My Forum About > Automotive > Motorcycle
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
  #1
Rope
 
Default OT: Economic?

Ross is doing a weeks work experience at a local power
station.

Yesterday he was in 'Materials Handling' i.e. unloading
coal. Apparently, on full chat, the station consumes 1/2 a
trainload of coal an hour.

Most of this coal comes from the docks - imported.
But *some* comes from 'Up North Somewhere'

Apparently this colliery has to dispose of the
furnace-grade stuff, and the most economic way to do so is
to *pay the power station to burn it*

Now to me, and I accept I am probably being a bit
simplistic here, but I would have thought that, rather than
*pay* the power station to 'dispose' of it, they could
possibly try to *sell* it to the power station at a
competitive price? - even if it was at a loss, it would
still, surely, be cheaper than *paying* them to burn it?

--
Rob_P
UKRM(at)indqualtec.co.uk
uppercase(d) BBIWYMC#1 BOG#11? MRO#31 IBCDBBB#1(kotl)
FJ1200, CCM130
Just call me Charlie Brown

 
  #2
Nidge
 
Default Re: OT: Economic?

OK, So the real question is what could UKRM profitably do with half a
train load of coal a day, right?

Nidge (at work)

 
  #3
Tim
 
Default Re: OT: Economic?

In message <VA.0000120a.138a2954@ukrm.net>, Rope <spam@ukrm.net> writes
>Ross is doing a weeks work experience at a local power
>station.
>
>Yesterday he was in 'Materials Handling' i.e. unloading
>coal. Apparently, on full chat, the station consumes 1/2 a
>trainload of coal an hour.
>
>Most of this coal comes from the docks - imported.
>But *some* comes from 'Up North Somewhere'
>

The imported stuff is probably "brown" coal which has a high sulphur
content.

>Apparently this colliery has to dispose of the
>furnace-grade stuff, and the most economic way to do so is
>to *pay the power station to burn it*
>

There's not enough home use these days and so many power stations burn
gas or oil.

>Now to me, and I accept I am probably being a bit
>simplistic here, but I would have thought that, rather than
>*pay* the power station to 'dispose' of it, they could
>possibly try to *sell* it to the power station at a
>competitive price? - even if it was at a loss, it would
>still, surely, be cheaper than *paying* them to burn it?
>

I think the market is regulated so they cannot, but someone will be
along who knows.

--
Tim two#21, YGL#3 & BOTAFOT#84

Due to the limitations of current email, the lip movements may be
out of synchronisation as you move your finger under the text while reading.

tim dot ukrm2 at dsl dot pipex dot com
 
Reply
Thread Tools


Powered by vBulletin

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.