My Forum About > Automotive > Motorcycle
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
  #1
Matt Horn
 
Default FA: ZX6R 636

I've decided to auction my bike off,

for anyone interested, it's here:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...tem=2484299788


2002 Silver ZX6R 636 carbed model on 02 plate,
Standard UK bike bought from Kawasaki dealer (I'm second owner)
Full Kawasaki approved service history up to recent 12k mile service.
Good rubber on rear (010), front will need doing shortly.
Rear hugger, shortened rear fender
Goodrich brake lines
Datatool System 3 Alarm immob, and fitting certs

Also available:
Baglux tank protector, tank perfect underneath.
Double bubble screen and original.
Kawaski Official Workshop Manual (direct from KMUK)

--
Matthew



 
  #2
Stonge
 
Default Re: ZX6R 636

"Matt Horn" wrote:

> I've decided to auction my bike off,
> 2002 Silver ZX6R 636 carbed model on 02 plate,


Nice bike...

--
Stonge

www.brainbashers.com


 
  #3
Ballistic
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

"Matt Horn" <matthew.horn@nospam.spamcop.net> had a sudden rush of
blood to the head and wrote in news:ccp6q6$hlc$1$8302bc10
@news.demon.co.uk:

> I've decided to auction my bike off


Why?

--
Ash ([:])

UKRMFBC#8 BOTAFOT#82 BOTAFOF#41 HMC#5 FTB#0
ETV1000 Caponord
http://www.theredline.co.uk
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast
enough." -- Mario Andretti

 
  #4
Stonge
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

"Matt Horn" wrote:

>> corners are no longer challenging


You want a 250 wet dream then


--
Stonge

www.brainbashers.com


 
  #5
Matt Horn
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636


"Stonge" <stonge@brainbashers.com> wrote in message
news:2lb8esFaoke5U1@uni-berlin.de...
> "Matt Horn" wrote:
>
> >> corners are no longer challenging

>
> You want a 250 wet dream then


The RF900 was good, ask pip!

--
Matt



 
  #6
Pip
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

"Matt Horn" <matthew.horn@nospam.spamcop.net> struggled to ejaculate:

>
>"Stonge" <stonge@brainbashers.com> wrote in message
>news:2lb8esFaoke5U1@uni-berlin.de...
>> "Matt Horn" wrote:
>>
>> >> corners are no longer challenging

>>
>> You want a 250 wet dream then

>
>The RF900 was good, ask pip!


Want to do a swap for the 636?

--
Pip, Ex - Hairy Gfedcker. RF 900RR, Ruff and Rattly.
WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4 MKA+E#3
ANORAK#8 MIRTTH#15 BOTAFOT/F#47/34a BONY#13 KotMIB# <space>
UKRMRM#14 TWA#2

 
  #7
Ballistic
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

"Matt Horn" <matthew.horn@nospam.spamcop.net> had a sudden rush of
blood to the head and wrote in news:ccpmjm$kan$1$8300dec7
@news.demon.co.uk:

> interested?


Nope.

--
Ash ([:])

UKRMFBC#8 BOTAFOT#82 BOTAFOF#41 HMC#5 FTB#0
ETV1000 Caponord
http://www.theredline.co.uk
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast
enough." -- Mario Andretti

 
  #8
Ace
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:19:07 +0100, "Matt Horn"
<matthew.horn@nospam.spamcop.net> wrote:

>
>"Ballistic" <ashleySIBERIANHAMSTER@theredline.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:Xns9522D4F12C354ashleyREMOVEALLYOURC@212.23. 3.119...
>> "Matt Horn" <matthew.horn@nospam.spamcop.net> had a sudden rush of
>> blood to the head and wrote in news:ccp6q6$hlc$1$8302bc10
>> @news.demon.co.uk:
>>
>> > I've decided to auction my bike off

>>
>> Why?

>
>because I want something slower, having something that is capabale of 160+
>mph and 0-100 in the blink of an eye.


Eh? I thought you had a 6R?

