| #1 | |
|
|
Upanishad
What is the good of loving our desires In this foul-smelling, insubstantial body, Of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, Tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? What is the good of loving our desires When we can see the whole world is decaying, That gnats, mosquitoes, all things that are living, The very trees and rocks, arise and perish? What is the good of loving our desires When we can see the drying up of oceans, the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, Even the disappearance of the stars? What is the good of lovng our desires? Deliver me, and let me not exist. |
| #2 | |
|
|
Upanishad
What is the good of loving our desires in this foul-smelling, insubstantial body of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? What is the good of loving our desires when we can see the whole world is decaying, that gnats, mosquitoes, every living creature, the very trees and rocks, arise and perish? What is the good of loving our desires when we can see the drying up of oceans, the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, even the disappearance of the stars? What is the good of loving our desires? Deliver me, and let me not exist. |
| #3 | |
|
|
"George Dance" <georgedance04@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:1179329821.814609.157230@e65g2000hsc.googlegr oups.com... > Upanishad > > What is the good of loving our desires > in this foul-smelling, insubstantial body > of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, > tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? > > What is the good of loving our desires > when we can see the whole world is decaying, > that gnats, mosquitoes, every living creature, > the very trees and rocks, arise and perish? > > What is the good of loving our desires > when we can see the drying up of oceans, > the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, > even the disappearance of the stars? > > What is the good of loving our desires? > Deliver me, and let me not exist. What is the good of loving pizza with its dough so sauced? Cheeses cover bubbles. What is the good of loving pizza (but pepper packets are free)? Sausage, pepperoni, onions and rocks, arise mighty pineapple! What is the good of loving pizza when the dough mountains explode and blow out the stars. What is the good of loving pizza? Deliver my pizza, and let me eat!! ![]() -- ------------------------------------------- AJ - http://ClitIns.Com e In. (800 folders. -- kiddie-filtered -- FREE, Usenet Porn.) |
| #4 | |
|
|
On May 16, 6:21 pm, "Amadeus Jinn" <a-j...@here.nu> wrote:
> "George Dance" <georgedanc...@yahoo.ca> wrote in messagenews:1179329821.814609.157230@e65g2000hsc.g ooglegroups.com... > > Upanishad > > > What is the good of loving our desires > > in this foul-smelling, insubstantial body > > of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, > > tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? > > > What is the good of loving our desires > > when we can see the whole world is decaying, > > that gnats, mosquitoes, every living creature, > > the very trees and rocks, arise and perish? > > > What is the good of loving our desires > > when we can see the drying up of oceans, > > the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, > > even the disappearance of the stars? > > > What is the good of loving our desires? > > Deliver me, and let me not exist. > > What is the good of loving pizza > with its dough so sauced? Cheeses > cover bubbles. > > What is the good of loving pizza > (but pepper packets are free)? > Sausage, pepperoni, onions > and rocks, arise mighty pineapple! > > What is the good of loving pizza > when the dough mountains explode > and blow out the stars. > > What is the good of loving pizza? > Deliver my pizza, and let me eat!! > > ![]() > Good, but you're rhythm's off in a few places; that's a blank verse sonnet. How about: What is the good of loving to eat pizza when every slice has 700 calories not to mention all the oily trans fats and tons and more tons of cholesterol? What is the good loving to eat pizza when the stuff is just so damned expensive, last night I had to fork out $20 for just six slices and eight bony wings? What is the good of loving to eat pizza when they make you wait for 40 minutes (unless, like half the time, the driver ends up lost, and the pizza winds up cold?) What is the good of loving to eat pizza? Deliver a salad and a diet Coke. |
| #5 | |
|
|
