| #1 | |
|
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2006/05/29/AR2006052900913.html http://tinyurl.com/pfcyy -- "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are 20 gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." -- Thomas Jefferson "There's hits in chicken." -- Wade Boggs |
| #2 | |
|
|
Jay Furr wrote:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- > dyn/content/article/2006/05/29/AR2006052900913.html > > http://tinyurl.com/pfcyy I predict most of the liberals of RSFC will see Reid as a hypocrite here...but a couple will defend him anyways using the yea but Republicans do worse defense. -- v/r Dread Pirate Rackham "You know one things that's wrong with this country? Everybody gets a chance to have their fair say." - President Clinton 28 May 1993 "There is nothing patriotic about hating your country, or pretending that you can love your country but despise your government." - President Clinton 5 May 1995 |
| #3 | |
|
|
Charles Beauchamp wrote:
> Jay Furr wrote: > >>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- >>dyn/content/article/2006/05/29/AR2006052900913.html >> >>http://tinyurl.com/pfcyy > > > I predict most of the liberals of RSFC will see Reid as a hypocrite > here...but a couple will defend him anyways using the yea but Republicans do > worse defense. good prediction. -- "when i visited Aden before collectivization, all the markets were full of fish product. After collectivization, the fish immediately disappeared." - Aleksandr Vassiliev, Soviet KGB official |
| #4 | |
|
|
Jay Furr wrote:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- > dyn/content/article/2006/05/29/AR2006052900913.html > > http://tinyurl.com/pfcyy > > -- > "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are 20 gods, or no god. > It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." -- Thomas Jefferson > > "There's hits in chicken." -- Wade Boggs /naiveté on/ He was just doing his job, free stuff would never influence him. I, for one, believe him. /naiveté off/ dam |
| #5 | |
|
|
Jay Furr <jfurr-nospam@nospam-furrs.org> wrote in
news:Xns97D38C7D5C1Dpennstatesux@216.168.3.44: > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- > dyn/content/article/2006/05/29/AR2006052900913.html > > http://tinyurl.com/pfcyy http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/000772.php "Only, there is an exception for gifts from governmental agencies (like the Nevada Athletic Commission) in the Senate ethics rules. So there is nothing untoward about Reid having accepted the free tickets. But it would still seem pretty bad if Reid had accepted the tickets and then stumped shamelessly for the commission. Only, he didn't. As was the case with Abramoff and the Marianas, Reid voted against the peddler's interest. As Solomon admits in the piece, Reid was advocating "the creation of a federal boxing commission that Nevada's agency feared might usurp its authority." Reid never changed his position. And this was a dramatically uncontroversial piece of legislation largely preoccupied with ensuring the safety of boxers by creating the United States Boxing Administration. It passed the Senate unanimously." dave |
| #6 | |
|
|
dave reid wrote:
> So there is nothing untoward about Reid having accepted the free tickets. Except if'n you're talking morality or integrity. But of course, that doesn't matter. It's only about what the rules spell out. dam |
| #7 | |
|
|
"dam" <dave.melvin@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1148998177.693104.193520@u72g2000cwu.googlegr oups.com: > Except if'n you're talking morality or integrity. But of course, that > doesn't matter. It's only about what the rules spell out. So does this higher standard apply only to Sen. Reid? Or the rest of the Democrats in the Congress? dave |
| #8 | |
|
|
Dave Reid wrote:
> "dam" <dave.melvin@gmail.com> wrote in > news:1148998177.693104.193520@u72g2000cwu.googlegr oups.com: > > > Except if'n you're talking morality or integrity. But of course, that > > doesn't matter. It's only about what the rules spell out. > > So does this higher standard apply only to Sen. Reid? Or the rest of > the Democrats in the Congress? > > dave You, me, EVERYONE. dam |
| #9 | |
|
|
Dave Reid wrote: > So does this higher standard apply only to Sen. Reid? > Or the rest of the Democrats in the Congress? Do you do anything else but whine? -Tom Enright > dave |
| #10 | |
|
|
"Tom Enright" <freddy_hayek@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1149018002.968397.285500@38g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com: > Do you do anything else but whine? Did Jonah Goldberg tell you to post that? dave |
| #11 | |
|
|
Jay Furr wrote:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- > dyn/content/article/2006/05/29/AR2006052900913.html > > http://tinyurl.com/pfcyy > Bah, chickenfeed. He's been getting land bills passed for his son's clients for years. Doug |
| #12 | |
|
|
"Tom Enright" <freddy_hayek@yahoo.com> writes:
> > Dave Reid wrote: > > > So does this higher standard apply only to Sen. Reid? > > Or the rest of the Democrats in the Congress? > > Do you do anything else but whine? Asking pertinent legal questions about law and justice is not "whining." Crying over what google puts on their banner for holidays, now that's whining. HTH. --Ralph Kennedy {ames,gatech,husc6,rutgers}!ncar!noao!asuvax!kenne dy {allegra,decvax,ihnp4,oddjob}--^ ^---------------The Wrong Choice internet: kennedy@asuvax.eas.asu.edu |