| #1 | |
|
|
Where's he/she gone?
We're all missing him over here in uk.rec.pets.misc very much. Puppy Wizard PLEASE come back! |
| #2 | |
|
|
TOO funny. What a sad little man.
|
| #3 | |
|
|
http://makeashorterlink.com/?G34D2527A
he's around, look for ThePuppyFae...@mail.com on posts, or YourConcience Still out there making friends. |
| #4 | |
|
|
Tania wrote:
> > Where's he/she gone? > > We're all missing him over here in uk.rec.pets.misc very much. > > Puppy Wizard PLEASE come back! > I thought that "YourConcience" and a few other psuedonyms that appear on this newsgroup a little too often...*are* the Puppy Wizard in disguise. I think he is trying to sneak by all the people who have him kill-filed. -- +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Charles and Francis Richmond It is moral cowardice to leave | | undone what one perceives right | | richmond at plano dot net to do. -- Confucius | +----------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| #5 | |
|
|
Satisfied NHOWE?
You're welcome! TPW <{) ; ~ ) > P.S. Hey? Whaddaya think of THIS?: "Tending To Agree With The Positive Reinforcement Method"? HOWEDY People, Hello Tara, "Tara O." <tara29...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:n%Zy6.30496$BC6.8869056@e3500-chi1.usenetserver.co m... > I tend to agree with the positive reinforcement > method. Oh, that's nice. I tend to think people who tend to agree with positive reinforcement methods tend to be pulling our chains... That's what I tend to think, based on my experience working with people who tend to agree with positive reinforcement who TEND TO hurt their dogs when their tendencies to use positive methods are outweighed by their tendencies to run out of information or intellect and TEND to get frustrated and TEND NOT to do the things they TEND TO believe are right, when they TEND to be frustrated, or TEND to be at a loss for INTELLECT, and TEND TO resort to violence because they TEND to be shy on BRAINS... I TEND TO view those folks as hypocrites, that's what I TEND to do because I just happen to TEND to be HONEST, > IMO, shock collars should be used only after normal > obedience training methods have failed. If your NORMAL obedience training TENDED to properly train dogs, there would be a TENDENCY to have well trained dogs. But that's not the case, becasuse NORMAL obedience training TENDS to provoke, intimidate, and confound your dog and inhibit his ability to think and learn to want to work and think and learn... SEE? That's what I TEND to think about NORMAL obedience training which TENDS to FAIL because it TENDS to resort to VIOLENCE instead of TENDING TOWARDS THE MOST EFFECTIVE SCIENTIFIC METHODS AVAILABLE. > It just bothers me to imagine shocking my dog, even > at a very low frequency. It bothers me less to think of shocking the dog than thinking about what punishment and confrontation can do to a dog's temperament. That's what I tend to think based on my thirty eight years professional experience training dogs. > I will definitely admit that there are many dogs who > either can't or won't benefit from training without > such things as e-collars. Is that based on your thirty eight years of experience specializing in temperament and behavior problems and protection training in giant breed dogs? Or is that based on your TENDANCY to believe incompetent dog abusing Thugs who tell you they TEND to get excellent results from HURTING dogs to train them because they TEND NOT TO be intelligent enough to outwit the cunning of the domestic puppy dog??? OR IS IT BASED ON YOUR TENDENCY TO MURDER YOUR OWN DEAD DOG Summer? > I just hope its a last-resort, not a first. And I just hope you figure out why your pals here who hurt dogs to train them TEND to claim they have me in their killfiles, because they TEND NOT TO be able to answer my questions in good conscience...That's what they TEND to do around here because our lying dog abusing Thugs TEND to be INCOMPETENT, IMMORAL, UNETHICAL, UNPRINCIPLED, DOG ABUSING COWARDS. Like yourself. That's what I tend to think. Your pal, Jerry "The PHONY," Howe. j;~} The Amazing Puppy Wizard. <{) ; ~ ) > <ThePuppyWiz...@EarthLink.Net> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:12:11 GMT Local: Thurs, Oct 7 2004 10:12 am Subject: "I'm Shocked That I Shocked" tara o. aka tee, NC Boxer Rescue Abuse HOWEDY People Here's WON of HOWER MENTAL CASES hurtin dogs and lying abHOWET it again. "I'm shocked that I shocked" "Tara O." <nos...