| #1 | |
|
|
I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. Would it be a queen ? -- Sleepalot aa #1385 |
| #2 | |
|
|
Sleepalot wrote:
> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. > Would it be a queen ? Or a hornet, in which case I think you'd notice it being distinctly brownish. Ideally get a photo of it on graph paper... ;-) Mike. -- If reply address = connectfee, add an r because it is free not fee. |
| #3 | |
|
|
"Mike Coon" <mjcoon@@connectfee.co.uk> wrote:
>Sleepalot wrote: >> I've got an enormous wasp in my dining room. >> Would it be a queen ? > >Or a hornet, in which case I think you'd notice it being distinctly >brownish. Ideally get a photo of it on graph paper... ;-) > Hmmm. Trouble is, I'm terrified of the bleeders! I know I can kill it, if only I can get to my can of WD40 - It's in a box in the dinig room! <sob> -- Sleepalot aa #1385 |
| #4 | |
|
|
"Mike Coon" <mjcoon@@connectfee.co.uk> wrote in message news:dll84h$cbk$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk... > Sleepalot wrote: > > I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. > > Would it be a queen ? > > > Or a hornet, in which case I think you'd notice it being distinctly > brownish. Ideally get a photo of it on graph paper... ;-) > OK, here's what to do. Get a sheet of glass or thin acrylic sheet. Place a glass tumbler over wasp/hornet. Slide glass/acrylic sheet under tumbler. Place sheet and tumbler over graph paper. Now, place a drop of honey or syrup on glass/acrylic sheet and manoeuvre tumbler over same. When wasp/hornet starts a-supping remove tumbler and photograph to your hearts content. Then post the images. QED. Next? :-)) -- ned http://www.bugsandweeds.co.uk last update 14.11.2005 |
| #5 | |
|
|
Sleepalot wrote: ia7sn15b4kobc58fvtsbsto7811541mdme@4ax.com,
> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. > Would it be a queen ? Yes, in this time of year it is a queen but what is wrong with queens? -- P.A. |
| #6 | |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:20:15 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alac@151105.nn>
wrote: >Sleepalot wrote: ia7sn15b4kobc58fvtsbsto7811541mdme@4ax.com, > >> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >> Would it be a queen ? > >Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >but what is wrong with queens? I suggest you take this matter up in demon.local, and have set a follow-up and crosspost accordingly. -- Paul Rooney |
| #7 | |
|
|
re: wasp
"ned" <me@privacy.net> wrote: >OK, here's what to do. >Get a sheet of glass or thin acrylic sheet. >Place a glass tumbler over wasp/hornet. >Slide glass/acrylic sheet under tumbler. >Place sheet and tumbler over graph paper. >Now, place a drop of honey or syrup on glass/acrylic sheet and >manoeuvre tumbler over same. >When wasp/hornet starts a-supping remove tumbler and photograph to >your hearts content. >Then post the images. >QED. >Next? :-)) I pretty sure that ain't gonna happen! -- Sleepalot aa #1385 |
| #8 | |
|
|
Paul Rooney wrote:
> "Peter Alaca" wrote: >> Sleepalot wrote: >>> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >>> Would it be a queen ? >> Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >> but what is wrong with queens? > I suggest you take this matter up in demon.local, and have set a > follow-up and crosspost accordingly. Why is that? And what is demon.local? -- P.A. |
| #9 | |
|
|
In article <437e4131$0$59044$dbd4f001@news.wanadoo.nl>, Peter Alaca <P.Alac@151105.nn> writes >Paul Rooney wrote: >> "Peter Alaca" wrote: >>> Sleepalot wrote: > >>>> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >>>> Would it be a queen ? > >>> Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >>> but what is wrong with queens? > >> I suggest you take this matter up in demon.local, and have set a >> follow-up and crosspost accordingly. > >Why is that? Because he's an idiot who thinks he's being clever :-( >And what is demon.local? > A newsgroup for subscribers to Demon ISP to chat in. Note that the poster isn't a Demon subscriber but seems to like spamming that particular newsgroup. -- Malcolm |
| #10 | |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:54:07 +0000, Malcolm
<Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >In article <437e4131$0$59044$dbd4f001@news.wanadoo.nl>, Peter Alaca ><P.Alac@151105.nn> writes >>Paul Rooney wrote: >>> "Peter Alaca" wrote: >>>> Sleepalot wrote: >> >>>>> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >>>>> Would it be a queen ? >> >>>> Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >>>> but what is wrong with queens? >> >>> I suggest you take this matter up in demon.local, and have set a >>> follow-up and crosspost accordingly. >> >>Why is that? > >Because he's an idiot who thinks he's being clever :-( > >>And what is demon.local? >> >A newsgroup for subscribers to Demon ISP to chat in. Note that the >poster isn't a Demon subscriber but seems to like spamming that >particular newsgroup. Libel! -- JK |
