| #1 | |
|
|
Ok, I still haven't calmed down yet, so please excuse in advance the
possible illiterate rant on here. On Saturday evening, the (modern, common rail) family diesel got driven on fumes to the garage. Where it got filled up with BP's finest unleaded. To the brim. And then ran for a couple of miles before expiring with 'injector fault'. Since the RAC regard this a 'driver' error, they offer limited options as to how they can help you. They found a place < 10 miles away who quoted 200 notes for drain/clean. We found another nearer home, who said it would be 100. Since I was convinced we would be looking at minimum new pump, injectors etc. I wanted to get it as close as possible to my tame mechanic who I use for the jobs I can't/don't have time to do. Sunday morning, they spend all day farting around telling us it will be ready 'soon'. Pick the car up Sunday pm they want a grand total of 338.98, paid under protest. I 'spose we were (relatively) happy that it seems to be running ok with no nasty errors, so far anyway. Drive it to garage. Fill it to the brim with Sainsbury's finest heavy oil. Walk to pay for the fuel, turn around, there's gallons of the stuff gushing out underneath, flooding the forecourt. Cue lots of people running around with buckets of sand, us on 'phone telling the guy to come and sort it out. He turned up, we gave him the key and left him to it. Today, after much more farting around, ("10 hours labour mate"), they say they have to replace the fuel tank, another 250 PLUS the labour. Whaaaaaaaaaaaat! They say the tank's distorted and they can't get it to seal. They are going to get a nice visit from me in the morning. To my mind they will not be getting a single penny more - they are more incompetent than a bunch of incompetents as far as I can see. Tame mechanic thinks that what's happened is that when they pumped it out they basically sucked the tank/pipes out of shape, thus knackering the whole shebang. What do the legal FOAK think should be my opening gambit please? Of course the damn things gonna be in pieces in their workshop tomorrow, so they are going to have the upper hand, but I'll be damned if I am going to let them get away with such crappy mechanicking. -- /Simon |
| #2 | |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:26:41 -0000, "Simon Wilson"
<siwilson@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote: >They are going to get a nice visit from me in the morning. To my mind >they will not be getting a single penny more - they are more >incompetent than a bunch of incompetents as far as I can see. Tame >mechanic thinks that what's happened is that when they pumped it out >they basically sucked the tank/pipes out of shape, thus knackering the >whole shebang. Another option, if you had Comprehensive Insurance, would have been to call them at the petrol station in the first place and say that you've been silly and waited for them to make everything better. -- -- Nick ICQ: 9235201 EMAIL & MSN: nickmooney@spamcop.net -- LOTR#4 SKOGA#8 DS#7 BOTAFOT#159 BOTM#2 FBOTY#06 PM#11 -- GSF600n www.bgn.me.uk - Drive until you lose the road |
| #3 | |
|
|
BGN wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:26:41 -0000, "Simon Wilson" > <siwilson@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote: > > > They are going to get a nice visit from me in the morning. To my > > mind they will not be getting a single penny more - they are more > > incompetent than a bunch of incompetents as far as I can see. Tame > > mechanic thinks that what's happened is that when they pumped it out > > they basically sucked the tank/pipes out of shape, thus knackering > > the whole shebang. > > Another option, if you had Comprehensive Insurance, would have been to > call them at the petrol station in the first place and say that you've > been silly and waited for them to make everything better. Are you referring to the first or second visit to the petrol station? I do have fully comp. but I didn't think it would cover that kind of thing. At the first petrol station we also of course had no idea that anything was wrong at that stage. -- /Simon |
| #4 | |
|
|
>
> >What do the legal FOAK think should be my opening gambit please? > > Dunno but when you take out insurance you also have the option to pay for legal cover. Speak to you insurance co as they may well be able to help out. Hope it turns out nice (for you anyway) |
| #5 | |
|
|
On 30 Jul, 20:47, "Simon Wilson" <siwil...@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
> BGN wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:26:41 -0000, "Simon Wilson" > > <siwil...@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > They are going to get a nice visit from me in the morning. To my > > > mind they will not be getting a single penny more - they are more > > > incompetent than a bunch of incompetents as far as I can see. Tame > > > mechanic thinks that what's happened is that when they pumped it out > > > they basically sucked the tank/pipes out of shape, thus knackering > > > the whole shebang. > > > Another option, if you had Comprehensive Insurance, would have been to > > call them at the petrol station in the first place and say that you've > > been silly and waited for them to make everything better. > > Are you referring to the first or second visit to the petrol station? I > do have fully comp. but I didn't think it would cover that kind of > thing. At the first petrol station we also of course had no idea that > anything was wrong at that stage. When I was working at the local bike shop we rebuilt a 2 year old 1000 Fireblade gearbox that had been damaged by a piece of that plastic strapping you find round cardboard boxes. It had wound itself round the front sprocket complete with the metal sealing piece, wrecked the output shaft seal and then destroyed the output shaft bearing causing the gearbox to run out of true and grind itself to oblivion. Surprisingly the engine itself suffered no damage at all considering it had lost most of its oil. The guy who owned the bike claimed for the whole job on his fully comp insurance, and they paid up. They regarded it as being no different to the owner crashing through no fault of his own - either way his bike got damaged in some way and he could claim. The bill came to a little over £1000 including labour. -- Lozzo |
| #6 | |
|
|
In article <13aserh3ifg1v63@corp.supernews.com>, Simon Wilson says...