--
Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
GSX-R1000K3, CB400F2
BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, BOTCdV#1
 
  #9
dwb
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

Ace wrote:
>> because I want something slower, having something that is capabale
>> of 160+ mph and 0-100 in the blink of an eye.

>
> Eh? I thought you had a 6R?


Har har.

One man's blink is another man's squint.

Or something.

BTW, check the stats - 600's get to 60 (100km/h ) just as fast (in some
cases faster) then the litre bikes.

It's after that it all goes downhill for the 2 pint brigade.



 
  #10
Champ
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:58:40 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
wrote:

>BTW, check the stats - 600's get to 60 (100km/h ) just as fast (in some
>cases faster) then the litre bikes.


Do they!? I've never seen such a set of figures. My only conclusion
would be that the litre bike jockey would have to be incompetent.
--
Champ
GSX-R 1000, GPz 750 turbo, ZX7RR Endurance Racer x 2
GYASB#0 BotToS#2 BOTAFO(T|F)#35 WG*#1 DFV#8
Team UKRM Racing : www.team-ukrm.com
 
  #11
dwb
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

Champ wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:58:40 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> BTW, check the stats - 600's get to 60 (100km/h ) just as fast
>> (in some cases faster) then the litre bikes.

>
> Do they!? I've never seen such a set of figures. My only conclusion
> would be that the litre bike jockey would have to be incompetent.


Well, it was in Ride. Make of that what you will.




 
  #12
dwb
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

dwb wrote:
> Champ wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:58:40 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, check the stats - 600's get to 60 (100km/h ) just as fast
>>> (in some cases faster) then the litre bikes.

>>
>> Do they!? I've never seen such a set of figures. My only conclusion
>> would be that the litre bike jockey would have to be incompetent.

>
> Well, it was in Ride. Make of that what you will.


And actually, a bit of thought, it does make some sense.
Easier to get the power down etc etc.

Note as i said this is up to 60. After that, forget about it obviously.



 
  #13
Ace
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:04:44 +0100, Champ <neal@champ.org.uk> wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:58:40 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>BTW, check the stats - 600's get to 60 (100km/h ) just as fast (in some
>>cases faster) then the litre bikes.

>
>Do they!? I've never seen such a set of figures.


And it's unlikely you would. I mean, who's interested in 0-60 figures
anyway? They're pretty meaningless and incredibly difficult to
accurately measure once you get below say, 5 seconds or so.

>My only conclusion would be that the litre bike jockey would have to be incompetent.


Oh I dunno - ISTR my XT500 had better 0-60 times than some of the
behemoths that masqueraded as sprots bikes back in them thar days...

--
Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
GSX-R1000K3, CB400F2
BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, BOTCdV#1
 
  #14
Ace
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:17:31 +0200, Ace <b.rogers@virgin.net> wrote:


>Oh I dunno - ISTR my XT500 had better 0-60 times than some of the
>behemoths that masqueraded as sprots bikes back in them thar days...


Bad form an' all, but it got me thinking, and then I came across this
on ebay
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...m=24837482 79

Tempted, almost, I am. I'd love to have another one of these. Happy
days, and all that...

--
Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
GSX-R1000K3, CB400F2
BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, BOTCdV#1
 
  #15
Champ
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:08:39 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
wrote:

>dwb wrote:
>> Champ wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:58:40 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> BTW, check the stats - 600's get to 60 (100km/h ) just as fast
>>>> (in some cases faster) then the litre bikes.
>>>
>>> Do they!? I've never seen such a set of figures. My only conclusion
>>> would be that the litre bike jockey would have to be incompetent.

>>
>> Well, it was in Ride. Make of that what you will.

>
>And actually, a bit of thought, it does make some sense.
>Easier to get the power down etc etc.


Yersh. Whenever I've seen 0-60 times, pretty much everything with 100+
horspower does 3.something seconds. Once you've got enough power to
spin the wheel, that's going to be the limiting factor up to such a
low speed. But I'd be very suprised if a 600 could consistently,
measurably and significantly beat a litre bike.

