wanderer

"Archibald" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:3F03CF27.CFEA64A@privacy.net...

<snip>

> Isn't it strange that whenever Hulbert and/or Mould are facing awkward
> or probing questions, they both go very quiet and you or an associated
> abusive sockpuppet pops up and tries to divert matters.

Must admit, after the initial comments from Mould, which I rebuffed very
firmly, he has been pretty conspicuous by his absence, although I did see a
couple of subsequent posts in other threads. I wonder if he's found out for
certain that I *ain't* who he though I was. No, no, he can't have done, coz
he *did* say he'd apologise if he was wrong!

Archibald

wanderer wrote:
>
> "Archibald" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:3F03CF27.CFEA64A@privacy.net...
>
> <snip>
>
> > Isn't it strange that whenever Hulbert and/or Mould are facing awkward
> > or probing questions, they both go very quiet and you or an associated
> > abusive sockpuppet pops up and tries to divert matters.
>
> Must admit, after the initial comments from Mould, which I rebuffed very
> firmly, he has been pretty conspicuous by his absence, although I did see a
> couple of subsequent posts in other threads.

He is displaying his "classic" behaviour patterns that we in uk.legal
have seen many, many times before involving many different "victims". I
think most normal people have concluded he is mentally ill and in need
of urgent professional help.

Before he infested uk.legal he infested uk.radio.amateur where he
displayed his rather distasteful obsession with menstruation along with
his familiar habit of publishing what he thinks are his opponents home
addresses and other personal details. He thinks this makes him look very
clever but in reality it just makes people realise what a nasty,
obsessive, spiteful and malicious character he really is. Unfortunately
his presence on the newsgroups attracts other malcontents and social
misfits who take advantage.

> I wonder if he's found out for
> certain that I *ain't* who he though I was.

I doubt it. More likely he is just attending to another of his many
obsessions. It seems to be a full-time occupation for him.

> No, no, he can't have done, coz
> he *did* say he'd apologise if he was wrong!

Don't hold your breath on that one!

Archie

Bear

Archibald wibbled ...

> I
> think most normal people have concluded he is mentally ill and in need
> of urgent professional help.

I think even the abnormal folk have probably reached that conclusion
too, by now
--
Bear
These are my own opinions, and not necessarily those of all Bears
"I was so much older then; I'm younger than that now"
Bear's Current Paw Track: Dust Junkies: "Movin' On (Mega Bubble Dub)"

Stan Mould

"Andy" <andy_j7@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:KbSMa.14643$i84.17524@newsfep2-gui.server.ntli.net...
>
> "wanderer" <wanderer@tesco.net> wrote in message
> news:be0ksu$128r6b$1@ID-168920.news.dfncis.de...
> > "Archibald" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
> > news:3F03CF27.CFEA64A@privacy.net...
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Isn't it strange that whenever Hulbert and/or Mould are facing
awkward
> > > or probing questions, they both go very quiet and you or an
associated
> > > abusive sockpuppet pops up and tries to divert matters.
> >
> > Must admit, after the initial comments from Mould, which I
rebuffed very
> > firmly, he has been pretty conspicuous by his absence, although
I did see
> a
> > couple of subsequent posts in other threads. I wonder if he's
found out
> for
> > certain that I *ain't* who he though I was
>
> He really isn"t very good at this tracing lark. For a while he
shouted very
> loudly that Croft and myself were the same person, he even said he
had
> "proof".

Either way, I'll soon know who you are.

Andy

"Stan Mould" <stanmould@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:v03Na.945$OF6.479@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "Andy" <andy_j7@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:KbSMa.14643$i84.17524@newsfep2-gui.server.ntli.net...
> >
> > "wanderer" <wanderer@tesco.net> wrote in message
> > news:be0ksu$128r6b$1@ID-168920.news.dfncis.de...
> > > "Archibald" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
> > > news:3F03CF27.CFEA64A@privacy.net...
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > Isn't it strange that whenever Hulbert and/or Mould are facing
> awkward
> > > > or probing questions, they both go very quiet and you or an
> associated
> > > > abusive sockpuppet pops up and tries to divert matters.
> > >
> > > Must admit, after the initial comments from Mould, which I
> rebuffed very
> > > firmly, he has been pretty conspicuous by his absence, although
> I did see
> > a
> > > couple of subsequent posts in other threads. I wonder if he's
> found out
> > for
> > > certain that I *ain't* who he though I was
> >
> > He really isn"t very good at this tracing lark. For a while he
> shouted very
> > loudly that Croft and myself were the same person, he even said he
> had
> > "proof".
>
> Either way, I'll soon know who you are.


So i"m not Croft then? Or am i? You are confusing me Stan, who am i?
>
>