©¿©

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:28:41 +0100, ©¿© <icecool@isis232.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:12:43 +0100, ©¿© <icecool@isis232.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:52:31 +0100, Paul {Hamilton Rooney}
>><craig@oilfield.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:41:24 +0100, "Jim Webster"
>>><Jim@websterpagespabank.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" <craig@oilfield.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:hr7bf2pvi9e7cg92n0pbcgrcq1ckd6qahf@4ax.co m...
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:58:44 +0100, "Jim Webster"
>>>>> <Jim@websterpagespabank.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >"Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" <craig@oilfield.com> wrote in message
>>>>> >news:i72bf25qam02ku192bpdib8h2dtk5eulud@4ax.com.. .
>>>>> >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:18:16 +0100, "Jim Webster"
>>>>> >> <Jim@websterpagespabank.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >"Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" <craig@oilfield.com> wrote in message
>>>>> >> >news:g60bf2pde3e1ae9pm48cterco66a3ocb95@4ax.com.. .
>>>>> >> >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:11:31 +0100, "Jim Webster"
>>>>> >> >> <Jim@websterpagespabank.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> >"Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" <craig@oilfield.com> wrote in message
>>>>> >> >> >news:srvaf2hi7jl4bbtdjm2k9akq9evrp0khl0@4ax.com.. .
>>>>> >> >> >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:55:55 +0100, Malcolm
>>>>> >> ><Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk>
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >> A simple answer to a straight question would suffice: did you
>>>>> >> >acknowledge
>>>>> >> >> >> Konter's work in your book?
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> >so you haven't actually read both books?
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> I haven't read either, Jim. Grebes aren't my thing. >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >so without reading either book you accuse someone of copying?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> So without reading any messages you accuse someone of accusing someone
>>>>of
>>>>> >> copying?
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>> Noted - no response.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >so you haven't read his book then, that's all I wanted to establish.
>>>>> >I now know what value to put on your opinion of the issue
>>>>>
>>>>> What issue? As far as I can tell the only issue under discussion is
>>>>> Malcolm's claim to have written the first ever book on grebes. Did you
>>>>have
>>>>> some other issue in mind?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>well you seem to be accusing him of copying someone elses book.
>>>
>>>Bollocks, Jim. Try reading before jumping in.
>>>
>>>>If not then fair enough, but it does seem a strange accusation to make if
>>>>you haven't read both books.
>>>>Also he might be correct, his may be the first attempt to write a definitive
>>>>book on grebes.
>>>
>>>No. That was André Konter's book, which was sitting on Malcolm's shelf
>>>while he typed his claim (-:
>
>More interesting quotes on Ogilvies false claim...
>
> 8888888888888888888888888
>
>> You are making yourself look foolish. The book on Grebes by Andre
>> Konter that was published in 2001 was entitled 'Grebes of OUR World'.
>> My book, published only this month, is entitled 'Grebes of THE World',
>> and as such is entirely different. The similarity of the front covers
>> is quite coincidental. My book IS the first ever devoted to Grebes.
>
>
>> Malcolm
>
>
>
>KONTER (Andre) - Grebes of our World. Visiting all Species on Five
>Continents - 2001, 8vo. 187pp. Colour photographs, line drawings. A
>description of the 22 species of grebes, their natural history,
>ecology
>and behaviour.
>
>Grebes of the World
>Malcolm Ogilvie
>The book starts with an authoritative introduction on the origin,
>evolution, distribution, physiology and behaviour of grebes, followed
>by
>accounts of each of the 22 species
>
>
>Malcolm it looks as though Konter might dispute that statement!
>
>Rob
>
>
> 8888888888888888888888888888888888888