this group

Has died a death. I'm going to petition in uk.net.news.config for it's
removal ASAP

On my server there are over 30 different groups dealing with pets all better
supported than this one.

It has become evident to many over the last year that this group in now ripe
for a visit from Dr. Death.

Fanny.

FANNY wrote:
> Has died a death. I'm going to petition in uk.net.news.config for it's
> removal ASAP
>
> On my server there are over 30 different groups dealing with pets all
> better supported than this one.
>
> It has become evident to many over the last year that this group in
> now ripe for a visit from Dr. Death.
>
> Fanny.
>
So you have the right to remove a group because you dont like it? Get a
life.

"Ray" <r.sherlbra@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:18ORc.778$zT5.675@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net...
> FANNY wrote:
> > Has died a death. I'm going to petition in uk.net.news.config for it's
> > removal ASAP
> >
> > On my server there are over 30 different groups dealing with pets all
> > better supported than this one.
> >
> > It has become evident to many over the last year that this group in
> > now ripe for a visit from Dr. Death.
> >
> > Fanny.
> >
> So you have the right to remove a group because you dont like it? Get a
> life.
>

Dont be silly Ray. I can put forward a RFD (request for discussion)

Control will cross post the RFD to uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config
and any other groups or mailing lists related to the proposed topic or
likely to be affected. The groups to be cross posted into should be those
requested by the proponent. The proponent may also indicate which groups the
Followups should be set to. Control may, at his discretion, add additional
groups to these lists (or remove groups where such cross posting is beyond
the technical capabilities of the news software). Uk.net.news.config shall
be included in both the original cross posting and followups. Only postings
which are cross posted to uk.net.news.config will be considered part of the
definitive discussion.

FANNY wrote:
>>>
>
> Dont be silly Ray. I can put forward a RFD (request for discussion)
>
> Control will cross post the RFD to uk.net.news.announce,
> uk.net.news.config and any other groups or mailing lists related to
> the proposed topic or likely to be affected. The groups to be cross
> posted into should be those requested by the proponent. The proponent
> may also indicate which groups the Followups should be set to.
> Control may, at his discretion, add additional groups to these lists
> (or remove groups where such cross posting is beyond the technical
> capabilities of the news software). Uk.net.news.config shall be
> included in both the original cross posting and followups. Only
> postings which are cross posted to uk.net.news.config will be
> considered part of the definitive discussion.
>
You are so sad, you want a group removed because you dont like it? Go find
something else to do and leave the group alone.

GOOD GOLLY MISS mOLLY wrote:
> >
> You want to borrow my troll swatter Marcus? They seem to be breeding
> like flies at the moment and the OP is one too.
>
You wont be able to read this then?

Mike wrote:
> >
> Good, and the sooner you get rid of that old twat "Molly", the
> better. She's the reason this group is so wasted. She can deny
> all she likes, but google supports my view. Her partner Brenchley
> being dead is of course, better for the group as that's one less
> pillock keeping it down.
>
>> Just out of interest, why do you care?
>
> Dunno why the OP cares, but in my case I think this ought to be a
> moderated group. That would kill most of Molly's abusive posts.
>
It would kill your abusive posts too Idiot.

"Ray" <r.sherlbra@virgin.net> wrote:

>Mike wrote:
>> >
>> Good, and the sooner you get rid of that old twat "Molly", the
>> better. She's the reason this group is so wasted. She can deny
>> all she likes, but google supports my view. Her partner Brenchley
>> being dead is of course, better for the group as that's one less
>> pillock keeping it down.
>>
>>> Just out of interest, why do you care?
>>
>> Dunno why the OP cares, but in my case I think this ought to be a
>> moderated group. That would kill most of Molly's abusive posts.
>>
>It would kill your abusive posts too Idiot.

What abusive posts?

	#1
FANNY	this group Has died a death. I'm going to petition in uk.net.news.config for it's removal ASAP On my server there are over 30 different groups dealing with pets all better supported than this one. It has become evident to many over the last year that this group in now ripe for a visit from Dr. Death. Fanny.

	#2
Ray	Re: this group FANNY wrote: > Has died a death. I'm going to petition in uk.net.news.config for it's > removal ASAP > > On my server there are over 30 different groups dealing with pets all > better supported than this one. > > It has become evident to many over the last year that this group in > now ripe for a visit from Dr. Death. > > Fanny. > So you have the right to remove a group because you dont like it? Get a life.

	#3
FANNY	Re: this group "Ray" <r.sherlbra@virgin.net> wrote in message news:18ORc.778$zT5.675@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net... > FANNY wrote: > > Has died a death. I'm going to petition in uk.net.news.config for it's > > removal ASAP > > > > On my server there are over 30 different groups dealing with pets all > > better supported than this one. > > > > It has become evident to many over the last year that this group in > > now ripe for a visit from Dr. Death. > > > > Fanny. > > > So you have the right to remove a group because you dont like it? Get a > life. > Dont be silly Ray. I can put forward a RFD (request for discussion) Control will cross post the RFD to uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config and any other groups or mailing lists related to the proposed topic or likely to be affected. The groups to be cross posted into should be those requested by the proponent. The proponent may also indicate which groups the Followups should be set to. Control may, at his discretion, add additional groups to these lists (or remove groups where such cross posting is beyond the technical capabilities of the news software). Uk.net.news.config shall be included in both the original cross posting and followups. Only postings which are cross posted to uk.net.news.config will be considered part of the definitive discussion.

	#4
Ray	Re: this group FANNY wrote: >>> > > Dont be silly Ray. I can put forward a RFD (request for discussion) > > Control will cross post the RFD to uk.net.news.announce, > uk.net.news.config and any other groups or mailing lists related to > the proposed topic or likely to be affected. The groups to be cross > posted into should be those requested by the proponent. The proponent > may also indicate which groups the Followups should be set to. > Control may, at his discretion, add additional groups to these lists > (or remove groups where such cross posting is beyond the technical > capabilities of the news software). Uk.net.news.config shall be > included in both the original cross posting and followups. Only > postings which are cross posted to uk.net.news.config will be > considered part of the definitive discussion. > You are so sad, you want a group removed because you dont like it? Go find something else to do and leave the group alone.

	#5
Ray	Re: this group GOOD GOLLY MISS mOLLY wrote: > > > You want to borrow my troll swatter Marcus? They seem to be breeding > like flies at the moment and the OP is one too. > You wont be able to read this then?

	#6
Ray	Re: this group Mike wrote: > > > Good, and the sooner you get rid of that old twat "Molly", the > better. She's the reason this group is so wasted. She can deny > all she likes, but google supports my view. Her partner Brenchley > being dead is of course, better for the group as that's one less > pillock keeping it down. > >> Just out of interest, why do you care? > > Dunno why the OP cares, but in my case I think this ought to be a > moderated group. That would kill most of Molly's abusive posts. > It would kill your abusive posts too Idiot.

	#7
Mike	Re: this group "Ray" <r.sherlbra@virgin.net> wrote: >Mike wrote: >> > >> Good, and the sooner you get rid of that old twat "Molly", the >> better. She's the reason this group is so wasted. She can deny >> all she likes, but google supports my view. Her partner Brenchley >> being dead is of course, better for the group as that's one less >> pillock keeping it down. >> >>> Just out of interest, why do you care? >> >> Dunno why the OP cares, but in my case I think this ought to be a >> moderated group. That would kill most of Molly's abusive posts. >> >It would kill your abusive posts too Idiot. What abusive posts?