| #11 | |
|
|
Malcolm wrote: eVVmzgLvgufDFws5@indaal.demon.co.uk,
> In article <437e4131$0$59044$dbd4f001@news.wanadoo.nl>, Peter Alaca > <P.Alac@151105.nn> writes >> Paul Rooney wrote: >>> "Peter Alaca" wrote: >>>> Sleepalot wrote: >> >>>>> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >>>>> Would it be a queen ? >> >>>> Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >>>> but what is wrong with queens? >> >>> I suggest you take this matter up in demon.local, and have set a >>> follow-up and crosspost accordingly. >> >> Why is that? > > Because he's an idiot who thinks he's being clever :-( > >> And what is demon.local? >> > A newsgroup for subscribers to Demon ISP to chat in. Note that the > poster isn't a Demon subscriber but seems to like spamming that > particular newsgroup. In that case I prefere a queen wasp and a dining room. -- P.A. |
| #12 | |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:09:18 +0000, JK <johnkaye@casakeye.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:54:07 +0000, Malcolm ><Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >> >>In article <437e4131$0$59044$dbd4f001@news.wanadoo.nl>, Peter Alaca >><P.Alac@151105.nn> writes >>>Paul Rooney wrote: >>>> "Peter Alaca" wrote: >>>>> Sleepalot wrote: >>> >>>>>> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >>>>>> Would it be a queen ? >>> >>>>> Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >>>>> but what is wrong with queens? >>> >>>> I suggest you take this matter up in demon.local, and have set a >>>> follow-up and crosspost accordingly. >>> >>>Why is that? >> >>Because he's an idiot who thinks he's being clever :-( >> >>>And what is demon.local? >>> >>A newsgroup for subscribers to Demon ISP to chat in. Note that the >>poster isn't a Demon subscriber but seems to like spamming that >>particular newsgroup. > >Libel! Slander! -- Ben Newsam |
| #13 | |
|
|
Ben Newsam wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:09:18 +0000, JK <johnkaye@casakeye.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:54:07 +0000, Malcolm >><Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> >>>In article <437e4131$0$59044$dbd4f001@news.wanadoo.nl>, Peter Alaca >>><P.Alac@151105.nn> writes >>>>Paul Rooney wrote: >>>>> "Peter Alaca" wrote: >>>>>> Sleepalot wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >>>>>>> Would it be a queen ? >>>> >>>>>> Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >>>>>> but what is wrong with queens? >>>> >>>>> I suggest you take this matter up in demon.local, and have set a >>>>> follow-up and crosspost accordingly. >>>> >>>>Why is that? >>> >>>Because he's an idiot who thinks he's being clever :-( >>> >>>>And what is demon.local? >>>> >>>A newsgroup for subscribers to Demon ISP to chat in. Note that the >>>poster isn't a Demon subscriber but seems to like spamming that >>>particular newsgroup. >> >>Libel! > > Slander! Cod! -- ah |
| #14 | |
|
|
Ben Newsam<bennewsam@wetfich.com> wrote on Saturday 19 Nov 2005 5:41 pm:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:09:18 +0000, JK <johnkaye@casakeye.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:54:07 +0000, Malcolm >><Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> >>>In article <437e4131$0$59044$dbd4f001@news.wanadoo.nl>, Peter Alaca >>><P.Alac@151105.nn> writes >>>>Paul Rooney wrote: >>>>> "Peter Alaca" wrote: >>>>>> Sleepalot wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >>>>>>> Would it be a queen ? >>>> >>>>>> Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >>>>>> but what is wrong with queens? >>>> >>>>> I suggest you take this matter up in demon.local, and have set a >>>>> follow-up and crosspost accordingly. >>>> >>>>Why is that? >>> >>>Because he's an idiot who thinks he's being clever :-( >>> >>>>And what is demon.local? >>>> >>>A newsgroup for subscribers to Demon ISP to chat in. Note that the >>>poster isn't a Demon subscriber but seems to like spamming that >>>particular newsgroup. >> >>Libel! > > Slander! > > -- > > Ben Newsam Libel is written; slander is spoken. I haven't heard anything with my ears on this NG. -- Edwin Hutton (use edDOThuttonATlsaevaPOINTuklinuxSTOPnet for email) ....Grant we beseech Thee that, ... during our journeys through the Internet we will ... treat with charity and patience all those souls whom we encounter. Amen.From <http://www.catholic.org/isidore> |
| #15 | |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:08:27 +0000, "e.hutton"
