lizard ID please

I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no website
to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the internet of the
common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green than this one was.
I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long, including the tail, which was
the same length as the body. There were rows of pale spots down its
back. I guess that it must have been a common lizard, as it looked
nothing like the sand lizard, and it certainly wasn`t a slowworm.

Kate

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no website
> to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the internet of the
> common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green than this one was.
> I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long, including the tail, which was
> the same length as the body. There were rows of pale spots down its
> back. I guess that it must have been a common lizard, as it looked
> nothing like the sand lizard, and it certainly wasn`t a slowworm.
>
> Kate

Where did you see it? The locations for native Sand Lizard are pretty
limited.

If in a built-up area, I guess an escaped exotic is a distinct
possibility?
--
Larry Stoter

Kate wrote...
>I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no website to
>post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the internet of the common
>lizard shows them to be a more muddy green than this one was. I reckon that
>it was at least 9 cm long, including the tail, which was the same length as
>the body. There were rows of pale spots down its back. I guess that it
>must have been a common lizard, as it looked nothing like the sand lizard,
>and it certainly wasn`t a slowworm.

I believe that the male sand lizard is our only bright green native lizard.
(Supposed to be particularly intense green in the breeding season).

David

"Larry Stoter" <larry@cymru.freewire.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1h0ql0u.sicxsg115zl9gN%larry@cymru.freewire.c o.uk...
> "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no
>> website
>> to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the internet of
>> the
>> common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green than this one
>> was.
>> I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long, including the tail, which
>> was
>> the same length as the body. There were rows of pale spots down
>> its
>> back. I guess that it must have been a common lizard, as it looked
>> nothing like the sand lizard, and it certainly wasn`t a slowworm.
>>
>> Kate
>
> Where did you see it? The locations for native Sand Lizard are
> pretty
> limited.
>
> If in a built-up area, I guess an escaped exotic is a distinct
> possibility?
> --
> Larry Stoter

Dorset (Moors Valley Country Park) - one of the areas the sand lizard
may still be seen. However, this green lizard bore no resemblance to
the pictures I saw of sand lizards on line. If it was an escapee, it
had legged it pretty far as it was a long way from houses! Unless
someone got fed up with a pet and released it in the Park
deliberately.

I may have to print a copy of the photo I took. Perhaps one of the
Rangers may be able to identify it, or confirm that it is not a native
species. It had extremely long toes on its back feet, but maybe
that`s normal for lizards?

Thanks
Kate

"David Lee" <davidlee_malvern@dont.use.this.bit.hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:uZmdnYdATLe2oGzfRVnyvQ@eclipse.net.uk...
> Kate wrote...
>>I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no
>>website to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the
>>internet of the common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green
>>than this one was. I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long,
>>including the tail, which was the same length as the body. There
>>were rows of pale spots down its back. I guess that it must have
>>been a common lizard, as it looked nothing like the sand lizard, and
>>it certainly wasn`t a slowworm.
>
> I believe that the male sand lizard is our only bright green native
> lizard. (Supposed to be particularly intense green in the breeding
> season).
>
> David
It turns out that this lizard was a Common. According to the HCT`s
website, common lizards are normally brown, but can be green, yellow,
or nearly black.
It certainly looked exotic in green.

Kate

Kate wrote: dd0q71$oic$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk,

> "David Lee" <davidlee_malvern@dont.use.this.bit.hotmail.com> wrote in
> message news:uZmdnYdATLe2oGzfRVnyvQ@eclipse.net.uk...
>> Kate wrote...
>>> I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no
>>> website to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the
>>> internet of the common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green
>>> than this one was. I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long,
>>> including the tail, which was the same length as the body. There
>>> were rows of pale spots down its back. I guess that it must have
>>> been a common lizard, as it looked nothing like the sand lizard, and
>>> it certainly wasn`t a slowworm.
>>
>> I believe that the male sand lizard is our only bright green native
>> lizard. (Supposed to be particularly intense green in the breeding
>> season).
>>
>> David
> It turns out that this lizard was a Common. According to the HCT`s
> website, common lizards are normally brown, but can be green, yellow,
> or nearly black.
> It certainly looked exotic in green.
>
> Kate

Only the females are normally brown, the males
are indeed 'exotic'bright green at the sides.