> they are more > incompetent than a bunch of incompetents as far as I can see. Hmmmmmm ... coming from someone who filled a diesel car with unleaded, that's a *tad* rich, don't you think? If they're a halfway wealthy garage a solicitor's letter may well spark some interest, but frankly, IME, for every mechanic you can find who will say "they're twats" in court, they'll find another 2 who'll say "no they're not". -- Bear |
| #7 | |
|
|
Simon Wilson wrote:
> > What do the legal FOAK think should be my opening gambit please? Of > course the damn things gonna be in pieces in their workshop tomorrow, > so they are going to have the upper hand, but I'll be damned if I am > going to let them get away with such crappy mechanicking. Call consumer direct and see if they can advise on 08454 04 05 06. It's usually for purchases, but they do have a Cars section in Goods & Services on their website: http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/ Worth a try, as if it's their bag they'll give you the full legal low down on what you need to know and how to tackle it. -- Christofire DIAABTCOD#1 DS#9 ZX-10R |
| #8 | |
|
|
Simon Wilson <siwilson@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
> They say the tank's distorted and they can't get it to > seal. How's that, then. Don't all tanks have simple drain plugs? -- K1100LT 955i 750SS CB400F CD250 CM200 SL125 GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 The bells, the bells..... |
| #9 | |
|
|
The Older Gentleman <chateau.murrayTAKETHISOUT@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> Simon Wilson <siwilson@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote: > > > They say the tank's distorted and they can't get it to > > seal. > > How's that, then. Don't all tanks have simple drain plugs? They disappeared off cars around the time when pull out cork petrol taps disappeared off motorbikes. Alan. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. |
| #10 | |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:47:36 -0000, "Simon Wilson"
<siwilson@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote: >> > They are going to get a nice visit from me in the morning. To my >> > mind they will not be getting a single penny more - they are more >> > incompetent than a bunch of incompetents as far as I can see. Tame >> > mechanic thinks that what's happened is that when they pumped it out >> > they basically sucked the tank/pipes out of shape, thus knackering >> > the whole shebang. >> >> Another option, if you had Comprehensive Insurance, would have been to >> call them at the petrol station in the first place and say that you've >> been silly and waited for them to make everything better. > >Are you referring to the first or second visit to the petrol station? I >do have fully comp. but I didn't think it would cover that kind of >thing. At the first petrol station we also of course had no idea that >anything was wrong at that stage. The first visit. There's not much of a difference between driving the car head first into a brick wall and filling it full of The Wrong Type of Fuel. -- -- Nick ICQ: 9235201 EMAIL & MSN: nickmooney@spamcop.net -- LOTR#4 SKOGA#8 DS#7 BOTAFOT#159 BOTM#2 FBOTY#06 PM#11 -- GSF600n www.bgn.me.uk - Drive until you lose the road |
| #11 | |
|
|
A.Lee <alan@darkroom.+.com> wrote:
> The Older Gentleman <chateau.murrayTAKETHISOUT@dsl.pipex.com> wrote: > > > Simon Wilson <siwilson@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > They say the tank's distorted and they can't get it to > > > seal. > > > > How's that, then. Don't all tanks have simple drain plugs? > > They disappeared off cars around the time when pull out cork petrol taps > disappeared off motorbikes. > Alan. Seriously? I thought all cars still had them, somewhere. Otherwise, how do you drain a car fuel tank, given that they all seem to be fitted with anti-syphon devices these days? An enquiring mind would like to knwo.... -- K1100LT 955i 750SS CB400F CD250 CM200 SL125 GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 The bells, the bells..... |
| #12 | |
|
|