I like to think I know a little of which I speak:
http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/launch.jpg
http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/winners.jpg
--
Champ
GSX-R 1000, GPz 750 turbo, ZX7RR Endurance Racer x 2
GYASB#0 BotToS#2 BOTAFO(T|F)#35 WG*#1 DFV#8
Team UKRM Racing : www.team-ukrm.com
 
  #16
Ben Blaney
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

Champ wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:58:40 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>BTW, check the stats - 600's get to 60 (100km/h ) just as fast (in some
>>cases faster) then the litre bikes.

>
>Do they!? I've never seen such a set of figures. My only conclusion
>would be that the litre bike jockey would have to be incompetent.


I was looking at some numbers in the latest (to me) PB the other day.
Can't remember what they were. And, um. Yeah. That's it really.

--
Ben Blaney
 
  #17
dwb
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

Champ wrote:
>
> I like to think I know a little of which I speak:
> http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/launch.jpg
> http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/winners.jpg


Come on - that doesn't prove your point at all - it's just an ego trip :-)



 
  #18
Champ
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:42:52 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
wrote:

>Champ wrote:
>>
>> I like to think I know a little of which I speak:
>> http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/launch.jpg
>> http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/winners.jpg

>
>Come on - that doesn't prove your point at all - it's just an ego trip :-)


Rumbled :-) But, I *did* win the street class at Ramsey Sprint!
--
Champ
GSX-R 1000, GPz 750 turbo, ZX7RR Endurance Racer x 2
GYASB#0 BotToS#2 BOTAFO(T|F)#35 WG*#1 DFV#8
Team UKRM Racing : www.team-ukrm.com
 
  #19
Mr. Fantastic
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

"Ben Blaney" <benblaney@ukrm.net> wrote...
> Champ wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:58:40 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>BTW, check the stats - 600's get to 60 (100km/h ) just as fast (in

some
> >>cases faster) then the litre bikes.

> >
> >Do they!? I've never seen such a set of figures. My only conclusion
> >would be that the litre bike jockey would have to be incompetent.

>
> I was looking at some numbers in the latest (to me) PB the other day.
> Can't remember what they were. And, um. Yeah. That's it really.
>


Bored eh?

--
Mr. Fantastic

ZXR400
Remove Pirate to Reply


 
  #20
Andy Wegg
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

"Champ" <neal@champ.org.uk> wrote in message
news:4i65f0d8rthi33vj6l0inqd5u35kp5urqg@4ax.com

> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:42:52 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> >Champ wrote:
> >>
> >> I like to think I know a little of which I speak:
> >> http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/launch.jpg
> >> http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/winners.jpg

> >
> >Come on - that doesn't prove your point at all - it's just an ego trip :-)

>
> Rumbled :-) But, I *did* win the street class at Ramsey Sprint!



Heh. Top Gear last night were making a similar point about some new
over-pwered Merc that just lights up the rear wheels if you try to gas
it as hard as you can.


I'd also point the learned gentleman to a series of traffic light drag
races between self on a mildly tuned DR-Z 400 supermoto and a bloke on a
litre bike, to whit an old GSX1100E with a Harris race pipe, last week
off the lights on the Walworth Rd. The DR-Z easily got away first and
it took the GSX until we were doing about 40-50 a hundred yards or so on
to come past. Repeated at the Camberwell Green lights and Denmark Hill
lights for good effect :-)


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
 
  #21
Ben Blaney
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

Mr. Fantastic wrote:

>"Ben Blaney" <benblaney@ukrm.net> wrote...
>>
>> I was looking at some numbers in the latest (to me) PB the other day.
>> Can't remember what they were. And, um. Yeah. That's it really.
>>

>
>Bored eh?


I'm good with numbers if they mean something. I can read a balance
sheet. I'm the quickest with the chalk if I'm having a game of darts
in the pub. But I was looking at this thing in PB and it was about
which bike was .1 of a second quicker to 60. And it wasn't
necessarily the most powerful one (but I can't even remember which
bikes were involved). And I was thinking "oh". And now I have *no*
recollection.