--
¨°º°¨Peter Alaca¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨

"Alaca" <P.Alaca@3075.NN> wrote in message
news:42f3fc31$0$74537$dbd4f001@news.wanadoo.nl...
> Kate wrote: dd0q71$oic$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk,
>
>> "David Lee" <davidlee_malvern@dont.use.this.bit.hotmail.com> wrote
>> in
>> message news:uZmdnYdATLe2oGzfRVnyvQ@eclipse.net.uk...
>>> Kate wrote...
>>>> I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no
>>>> website to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the
>>>> internet of the common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green
>>>> than this one was. I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long,
>>>> including the tail, which was the same length as the body. There
>>>> were rows of pale spots down its back. I guess that it must have
>>>> been a common lizard, as it looked nothing like the sand lizard,
>>>> and
>>>> it certainly wasn`t a slowworm.
>>>
>>> I believe that the male sand lizard is our only bright green
>>> native
>>> lizard. (Supposed to be particularly intense green in the breeding
>>> season).
>>>
>>> David
>> It turns out that this lizard was a Common. According to the HCT`s
>> website, common lizards are normally brown, but can be green,
>> yellow,
>> or nearly black.
>> It certainly looked exotic in green.
>>
>> Kate
>
> Only the females are normally brown, the males
> are indeed 'exotic'bright green at the sides.
>
> --
> ¨°º°¨Peter Alaca¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨
>
Peter : this lizard was green all over - nose to tail-tip, legs, the
lot - not just down the sides. That was why I wasn`t sure what type
it was initially. I wish I could post the photo I took somewhere,
then you could see just how green it was!

Kate

> Peter : this lizard was green all over - nose to tail-tip, legs, the
> lot - not just down the sides. That was why I wasn`t sure what type it
> was initially. I wish I could post the photo I took somewhere, then you
> could see just how green it was!
>
> Kate
I havent tried it but it might be worth you checking it out

http://imageshack.us/

"SpiKe >" <no-one@home.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:GB6Je.23508$Fx3.4656@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
>
>> Peter : this lizard was green all over - nose to tail-tip, legs,
>> the
>> lot - not just down the sides. That was why I wasn`t sure what
>> type it was initially. I wish I could post the photo I took
>> somewhere, then you could see just how green it was!
>>
>> Kate
> I havent tried it but it might be worth you checking it out
>
> http://imageshack.us/
>

Thanks,Spike. I don`t know if it will work until I post it, but
here`s the URL I was allocated :
http://imageshack.us]

[/url]

Kate

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dd30uv$luo$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> "SpiKe >" <no-one@home.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:GB6Je.23508$Fx3.4656@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
>>
>>> Peter : this lizard was green all over - nose to tail-tip, legs,
>>> the
>>> lot - not just down the sides. That was why I wasn`t sure what
>>> type it was initially. I wish I could post the photo I took
>>> somewhere, then you could see just how green it was!
>>>
>>> Kate
>> I havent tried it but it might be worth you checking it out
>>
>> http://imageshack.us/
>>
>
> Thanks,Spike. I don`t know if it will work until I post it, but
> here`s the URL I was allocated :
> http://imageshack.us]

[/url]
>
> Kate
>
>
That didn`t seem to work. I`ll try again...
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3711/commonlizardgreen9ww.jpg[/IMG][/url]

Kate

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dd31ds$mo9$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dd30uv$luo$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk...
>>
>> "SpiKe >" <no-one@home.com.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:GB6Je.23508$Fx3.4656@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
>>>
>>>> Peter : this lizard was green all over - nose to tail-tip, legs,
>>>> the
>>>> lot - not just down the sides. That was why I wasn`t sure what
>>>> type it was initially. I wish I could post the photo I took
>>>> somewhere, then you could see just how green it was!
>>>>
>>>> Kate
>>> I havent tried it but it might be worth you checking it out
>>>
>>> http://imageshack.us/
>>>
>>
>> Thanks,Spike. I don`t know if it will work until I post it, but
>> here`s the URL I was allocated :
>> http://imageshack.us]

[/url]
>>
>> Kate
>>
>>
> That didn`t seem to work. I`ll try again...
> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3711/commonlizardgreen9ww.jpg[/IMG][/url]
>
> Kate
I give up!
Kate

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dd31qn$m4h$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dd31ds$mo9$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>
>> "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:dd30uv$luo$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk...
>>>
>>> "SpiKe >" <no-one@home.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:GB6Je.23508$Fx3.4656@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
>>>>
>>>>> Peter : this lizard was green all over - nose to tail-tip, legs,
>>>>> the
>>>>> lot - not just down the sides. That was why I wasn`t sure what
>>>>> type it was initially. I wish I could post the photo I took
>>>>> somewhere, then you could see just how green it was!
>>>>>
>>>>> Kate
>>>> I havent tried it but it might be worth you checking it out
>>>>
>>>> http://imageshack.us/
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,Spike. I don`t know if it will work until I post it, but here`s
>>> the URL I was allocated :
>>> http://imageshack.us]

[/url]
>>>
>>> Kate
>>>
>>>
>> That didn`t seem to work. I`ll try again...
>> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3711/commonlizardgreen9ww.jpg[/IMG][/url]
>>
>> Kate
> I give up!
> Kate
Typical !