"George Dance" <georgedance04@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:1179404510.710464.199670@h2g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com... > On May 16, 6:21 pm, "Amadeus Jinn" <a-j...@here.nu> wrote: >> "George Dance" <georgedanc...@yahoo.ca> wrote in messagenews:1179329821.814609.157230@e65g2000hsc.g ooglegroups.com... >> > Upanishad >> >> > What is the good of loving our desires >> > in this foul-smelling, insubstantial body >> > of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, >> > tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? >> >> > What is the good of loving our desires >> > when we can see the whole world is decaying, >> > that gnats, mosquitoes, every living creature, >> > the very trees and rocks, arise and perish? >> >> > What is the good of loving our desires >> > when we can see the drying up of oceans, >> > the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, >> > even the disappearance of the stars? >> >> > What is the good of loving our desires? >> > Deliver me, and let me not exist. >> >> What is the good of loving pizza >> with its dough so sauced? Cheeses >> cover bubbles. >> >> What is the good of loving pizza >> (but pepper packets are free)? >> Sausage, pepperoni, onions >> and rocks, arise mighty pineapple! >> >> What is the good of loving pizza >> when the dough mountains explode >> and blow out the stars. >> >> What is the good of loving pizza? >> Deliver my pizza, and let me eat!! >> >> ![]() >> > > > Good, but you're rhythm's off in a few places; that's a blank verse > sonnet. Mine wasn't a sonnet. Probably a poem. > How about: > > > What is the good of loving to eat pizza > when every slice has 700 calories > not to mention all the oily trans fats > and tons and more tons of cholesterol? > > What is the good loving to eat pizza > when the stuff is just so damned expensive, > last night I had to fork out $20 > for just six slices and eight bony wings? > > What is the good of loving to eat pizza > when they make you wait for 40 minutes > (unless, like half the time, the driver ends up > lost, and the pizza winds up cold?) > > What is the good of loving to eat pizza? > Deliver a salad and a diet Coke. Blasphemy! ![]() -- ------------------------------------------- AJ - http://ClitIns.Com e In. (800 folders. -- kiddie-filtered -- FREE, Usenet Porn.) |
| #6 | |
|
|
On May 17, 5:21 am, George Dance <georgedanc...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
[rewrite] > On May 16, 6:21 pm, "Amadeus Jinn" <a-j...@here.nu> wrote: > > > What is the good of loving pizza > > with its dough so sauced? Cheeses > > cover bubbles. > > > What is the good of loving pizza > > (but pepper packets are free)? > > Sausage, pepperoni, onions > > and rocks, arise mighty pineapple! > > > What is the good of loving pizza > > when the dough mountains explode > > and blow out the stars. > > > What is the good of loving pizza? > > Deliver my pizza, and let me eat!! > > > ![]() > > Good, but you're rhythm's off in a few places; that's a blank verse > sonnet. How about: > What is the good of ordering a pizza when every slice has 700 calories, not to mention all the oily trans fats and tons and more tons of cholesterol? What is the good of ordering a pizza when that stuff is just so damned expensive, last night I had to fork out $20 for just six slices and eight bony wings? What is the good of ordering a pizza when you have to wait for 40 minutes (unless, like half the time, the driver ends up lost, and the pizza ends up cold?) What is the good of ordering a pizza? Deliver me a salad and a Coke. |
| #7 | |
|
|
George Dance wrote:
> Upanishad > > What is the good of loving our desires > in this foul-smelling, insubstantial body > of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, > tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? > > What is the good of loving our desires > when we can see the whole world is decaying, > that gnats, mosquitoes, every living creature, > the very trees and rocks, arise and perish? > > What is the good of loving our desires > when we can see the drying up of oceans, > the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, > even the disappearance of the stars? > > What is the good of loving our desires? We also serve who vent off Brahman's fires. -- -------(m+ ~/ )_|I do not "negotiate" for half my baby back, Solomon. http://scrawlmark.org |
| #8 | |
|
|
On May 17, 11:36 am, "Dennis M. Hammes" <scrawlm...@arvig.net> wrote:
> George Dance wrote: > > Upanishad > > > What is the good of loving our desires > > in this foul-smelling, insubstantial body > > of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, > > tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? > > > What is the good of loving our desires > > when we can see the whole world is decaying, > > that gnats, mosquitoes, every living creature, > > the very trees and rocks, arise and perish? > > > What is the good of loving our desires > > when we can see the drying up of oceans, > > the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, > > even the disappearance of the stars? > > > What is the good of loving our desires? > > We also serve who vent off Brahman's fires. > Then spoke the thunder to its father: "DA-DA" The net result of that, precisely nada. |