<caterpillar@amuscaria.invalid> wrote: >Libel is written; slander is spoken. >I haven't heard anything with my ears on this NG. >A newsgroup for subscribers to Demon ISP to _chat_ in. -- Ben Newsam |
| #16 | |
|
|
Peter Alaca <P.Alac@151105.nn> observed
>Sleepalot wrote: ia7sn15b4kobc58fvtsbsto7811541mdme@4ax.com, > >> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >> Would it be a queen ? > >Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >but what is wrong with queens? > They don't sting? Mike [The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting] -- Michael J Davis <>< Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused the meaning of "discussion" with "digression". <>< |
| #17 | |
|
|
Michael J Davis wrote: 6HwD8JGQdxgDFwAu@trustsof.demon.co.uk,
> Peter Alaca <P.Alac@151105.nn> observed >> Sleepalot wrote: ia7sn15b4kobc58fvtsbsto7811541mdme@4ax.com, >> >>> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >>> Would it be a queen ? >> >> Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >> but what is wrong with queens? >> > They don't sting? As far as I know, only the female workers sting, but I am not very sure (Never tried a queen). As long as you don't disturb a nest, there is no reason to fear wasps. And a queen is always alone. Just show her the door. -- º°º°º°º < Peter Alaca > º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º° |
| #18 | |
|
|
Peter Alaca wrote:
> Michael J Davis wrote: 6HwD8JGQdxgDFwAu@trustsof.demon.co.uk, > >> Peter Alaca <P.Alac@151105.nn> observed >>> Sleepalot wrote: ia7sn15b4kobc58fvtsbsto7811541mdme@4ax.com, >>> >>>> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >>>> Would it be a queen ? >>> >>> Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >>> but what is wrong with queens? >>> >> They don't sting? > > As far as I know, only the female workers sting, > but I am not very sure (Never tried a queen). > As long as you don't disturb a nest, there is no > reason to fear wasps. And a queen is always > alone. Just show her the door. Since the sting is a modified ovipositor I presume they don't having a stinging mechanism if their job is laying eggs. Mike. -- If reply address = connectfee, add an r because it is free not fee. |
| #19 | |
|
|
Mike Coon wrote:
> Peter Alaca wrote: >> Michael J Davis wrote: >>> Peter Alaca observed >>>> Sleepalot wrote: >>>>> I've got an enormous wasp in my didning room. >>>>> Would it be a queen ? >>>> Yes, in this time of year it is a queen >>>> but what is wrong with queens? >>> They don't sting? >> As far as I know, only the female workers sting, >> but I am not very sure (Never tried a queen). >> As long as you don't disturb a nest, there is no >> reason to fear wasps. And a queen is always >> alone. Just show her the door. > > > Since the sting is a modified ovipositor I presume they > don't having a stinging mechanism if their job is laying eggs. That's what I thought. -- p.a. |
| #20 | |
|
|
OK I have to step in here.
Queen wasps can sting. It's not just the queen that lay eggs so I'm afraid the modified ovipositor theory doesn't work. Catwasp |
| #21 | |
|
|
catwasp wrote in message ...
> OK I have to step in here. > > Queen wasps can sting. It's not just the queen that lay eggs so I'm > afraid the modified ovipositor theory doesn't work. I thought that was the case - it's confirmed at http://www.kendall-bioresearch.co.uk/wasp.htm Incidentally this appears to be an extremely good entomological resource (which I have just book-marked!) and the owner - David Kendall, Consulting Entomologist - offers a free insect identification service (for non-comercial purposes) based on emailed descriptions or images. He will also identify (generally down to species)samples posted in by UK residents for a very reasonable fee of 10 quid per sample. David |
| #22 | |
|
|
In article <1132749475.650580.241740@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>, catwasp <catherine.catwasp@gmail.com> writes >OK I have to step in here. > >Queen wasps can sting. It's not just the queen that lay eggs so I'm >afraid the modified ovipositor theory doesn't work. > The following URL seems reasonably authoritative and confirms that queens can sting, but the idea that wasps other than queens can lay eggs isn't mentioned and is certainly not something I've come across before. http://www.kendall-bioresearch.co.uk/wasp.htm -- Malcolm |
| #23 | |
|
|
Certainly the queen lays most of the eggs upon a nest. However, even
though they are unfertilised, workers can produce males and egg genotyping has revealed that this often takes place, to varying degrees, depending upon the species in question. Catwasp |
| #24 | |
|
|
Malcolm wrote...
