My Forum About > Automotive > Motorcycle > Classic motorcycles
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
  #1
Austin Shackles
 
Default coo.


now this is what I call a monumental mod.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...s/R985bike.jpg
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.

a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
 
  #2
Tim
 
Default Re: coo.

In message <9qcc13p7hqgl55nkbhsmnb7l6s9bi23p4t@4ax.com>, Austin Shackles
<austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> writes
>
>now this is what I call a monumental mod.
>
>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...s/R985bike.jpg


I think I'd like something to keep my parts away from that belt.
--
Tim
http://www.pitfieldbeershop.co.uk/
 
  #3
The Older Gentleman
 
Default Re: coo.

Austin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> wrote:

> now this is what I call a monumental mod.
>
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...s/R985bike.jpg


That's rather good.


--
BMW K1100LT 750SS CB400F CD250 SL125
GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 YTC#3
BOF#30 WUSS#5 The bells, the bells.....
 
  #4
Jeremy
 
Default Re: coo.

In article <1hw5i0d.dt7f8jjmhieuN%
chateau.murray.takethisout@dsl.pipex.com>, The Older Gentleman says...
> Austin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> wrote:
>
> > now this is what I call a monumental mod.
> >
> > http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...s/R985bike.jpg

>
> That's rather good.
>
>
>

I subscribe to Cycle World (US m/c magazine) and they had a fascinating
article on aero-engined choppers in the April 07 issue. Bit tricky
filtering I should imagine.
--
jeremy
Sprint ST 955i
 
  #5
Dr Ivan D. Reid
 
Default Re: coo.

On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:47:54 +0100, Aus
tin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net>
wrote in <9qcc13p7hqgl55nkbhsmnb7l6s9bi23p4t@4ax.com>:

> now this is what I call a monumental mod.


> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...s/R985bike.jpg


How many furlongs to the tank?

--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
 
  #6
Jeremy
 
Default Re: coo.

In article <MPG.20805da0e0ca77bb98a412@news.individual.net> , Jeremy
says...
> In article <1hw5i0d.dt7f8jjmhieuN%
> chateau.murray.takethisout@dsl.pipex.com>, The Older Gentleman says...
> > Austin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> wrote:
> >
> > > now this is what I call a monumental mod.
> > >
> > > http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...s/R985bike.jpg

> >
> > That's rather good.
> >
> >
> >

> I subscribe to Cycle World (US m/c magazine) and they had a fascinating
> article on aero-engined choppers in the April 07 issue. Bit tricky
> filtering I should imagine.
>

Bad from etc. though I should point out the ones in the mag to which I
referred were mounted (how would you call it) transverse in the frame.

--
jeremy
Sprint ST 955i
 
  #7
Fr Jack
 
Default Re: coo.

Austin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> wrote:

>
>now this is what I call a monumental mod.
>
>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...s/R985bike.jpg


**WANT**
--

FrJ
 
  #8
Austin Shackles
 
Default Re: coo.

On or around Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:53:04 +0100, Fr Jack <sp@m.com> enlightened
us thusly:

>Austin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>now this is what I call a monumental mod.
>>
>>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...s/R985bike.jpg

>
>**WANT**


'tis rather shiny, innit.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.

a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
 
  #9
Fr Jack
 
Default Re: coo.

Austin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> wrote:


>'tis rather shiny, innit.


Bollocks to shiny - Mental wins! ;-)
--

FrJ
 
  #10
Grimly Curmudgeon
 
Default Re: coo.

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember Austin Shackles
<austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> saying something like:

>
>now this is what I call a monumental mod.
>
>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...s/R985bike.jpg


Be even more fun if it was a proper rotary, like a Gnome.
 
  #11
Austin Shackles
 
Default Re: coo.

On or around Sun, 08 Apr 2007 00:57:29 +0100, Grimly Curmudgeon
<grimly4REMOVE@REMOVEgmail.com> enlightened us thusly:

>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>drugs began to take hold. I remember Austin Shackles
><austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> saying something like:
>
>>
>>now this is what I call a monumental mod.
>>
>>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...s/R985bike.jpg

>
>Be even more fun if it was a proper rotary, like a Gnome.


might be scary - ISTR they run at a fixed speed and you make it "idle" by
switching the sparks on and off.

now, build the rotary into the back wheel...
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.

a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
 
  #12
Naqerj
 
Default Re: coo.

Austin Shackles wrote:
> On or around Sun, 08 Apr 2007 00:57:29 +0100, Grimly Curmudgeon
> <grimly4REMOVE@REMOVEgmail.com> enlightened us thusly:
>


>> Be even more fun if it was a proper rotary, like a Gnome.