| #9 | |
|
|
George Dance wrote:
>Will Dockery wrote: > >George Dance wrote: > > > > > Upanishad > > > > > > What is the good of loving our desires > > > > In this foul-smelling, insubstantial body, > > > > Of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, > > > > Tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? > > > > > > What is the good of loving our desires > > > > When we can see the whole world is decaying, > > > > That gnats, mosquitoes, all things that are living, > > > > The very trees and rocks, arise and perish? > > > > > > What is the good of loving our desires > > > > When we can see the drying up of oceans, > > > > the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, > > > > Even the disappearance of the stars? > > > > > > What is the good of lovng our desires? > > > > Deliver me, and let me not exist. > > > > > > -George Dance > > > > > Hmm ... I'm starting to see what OB meant by never completing a poem. > > > L7 obviously should read, "... every living creature". > > > > Yeah... that's smoother. > > > > > As well, I > > > don't see any reason for the initial caps here. I'll revise and > > > repost. > > > > I never liked using the caps, and usually don't... there's probably a "rule" > > about that somewhere, though? > > The initial capitals are a convention in formal poetry; IMO, their > main reason is to draw attention from the last word in each line > (where it normally goes) to the first. When a poet's working with a > formal rhyme-scheme, often some of his most fitting words for the poem > simply won't work at the end of a line; so this gives him another > place to put them. > > But here that's all irrelevant; there's no rhyme, and the words at the > end are better than those at the first, anyway. Yeah, it sometimes gives the poem an awkward stop-start feeling in the reading when there isn't a rhyme at the end to follow from in the unrhymed /flowing/ poetry. -- "Wobble" by Dockery-Conley: http://www.myspace.com/willdockery "The Ride (Combat Zone)" by Dockery-Mallard-Beck: http://www.myspace.com/shadowvilleallstars |
| #10 | |
|
|
In article <6018c$464cba0e$18d62320$5244@KNOLOGY.NET>, Will Dockery says...
> > George Dance wrote: >>Will Dockery wrote: >> >George Dance wrote: >> >> > > > Upanishad >> > >> > > > What is the good of loving our desires >> > > > In this foul-smelling, insubstantial body, >> > > > Of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, >> > > > Tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? >> > >> > > > What is the good of loving our desires >> > > > When we can see the whole world is decaying, >> > > > That gnats, mosquitoes, all things that are living, >> > > > The very trees and rocks, arise and perish? >> > >> > > > What is the good of loving our desires >> > > > When we can see the drying up of oceans, >> > > > the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, >> > > > Even the disappearance of the stars? >> > >> > > > What is the good of lovng our desires? >> > > > Deliver me, and let me not exist. >> > >> > > > -George Dance >> > >> > > Hmm ... I'm starting to see what OB meant by never completing a poem. >> > > L7 obviously should read, "... every living creature". >> > >> > Yeah... that's smoother. >> > >> > > As well, I >> > > don't see any reason for the initial caps here. I'll revise and >> > > repost. >> > >> > I never liked using the caps, and usually don't... there's probably a >"rule" >> > about that somewhere, though? >> >> The initial capitals are a convention in formal poetry; IMO, their >> main reason is to draw attention from the last word in each line >> (where it normally goes) to the first. When a poet's working with a >> formal rhyme-scheme, often some of his most fitting words for the poem >> simply won't work at the end of a line; so this gives him another >> place to put them. >> >> But here that's all irrelevant; there's no rhyme, and the words at the >> end are better than those at the first, anyway. > >Yeah, it sometimes gives the poem an awkward stop-start feeling in the >reading when there isn't a rhyme at the end to follow from in the unrhymed >/flowing/ poetry. christ. if only you knew what that meant. you're hilarious when you want to sound like you know something. most sincerely, GodBuilt -- ----------------------------------------------- "I like to drink, I like to drive, I like to think all of the Jews got out of the Holocaust alive, my name is Mel, and can't you tell, I like Tequila!" Denis Leary |
| #11 | |
|
|
On May 17, 4:40 pm, On The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built wrote:
>Will Dockery wrote: >>George Dance wrote: > > >> > > > Upanishad > > >> > > > What is the good of loving our desires > >> > > > In this foul-smelling, insubstantial body, > >> > > > Of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, > >> > > > Tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? > > >> > > > What is the good of loving our desires > >> > > > When we can see the whole world is decaying, > >> > > > That gnats, mosquitoes, all things that are living, > >> > > > The very trees and rocks, arise and perish? > > >> > > > What is the good of loving our desires > >> > > > When we can see the drying up of oceans, > >> > > > the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, > >> > > > Even the disappearance of the stars? > > >> > > > What is the good of lovng our desires? > >> > > > Deliver me, and let me not exist. > > >> > > > -George Dance > > >> > > Hmm ... I'm starting to see what OB meant by never completing a poem. > >> > > L7 obviously should read, "... every living creature". > > >> > Yeah... that's smoother. > > >> > > As well, I > >> > > don't see any reason for the initial caps here. I'll revise and > >> > > repost. > > >> > I never liked using the caps, and usually don't... there's probably a > >"rule" > >> > about that somewhere, though? > > >> The initial capitals are a convention in formal poetry; IMO, their > >> main reason is to draw attention from the last word in each line > >> (where it normally goes) to the first. When a poet's working with a > >> formal rhyme-scheme, often some of his most fitting words for the poem > >> simply won't work at the end of a line; so this gives him another > >> place to put them. > > >> But here that's all irrelevant; there's no rhyme, and the words at the > >> end are better than those at the first, anyway. > > >Yeah, it sometimes gives the poem an awkward stop-start feeling in the > >reading when there isn't a rhyme at the end to follow from in the unrhymed > >/flowing/ poetry. > > christ. if only you knew How obsessed with me you are? No thanks. I don't wanna know, pal. -- "Wobble" by Dockery-Conley: http://www.myspace.com/willdockery "The Ride (Combat Zone)" by Dockery-Mallard-Beck: http://www.myspace.com/shadowvilleallstars |
| #12 | |
|
|
in article 1179437993.756949.275030@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups. com, Will
Dockery at will.dockery@gmail.com wrote on 5/17/07 5:39 PM: > How obsessed with me you are? Will, that's French. Why did you type it in English? |
| #13 | |
|
|
In article <1179437993.756949.275030@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups .com>, Will Dockery
says... > >On May 17, 4:40 pm, On The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built wrote: >>Will Dockery wrote: >>>George Dance wrote: >> >> >> > > > Upanishad >> >> >> > > > What is the good of loving our desires >> >> > > > In this foul-smelling, insubstantial body, >> >> > > > Of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, >> >> > > > Tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? >> >> >> > > > What is the good of loving our desires >> >> > > > When we can see the whole world is decaying, >> >> > > > That gnats, mosquitoes, all things that are living, >> >> > > > The very trees and rocks, arise and perish? >> >> >> > > > What is the good of loving our desires >> >> > > > When we can see the drying up of oceans, >> >> > > > the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, >> >> > > > Even the disappearance of the stars? >> >> >> > > > What is the good of lovng our desires? >> >> > > > Deliver me, and let me not exist. >> >> >> > > > -George Dance >> >> >> > > Hmm ... I'm starting to see what OB meant by never completing a poem. >> >> > > L7 obviously should read, "... every living creature". >> >> >> > Yeah... that's smoother. >> >> >> > > As well, I >> >> > > don't see any reason for the initial caps here. I'll revise and >> >> > > repost. >> >> >> > I never liked using the caps, and usually don't... there's probably a >> >"rule" >> >> > about that somewhere, though? >> >> >> The initial capitals are a convention in formal poetry; IMO, their >> >> main reason is to draw attention from the last word in each line >> >> (where it normally goes) to the first. When a poet's working with a >> >> formal rhyme-scheme, often some of his most fitting words for the poem >> >> simply won't work at the end of a line; so this gives him another >> >> place to put them. >> >> >> But here that's all irrelevant; there's no rhyme, and the words at the >> >> end are better than those at the first, anyway. >> >> >Yeah, it sometimes gives the poem an awkward stop-start feeling in the >> >reading when there isn't a rhyme at the end to follow from in the unrhymed >> >/flowing/ poetry. >> >> christ. if only you knew > >How obsessed with me you are? you misspelled the word "amused." but you're always hilarious when you want to sound like you know something. you believe you're contributing something significant to the conversation, and all you're doing is looking really ignorant. and stupid. and hilarious. heh. most sincerely, GodBuilt -- ----------------------------------------------- "I like to drink, I like to drive, I like to think all of the Jews got out of the Holocaust alive, my name is Mel, and can't you tell, I like Tequila!" Denis Leary |
