| #1 | |
|
|
If one has a standard tyre size of 225 x 60 x 16 can one
fit for example a 225 x (55 or 50) x 16 on the rim quite happily? Perhaps even go up a size to 230 or 235? I dunno the answer. Alan -- SP1 for Fun, Jaguar for Comfort. BOTAFOT #148 |
| #2 | |
|
|
"Alan Crowder" <alan.crowder@NOSPAMpharm.ox.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:c24bot$mrn$1@news.ox.ac.uk... > If one has a standard tyre size of 225 x 60 x 16 can one > fit for example a 225 x (55 or 50) x 16 on the rim quite > happily? > You're only lowering the profile of the tyre which, AFAIK, shouldn't make any difference with regards to clearance. However, it could look incredibly gay if you reduce it a lot (ie down to 35/40) and don't up the wheel size. > Perhaps even go up a size to 230 or 235? > Depends, an increase of 10 is usually okay but, I'm no expert. -- Mr. Fantastic ZXR400 Remove Pirate to Reply |
| #3 | |
|
|
alan.crowder@NOSPAMpharm.ox.ac.uk said:
> If one has a standard tyre size of 225 x 60 x 16 can one > fit for example a 225 x (55 or 50) x 16 on the rim quite > happily? > > Perhaps even go up a size to 230 or 235? http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html might help. I think it's java, unfortunately. -- Trevor, botafot#106, BMW R1150RS http://www.employees.org/~tw/rrs |
| #4 | |
|
|
Alan Crowder wrote:
> If one has a standard tyre size of 225 x 60 x 16 can one > fit for example a 225 x (55 or 50) x 16 on the rim quite > happily? > > Perhaps even go up a size to 230 or 235? Depends on the rim width. Check the tyre manufacturer's recommendations. In principle yes. SWMBO's car has 225/55-16 on 7" rims at the front and on 7.5" rims on the back. The 7.5" rims would take up to about a 255 tyre without spoiling the handling too much. You could go down to about 205 but would always be scraping the rim on the kerb. And you can't just change the sprockets on a car! -- Roger. |
| #5 | |
|
|
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:24:28 -0000, "Alan Crowder" wrote:
>If one has a standard tyre size of 225 x 60 x 16 can one >fit for example a 225 x (55 or 50) x 16 on the rim quite >happily? > Talk to these people http://www.xpediatyre.co.uk. Speak to either John or Graham. -- Otter http://www.paganotter.org.uk |
| #6 | |
|
|
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:24:28 -0000, "Alan Crowder"
<alan.crowder@NOSPAMpharm.ox.ac.uk> wrote: >If one has a standard tyre size of 225 x 60 x 16 can one >fit for example a 225 x (55 or 50) x 16 on the rim quite >happily? > >Perhaps even go up a size to 230 or 235? Cor, I've not had to think about this for a while. The biggest effect will be on your speedo - so it depends where it's driven from. If you don't mind it being inaccurate, then the sky's the limit. What you're considering is changing the rolling circumference of the tyre, OK? The 225 figure is the nominal width of the tread from shoulder to shoulder in millimetres. The 60 figure is the "aspect ratio" which is the height of the sidewall as a percentage of the aforementioned width - so a 225/60 is 225mm wide and the sidewall is <tap tap> 135mm high. The way it works is that if you go up two width increments and down one aspect ratio increment the circumference remains approximately the same (at least as far as gearing and therefore speedo accuracy go), thus a 225/60 is effectively the same as a 255/50 or a 275/40. Are you still with me? The only limitation will be your taste in ride quality which will get harsher as the aspect ratio gets smaller and the wheelarch to tyre clearance which may be critical on full lock/full bump with wider rubber. To answer your question, if you want to go to a 235, it had best be a 55, or a 245/50 to maintain gearing. You'll probably be OK with clearance, but there again ... Remember this advice is worth exactly what you paid for it, but it is accurate as far as it goes, not knowing what car you're talking about but assuming it's a Jag. -- Pip, Hairy Gfedcker. RF 900RR, Ruff and Rattly. WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4 MKA+E#3 ANORAK#8 MIRTTH#15 BOTAFOT/F#47/34a BONY#13 KotMIB# <space> UKRMRM#14 TWA#2 |
| #7 | |
|
|
"TW" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:MPG.1aaff847279eceb3989688@news.individual.ne t... > alan.crowder@NOSPAMpharm.ox.ac.uk said: > > If one has a standard tyre size of 225 x 60 x 16 can one > > fit for example a 225 x (55 or 50) x 16 on the rim quite > > happily? > > > > Perhaps even go up a size to 230 or 235? > > http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html > > might help. I think it's java, unfortunately. Thats a handy page, thanks very much. Now i might change my mind....why did i even start down this road? Alan SP1 for Fun, Jaguar for Comfort BOTAFOT #148 |
| #8 | |
|
|
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:35:28 -0000, "Alan Crowder"