--
Ben Blaney
 
  #22
Paul Corfield
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:42:52 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
wrote:

>Champ wrote:
>>
>> I like to think I know a little of which I speak:
>> http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/launch.jpg
>> http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/winners.jpg

>
>Come on - that doesn't prove your point at all - it's just an ego trip :-)


You beat me to it.
--
Paul C - "the big camp bastard" (tm d.a.r.s.y)
VFR800 | ZX6R | R1150GS
BOD#5, two#4, BOTAFOT#23, BOTAFOF#4, URMSBC#09, COFF#09
Admits to working for London Underground!

 
  #23
Champ
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:36:09 +0100, Paul Corfield
<aooy65@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:42:52 +0100, "dwb" <parc_erom@crossdata.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>Champ wrote:
>>>
>>> I like to think I know a little of which I speak:
>>> http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/launch.jpg
>>> http://www.champ.org.uk/bikes/images/winners.jpg

>>
>>Come on - that doesn't prove your point at all - it's just an ego trip :-)

>
>You beat me to it.


I know - me, promoting my ego. Imagine!
--
Champ
I don't know, but I've been told, never slow down, you never grow old
GSX-R 1000, GPz 750 turbo, ZX7RR Endurance Racer x 2
GYASB#0 BotToS#2 BOTAFO(T|F)#35 WG*#1 DFV#8
Team UKRM Racing : www.team-ukrm.com
 
  #24
darsy
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:06:54 +0100, Champ <ukrm@champ.org.uk> wrote:

> me, promoting my ego.


it's the other way around, surely.
--
darsy
r65ls|zx-7r|cbr929rr-1
 
  #25
Champ
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:20:55 +0100, darsy <darsy@sticky.co.uk> wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:06:54 +0100, Champ <ukrm@champ.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> me, promoting my ego.

>
>it's the other way around, surely.


Er, yes, I suppose it is. My super-ego is one lazy bastard, mind.
--
Champ
GSX-R 1000, GPz 750 turbo, ZX7RR Endurance Racer x 2
GYASB#0 BotToS#2 BOTAFO(T|F)#35 WG*#1 DFV#8
Team UKRM Racing : www.team-ukrm.com
 
  #26
Linger
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

Verdigris wrote:

>>>>
>>> another GS convert?

>>
>> Nah he fancies something with real off road ability.

>
> At the larger end, the new KTM 950 Adventure (?) has had impressive
> reports. I was chatting to a bloke who had one, and he reckons it's
> excellent for green-laning.


Really, I wouldn't consider anything more than 450 4T.
I was thinking of getting a KTM so I could, motocross, enduro and
fit supermoto wheels.

I was thinking about the 450.
Although I still like strokers off road.

--
Linger


 
  #27
Pip
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

"Linger" <travis@BADSMELLenglishgolfer.com> struggled to ejaculate:

>Although I still like strokers off road.


There's a sirtony reference if ever I heard one.

--
Pip, Ex - Hairy Gfedcker. RF 900RR, Ruff and Rattly.
WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4 MKA+E#3
ANORAK#8 MIRTTH#15 BOTAFOT/F#47/34a BONY#13 KotMIB# <space>
UKRMRM#14 TWA#2

 
  #28
Verdigris
 
Default Re: FA: ZX6R 636

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:22:12 +0100, Linger wrote:

> Verdigris wrote:
>
>
>>>> another GS convert?
>>>
>>> Nah he fancies something with real off road ability.

>>
>> At the larger end, the new KTM 950 Adventure (?) has had impressive
>> reports. I was chatting to a bloke who had one, and he reckons it's
>> excellent for green-laning.

>
> Really, I wouldn't consider anything more than 450 4T. I was thinking of
> getting a KTM so I could, motocross, enduro and fit supermoto wheels.


It certainly does appear to be a bit on the large side, but apparently it
works. Not the sort of thing to take anywhere difficult though, I
wouldn't have thought.

--
Simon - verdant lineone ne t
Triumph Tiger. Big trailees - you know they make sense.
Z1000 - less sense, more sensation.
MAG BOTAFOT#36 two#22 HLR#pi BONY#62 BHaLC#3

 
Reply
Thread Tools


Powered by vBulletin

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.