CT

Bear wrote:

> Looks great, but only a 2 megapixel camera, and I do use my phone
> camera quite a bit. Does look good though.

*Only* 2mp? How many do you need?! You want the-moon-onna-stick you
do )

My first 'proper' digital camera was only 1.2mp and my current one is
only 3.2mp

--
Chris

Bear

In article <xn0f9ie8i7d36r008@news.individual.net>, CT says...
> Bear wrote:
>
> > Looks great, but only a 2 megapixel camera, and I do use my phone
> > camera quite a bit. Does look good though.
>
> *Only* 2mp? How many do you need?! You want the-moon-onna-stick you
> do )
>
> My first 'proper' digital camera was only 1.2mp and my current one is
> only 3.2mp

You're clearly a pikey.
--
Bear

CT

Bear wrote:
> In article <xn0f9ie8i7d36r008@news.individual.net>, CT says...
> >
> > My first 'proper' digital camera was only 1.2mp and my current one
> > is only 3.2mp
>
> You're clearly a pikey.

Indeed.

TBH, I keep thinking I *need* a new camera[1], but then I really only
do snaps and I don't even use the max resolution with this one.
1600x1200 is fine for 7x5 prints.

[1] That new Panasonic Lumix Compact with 10x optical zoom, for example.
--
Chris

Hog

Bear wrote:
> In article <xn0f9ie8i7d36r008@news.individual.net>, CT says...
>> Bear wrote:
>>
>>> Looks great, but only a 2 megapixel camera, and I do use my phone
>>> camera quite a bit. Does look good though.
>>
>> *Only* 2mp? How many do you need?! You want the-moon-onna-stick you
>> do )
>>
>> My first 'proper' digital camera was only 1.2mp and my current one is
>> only 3.2mp
>
> You're clearly a pikey.

I don't own a digital camera other than that in my phone.

"If I want pictures I will take a photographer along"

--
Hog
'03 ST4S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400