Re: Jesus wept

genuine_froggie@zeouane.org wrote:
> TOG@toil, chateau.murray@btinternet.com,
<chateau.murray@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > genuine_froggie@zeouane.org wrote:
> > > TOG@toil, chateau.murray@btinternet.com,
> > <chateau.murray@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > > > genuine_froggie@zeouane.org wrote:
> > > > > TOG@toil, chateau.murray@btinternet.com,
> > > > <chateau.murray@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > > > > > genuine_froggie@zeouane.org wrote:
> > > > > > > porl <porl@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > >
> > <snip to avoid binary filters>
> > >
> > > > But they're still differentiating.
> > >
> > > No they're not. They only ever mention it when I ask 'what do
you
> > think
> > > of [insert name of letter] that I wrote ?'.
>
> > Yes, they are. If someone said: "You write better than anyone I
know",
> > that would be different. By introducing nationality, they
> > differentiate. Fact. Just the mention of nationality is enough.
>
> Nope, and stating 'fact' doesn't make it so.
>
Well, your english is rustier than you believe.

>
<snip>>
> What wasn't untrue, that you ran out of petrol ? I don't recall
> saying that, but can't be arsed going to google to check, and so will
> take your word for it.

You did indeed say it.

> If it's the 'French petrol stations' thread
> that you started both here and on fr.rec.moto, I seem to recall
posting
> a calm, measured follow-up in which I asked the following quite
> legitimate question, in the polite, articulate, erudite manner that
has
> come to characterise all of my posts to UKRM:

Yeah, right.....

> why didn't you, a dedicated
> francophile with so much experience in the matter, know that on a
Sunday
> in rural France, you wouldn't be able to use your UK plastic ?

Nope, not getting diverted.
>
> My memory of your response, and again it's only a vague recollection
> so feel free to point to a google reference and prove me wrong,

Er, because it's on the web, it isn't proof, remember? Anyway, do your
own googling.
>
> So all in all, I don't recall calling you a twonk.
>
> Not that time, anyway.

You didn't. That was part of my posting here, not yours then.
>
<snip>
>
> I couldn't be more relaxed, and
> you really do flatter yourself if you think that your words are
having
> an adverse effect on me.
>
Oh, but they are......

Dance, boi.

	#1
TOG@toil, chateau.murray@btinternet.com,	Re: Jesus wept genuine_froggie@zeouane.org wrote: > TOG@toil, chateau.murray@btinternet.com, <chateau.murray@btinternet.com> wrote: > > genuine_froggie@zeouane.org wrote: > > > TOG@toil, chateau.murray@btinternet.com, > > <chateau.murray@btinternet.com> wrote: > > > > genuine_froggie@zeouane.org wrote: > > > > > TOG@toil, chateau.murray@btinternet.com, > > > > <chateau.murray@btinternet.com> wrote: > > > > > > genuine_froggie@zeouane.org wrote: > > > > > > > porl <porl@btinternet.com> wrote: > > > > > <snip to avoid binary filters> > > > > > > > But they're still differentiating. > > > > > > No they're not. They only ever mention it when I ask 'what do you > > think > > > of [insert name of letter] that I wrote ?'. > > > Yes, they are. If someone said: "You write better than anyone I know", > > that would be different. By introducing nationality, they > > differentiate. Fact. Just the mention of nationality is enough. > > Nope, and stating 'fact' doesn't make it so. > Well, your english is rustier than you believe. > <snip>> > What wasn't untrue, that you ran out of petrol ? I don't recall > saying that, but can't be arsed going to google to check, and so will > take your word for it. You did indeed say it. > If it's the 'French petrol stations' thread > that you started both here and on fr.rec.moto, I seem to recall posting > a calm, measured follow-up in which I asked the following quite > legitimate question, in the polite, articulate, erudite manner that has > come to characterise all of my posts to UKRM: Yeah, right..... > why didn't you, a dedicated > francophile with so much experience in the matter, know that on a Sunday > in rural France, you wouldn't be able to use your UK plastic ? Nope, not getting diverted. > > My memory of your response, and again it's only a vague recollection > so feel free to point to a google reference and prove me wrong, Er, because it's on the web, it isn't proof, remember? Anyway, do your own googling. > > So all in all, I don't recall calling you a twonk. > > Not that time, anyway. You didn't. That was part of my posting here, not yours then. > <snip> > > I couldn't be more relaxed, and > you really do flatter yourself if you think that your words are having > an adverse effect on me. > Oh, but they are...... Dance, boi.