Brighton suggestions?

I hope to visit Brighton soon. I know there is a naturist beach which I
have been to quite a few years ago. It is an official beach but I believe
that it is also a "cruisy" area, including the paths etc nearby and esp of
an evening. That's fine with me and I expect to visit there but I was
wondering if in light of this the area is monitored by the police - for
instance am I likely to find police cars driving past, which would
definitely put me off going there.

"Ruite A." <loyy6e@gospamthisone.org> wrote in message
news:1nRni.54$8e1.28@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
>I hope to visit Brighton soon. I know there is a naturist beach which I
>have been to quite a few years ago. It is an official beach but I believe
>that it is also a "cruisy" area, including the paths etc nearby and esp of
>an evening. That's fine with me and I expect to visit there but I was
>wondering if in light of this the area is monitored by the police - for
>instance am I likely to find police cars driving past, which would
>definitely put me off going there.
>
Why?

Police cars are quite harmless unless you jump out in front of them.

On Jul 20, 1:25 am, "John Gwalter" <n...@stoppage.gwalter.co.uk>
wrote:
> "Ruite A." <loy...@gospamthisone.org> wrote in message
>
> news:1nRni.54$8e1.28@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...>I hope to visit Brighton soon. I know there is a naturist beach which I
> >have been to quite a few years ago. It is an official beach but I believe
> >that it is also a "cruisy" area, including the paths etc nearby and esp of
> >an evening. That's fine with me and I expect to visit there but I was
> >wondering if in light of this the area is monitored by the police - for
> >instance am I likely to find police cars driving past, which would
> >definitely put me off going there.
>
> Why?
>
> Police cars are quite harmless unless you jump out in front of them.

Or you are there for illicit purposes!!

"Pete Knight" <pete084@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184912830.338586.249450@w3g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
> On Jul 20, 1:25 am, "John Gwalter" <n...@stoppage.gwalter.co.uk>
> wrote:
>> "Ruite A." <loy...@gospamthisone.org> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1nRni.54$8e1.28@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...>I hope to visit Brighton
>> soon. I know there is a naturist beach which I
>> >have been to quite a few years ago. It is an official beach but I
>> >believe
>> >that it is also a "cruisy" area, including the paths etc nearby and esp
>> >of
>> >an evening. That's fine with me and I expect to visit there but I was
>> >wondering if in light of this the area is monitored by the police - for
>> >instance am I likely to find police cars driving past, which would
>> >definitely put me off going there.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Police cars are quite harmless unless you jump out in front of them.
>
> Or you are there for illicit purposes!!
>

Both comments are fair enough in a sense, but I would rather not visit an
area if one's motives may be questioned in doing so and if the area has a
bad reputation locally.

"Ruite A." <loyy6e@gospamthisone.org> wrote in message
news

_Yni.17$nm3.1@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "Pete Knight" <pete084@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1184912830.338586.249450@w3g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
>> On Jul 20, 1:25 am, "John Gwalter" <n...@stoppage.gwalter.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> "Ruite A." <loy...@gospamthisone.org> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:1nRni.54$8e1.28@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...>I hope to visit Brighton
>>> soon. I know there is a naturist beach which I
>>> >have been to quite a few years ago. It is an official beach but I
>>> >believe
>>> >that it is also a "cruisy" area, including the paths etc nearby and esp
>>> >of
>>> >an evening. That's fine with me and I expect to visit there but I was
>>> >wondering if in light of this the area is monitored by the police - for
>>> >instance am I likely to find police cars driving past, which would
>>> >definitely put me off going there.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> Police cars are quite harmless unless you jump out in front of them.
>>
>> Or you are there for illicit purposes!!
>>
>
> Both comments are fair enough in a sense, but I would rather not visit an
> area if one's motives may be questioned in doing so and if the area has a
> bad reputation locally.
I would think the Police presence would be to protect the beach users rights
and stop any illicit/cruising behaviour and therefore as mentioned in other
posts it is the far safer beach option in/near Brighton as I believe there
is an unofficial well used beach nearby which has made users feel unsafe.

There is also (if the weathers not great!) Bristol Gardens Health Spa
http://www.bghs.co.uk/index.htm which has had some good reviews here!

A report on your stay would be good as we hope touse a friends flat one
weekend away from the kids and (as the wife puts it) have a naturist
adventure!!!