The Older Gentleman <chateau.murrayTAKETHISOUT@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> A.Lee <alan@darkroom.+.com> wrote: > > The Older Gentleman <chateau.murrayTAKETHISOUT@dsl.pipex.com> wrote: > > > How's that, then. Don't all tanks have simple drain plugs? > > > > They disappeared off cars around the time when pull out cork petrol taps > > disappeared off motorbikes. > Seriously? I thought all cars still had them, somewhere. Otherwise, how > do you drain a car fuel tank, given that they all seem to be fitted with > anti-syphon devices these days? > An enquiring mind would like to knwo.... As they seemed to have done for the OP - fit a small tube down the filler cap, and sucked it out. Or, take off the outlet pipe and let it drainoff through there, then suck out what is left. (as an aside, I was a little surprised to find that some garages no longer use the engine sump plug to drain the oil - they stick a pipe down the filling cap, then suck it out) Many petrol tanks are plastic nowadays, with only an inlet and outlet holes, and maybe a small hole for the level sensor, though these can be combined with the outlet pipe. I remember changing a 1977 Cortina petrol tank in the mid-80s - even that had no tap - I know as I got as much out as poss, then still covered the driveway with petrol when I dropped it down. Alan. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. |
| #13 | |
|
|
Simon Wilson wrote:
> Ok, I still haven't calmed down yet, so please excuse in advance the > possible illiterate rant on here. > I work for a recovery co' & we do on average 6-8 fuel drains a week. What make/model/year is it??? Most problems we've experienced are with the anti syphon/overfill devices fitted to the tank/inlet pipes. We have a purpose built vacuum tank that sucks the fuel out, I don't think this method in itself would cause any distortion of your tank & pipes. We feed a suction hose into the tank to remove the bulk of it, then connect it to the fuel feed/return lines under the bonnet to suck out the rest. These machines are amazing in how 'dry' they will leave the system but the vacuum is hardly powerfull enough to distort anything, our suction hose is a very soft & flexible rubber tubing. We have however had MAJOR problems with some modern anti syphon/overfill devices, particularly on Renault diesels, it seems you can feed the suction hose into the tank, but can't get it out again without dropping the tank & removing the inlet pipe to get at the device, a kind of ping pong ball in a cage. I'll bet they've done exactly what we did the first time we experienced one, suck the tank out then pull, tug, pull harder, then try to yank the pipe out (think 2 spanner monkeys with their feet on your bodywork). When that doesn't work, you half drop the tank to disconnect the inlet to have a looksey. Finally, you realise the inlet hose has to come off to free the suction hose frome the trap. Don't forget that at all stages of this they're trying to do it as quickly as possible with the minimum amount of work. We'd never tackle it by fully dismantling/removing anything first go. Sounds like what they,ve done is wrecked the tank/inlet/trap in the process. On the basis that we NEVER release a vehicle untill it's paid for I think you're gonna have trouble. You can pay to release the vehicle then fight over it later, or (my option) see a solicitor and be armed & dangerous before you talk to the garage. "IF" the solicitor thinks you have a good case, give the garage the opportunity to put everything right FOC while you enjoy either their courtesy car or the hire car that you're going to bill them for, for luck I'd get the car independantly checked when they're finished. IME the legal cover attached to your insurance is not going to help you. Garages charging the customer to put right their f#ck ups is not uncommon, mostly invisible and more often than you think, legally justifiable. |
| #14 | |
|
|
Fury wrote:
> On the basis that we NEVER release a vehicle untill it's paid for I > think you're gonna have trouble. He could always write a cheque.. then cancel it. |
| #15 | |
|
|
Bear wrote:
> In article <13aserh3ifg1v63@corp.supernews.com>, Simon Wilson says... > >> they are more >> incompetent than a bunch of incompetents as far as I can see. > > Hmmmmmm ... coming from someone who filled a diesel car with unleaded, > that's a *tad* rich, don't you think? > <cough> No comment. It might not have been me, you see? Ta anyway. -- /Simon |
| #16 | |
|
|
ginge wrote:
> Fury wrote: >> On the basis that we NEVER release a vehicle untill it's paid for I >> think you're gonna have trouble. > > He could always write a cheque.. then cancel it. What's a c h e q u e? -- Hog '03 ST4S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400 |
| #17 | |
|
|
The Older Gentleman wrote:
