you haven't read his book then, that's all I wanted to establish.
>>>>>> >I now know what value to put on your opinion of the issue
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What issue? As far as I can tell the only issue under discussion is
>>>>>> Malcolm's claim to have written the first ever book on grebes. Did you
>>>>>have
>>>>>> some other issue in mind?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>well you seem to be accusing him of copying someone elses book.
>>>>
>>>>Bollocks, Jim. Try reading before jumping in.
>>>>
>>>>>If not then fair enough, but it does seem a strange accusation to make if
>>>>>you haven't read both books.
>>>>>Also he might be correct, his may be the first attempt to write a definitive
>>>>>book on grebes.
>>>>
>>>>No. That was André Konter's book, which was sitting on Malcolm's shelf
>>>>while he typed his claim (-:
>>
>>More interesting quotes on Ogilvies false claim...
>>
>> 8888888888888888888888888
>>
>>> You are making yourself look foolish. The book on Grebes by Andre
>>> Konter that was published in 2001 was entitled 'Grebes of OUR World'.
>>> My book, published only this month, is entitled 'Grebes of THE World',
>>> and as such is entirely different. The similarity of the front covers
>>> is quite coincidental. My book IS the first ever devoted to Grebes.
>>
>>
>>> Malcolm
>>
>>
>>
>>KONTER (Andre) - Grebes of our World. Visiting all Species on Five
>>Continents - 2001, 8vo. 187pp. Colour photographs, line drawings. A
>>description of the 22 species of grebes, their natural history,
>>ecology
>>and behaviour.
>>
>>Grebes of the World
>>Malcolm Ogilvie
>>The book starts with an authoritative introduction on the origin,
>>evolution, distribution, physiology and behaviour of grebes, followed
>>by
>>accounts of each of the 22 species
>>
>>
>>Malcolm it looks as though Konter might dispute that statement!
>>
>>Rob
>>
>>
>> 8888888888888888888888888888888888888
>
>To which Ogilvie replied presently
>
>"Yes, indeed, what I said was wrong and I apologise to Andre Konter, "
>
>LOL