| #14 | |
|
|
On The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built wrote:
>Will Dockery wrote: >>George Dance wrote: > > >> >>> Upanishad > > >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires > >> >>> In this foul-smelling, insubstantial body, > >> >>> Of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, > >> >>> Tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? > > >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires > >> >>> When we can see the whole world is decaying, > >> >>> That gnats, mosquitoes, all things that are living, > >> >>> The very trees and rocks, arise and perish? > > >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires > >> >>> When we can see the drying up of oceans, > >> >>> the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, > >> >>> Even the disappearance of the stars? > > >> >>> What is the good of lovng our desires? > >> >>> Deliver me, and let me not exist. > > >> >>> -George Dance > > >> >> > > Hmm ... I'm starting to see what OB meant by never completing a poem. > >> >> > > L7 obviously should read, "... every living creature". > > >> >> > Yeah... that's smoother. > > >> >> > > As well, I > >> >> > > don't see any reason for the initial caps here. I'll revise and repost. > > >> >> > I never liked using the caps, and usually don't... there's probably a "rule" > >> >> > about that somewhere, though? > > >> >> The initial capitals are a convention in formal poetry; IMO, their main reason is to draw attention from the last word in each line > >> >> (where it normally goes) to the first. When a poet's working with a > >> >> formal rhyme-scheme, often some of his most fitting words for the poem > >> >> simply won't work at the end of a line; so this gives him another place to put them. > > >> >> But here that's all irrelevant; there's no rhyme, and the words at the > >> >> end are better than those at the first, anyway. > > >> >Yeah, it sometimes gives the poem an awkward stop-start feeling in the > >> >reading when there isn't a rhyme at the end to follow from in the unrhymed > >> >/flowing/ poetry. > > >> christ. if only you knew > > >How obsessed with me you are? > > you misspelled the word "amused." Either way, you sure didn't come here for the poetry... your only purpose is to sniff along behind me, obsessively "amused". -- "Wobble" by Dockery-Conley: http://www.myspace.com/willdockery "The Ride (Combat Zone)" by Dockery-Mallard-Beck: http://www.myspace.com/shadowvilleallstars |
| #15 | |
|
|
In article <1179508572.491695.66330@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.c om>, Will Dockery
says... > >On The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built wrote: >>Will Dockery wrote: >>>George Dance wrote: >> >> >> >>> Upanishad >> >> >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires >> >> >>> In this foul-smelling, insubstantial body, >> >> >>> Of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, >> >> >>> Tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? >> >> >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires >> >> >>> When we can see the whole world is decaying, >> >> >>> That gnats, mosquitoes, all things that are living, >> >> >>> The very trees and rocks, arise and perish? >> >> >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires >> >> >>> When we can see the drying up of oceans, >> >> >>> the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, >> >> >>> Even the disappearance of the stars? >> >> >> >>> What is the good of lovng our desires? >> >> >>> Deliver me, and let me not exist. >> >> >> >>> -George Dance >> >>>> >> > > Hmm ... I'm starting to see what OB meant by never completing a poem. >> >> >> > > L7 obviously should read, "... every living creature". >> >> >> >> > Yeah... that's smoother. >> >> >> >> > > As well, I >>>> >> > > don't see any reason for the initial caps here. I'll revise and >>repost. >> >>>> >> > I never liked using the caps, and usually don't... there's probably a >>"rule" >> >> >> > about that somewhere, though? >> >>>> >> The initial capitals are a convention in formal poetry; IMO, their main >>reason is to draw attention from the last word in each line >> >> >> (where it normally goes) to the first. When a poet's working with a >> >> >> formal rhyme-scheme, often some of his most fitting words for the poem >>>> >> simply won't work at the end of a line; so this gives