<alan.crowder@pharm.ox.ac.uk> wrote: >And we have met once, your the hairy one. I remember it, Alan. H&J car park, 'FOT and Englands Rose, on a pleasant sunny day last year. Must do that again, you know. -- Pip, Hairy Gfedcker. RF 900RR, Ruff and Rattly. WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4 MKA+E#3 ANORAK#8 MIRTTH#15 BOTAFOT/F#47/34a BONY#13 KotMIB# <space> UKRMRM#14 TWA#2 |
| #9 | |
|
|
In uk.rec.motorcycles, Mr. Fantastic said:
> You're only lowering the profile of the tyre which, AFAIK, shouldn't make > any difference with regards to clearance. However, it could look incredibly > gay if you reduce it a lot (ie down to 35/40) and don't up the wheel size. Or lower the car. > > Perhaps even go up a size to 230 or 235? > > > > Depends, an increase of 10 is usually okay but, I'm no expert. Back in the days when Ford Crapris had 185/70/13s I got a set of 205/60/13s on OK. -- Smile...tomorrow will be worse CBR1000FL |
| #10 | |
|
|
"Pip" <pip@ukrm.net> wrote in message news:huic40dptnk27njobrec5esiafelg81smg@4ax.com... > On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:35:28 -0000, "Alan Crowder" > <alan.crowder@pharm.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > > >And we have met once, your the hairy one. > > I remember it, Alan. H&J car park, 'FOT and Englands Rose, on a > pleasant sunny day last year. Must do that again, you know. I have every intention of doing so, when the sodding weather gets better. Alan -- SP1 for Fun, Jaguar for Comfort. BOTAFOT #148 |
| #11 | |
|
|
Whinging Courier wrote:
<snip> >>>Perhaps even go up a size to 230 or 235? >> >>Depends, an increase of 10 is usually okay but, I'm no expert. > > Back in the days when Ford Crapris had 185/70/13s I got a set of > 205/60/13s on OK. > I wrote off one of them when it ran me over. -- Bob Currently borrowing a black and red Yamaha XJ750 with fuel injection Present: Honda XL125RF (FS) Past: Honda CG125 bob at homeurl tomato dot co dot uk remove the red fruit if you'd like to email me. |
| #12 | |
|
|
"Pip" <pip@ukrm.net> wrote...
> > The way it works is that if you go up two width increments and down > one aspect ratio increment the circumference remains approximately the > same (at least as far as gearing and therefore speedo accuracy go), > thus a 225/60 is effectively the same as a 255/50 or a 275/40. Are > you still with me? Er, I'm not. How does changing the width of the tyre change the circumference? -- Mr. Fantastic ZXR400 Remove Pirate to Reply |
| #13 | |
|
|
Mr. Fantastic <james_kay@yarhoo.com> wrote:
> "Pip" <pip@ukrm.net> wrote... > > > > The way it works is that if you go up two width increments and down > > one aspect ratio increment the circumference remains approximately the > > same (at least as far as gearing and therefore speedo accuracy go), > > thus a 225/60 is effectively the same as a 255/50 or a 275/40. Are > > you still with me? > > Er, I'm not. How does changing the width of the tyre change the > circumference? Because the height of a tyre is quoted as a percentage of the width. ie. if you take the following: 195/60 and 205/60 they'll have different height sidewalls, and therefore a different circumference. The first tyre is 117mm tall, and the 2nd is 123mm tall. HTH. -- Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo' http://www.italiancar.co.uk Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300 VW Golf Cabrio - Alfa 75TS - Nissan Primera(I can't explain that either) BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC # |
| #14 | |
|
|
"SteveH" <steve@italiancar.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1ga4wvm.ad98zn1eom905N%steve@italiancar.co.uk ... > Mr. Fantastic <james_kay@yarhoo.com> wrote: > > > "Pip" <pip@ukrm.net> wrote... > > > > > > The way it works is that if you go up two width increments and down > > > one aspect ratio increment the circumference remains approximately the > > > same (at least as far as gearing and therefore speedo accuracy go), > > > thus a 225/60 is effectively the same as a 255/50 or a 275/40. Are > > > you still with me? > > > > Er, I'm not. How does changing the width of the tyre change the > > circumference? > > Because the height of a tyre is quoted as a percentage of the width. > > ie. if you take the following: > > 195/60 > and > 205/60 > > they'll have different height sidewalls, and therefore a different > circumference. The first tyre is 117mm tall, and the 2nd is 123mm tall. > > HTH. Oh yeah, gotcha. Keep thinking of the sidewalls as measurement in mm rather than %. Ta! -- Mr. Fantastic ZXR400 Remove Pirate to Reply |
| #15 | |
|
|
In uk.rec.motorcycles, Bob123 said:
> I wrote off one of them when it ran me over. What, the car or the tyre? -- Smile...tomorrow will be worse CBR1000FL |
| #16 | |
|
|
Whinging Courier wrote:
> In uk.rec.motorcycles, Bob123 said: > >>I wrote off one of them when it ran me over. > > What, the car or the tyre? Oh the car, I had bicycled to a mate's flat on Harwood Rd to fix his computer at about 11:00am and knowing it to be a 2 hour job I didn't take my lights. Anyway by the time I'd had lunch and taught him how to use his new scanner and had 2 tins of larger with him it was 4:30, just the beginning of dusk. I headed up Harwood rd planning on turning right into Moore Park Road I'm in the bus lane and just about to arrive at the point when I have to turn so I look over my shoulder and there is nothing, not even tumble weed, I can see all the way to the kings road and there aren't even any pedestrians, so with a slightly odd "Day of the Triffids" feeling I start to move out and look the other way, there are three cars coming down from Fulham Broadway at quite some speed so I continue to move out fairly slowly until they pass then start to turn more quickly, now I know your perception of time around an accident is screwed up but I can't balance a bike going very slowly and I had only travelled a couple of meters while this whole thing was going on so it can't have been more than 4~5 seconds and it felt more like 3, I wasn't going to bother with another look down towards the Kings Road as I had just had one. For some reason I did and sure enough there was an old Ford Crapris doing 40 odd about 20 meters away, he saw me and slammed on the brakes, by the time he hit me he was probably only doing 25mph odd. When he hit I was at an angle of about 45 deg to his bumper so the first bit of me it hit was my leg flipping them up in the air and then I was picked up by the front of the roof [1] on the fleshy part of my side between the hip and ribs and catapulted down the road quite an impressive distance. I ended up on the roads about 10 meters from the front of the car and about 35 from the point of impact. I didn't loose consciousness at any point and as soon as I landed on the road I got up and ran straight to the pavement for fear of being run over again, [2] then I checked the traffic conditions again and ran back to my now semicircular bike picked it up and carried it to a railing and chained it to it to stop the thieving scroats running of with the thing. Then the adrenalin started to make me feel woozy and I sat on the pavement and awaited the ambulance like a good boy. I could see the car, the driver had had to climb out of the window as the doors wouldn't open as I'd bent the roof frame of the car back at an angle so it pinched the doors effectively locking them, also at where I'd hit the roof it was bent back in an inverted snowplough shape about 20 centimetres from its original position, apparently this was sufficient damage to write of the car. When the ambulance arrived they strapped me to a back bored designed for midgets and the rather sharp edge at the bottom was cutting rather painfully into my achilles tendon, this was the most painful part of the whole experience. The Chealsea and Westminster Hospital A&E department were board and under worked so they all came to work on me [3] and in an effort to x-ray that tricky bit of spine they can't see I had one junior doctor on each arm puling them down to expose the vertebra. Anyway I was fine and they made me spent a night in a ward with the optional periodic wakeup call to have a torch shoved in your eye, when I walked home in the morning I was a bit stiff to say the least but sadly [4] I don't bruise much so only if you looked closely could you see a slight discoloration. [1] the bit where the roof and the windscreen meet [2] noting the slack jawed look on the people in the bus stop [3] you remember what your mum said about clean shredies at times like these, I was going commando. [4] sadly because I love the pretty colours bruises go on some people -- Bob Currently borrowing a black and red Yamaha XJ750 with fuel injection Present: Honda XL125RF (FS) Past: Honda CG125 bob at homeurl tomato dot co dot uk remove the red fruit if you'd like to email me. |
| #17 | |
|
|
In uk.rec.motorcycles, Bob123 said:
<snip tale of woe> Thankfully <touches wood> I've never been taken off like that. I've been nudged a few times and had my course altered by cars touching my rear wheel and stuff (obviously, I've crashed into lorries and parked cars) but I've always been in the fortunate position to give them a jolly good mouthful afterwards :-) -- Smile...tomorrow will be worse CBR1000FL |
| #18 | |
|
|
Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Whinging Courier
<markonusenetTAKEITAWAY@yahoo.co.uk> typed >In uk.rec.motorcycles, Bob123 said: > ><snip tale of woe> > >Thankfully <touches wood> I've never been taken off like that. I've been >nudged a few times and had my course altered by cars touching my rear >wheel and stuff (obviously, I've crashed into lorries and parked cars) >but I've always been in the fortunate position to give them a jolly good >mouthful afterwards :-) > "Suck this and we can keep this off the insurance" stylee? -- Nigel - No longer worse than Platypus WS* GHPOTHUF#24 APOSTLE#14 DLC#1 COFF#20 BOTAFOT#150 HYPO#0(KoTL) ZZR1100, Enfield 500 Curry House Racer "The Basmati Rice Burner", Honda GL1000K2 |