> A.Lee <alan@darkroom.+.com> wrote: > >> The Older Gentleman <chateau.murrayTAKETHISOUT@dsl.pipex.com> wrote: >> >>> Simon Wilson <siwilson@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> They say the tank's distorted and they can't get it to >>>> seal. >>> How's that, then. Don't all tanks have simple drain plugs? >> They disappeared off cars around the time when pull out cork petrol taps >> disappeared off motorbikes. >> Alan. > > Seriously? I thought all cars still had them, somewhere. Otherwise, how > do you drain a car fuel tank, given that they all seem to be fitted with > anti-syphon devices these days? > > An enquiring mind would like to knwo.... > Seems the common method is to take off inspection plate above the tank, then remove fuel pump & access panel, pump out fuel, put it all back together again. In this case it appears that the tank distorts if the lid is left off for 'more than 30 minutes' with a full tank. We're told it took them several hours to pump it all out. Now the tank is distorted they can't get it back together again. -- /Simon |
| #18 | |
|
|
Simon Wilson wrote:
> The Older Gentleman wrote: >> A.Lee <alan@darkroom.+.com> wrote: >> >>> The Older Gentleman <chateau.murrayTAKETHISOUT@dsl.pipex.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Simon Wilson <siwilson@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> They say the tank's distorted and they can't get it to >>>>> seal. >>>> How's that, then. Don't all tanks have simple drain plugs? >>> They disappeared off cars around the time when pull out cork petrol >>> taps disappeared off motorbikes. >>> Alan. >> >> Seriously? I thought all cars still had them, somewhere. Otherwise, >> how do you drain a car fuel tank, given that they all seem to be >> fitted with anti-syphon devices these days? >> >> An enquiring mind would like to knwo.... >> > > Seems the common method is to take off inspection plate above the > tank, then remove fuel pump & access panel, pump out fuel, put it all > back together again. > > In this case it appears that the tank distorts if the lid is left off > for 'more than 30 minutes' with a full tank. We're told it took them > several hours to pump it all out. > > Now the tank is distorted they can't get it back together again. That really is incompetent of them and they should carry insurance or self cover for their incompetence. It only takes 10 minutes to pump or siphon a tank......unless you have a couple of giant oil drums hiding under there. I used to have a small drill powered pump like http://www.machinemart.co.uk/shop/pr...llaneous-pumps and a jerrycan to hand for such things. -- Hog '03 ST4S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400 |
| #19 | |
|
|
Bear wrote:
> In article <13aserh3ifg1v63@corp.supernews.com>, Simon Wilson says... > >> they are more >> incompetent than a bunch of incompetents as far as I can see. > > Hmmmmmm ... coming from someone who filled a diesel car with unleaded, > that's a *tad* rich, don't you think? > and anyway, I'm the customer, I'm *allowed* to be incompetent. So there. -- /Simon |
| #20 | |
|
|
"Fury" <me@home> wrote in message
news:46aeee8a$0$1624$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net... <snip> > > On the basis that we NEVER release a vehicle untill it's paid for I think > you're gonna have trouble. I would imagine you would too, as I'm sure that's illegal. -- Dan White (dan@finex666.org.uk) Perform an exorcism when replying. |
| #21 | |
|
|
Hog <hogSPAM@freenetCHIPS.co.uk> wrote:
> ginge wrote: > > Fury wrote: > >> On the basis that we NEVER release a vehicle untill it's paid for I > >> think you're gonna have trouble. > > > > He could always write a cheque.. then cancel it. > > What's a c h e q u e? *Waves* -- K1100LT 955i 750SS CB400F CD250 CM200 SL125 GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 The bells, the bells..... |
| #22 | |
|
|
Fury <me@home> wrote:
<snip amazingly interesting info> Not for the first time, urkm manages to provide an expert on an obscure topic. Great stuff. -- K1100LT 955i 750SS CB400F CD250 CM200 SL125 GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 The bells, the bells..... |
| #23 | |
|
|
ginge wrote:
> Fury wrote: >> On the basis that we NEVER release a vehicle untill it's paid for I >> think you're gonna have trouble. > > He could always write a cheque.. then cancel it. Transax ? |
| #24 | |
|
|
Dan White wrote:
> "Fury" <me@home> wrote in message > news:46aeee8a$0$1624$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net... > <snip> >> On the basis that we NEVER release a vehicle untill it's paid for I think >> you're gonna have trouble. > > I would imagine you would too, as I'm sure that's illegal. > > Wrong. When we recover a vehicle we are legally entitled to hold that vehicle until payment is satisfied. The legal bits after working on a vehicle is not always clear cut, depends on lots of variables, we just call there bluff anyway. |