>
> might be scary - ISTR they run at a fixed speed and you make it "idle" by
> switching the sparks on and off.
>
> now, build the rotary into the back wheel...


Trust you to come up with a daft idea like that - sensible people build
rotary engines into the /front/ wheel. Assuming the perpetrators of the
Megola can be classed as sensible.

A few years ago, LVM did a sort of mini-Megola as a poisson d'Avril.
'Twas alleged to have 5 cylinders of 10cc each... a Megola moped.

--
Andrew
 
  #13
Austin Shackles
 
Default Re: coo.

On or around Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:26:09 +0100, Naqerj
<pattle@globalnet.co.invalid> enlightened us thusly:

>Austin Shackles wrote:
>> On or around Sun, 08 Apr 2007 00:57:29 +0100, Grimly Curmudgeon
>> <grimly4REMOVE@REMOVEgmail.com> enlightened us thusly:
>>

>
>>> Be even more fun if it was a proper rotary, like a Gnome.

>>
>> might be scary - ISTR they run at a fixed speed and you make it "idle" by
>> switching the sparks on and off.
>>
>> now, build the rotary into the back wheel...

>
>Trust you to come up with a daft idea like that - sensible people build
>rotary engines into the /front/ wheel. Assuming the perpetrators of the
>Megola can be classed as sensible.


rotary in BOTH wheels - 2 wheel drive!

has anyone ever done a successful 2WD bike?
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.

a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
 
  #14
Pip Luscher
 
Default Re: coo.

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:28:01 +0100, Austin Shackles
<austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> wrote:

>has anyone ever done a successful 2WD bike?


Yamaha.

Some variant of the four-stroke YZ MX bike. They've been demo-ing it,
if not selling it, for several years. It uses a hydraulic system for
the front wheel that kicks in when the rear wheel spins up.

--
-Pip
 
  #15
Naqerj
 
Default Re: coo.

Austin Shackles wrote:

>
> rotary in BOTH wheels - 2 wheel drive!
>
> has anyone ever done a successful 2WD bike?


Oh yes, several... I'm sure others in this group will come up with the
more sensible stuff [1] but I must mention Bill Greaves who, in the
1950s, fitted Cyclemasters to the front and back of his push-bike and
set off on a World tour. I don't know much more except that the tour
included Australia, New Zealand and Jamaica and he covered 12,000 miles
or more.

I believe one or two people have also built 2WD VeloSolexes - being
piston-ported, the rear engine can be mounted back-to-front and re-timed
to run backwards.

[1] Neatly avoiding having to go and look up any details.
--
Andrew

 
  #16
Dr Ivan D. Reid
 
Default Re: coo.

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:28:01 +0100, Austin Shackles <austin
DITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net>
wrote in <d7uj13p44i14hhltjai35qlcp050ocmvlj@4ax.com>:

> has anyone ever done a successful 2WD bike?


Rokon, amongst others.

http://www.rokon.com/products/trailbrkr.htm

--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
 
  #17
kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk
 
Default Re: coo.

In article <d7uj13p44i14hhltjai35qlcp050ocmvlj@4ax.com>,
austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net (Austin Shackles) wrote:

> has anyone ever done a successful 2WD bike?


Not exactly what you have in mind but the German WW2 combinations could
drive the sidecar wheel.

Ken Young
 
  #18
Naqerj
 
Default Re: coo.

Dr Ivan D. Reid wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:28:01 +0100, Austin Shackles <austin
> DITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net>
> wrote in <d7uj13p44i14hhltjai35qlcp050ocmvlj@4ax.com>:
>
>> has anyone ever done a successful 2WD bike?

>
> Rokon, amongst others.
>
> http://www.rokon.com/products/trailbrkr.htm
>


Ah yes, that's one I was thinking of but CBA to look up the name of.

--
Andrew
 
  #19
platypus
 
Default Re: coo.

kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
> In article <d7uj13p44i14hhltjai35qlcp050ocmvlj@4ax.com>,
> austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net (Austin Shackles) wrote:
>
>> has anyone ever done a successful 2WD bike?

>
> Not exactly what you have in mind but the German WW2 combinations
> could drive the sidecar wheel.


Like Ural Gear-Up outfits, you mean?

--
platypus

"Merely corroborative detail, intended to
give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise
bald and unconvincing narrative.”

 
  #20
Naqerj
 
Default Re: coo.

kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
> In article <d7uj13p44i14hhltjai35qlcp050ocmvlj@4ax.com>,
> austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net (Austin Shackles) wrote:
>
>> has anyone ever done a successful 2WD bike?