him another place to >>put them. >> >> >> >> But here that's all irrelevant; there's no rhyme, and the words at the >> >> >> end are better than those at the first, anyway. >> >> >> >Yeah, it sometimes gives the poem an awkward stop-start feeling in the >>>> >reading when there isn't a rhyme at the end to follow from in the unrhymed >> >> >/flowing/ poetry. >> >> >> christ. if only you knew >> >> >How obsessed with me you are? >> >> you misspelled the word "amused." > >Either way, you sure didn't come here for the poetry... your only >purpose is to sniff along behind me, obsessively "amused". are you implying that you're here for the poetry, dockery? now that IS amusing. that's the biggest lie you've told, and you've told some whoopers. and why do you respond to my every post? seems you're doing enough sniffing for the both of us. most sincerely, GodBuilt -- ----------------------------------------------- "I like to drink, I like to drive, I like to think all of the Jews got out of the Holocaust alive, my name is Mel, and can't you tell, I like Tequila!" Denis Leary |
| #16 | |
|
|
On The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built wrote:
>Will Dockery wrote: >>George Dance wrote: > > >> >> >>> Upanishad > > >> >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires > >> >> >>> In this foul-smelling, insubstantial body, > >> >> >>> Of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, > >> >> >>> Tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? > > >> >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires > >> >> >>> When we can see the whole world is decaying, > >> >> >>> That gnats, mosquitoes, all things that are living, > >> >> >>> The very trees and rocks, arise and perish? > > >> >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires > >> >> >>> When we can see the drying up of oceans, > >> >> >>> the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, > >> >> >>> Even the disappearance of the stars? > > >> >> >>> What is the good of lovng our desires? > >> >> >>> Deliver me, and let me not exist. > > >> >> >>> -George Dance > >> >> > > Hmm ... I'm starting to see what OB meant by never completing a poem. >> >> > > L7 obviously should read, "... every living creature". > >> >> > Yeah... that's smoother. > > >> > > As well, I > >> > > don't see any reason for the initial caps here. I'll revise and repost. > >> >> > I never liked using the caps, and usually don't... there's probably a "rule" >> >> > about that somewhere, though? > > >> The initial capitals are a convention in formal poetry; IMO, their main > >>reason is to draw attention from the last word in each line > >> (where it normally goes) to the first. When a poet's working with a > >> formal rhyme-scheme, often some of his most fitting words for the poem > >> simply won't work at the end of a line; so this gives him another place to > >>put them. > >> >> But here that's all irrelevant; there's no rhyme, and the words at the >> >> end are better than those at the first, anyway. > >> >Yeah, it sometimes gives the poem an awkward stop-start feeling in the >> >reading when there isn't a rhyme at the end to follow from in the unrhymed /flowing/ poetry. > > >> >> christ. if only you knew > > >> >How obsessed with me you are? > > >> you misspelled the word "amused." > > >Either way, you sure didn't come here for the poetry... your only > >purpose is to sniff along behind me, obsessively "amused". > > are you implying that you're here for the poetry, dockery? Sure, I write it, post it and read it, while you're obviously here only for your daily dose of "Will Dockery" and nothing else... although you do seem to be developing a crush on Dave... heh. The evidence for this is that you're in this thread but haven't written /one word/ about the poem posted here, only sniffing behind me, as always. Carry on, you know you can't help yourself. -- "Wobble" by Dockery-Conley: http://www.myspace.com/willdockery "The Ride (Combat Zone)" by Dockery-Mallard-Beck: http://www.myspace.com/shadowvilleallstars |
| #17 | |
|
|
"Stuart Leichter" wrote: >Will Dockery wrote on 5/17/07 5:39 PM: > > > How obsessed with me you are? > > Will, that's French. Why did you type it in English? Nostalgia, maybe. -- "The Shadowville All-Stars provide the musical canvas for the word paintings of Will Dockery, the Poet Laureate of Shadowville. The group represents a vision for a multi-faceted arts ensemble..." -Dennis Beck "The Ride (Combat Zone)" by Dockery-Mallard-Beck: http://www.myspace.com/shadowvilleallstars "Wobble" by Dockery-Conley: http://www.myspace.com/willdockery |
| #18 | |
|
|
On May 19, 1:44 pm, "Will Dockery" <will.dock...@knology.net> wrote:
> "Stuart Leichter" wrote: > >Will Dockery wrote on 5/17/07 5:39 PM: > > > > How obsessed with me you are? > > > Will, that's French. Why did you type it in English? > > Nostalgia, maybe. At which point, OB will reply "Nostalgie de la boue", And all the trolls will have a laugh Though none will have a clue. |
| #19 | |
|
|
George Dance <georgedance04@yahoo.ca> said:
> Goober Duck Will "Crybaby" Dockery quacked: > > > "Stuart Leichter" wrote: > > > > > Goober Duck Will "Crybaby" Dockery quacked: > > > > > > How obsessed with me you are? > > > > > Will, that's French. Why did you type it in English? > > > > Nostalgia, maybe. > > > At which point, OB will reply > "Nostalgie de la boue", > And all the trolls will have a laugh > Though none will have a clue. Heh. You underestimate those around you. -- Cm~ |
| #20 | |
|
|
On May 19, 2:58 pm, Barbara's Cat <c...@NOSPAMscientist.com> wrote:
> George Dance <georgedanc...@yahoo.ca> said: > > > > > > > Goober Duck Will "Crybaby" Dockery quacked: > > > > "Stuart Leichter" wrote: > > > > > Goober Duck Will "Crybaby" Dockery quacked: > > > > > > How obsessed with me you are? > > > > > Will, that's French. Why did you type it in English? > > > > Nostalgia, maybe. > > > At which point, OB will reply > > "Nostalgie de la boue", > > And all the trolls will have a laugh > > Though none will have a clue. > > Heh. > You underestimate those around you. > Not at all. I expected those who understood the reference to think to themselves, "Just shows that I'm not really a troll." |
| #21 | |
|
|
George Dance wrote:
> On May 19, 1:44 pm, "Will Dockery" <will.dock...@knology.net> wrote: > >>"Stuart Leichter" wrote: >> >>>Will Dockery wrote on 5/17/07 5:39 PM: >> >>>>How obsessed with me you are? >> >>>Will, that's French. Why did you type it in English? >> >>Nostalgia, maybe. > > > > At which point, OB will reply > "Nostalgie de la boue", > And all the trolls will have a laugh > Though none will have a clue. > "Harquarte Fentoine de la Boue, je me parle a toi..." -- -------(m+ ~/ )_|I do not "negotiate" for half my baby back, Solomon. http://scrawlmark.org |
| #22 | |
|
|
On The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built wrote:
>Will Dockery wrote: >>George Dance wrote: > >>> Upanishad > >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires >>> In this foul-smelling, insubstantial body, >>> Of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, >>> Tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? > >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires >>> When we can see the whole world is decaying, >>> That gnats, mosquitoes, all things that are living, >>> The very trees and rocks, arise and perish? > >> >>> What is the good of loving our desires >>> When we can see the drying up of oceans, >>> the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, >>> Even the disappearance of the stars? > >> >>> What is the good of lovng our desires? >>> Deliver me, and let me not exist. > >>> -George Dance > >> > >>> >> > > Hmm ... I'm starting to see what OB meant by never completing a poem. > >>> >> > > L7 obviously should read, "... every living creature". > >> > >>> >> > Yeah... that's smoother. > >> > >> >> > > As well, I > >>>> > > don't see any reason for the initial caps here. I'll revise and repost. > >> > >>>>> > I never liked using the caps, and usually don't... there's probably a > >>>"rule" > >>> >> > about that somewhere, though? > >> > >> >> The initial capitals are a convention in formal poetry; IMO, their main > >> >>reason is to draw attention from the last word in each line > >> >> (where it normally goes) to the first. When a poet's working with a > >> >> formal rhyme-scheme, often some of his most fitting words for the poem > >> >> simply won't work at the end of a line; so this gives him another place to > >> >>put them. > >> > >>> >> But here that's all irrelevant; there's no rhyme, and the words at the > >>> >> end are better than those at the first, anyway. > >> > >>> >Yeah, it sometimes gives the poem an awkward stop-start feeling in the > >>>>reading when there isn't a rhyme at the end to follow from in the unrhymed > >>>/flowing/ poetry. > >> > >> >> >> christ. if only you knew > >> > >> >> >How obsessed with me you are? > >> > >> >> you misspelled the word "amused." > >> > >> >Either way, you sure didn't come here for the poetry... your only > >> >purpose is to sniff along behind me, obsessively "amused". > >> > >> are you implying that you're here for the poetry, dockery? > > > >Sure, I write it, post it and read it, while you're obviously here > >only for your daily dose of "Will Dockery" and nothing else... > > it's fun It's fun to see just how big a fool you've become. > >although you do seem to be developing a crush on Dave... heh. > > feeling abandoned? Not at all... just pointing out what a jeering fool you've become. > >The evidence for this is that you're in this thread but haven't > >written /one word/ about the poem posted here, only sniffing behind > >me, as always. > > not at all. i've asked you at least half a dozen times to please explain Sorry, pal, but I have no intention of explaining anything to a jeering fool like you. -- "Mirror Twins" by W. Dockery-B. Fowler: http://www.myspace.com/shadowvilleallstars "Hasty Pudding" by W. Dockery-H. Conley: http://www.myspace.com/willdockery |