Ahh well, it was worth a try.

Kate wrote...
>> That didn`t seem to work. I`ll try again...
>> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3711/commonlizardgreen9ww.jpg[/IMG][/url]
>>
>> Kate
> I give up!

Shame! You aren't connected via broadband are you Kate? If so you would
probably have 20MB or so of web space that you could upload stuff to. You
don't need to muck about with HTML and web pages or any of that - you just
create a location in "My Network Places", type a password and simply drag
and drop your files. Without an index page ordinary files simply appear in
a directory tree on the web - just like in Windows Explorer.

You can see the results of my Mickey-Mouse experimenting of a couple of days
ago at http://www.thespis.eclipse.co.uk. The links are very simple lines of
HTML inserted into the standard page provided by the service provider. The
Bat Survey Results link will show you what you get if you simply put files
ino a folder.

David

"David Lee" <davidlee_malvern@dont.use.this.bit.hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:qJedncaDu4JVu2jfRVnyhA@eclipse.net.uk...
> Kate wrote...
>>> That didn`t seem to work. I`ll try again...
>>> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3711/commonlizardgreen9ww.jpg[/IMG][/url]
>>>
>>> Kate
>> I give up!
>
> Shame! You aren't connected via broadband are you Kate? If so you
> would probably have 20MB or so of web space that you could upload
> stuff to. You don't need to muck about with HTML and web pages or
> any of that - you just create a location in "My Network Places",
> type a password and simply drag and drop your files. Without an
> index page ordinary files simply appear in a directory tree on the
> web - just like in Windows Explorer.
>
> You can see the results of my Mickey-Mouse experimenting of a couple
> of days ago at http://www.thespis.eclipse.co.uk. The links are very
> simple lines of HTML inserted into the standard page provided by the
> service provider. The Bat Survey Results link will show you what
> you get if you simply put files ino a folder.
>
> David
I do have ADSL, and it sounds pretty straight forward, David, and an
excellent idea, but where do I start? In "My Network Places" I have
three options : Microsoft Terminal Services, MS Windows Network, and
Web Client Network. I assume that I use the last one, but when I
click on it, nothing happens. Do you think you could you talk me
through what I should do, please? Assume I know nothing - and you
won`t be far wrong!

Many thanks
Kate

Kate wrote...
>> David
> I do have ADSL, and it sounds pretty straight forward, David, and an
> excellent idea, but where do I start? In "My Network Places" I have three
> options : Microsoft Terminal Services, MS Windows Network, and Web Client
> Network. I assume that I use the last one, but when I click on it,
> nothing happens. Do you think you could you talk me through what I should
> do, please? Assume I know nothing - and you won`t be far wrong!
>
> Many thanks
> Kate

Kate

It's normally just an ftp address - you can do it straight from your
browser. In my case the address is ftp://myfiles.eclipse.co.uk. Internet
Explorer opens this in Windows Explorer, showing all the public folders on
the Eclipse ftp server, and when I log in with my Eclipse username and
password my own webspace also appears as a folder. For example the folder
containing my pictures appears in Exlorer under "Internet Explorer" as
ftp://myfiles.eclipse.co.uk/www.thes...o.uk/pictures/ and I can
simply drag and drop to and from this folder.

However, first you must check that your ADSL package actually includes a web
space - all the ones I considered do, but now I'm not so sure how many of
the "popular" providers offer the facility. Normally it will be included if
your email address includes a "subdomain" eg
youraddress@yourdomain.provider.co.uk, in which case your web space will be
www.yourdomain.provider.co.uk. If your email address is simply in the form
youraddress@provider.co.uk then you probably won't have any webspace.

I think that you are with Demon - if so it depends on which package you have
eg "Home Office" includes 20MB of webspace but "Home" doesn't have any.

Sorry If I have misled you.

David

"Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dd31qn$m4h$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk...

>>>
>> That didn`t seem to work. I`ll try again...
>> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3711/commonlizardgreen9ww.jpg[/IMG][/url]
>>
>> Kate
> I give up!
> Kate
>

http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3...rdgreen9ww.jpg
seems to work.

Keith

"Keith Edkins" <keith.edkins@gwydir.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dd4dns$51s$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dd31qn$m4h$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk...
>
>>>>
>>> That didn`t seem to work. I`ll try again...
>>> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3711/commonlizardgreen9ww.jpg[/IMG][/url]
>>>
>>> Kate
>> I give up!
>> Kate
>>
>
>
> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3...rdgreen9ww.jpg
> seems to work.
>
>
> Keith
I am confused now, is that Kate's pic or Yours Kieth ??

