| #1 | |
|
|
Champ <news@champ.org.uk> wrote:
>On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:10:01 +0000, darsy <darsy@sticky.co.uk> wrote: > >>"Cane" <enac@ukrm.org> wrote: >> >>>Oi! Those are original Ray Main signed photographs. >> >>if you'd said Man Ray, I might have been impressed. > >I actually assumed that was what he meant, but was too ignorant to get >the name right. you know, you could well be right, there. -- d. |
| #2 | |
|
|
darsy
> Champ > >On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:10:01 +0000, darsy <darsy@sticky.co.uk> wrote: > > > >>"Cane" <enac@ukrm.org> wrote: > >> > >>>Oi! Those are original Ray Main signed photographs. > >> > >>if you'd said Man Ray, I might have been impressed. > > > >I actually assumed that was what he meant, but was too ignorant to get > >the name right. > > you know, you could well be right, there. Well, I wouldn't be surprised if Cane spent the best part of a grand on each, thinking the former is the latter. -- ts350 xl600v petert |