| #23 | |
|
|
"Will Dockery" <will.dockery@knology.net> wrote in message news:d3f06$46509a8d$18d62320$25748@KNOLOGY.NET... > On The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built wrote: >>Will Dockery wrote: >>>George Dance wrote: >> >>>> Upanishad >> >> >>>> What is the good of loving our desires >>>> In this foul-smelling, insubstantial body, >>>> Of bone, skin, muscle, marrow, semen, flesh, >>>> Tears, sweat, feces, urine, bile, and wind? >> >> >>>> What is the good of loving our desires >>>> When we can see the whole world is decaying, >>>> That gnats, mosquitoes, all things that are living, >>>> The very trees and rocks, arise and perish? >> >> >>>> What is the good of loving our desires >>>> When we can see the drying up of oceans, >>>> the fall of mountains, and the earth's submergence, >>>> Even the disappearance of the stars? >> >> >>>> What is the good of lovng our desires? >>>> Deliver me, and let me not exist. >> >>>> -George Dance >> >> >> >>> >> > > Hmm ... I'm starting to see what OB meant by never completing >> >>> >> > > a > poem. >> >>> >> > > L7 obviously should read, "... every living creature". >> >> >> >>> >> > Yeah... that's smoother. >> >> >> >> >> > > As well, I >> >>>> > > don't see any reason for the initial caps here. I'll revise and > repost. >> >> >> >>>>> > I never liked using the caps, and usually don't... there's > probably a >> >>>"rule" >> >>> >> > about that somewhere, though? >> >> >> >> >> The initial capitals are a convention in formal poetry; IMO, their > main >> >> >>reason is to draw attention from the last word in each line >> >> >> (where it normally goes) to the first. When a poet's working with >> >> >> a >> >> >> formal rhyme-scheme, often some of his most fitting words for the > poem >> >> >> simply won't work at the end of a line; so this gives him another > place to >> >> >>put them. >> >> >> >>> >> But here that's all irrelevant; there's no rhyme, and the words at > the >> >>> >> end are better than those at the first, anyway. >> >> >> >>> >Yeah, it sometimes gives the poem an awkward stop-start feeling in > the >> >>>>reading when there isn't a rhyme at the end to follow from in the > unrhymed >> >>>/flowing/ poetry. >> >> >> >> >> >> christ. if only you knew >> >> >> >> >> >How obsessed with me you are? >> >> >> >> >> you misspelled the word "amused." >> >> >> >> >Either way, you sure didn't come here for the poetry... your only >> >> >purpose is to sniff along behind me, obsessively "amused". >> >> >> >> are you implying that you're here for the poetry, dockery? >> > >> >Sure, I write it, post it and read it, while you're obviously here >> >only for your daily dose of "Will Dockery" and nothing else... >> >> it's fun > > It's fun to see just how big a fool you've become. > >> >although you do seem to be developing a crush on Dave... heh. >> >> feeling abandoned? > > Not at all... just pointing out what a jeering fool you've become. > >> >The evidence for this is that you're in this thread but haven't >> >written /one word/ about the poem posted here, only sniffing behind >> >me, as always. >> >> not at all. i've asked you at least half a dozen times to please explain > > Sorry, pal, but I have no intention of explaining anything to a jeering > fool > like you. riiiiiiiiight. you could do it if you wanted to, huh? uh-huh. sure you could. so tell me, is it hard to be as stupid as you or are you simply so stupid you don't know how, well, stupid you are? take your time. Renay > > -- > "Mirror Twins" by W. Dockery-B. Fowler: > http://www.myspace.com/shadowvilleallstars > > "Hasty Pudding" by W. Dockery-H. Conley: > http://www.myspace.com/willdockery > > |
| #24 | |
|
|
"George Dance" wrote: >"Will Dockery" wrote: > > "Stuart Leichter" wrote: > > >Will Dockery wrote: > > > > > How obsessed with me you are? > > > > > Will, that's French. Why did you type it in English? > > > > Nostalgia, maybe. > > At which point, OB will reply > "Nostalgie de la boue", > And all the trolls will have a laugh > Though none will have a clue. "...there are five native American art forms that we've given to the world: Jazz, of course. Musical comedy as we know it today. The detective story as crafted by Poe. The banjo. And comic books." -Harlan Ellison -- "Mirror Twins" by W. Dockery-B. Fowler: http://www.myspace.com/shadowvilleallstars "Hasty Pudding" by W. Dockery-H. Conley: http://www.myspace.com/willdockery |
| #25 | |
|
|
|