"SpiKe >" <no-one@home.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:wOmJe.820$Dm5.195@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "Keith Edkins" <keith.edkins@gwydir.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dd4dns$51s$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>
>> "Kate" <@*slamaspam*.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:dd31qn$m4h$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk...
>>
>>>>>
>>>> That didn`t seem to work. I`ll try again...
>>>> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3711/commonlizardgreen9ww.jpg[/IMG][/url]
>>>>
>>>> Kate
>>> I give up!
>>> Kate
>>>
>>
>>
>> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3...rdgreen9ww.jpg
>> seems to work.
>>
>>
>> Keith
> I am confused now, is that Kate's pic or Yours Kieth ??

It`s mine! So I just had delete the [/IMG][/url] bit? I think that
was about the only thing I didn`t try... Thanks, Keith.

David : I have Demon Home Office, so the webspace should be available.
However, it won`t accept my password and I get an error message. I
shall have to speak to Demon to see what I am doing wrong. Meanwhile,
the lizard photo may be seen at the above URL that Keith got to work
for me.

Thanks again
Kate

	#1
Kate	lizard ID please I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no website to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the internet of the common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green than this one was. I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long, including the tail, which was the same length as the body. There were rows of pale spots down its back. I guess that it must have been a common lizard, as it looked nothing like the sand lizard, and it certainly wasn`t a slowworm. Kate

	#2
Larry Stoter	Re: lizard ID please "Kate" <@slamaspam.demon.co.uk> wrote: > I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no website > to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the internet of the > common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green than this one was. > I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long, including the tail, which was > the same length as the body. There were rows of pale spots down its > back. I guess that it must have been a common lizard, as it looked > nothing like the sand lizard, and it certainly wasn`t a slowworm. > > Kate Where did you see it? The locations for native Sand Lizard are pretty limited. If in a built-up area, I guess an escaped exotic is a distinct possibility? -- Larry Stoter

	#3
David Lee	Re: lizard ID please Kate wrote... >I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no website to >post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the internet of the common >lizard shows them to be a more muddy green than this one was. I reckon that >it was at least 9 cm long, including the tail, which was the same length as >the body. There were rows of pale spots down its back. I guess that it >must have been a common lizard, as it looked nothing like the sand lizard, >and it certainly wasn`t a slowworm. I believe that the male sand lizard is our only bright green native lizard. (Supposed to be particularly intense green in the breeding season). David

	#4
Kate	Re: lizard ID please "Larry Stoter" <larry@cymru.freewire.co.uk> wrote in message news:1h0ql0u.sicxsg115zl9gN%larry@cymru.freewire.c o.uk... > "Kate" <@slamaspam.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >> I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no >> website >> to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the internet of >> the >> common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green than this one >> was. >> I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long, including the tail, which >> was >> the same length as the body. There were rows of pale spots down >> its >> back. I guess that it must have been a common lizard, as it looked >> nothing like the sand lizard, and it certainly wasn`t a slowworm. >> >> Kate > > Where did you see it? The locations for native Sand Lizard are > pretty > limited. > > If in a built-up area, I guess an escaped exotic is a distinct > possibility? > -- > Larry Stoter Dorset (Moors Valley Country Park) - one of the areas the sand lizard may still be seen. However, this green lizard bore no resemblance to the pictures I saw of sand lizards on line. If it was an escapee, it had legged it pretty far as it was a long way from houses! Unless someone got fed up with a pet and released it in the Park deliberately. I may have to print a copy of the photo I took. Perhaps one of the Rangers may be able to identify it, or confirm that it is not a native species. It had extremely long toes on its back feet, but maybe that`s normal for lizards? Thanks Kate

	#5
Kate	Re: lizard ID please "David Lee" <davidlee_malvern@dont.use.this.bit.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:uZmdnYdATLe2oGzfRVnyvQ@eclipse.net.uk... > Kate wrote... >>I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no >>website to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the >>internet of the common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green >>than this one was. I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long, >>including the tail, which was the same length as the body. There >>were rows of pale spots down its back. I guess that it must have >>been a common lizard, as it looked nothing like the sand lizard, and >>it certainly wasn`t a slowworm. > > I believe that the male sand lizard is our only bright green native > lizard. (Supposed to be particularly intense green in the breeding > season). > > David It turns out that this lizard was a Common. According to the HCT`s website, common lizards are normally brown, but can be green, yellow, or nearly black. It certainly looked exotic in green. Kate

