| #1 | |
|
|
"Archibald" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:3F03CF27.CFEA64A@privacy.net... > Obiwan wrote: > > > > In article <3F012EFE.340CA759@privacy.net>, > > Archibald <me@privacy.net> wrote: > > > > > As the inmates of uk.legal have discovered, Mr Mould, along with his > > > mentor and hero Jim Hulbert, is extremely obsessive and malicious. It > > > all seems to be based upon fantasies and obsessions in his mind rather > > > than upon any facts or evidence. It would appear that he is unemployed > > > (unemployable?) and very lonely and has no other life like normal folk. > > snip Obiwan truth as it does not fit in with Husberk's obsession > > > > He is now convinced that you are one of his "opponents" and he will > > > leave no stone unturned in his efforts to "expose" you and nothing you > > > say or any fact to the contrary will convince him otherwise. He will > > > never admit he is wrong or apologise. > > > > Isn't that how you behaved when you were convinced that I was Paul > > Todd and you maliciously libelled him? Did you apologise to either of > > us? > > Get over it Obi. That was all to do with David Husband and I am not that > person. How many personalities have you got then, Schizo David? > I still remember how you made a very big fool of yourself and were > forced to publicly apologise to David Husband over your baseless claims > about his domain name "husbando.org.uk" UH? > > > If he is able to obtain a court order to force your ISP to divulge your > > > personal details that is likely to be just the beginning as he is likely > > > to publish those details on the Internet along with any personal details > > > he can obtain about your children, wife, girlfriend, etc. He seems to be > > > an extremely warped person. > > snip Obiwan truth because it is too close to home > > > > In my case he is convinced that I am another person he is obsessed with, > > > and he also thinks J S Tinks is the same person. This all seems to be > > > based upon the fact that we are all Newscene.com news-server > > > subscribers! > > > > It is based on the fact that you are one and the same, > > Not something you can prove as your claims have no basis in reality. Another one who demands 'proof' but does not understand what a finding of fact is. But I shall know just who you are 'real soon now'. |