| #25 | |
|
|
Fury wrote:
> Simon Wilson wrote: >> Ok, I still haven't calmed down yet, so please excuse in advance the >> possible illiterate rant on here. >> > > I work for a recovery co' & we do on average 6-8 fuel drains a week. > What make/model/year is it??? > > Most problems we've experienced are with the anti syphon/overfill > devices fitted to the tank/inlet pipes. We have a purpose built vacuum > tank that sucks the fuel out, I don't think this method in itself would > cause any distortion of your tank & pipes. We feed a suction hose into > the tank to remove the bulk of it, then connect it to the fuel > feed/return lines under the bonnet to suck out the rest. > > These machines are amazing in how 'dry' they will leave the system but > the vacuum is hardly powerfull enough to distort anything, our suction > hose is a very soft & flexible rubber tubing. We have however had MAJOR > problems with some modern anti syphon/overfill devices, particularly on > Renault diesels, it seems you can feed the suction hose into the tank, > but can't get it out again without dropping the tank & removing the > inlet pipe to get at the device, a kind of ping pong ball in a cage. <Ding> Renault Scenic 1.5Dci 53 plate. > > I'll bet they've done exactly what we did the first time we experienced > one, suck the tank out then pull, tug, pull harder, then try to yank the > pipe out (think 2 spanner monkeys with their feet on your bodywork). > When that doesn't work, you half drop the tank to disconnect the inlet > to have a looksey. Finally, you realise the inlet hose has to come off > to free the suction hose frome the trap. > > Don't forget that at all stages of this they're trying to do it as > quickly as possible with the minimum amount of work. We'd never tackle > it by fully dismantling/removing anything first go. Yep. I think it was the owners son who messed up - today they have been mostly trying to fix it by fitting a new ring/seal to the top of the tank, but claim that they have had to drop the tank to get at everything properly. > > Sounds like what they,ve done is wrecked the tank/inlet/trap in the > process. > > On the basis that we NEVER release a vehicle untill it's paid for I > think you're gonna have trouble. You can pay to release the vehicle then > fight over it later, or (my option) see a solicitor and be armed & > dangerous before you talk to the garage. "IF" the solicitor thinks you > have a good case, give the garage the opportunity to put everything > right FOC while you enjoy either their courtesy car or the hire car that > you're going to bill them for, for luck I'd get the car independantly > checked when they're finished. > > IME the legal cover attached to your insurance is not going to help you. > > Garages charging the customer to put right their f#ck ups is not > uncommon, mostly invisible and more often than you think, legally > justifiable. Thanks. Very informative. We'll see how it progresses. -- /Simon |
| #26 | |
|
|
Simon Wilson wrote:
> Fury wrote: >> Simon Wilson wrote: > > <Ding> Renault Scenic 1.5Dci 53 plate. > Before you lot buy ANYTHING on 4 wheels, invest some of your £budget on a night out for a mixed bag of local spanner monkeys, at least 1 chap from either the AA or RAC, a wizened old bloke who's been there before and your insewerance broker of choice. Ask them collectively "what should I buy" before they get pissed, then sit back and let 'em fight it out. My current advice consists of: "If you can't afford a Lexus, buy a Toyota. (I own 2 Toyota's, there are 5 Toyota's at work, boss man drives a Lexus). NEVER buy anything with more seats than doors and NEVER buy anything with more wheels than seats". VAG cars are OK if you need prestige but BM's & Merc's are a strict No No unless you spend at least £60k. I can't think of anything that's not made by VAG, Lexus/Toyota, Mazda, Saab, Honda or Mitsubishi that I could contemplate owning. I certainly wouldn't want my children being driven around in a tin box like a Ford. For an easy indicator of what to buy, look at what the people you 'should' respect are buying. If you want a people carrier, look at what the taxi drivers choose, if you want a roundtown runabout for the missus look towards the driving skools. Who else do you know that's bought a Renault Scenic ???? > > Yep. I think it was the owners son who messed up - today they have been > mostly trying to fix it by fitting a new ring/seal to the top of the > tank, but claim that they have had to drop the tank to get at everything > properly. > Be forcefull & singleminded, but don't be too hard on 'em. Good mechanics are like good builders & plumbers these days, VERY hard to find. > > Thanks. > > Very informative. > > We'll see how it progresses. My pleasure, good luck. IME you're going to need it, the motor trade is one of the last remaining outposts of the cowboy. |