	#6
Alaca	Re: lizard ID please Kate wrote: dd0q71$oic$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk, > "David Lee" <davidlee_malvern@dont.use.this.bit.hotmail.com> wrote in > message news:uZmdnYdATLe2oGzfRVnyvQ@eclipse.net.uk... >> Kate wrote... >>> I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no >>> website to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the >>> internet of the common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green >>> than this one was. I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long, >>> including the tail, which was the same length as the body. There >>> were rows of pale spots down its back. I guess that it must have >>> been a common lizard, as it looked nothing like the sand lizard, and >>> it certainly wasn`t a slowworm. >> >> I believe that the male sand lizard is our only bright green native >> lizard. (Supposed to be particularly intense green in the breeding >> season). >> >> David > It turns out that this lizard was a Common. According to the HCT`s > website, common lizards are normally brown, but can be green, yellow, > or nearly black. > It certainly looked exotic in green. > > Kate Only the females are normally brown, the males are indeed 'exotic'bright green at the sides. -- ¨°º°¨Peter Alaca¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨

	#7
Kate	Re: lizard ID please "Alaca" <P.Alaca@3075.NN> wrote in message news:42f3fc31$0$74537$dbd4f001@news.wanadoo.nl... > Kate wrote: dd0q71$oic$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk, > >> "David Lee" <davidlee_malvern@dont.use.this.bit.hotmail.com> wrote >> in >> message news:uZmdnYdATLe2oGzfRVnyvQ@eclipse.net.uk... >>> Kate wrote... >>>> I saw a very bright green lizard today (I have a photo, but no >>>> website to post it, unfortunately). Looking at photos on the >>>> internet of the common lizard shows them to be a more muddy green >>>> than this one was. I reckon that it was at least 9 cm long, >>>> including the tail, which was the same length as the body. There >>>> were rows of pale spots down its back. I guess that it must have >>>> been a common lizard, as it looked nothing like the sand lizard, >>>> and >>>> it certainly wasn`t a slowworm. >>> >>> I believe that the male sand lizard is our only bright green >>> native >>> lizard. (Supposed to be particularly intense green in the breeding >>> season). >>> >>> David >> It turns out that this lizard was a Common. According to the HCT`s >> website, common lizards are normally brown, but can be green, >> yellow, >> or nearly black. >> It certainly looked exotic in green. >> >> Kate > > Only the females are normally brown, the males > are indeed 'exotic'bright green at the sides. > > -- > ¨°º°¨Peter Alaca¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨°º°¨ > Peter : this lizard was green all over - nose to tail-tip, legs, the lot - not just down the sides. That was why I wasn`t sure what type it was initially. I wish I could post the photo I took somewhere, then you could see just how green it was! Kate

	#8
SpiKe	Re: lizard ID please > Peter : this lizard was green all over - nose to tail-tip, legs, the > lot - not just down the sides. That was why I wasn`t sure what type it > was initially. I wish I could post the photo I took somewhere, then you > could see just how green it was! > > Kate I havent tried it but it might be worth you checking it out http://imageshack.us/

	#9
Kate	Re: lizard ID please "SpiKe >" <no-one@home.com.invalid> wrote in message news:GB6Je.23508$Fx3.4656@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net... > >> Peter : this lizard was green all over - nose to tail-tip, legs, >> the >> lot - not just down the sides. That was why I wasn`t sure what >> type it was initially. I wish I could post the photo I took >> somewhere, then you could see just how green it was! >> >> Kate > I havent tried it but it might be worth you checking it out > > http://imageshack.us/ > Thanks,Spike. I don`t know if it will work until I post it, but here`s the URL I was allocated : http://imageshack.us][/url] Kate

	#16
Keith Edkins	Re: lizard ID please "Kate" <@slamaspam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:dd31qn$m4h$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk... >>> >> That didn`t seem to work. I`ll try again... >> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3711/commonlizardgreen9ww.jpg[/IMG][/url] >> >> Kate > I give up! > Kate > http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3...rdgreen9ww.jpg seems to work. Keith

	#17
SpiKe	Re: lizard ID please "Keith Edkins" <keith.edkins@gwydir.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:dd4dns$51s$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk... > > "Kate" <@slamaspam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message > news:dd31qn$m4h$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk... > >>>> >>> That didn`t seem to work. I`ll try again... >>> http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3711/commonlizardgreen9ww.jpg[/IMG][/url] >>> >>> Kate >> I give up! >> Kate >> > > > http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/3...rdgreen9ww.jpg > seems to work. > > > Keith I am confused now, is that Kate's pic or Yours Kieth ??