>>Queen wasps can sting. It's not just the queen that lay eggs so I'm >>afraid the modified ovipositor theory doesn't work. >> > The following URL seems reasonably authoritative and confirms that queens > can sting, but the idea that wasps other than queens can lay eggs isn't > mentioned and is certainly not something I've come across before. > > http://www.kendall-bioresearch.co.uk/wasp.htm I've come across the idea of workers laying eggs before but can't remember the details. A line in Michael Chinery's Collins Field Guide to Insects (UK/Europe) says of social hymenoptera workers: "These [workers] are also female insects but they are not fully developed and only in exceptional circumstances can they lay eggs." Perhaps "exceptional circumstances" may include a colony under stress with no resident queen? Re the Kendall Bioresearch site - as I have already posted it appears to be an excellent resource but it is blighted by an irritating EasySpace advertising banner that keeps popping up. However you can easily block this (at least in Internet Explorer) by adding www.kendall-bioresearch.co.uk to the "Restricted Sites" zone of your browser(Internet Options/Security). By default this forbids scripts from running and so kills the banner. So far I haven't come across any problems with doing this although you can quickly move the site back into the Internet Zone if something doesn't work. David |
| #25 | |
|
|
In an advanced eusocial insect like the one in question I think it
would be unusual for egg-laying to take place by workers except under the exceptional circumstances you mentioned. Worker egg laying is more common in primitive eusocials such as Polistes but I'm just trying to make the point that egg layers can sting. Catwasp |
| #26 | |
|
|
David Lee wrote: qcednRODUOA05BneRVnytg@eclipse.net.uk,
> Malcolm wrote... >>> Queen wasps can sting. It's not just the queen that lay eggs so I'm >>> afraid the modified ovipositor theory doesn't work. >>> >> The following URL seems reasonably authoritative and confirms that >> queens can sting, but the idea that wasps other than queens can lay >> eggs isn't mentioned and is certainly not something I've come across >> before. http://www.kendall-bioresearch.co.uk/wasp.htm > > I've come across the idea of workers laying eggs before but can't > remember the details. A line in Michael Chinery's Collins Field > Guide to Insects (UK/Europe) says of social hymenoptera workers: > "These [workers] are also female insects but they are not fully > developed and only in exceptional circumstances can they lay eggs." > Perhaps "exceptional circumstances" may include a colony under > stress with no resident queen? > Re the Kendall Bioresearch site - as I have already posted it appears > to be an excellent resource but it is blighted by an irritating > EasySpace advertising banner that keeps popping up. However you can > easily block this (at least in Internet Explorer) by adding > www.kendall-bioresearch.co.uk to the "Restricted Sites" zone of your > browser(Internet Options/Security). By default this forbids scripts > from running and so kills the banner. So far I haven't come across > any problems with doing this although you can quickly move the site > back into the Internet Zone if something doesn't work. > David in my main sources (Peters et al 2004, De wespen en mieren van Nederland" and Bellmann 1995, "Bijen Wespen en Mieren"), I found no indication for more then one queen among the (Dolicho)Vespula species, but it is mentioned for Polistes (fieldwasps). The same information is on this site. http://es.rice.edu/projects/Bios321/Polistinewasps.html Colonies are started in the spring by mated, overwintered females that emerge from their hibernation sites on warm days. While single females sometimes start a colony, often times a group of females will found a colony together. This group of females must fight amongst themselves to establish a dominance hierarchy. The female at the top of the hierarchy becomes the queen, while the rest of the foundresses start to function as workers. The ovaries of the queen become well developed and she turns into the main egg layer. The ovaries of the rest of the foundresses start to decrease in size as they take on the dangerous tasks of foraging for water, for plant fibers to construct the nest, and for nectar and caterpillars to feed the queens and her offspring. See also http://www.earthlife.net/insects/socwasps.html -- º°º°º°º < Peter Alaca > º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º° |
| #27 | |
|
|
In message <BNrhVXKsiGhDFwfo@indaal.demon.co.uk>, Malcolm
<Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk> writes > >In article <1132749475.650580.241740@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>, >catwasp <catherine.catwasp@gmail.com> writes >>OK I have to step in here. >> >>Queen wasps can sting. It's not just the queen that lay eggs so I'm >>afraid the modified ovipositor theory doesn't work. >> >The following URL seems reasonably authoritative and confirms that >queens can sting, but the idea that wasps other than queens can lay >eggs isn't mentioned and is certainly not something I've come across >before. > >http://www.kendall-bioresearch.co.uk/wasp.htm > It's been seen in several social hymenoptera. For example http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20050319/bob8.asp -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
| #28 | |
|
|
I was wataching life in the undergrowth last night and it showed
Bumblebee workers laying eggs. It happens towards the end of the season when the queen stops producing the suppressent pheromone because she needs to lay eggs that will provide fertile adults. David attenborough said it so it must be true ![]() |