| #1 | |
|
|
I need a reservation at the Grand Krasnapolsky from 21 August to 28
August. Website says they're full. Can someone who speaks the lingo give them a bell and ask them if they have a room for a quiet, articulate, well-behaved person...and her uncouth, stupid boyfriend. Oh, and another room for her brother and his girlfriend. An email to firstname.lastname at us dot army dot mil would be great. I'll buy you a coffee and a joint in a couple of weeks. Cheers, -- vulgarandmischevious |
| #2 | |
|
|
vulgarandmischevious wrote:
> I need a reservation at the Grand Krasnapolsky from 21 August to 28 > August. Website says they're full. They probably are - that's short notice for them. > Can someone who speaks the lingo Their front desk likely speaks better English than you or I. -- Dnc |
| #3 | |
|
|
In article <f9bf81$s8v$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
doesnotcompute@gmail.com says... > vulgarandmischevious wrote: > > > I need a reservation at the Grand Krasnapolsky from 21 August to 28 > > August. Website says they're full. > > They probably are - that's short notice for them. > > > > Can someone who speaks the lingo > > Their front desk likely speaks better English than you or I. I think he just wants to show off by telling us all he's working for the military now. |
| #4 | |
|
|
doetnietcomputeren wrote:
> vulgarandmischevious wrote: > >> I need a reservation at the Grand Krasnapolsky from 21 August to 28 >> August. Website says they're full. > > They probably are - that's short notice for them. > > >> Can someone who speaks the lingo > > Their front desk likely speaks better English than you or I. Two languages... -- platypus somewhere to go for the night |
| #5 | |
|
|
Whinging Courier wrote:
> I think he just wants to show off by telling us all he's working for > the military now. But he usually denies it: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.re...5bc1194880c6e3 -- Chris |
| #6 | |
|
|
In article <xn0f9pay11rp2u000@news.individual.net>,
me@christrollen.co.uk says... > Whinging Courier wrote: > > > I think he just wants to show off by telling us all he's working for > > the military now. > > But he usually denies it: > http://groups.google.com/group/uk.re...5bc1194880c6e3 Taking email addresses from a domain you have no right to is illegal, isn't it? |
| #7 | |
|
|
Whinging Courier <markonusenet@takeitawayyahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <xn0f9pay11rp2u000@news.individual.net>, > me@christrollen.co.uk says... > >> Whinging Courier wrote: >> >> > I think he just wants to show off by telling us all he's working for >> > the military now. >> >> But he usually denies it: >> http://groups.google.com/group/uk.re...5bc1194880c6e3 > > Taking email addresses from a domain you have no right to is illegal, > isn't it? So is invading sovereign states that don't threaten you... D. -- des | 'trop d'la balle, j'kiffe grave!' BMW K100-LT |
| #8 | |
|
|
On 8 Aug, 09:43, Des <d...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Whinging Courier <markonuse...@takeitawayyahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > In article <xn0f9pay11rp2u...@news.individual.net>, > > m...@christrollen.co.uk says... > > >> Whinging Courier wrote: > > >> > I think he just wants to show off by telling us all he's working for > >> > the military now. > > >> But he usually denies it: > >>http://groups.google.com/group/uk.re...5bc1194880c6e3 > > > Taking email addresses from a domain you have no right to is illegal, > > isn't it? > > So is invading sovereign states that don't threaten you... I can see Ben invading a pie-shop or a free bar, but a sovereign state on his own...nah! -- Lozzo |
| #9 | |
|
|
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 04:03:57 -0700, speedyspic@googlemail.com wrote:
>I can see Ben invading a pie-shop or a free bar, but a sovereign state >on his own...nah! I thought Ben /was/ a sovereign state? -- Pip: B12 |
| #10 | |
|
|
Pip wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 04:03:57 -0700, speedyspic@googlemail.com wrote: > > >I can see Ben invading a pie-shop or a free bar, but a sovereign state > >on his own...nah! > > I thought Ben /was/ a sovereign state? Are you suggesting he's invaded too many pie-shops? -- ogden sv650 - surprisingly quick for a girl's bike |
| #11 | |
|
|
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:15:50 +0100, ogden <ogden@pre.org> wrote:
>Pip wrote: >> >> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 04:03:57 -0700, speedyspic@googlemail.com wrote: >> >> >I can see Ben invading a pie-shop or a free bar, but a sovereign state >> >on his own...nah! >> >> I thought Ben /was/ a sovereign state? > >Are you suggesting he's invaded too many pie-shops? Have you seen the size of his gravitational field? -- Pip: B12 |