>
> Not exactly what you have in mind but the German WW2 combinations could
> drive the sidecar wheel.


As could the Belgian ones - Gillet-Herstal and FN. Not the sort of
information I normally carry about in my head, I just happened to read
an article about them last week.

--
Andrew
 
  #21
kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk
 
Default Re: coo.

In article <DtSSh.9011$NK2.1686@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk> ,
monotreme@blueyonder.co.uk (platypus) wrote:

> Like Ural Gear-Up outfits, you mean?


Never heard of that. It was IIRC a dog clutch with no dif so mainly
usable for getting out of mud etc.

Ken Young
 
  #22
platypus
 
Default Re: coo.

kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
> In article <DtSSh.9011$NK2.1686@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk> ,
> monotreme@blueyonder.co.uk (platypus) wrote:
>
>> Like Ural Gear-Up outfits, you mean?

>
> Never heard of that. It was IIRC a dog clutch with no dif so mainly
> usable for getting out of mud etc.


http://www.uralmotorbikes.info/ural_outfits.htm

6th and 7th down are 2WD, but can't legally be used on the road in the UK.

--
platypus

"Merely corroborative detail, intended to
give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise
bald and unconvincing narrative.”

 
  #23
Austin Shackles
 
Default Re: coo.

On or around Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:50:41 GMT, "platypus"
<monotreme@blueyonder.co.uk> enlightened us thusly:

>kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
>> In article <DtSSh.9011$NK2.1686@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk> ,
>> monotreme@blueyonder.co.uk (platypus) wrote:
>>
>>> Like Ural Gear-Up outfits, you mean?

>>
>> Never heard of that. It was IIRC a dog clutch with no dif so mainly
>> usable for getting out of mud etc.

>
>http://www.uralmotorbikes.info/ural_outfits.htm
>
>6th and 7th down are 2WD, but can't legally be used on the road in the UK.


why not?
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.

a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
 
  #24
platypus
 
Default Re: coo.

Austin Shackles wrote:
> On or around Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:50:41 GMT, "platypus"
> <monotreme@blueyonder.co.uk> enlightened us thusly:
>
>> kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
>>> In article <DtSSh.9011$NK2.1686@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk> ,
>>> monotreme@blueyonder.co.uk (platypus) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Like Ural Gear-Up outfits, you mean?
>>>
>>> Never heard of that. It was IIRC a dog clutch with no dif so mainly
>>> usable for getting out of mud etc.

>>
>> http://www.uralmotorbikes.info/ural_outfits.htm
>>
>> 6th and 7th down are 2WD, but can't legally be used on the road in
>> the UK.

>
> why not?


Because the government has decided that, for your safety and comfort, the
only motorcycle sidecar combination to be allowed on British roads is the
one that swerves into the oncoming traffic when you close the throttle.

http://www.f2motorcycles.ltd.uk/rhsidecars.html

--
platypus

"Merely corroborative detail, intended to
give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise
bald and unconvincing narrative."

 
  #25
Champ
 
Default Re: coo.

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:19:06 +0100, Austin Shackles
<austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> wrote:

>>...so long as they're pre-'81. Or foreign-registered.

>
>fine by me. ideally, pre-73 and then there's no road tax to pay...


You really are rediculously tight, aren't you. You may even be worse
than TOG, FFS!
--
Champ
 
  #26
Rob
 
Default Re: coo.

Austin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> wrote:

> fine by me. ideally, pre-73 and then there's no road tax to pay...


<http://www.uralmotorbikes.info/chang_jiang.htm

This crowd were at one of the Stafford shows a few years back. They were
doing 'brand new' (zero miles) 1958 Chang Jiangs, that qualified for
classic tax status.

Looks like they can still do them judging from the comment to the left
of the prices.

The whole website's quite interesting - they were the providers of the
Ural outfit Mr Pole used on the recent telly prog.
--
Rob - Shropshire
So many cats,
So few recipes...
 
  #27
The Older Gentleman
 
Default Re: coo.

Champ <news@champ.org.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:19:06 +0100, Austin Shackles
> <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@ddol-las.net> wrote:
>
> >>...so long as they're pre-'81. Or foreign-registered.

> >
> >fine by me. ideally, pre-73 and then there's no road tax to pay...

>
> You really are rediculously tight, aren't you. You may even be worse
> than TOG, FFS!


Oi!


--
BMW K1100LT 750SS CB400F CD250 SL125
GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 YTC#3
BOF#30 WUSS#5 The bells, the bells.....
 
Reply
Thread Tools


Powered by vBulletin

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.