| #27 | |
|
|
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember chateau.murrayTAKETHISOUT@dsl.pipex.com (The Older Gentleman) saying something like: >Simon Wilson <siwilson@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote: > >> They say the tank's distorted and they can't get it to >> seal. > >How's that, then. Don't all tanks have simple drain plugs? Not for a very long time, a good couple of decades for most cars, trucks are different of course. -- Dave GS850x2 XS650 SE6a Teach a man to fish and he and his pikey mates will have the river cleaned out in a day. |
| #28 | |
|
|
Fury <me@home> wrote:
> NEVER buy > anything with more wheels than seats <considers Piaggio Ape> -- K1100LT 955i 750SS CB400F CD250 CM200 SL125 GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 The bells, the bells..... |
| #29 | |
|
|
Fury wrote:
> Simon Wilson wrote: > > Fury wrote: > > > Simon Wilson wrote: > > > > ><Ding> Renault Scenic 1.5Dci 53 plate. > > > > Before you lot buy ANYTHING on 4 wheels, invest some of your £budget > on a night out for a mixed bag of local spanner monkeys, at least 1 > chap from either the AA or RAC, a wizened old bloke who's been there > before and your insewerance broker of choice. Ask them collectively > "what should I buy" before they get pissed, then sit back and let 'em > fight it out. > I do this with my friendly Renault mechanic (R & J Autos in Hinckley, Leicestershire) he is an independent (but Renault trained) and he always tells it like it is to the customer. He gave me and my dad some advice about Renault 1.9 DCI engines he says they are good engines but at 100k they get coked up and need a decoke, other than that they are good. -- XJ600S |
| #30 | |
|
|
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:05:05 +0100, Fury <me@home> wrote:
>NEVER buy anything with more wheels than seats". What nonsense. -- Champ ZX10R | GPz750turbo | GSX-R 600 racer My advice as your attorney is to buy a motorcycle To email me, neal at my domain should work. |
| #31 | |
|
|
Pete Jones <rcgods@removethisyahoo.com> wrote:
> He gave me and my dad some advice about Renault 1.9 DCI engines he says > they are good engines but at 100k they get coked up and need a decoke, > other than that they are good. WTF?! Politely explain to him that the year is 2007, not 1947. -- SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo' www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC # |
| #32 | |
|
|
Fury wrote:
> NEVER buy anything with more wheels than seats. 'Tother way around, shirley? -- Rick NT650V (still) TWA#11 BREast#6 BOTAFOT#139 |
| #33 | |
|
|
Fury <me@home> wrote:
> Simon Wilson wrote: > > Ok, I still haven't calmed down yet, so please excuse in advance the > > possible illiterate rant on here. > > > > I work for a recovery co' & we do on average 6-8 fuel drains a week. > What make/model/year is it??? After reading the total bollocks you've posted later in the thread, any chance you could let us all know which company you work for so we can all actively avoid it? -- SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo' www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC # |
| #34 | |
|
|
steve@italiancar.co.uk (SteveH) wrote in news:1i2515y.xzalti1rwmxqrN%
steve@italiancar.co.uk: > Fury <me@home> wrote: > >> Simon Wilson wrote: >> > Ok, I still haven't calmed down yet, so please excuse in advance the >> > possible illiterate rant on here. >> > >> >> I work for a recovery co' & we do on average 6-8 fuel drains a week. >> What make/model/year is it??? > > After reading the total bollocks you've posted later in the thread, any > chance you could let us all know which company you work for so we can > all actively avoid it? Tchibo, of course, Mr Pot |
| #35 | |
|
|
The Older Gentleman wrote:
> Hog <hogSPAM@freenetCHIPS.co.uk> wrote: > >> ginge wrote: >>> Fury wrote: >>>> On the basis that we NEVER release a vehicle untill it's paid for I >>>> think you're gonna have trouble. >>> >>> He could always write a cheque.. then cancel it. >> >> What's a c h e q u e? > > *Waves* "Would you accept a note of my hand, landlord?" -- platypus "fastidious and precise" |