| #12 | |
|
|
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:37:59 +0100 Whinging Courier wrote:
>In article <xn0f9pay11rp2u000@news.individual.net>, >me@christrollen.co.uk says... > >> Whinging Courier wrote: >> >> > I think he just wants to show off by telling us all he's working for >> > the military now. >> >> But he usually denies it: >> http://groups.google.com/group/uk.re...5bc1194880c6e3 > >Taking email addresses from a domain you have no right to is illegal, >isn't it? I'm entitled to every email address that I have. If you want to try getting a us.army.mil address when you're not entitled to it, have at it. Good luck. -- vulgarandmischevious |
| #13 | |
|
|
In article <MPG.2123913fdc63d7f5989888@news.individual.net> , Whinging Courier wrote:
> In article <xn0f9pay11rp2u000@news.individual.net>, > me@christrollen.co.uk says... > >> Whinging Courier wrote: >> >> > I think he just wants to show off by telling us all he's working for >> > the military now. >> >> But he usually denies it: >> http://groups.google.com/group/uk.re...5bc1194880c6e3 > > Taking email addresses from a domain you have no right to is illegal, > isn't it? I'm saying nowt. Phil. -- Phil Launchbury, IT PHB 'I'm training the bats that live in my cube to juggle mushrooms' |
| #14 | |
|
|
In article <mibjb3tim8isqbmng3hv83se1qaidi245q@4ax.com>,
vulgarandmischevious@gmail.com says... > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:37:59 +0100 Whinging Courier wrote: > > >In article <xn0f9pay11rp2u000@news.individual.net>, > >me@christrollen.co.uk says... > > > >> Whinging Courier wrote: > >> > >> > I think he just wants to show off by telling us all he's working for > >> > the military now. > >> > >> But he usually denies it: > >> http://groups.google.com/group/uk.re...5bc1194880c6e3 > > > >Taking email addresses from a domain you have no right to is illegal, > >isn't it? > > I'm entitled to every email address that I have. But you don't work for the us military, directly or indirectly. You denied it when challenged by PL so if that's true, you have no right to it unless you're lying or got it via dishonest means. |
| #15 | |
|
|
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:51:49 +0100, Whinging Courier
<markonusenet@TAKEITAWAYyahoo.co.uk> wrote: >In article <mibjb3tim8isqbmng3hv83se1qaidi245q@4ax.com>, >vulgarandmischevious@gmail.com says... > >> On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:37:59 +0100 Whinging Courier wrote: >> >> >In article <xn0f9pay11rp2u000@news.individual.net>, >> >me@christrollen.co.uk says... >> > >> >> Whinging Courier wrote: >> >> >> >> > I think he just wants to show off by telling us all he's working for >> >> > the military now. >> >> >> >> But he usually denies it: >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/uk.re...5bc1194880c6e3 >> > >> >Taking email addresses from a domain you have no right to is illegal, >> >isn't it? >> >> I'm entitled to every email address that I have. > >But you don't work for the us military, directly or indirectly. You >denied it when challenged by PL so if that's true, you have no right to >it unless you're lying or got it via dishonest means. FFS don't be such a TC. I know what he does, and for whom, but won't say so here, but suffice it to say that his .mil address is perfectly legitimate. If you can't work it out then you're even thicker than I thought :-) -- _______ ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom) \`\ | /`/ DS#8 BOTAFOT#3 SbS#2 UKRMMA#13 DFV#8 SKA#2 IBB#10 `\\ | //' `\|/` ` |
| #16 | |
|
|
In article <ohqjb3drd9ve73jhau5vmafgj2c8sahogh@4ax.com>,
seesig@virgin.net says... > FFS don't be such a TC. I know what he does, and for whom, but won't > say so here, but suffice it to say that his .mil address is perfectly > legitimate. It isn't the legitimacy that I'm asking about. Your pizza will be coming son. > If you can't work it out then you're even thicker than I thought :-) I'm not thick, I want him to admit that he didn't need to use a dot mil address for a simple request for a hotel room. |
| #17 | |
|
|
Whinging Courier wrote:
> I'm not thick, I want him to admit that he didn't need to use a dot mil > address for a simple request for a hotel room. He didn't *need* to, but by doing so, he obviously managed to wind you and Des up. -- '01 SV650SK1 '99 EX250-F13 '98 ZG1000-A13 OMF #7 |
| #18 | |
|
|
Whinging Courier wrote:
> In article <ohqjb3drd9ve73jhau5vmafgj2c8sahogh@4ax.com>, > seesig@virgin.net says... > >> FFS don't be such a TC. I know what he does, and for whom, but won't >> say so here, but suffice it to say that his .mil address is perfectly >> legitimate. > > It isn't the legitimacy that I'm asking about. Your pizza will be > coming son. > >> If you can't work it out then you're even thicker than I thought :-) > > I'm not thick, I want him to admit that he didn't need to use a dot > mil address for a simple request for a hotel room. It may be the only one he has access to behind a work firewall though -- Hog |