Ric blondie64

	#1
Ruite A.	Brighton suggestions? I hope to visit Brighton soon. I know there is a naturist beach which I have been to quite a few years ago. It is an official beach but I believe that it is also a "cruisy" area, including the paths etc nearby and esp of an evening. That's fine with me and I expect to visit there but I was wondering if in light of this the area is monitored by the police - for instance am I likely to find police cars driving past, which would definitely put me off going there.

	#2
John Gwalter	Re: Brighton suggestions? "Ruite A." <loyy6e@gospamthisone.org> wrote in message news:1nRni.54$8e1.28@newsfe5-win.ntli.net... >I hope to visit Brighton soon. I know there is a naturist beach which I >have been to quite a few years ago. It is an official beach but I believe >that it is also a "cruisy" area, including the paths etc nearby and esp of >an evening. That's fine with me and I expect to visit there but I was >wondering if in light of this the area is monitored by the police - for >instance am I likely to find police cars driving past, which would >definitely put me off going there. > Why? Police cars are quite harmless unless you jump out in front of them.

	#3
Pete Knight	Re: Brighton suggestions? On Jul 20, 1:25 am, "John Gwalter" <n...@stoppage.gwalter.co.uk> wrote: > "Ruite A." <loy...@gospamthisone.org> wrote in message > > news:1nRni.54$8e1.28@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...>I hope to visit Brighton soon. I know there is a naturist beach which I > >have been to quite a few years ago. It is an official beach but I believe > >that it is also a "cruisy" area, including the paths etc nearby and esp of > >an evening. That's fine with me and I expect to visit there but I was > >wondering if in light of this the area is monitored by the police - for > >instance am I likely to find police cars driving past, which would > >definitely put me off going there. > > Why? > > Police cars are quite harmless unless you jump out in front of them. Or you are there for illicit purposes!!

	#4
Ruite A.	Re: Brighton suggestions? "Pete Knight" <pete084@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1184912830.338586.249450@w3g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com... > On Jul 20, 1:25 am, "John Gwalter" <n...@stoppage.gwalter.co.uk> > wrote: >> "Ruite A." <loy...@gospamthisone.org> wrote in message >> >> news:1nRni.54$8e1.28@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...>I hope to visit Brighton >> soon. I know there is a naturist beach which I >> >have been to quite a few years ago. It is an official beach but I >> >believe >> >that it is also a "cruisy" area, including the paths etc nearby and esp >> >of >> >an evening. That's fine with me and I expect to visit there but I was >> >wondering if in light of this the area is monitored by the police - for >> >instance am I likely to find police cars driving past, which would >> >definitely put me off going there. >> >> Why? >> >> Police cars are quite harmless unless you jump out in front of them. > > Or you are there for illicit purposes!! > Both comments are fair enough in a sense, but I would rather not visit an area if one's motives may be questioned in doing so and if the area has a bad reputation locally.

	#5
blondie64	Re: Brighton suggestions? "Ruite A." <loyy6e@gospamthisone.org> wrote in message news_Yni.17$nm3.1@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net... > > "Pete Knight" <pete084@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:1184912830.338586.249450@w3g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com... >> On Jul 20, 1:25 am, "John Gwalter" <n...@stoppage.gwalter.co.uk> >> wrote: >>> "Ruite A." <loy...@gospamthisone.org> wrote in message >>> >>> news:1nRni.54$8e1.28@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...>I hope to visit Brighton >>> soon. I know there is a naturist beach which I >>> >have been to quite a few years ago. It is an official beach but I >>> >believe >>> >that it is also a "cruisy" area, including the paths etc nearby and esp >>> >of >>> >an evening. That's fine with me and I expect to visit there but I was >>> >wondering if in light of this the area is monitored by the police - for >>> >instance am I likely to find police cars driving past, which would >>> >definitely put me off going there. >>> >>> Why? >>> >>> Police cars are quite harmless unless you jump out in front of them. >> >> Or you are there for illicit purposes!! >> > > Both comments are fair enough in a sense, but I would rather not visit an > area if one's motives may be questioned in doing so and if the area has a > bad reputation locally. I would think the Police presence would be to protect the beach users rights and stop any illicit/cruising behaviour and therefore as mentioned in other posts it is the far safer beach option in/near Brighton as I believe there is an unofficial well used beach nearby which has made users feel unsafe. There is also (if the weathers not great!) Bristol Gardens Health Spa http://www.bghs.co.uk/index.htm which has had some good reviews here! A report on your stay would be good as we hope touse a friends flat one weekend away from the kids and (as the wife puts it) have a naturist adventure!!! Ric blondie64