| #19 | |
|
|
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:32:56 -0500, Mark Olson <olsonm@tiny.invalid>
wrote: >Whinging Courier wrote: > >> I'm not thick, I want him to admit that he didn't need to use a dot mil >> address for a simple request for a hotel room. > >He didn't *need* to, but by doing so, he obviously managed to wind you >and Des up. <perk> I wasn't aware of that. Well done Ben! -- _______ ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom) \`\ | /`/ DS#8 BOTAFOT#3 SbS#2 UKRMMA#13 DFV#8 SKA#2 IBB#10 `\\ | //' `\|/` ` |
| #20 | |
|
|
In article <5hu9m7F3krboiU1@mid.individual.net>, Hog
<hogSPAM@freenetCHIPS.co.uk> writes >Whinging Courier wrote: >> In article <ohqjb3drd9ve73jhau5vmafgj2c8sahogh@4ax.com>, >> seesig@virgin.net says... >> >>> FFS don't be such a TC. I know what he does, and for whom, but won't >>> say so here, but suffice it to say that his .mil address is perfectly >>> legitimate. >> >> It isn't the legitimacy that I'm asking about. Your pizza will be >> coming son. >> >>> If you can't work it out then you're even thicker than I thought :-) >> >> I'm not thick, I want him to admit that he didn't need to use a dot >> mil address for a simple request for a hotel room. > >It may be the only one he has access to behind a work firewall though ^^^^ That word and The Blane?? It doesn't seem right. -- steve auvache A Bloo one with built in safety features |
| #21 | |
|
|
steve auvache wrote:
> In article <5hu9m7F3krboiU1@mid.individual.net>, Hog > <hogSPAM@freenetCHIPS.co.uk> writes > >It may be the only one he has access to behind a work firewall though > ^^^^ > That word and The Blane?? It doesn't seem right. FFS, not another one. ROT 13 his name to Oynar or something if it troubles you that much. |
| #22 | |
|
|
Mark Olson <olsonm@tiny.invalid> wrote:
> Whinging Courier wrote: >> I'm not thick, I want him to admit that he didn't need to use a dot mil >> address for a simple request for a hotel room. > > He didn't *need* to, but by doing so, he obviously managed to wind you > and Des up. Eh ?? Who 'wound [me] up' ? D. -- des | 'trop d'la balle, j'kiffe grave!' BMW K100-LT |
| #23 | |
|
|
Ace <seesig@virgin.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:32:56 -0500, Mark Olson <olsonm@tiny.invalid> > wrote: > >>Whinging Courier wrote: >> >>> I'm not thick, I want him to admit that he didn't need to use a dot mil >>> address for a simple request for a hotel room. >> >>He didn't *need* to, but by doing so, he obviously managed to wind you >>and Des up. > > <perk> > > I wasn't aware of that. Well done Ben! Clapping your hands like a retarded seal doesn't become you, Bruce. D. -- des | 'trop d'la balle, j'kiffe grave!' BMW K100-LT |
| #24 | |
|
|
Ace <seesig@virgin.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:51:49 +0100, Whinging Courier > <markonusenet@TAKEITAWAYyahoo.co.uk> wrote: > FFS don't be such a TC. I know what he does, and for whom, but won't say > so here, but suffice it to say that his .mil address is perfectly > legitimate. > > If you can't work it out then you're even thicker than I thought :-) *snort* 'my mate's hard, so 'e is !' D. -- des | 'trop d'la balle, j'kiffe grave!' BMW K100-LT |
| #25 | |
|
|
steve auvache <dont_spam@thecow.me.uk> wrote:
> That word and The Blane?? It doesn't seem right. Ah, Blaney. Sorry to disappoint Mark, but .. group=uk.rec.motorcycles case=0 score=kill from=*vulgarandmischevious@gmail.com* D. -- des | 'trop d'la balle, j'kiffe grave!' BMW K100-LT |
| #26 | |
|
|
In article <ondpo4-dr.ln1@alt-activism-death-penalty.org>, Des
<des@yahoo.fr> writes >Sorry to disappoint Mark, but .. > > group=uk.rec.motorcycles > case=0 > score=kill > from=*vulgarandmischevious@gmail.com* And to think of all that contempt you hold for those who killfile and ignore just on the basis of the name of the poster. How the mighty (for ukrm values of mighty) are so easily assimilated. We will be calling you a proper ukrmer soon and newbies will accuse you of being a part of the clique. -- steve auvache A Bloo one with built in safety features |
| #27 | |
|
|
steve auvache <dont_spam@thecow.me.uk> wrote:
> In article <ondpo4-dr.ln1@alt-activism-death-penalty.org>, Des > <des@yahoo.fr> writes >>Sorry to disappoint Mark, but .. >> >> group=uk.rec.motorcycles >> case=0 >> score=kill >> from=*vulgarandmischevious@gmail.com* > And to think of all that contempt you hold for those who killfile and > ignore just on the basis of the name of the poster. I didn't killfile him because of his posting name. HTH. D. -- des | 'trop d'la balle, j'kiffe grave!' BMW K100-LT |