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bh9f81$vrac2$1@ID-92443.news.uni-berlin.de... > Due to someone reprimanding Jar-Jar & the word > "rescue" in the post, I decided to read down and see > what he was spewing now. I was able to learn that > besides choking, pinching, crating, abusing and > murdering my dog, I also shocked her. I must be > suffering from amnesia. > Can someone point me to a post where I said > I shocked my dog, or any dog, or that I even > know *how* to use an e-collar....assuming I had one > which must have been stolen at the same time I lost > my memory. > One would think Jerry would be happy with the > "murder" part and all my other training sins but > evidently not. > -- > Tara HOWEDY tara o., You didn't HURT INTIMIDATE and MURFDER your own DEAD DOG Summer: Date: 2003-04-28 18:09:04 PST > "Tara O." wrote: > > Labs are a breed that are normally trained for > > field work with ear pinches, e-collars and other > > forms of physical interaction without making them > > fearful or aggressive. ============== From: Tara O. (tara29...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: Dane hyper when passing other dogs Date: 2001-04-21 12:07:54 PST I think its pertinent to mention that I've never had any dogs who exhibited signs of aggression or were in any way, shape, or form resistent to whatever "training" I did with them. I would not feel comfortable relying on my past experience or a book to train a dog to stop biting, snapping or growling. -- Tara O. =================== From: Tara O. (tara29...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: Canine Behaviors For Dummies Date: 2001-06-11 19:42:23 PST "joshua" <jos...@ycsi.net> wrote in message news:9g3uoi$sc7$0@63.90.193.133... > I cant seem to understand why people believe prong > collars are cruel and inhumane. They do nothing more > than pinch, getting the attention of the animal. > Choke collars, on the other hand, do permanent > damage. They bruise the esophagus. > Shock collars will eventually destroy nerve endings, > much the same as electric fencing. Joshua, you have just reopened a can of worms that can quickly cause infestation here lol -- Tara O. =============== From: Tara O. (tara29...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: jerry howe Date: 2001-04-04 11:58:06 PST > People are tired of being abused and insulted simply > for saying they use a prong collar, or a choke > collar, or an e-collar, or a crate, etc. If you want > to LEARN more about dog training and dog behavior, > then listen to what they have to say, too. "I've never not listened to what people say here. I use a crate, am about to begin with a choke collar, I'm not the bad guy here." tara o. ====================== From: Tara O. (tara29...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: Electronic Training Collars Date: 2001-05-11 17:29:33 PST ""Twzl, Sligo and Roy Happy Together"" wrote > BTW, this is one of the frequent topics on obedience > email lists. When people say that they haven't used > corrections, it turns out that they feel that if > they do it, it's not a real correction. ![]() That makes sense in a weird sort of way. I don't honestly think that its humanly possible to train anyone or anything without correction. Its human nature to say 'no' or to stop a behavior by doing something. I used a tin can with coins to correct Summer's bad puppy behaviors and the cold shoulder to correct her other less desirable behaviors. I have said 'no' so many times that I probably sound like a broken record. Amie can attest to that lol. It seems to me that some people are automatically equating the term correction with punishment. I guess they can go hand in hand since my tin can wasn't something Summer liked. My ignoring her when she's misbehaving is also something she doesn't like. Therefore it can be viewed as punishment? And that term is 100% negative. Maybe if more people saw it as correction and not the total negative, they'd be less inclined to want to be PP. Don't know if the way I wrote that made sense, it makes sense in my head but then again the men with the white coats could come a'knockin at any moment. Tara O. =================== From: Tara O. (nos...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: Any hope? rage? Date: 2003-03-26 05:46:02 PST Yes I see and understand your point. There's no such thing as 100% vigilence 100% of the time IMO. You could call an e-fence company to find out if its possible to wire only your front door so that if she gets within a certain range of that front door the collar will start working. I'd think there would be a way to work that and it may be inexpensive to do so. There are also items called Scat Mats that you place in front of doors or any area you don't want your dog to proceed through. When stepping on the mat, it gives off a vibration, something which most dogs hate. They'll stay far away from the mats. I believe you can buy them from -- Tara ================== Tara O. (nos...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: Need advice--barking dog Date: 2003-08-06 17:38:14 PST you could consider installing an invisible fence just inside the fence line so he cannot get too close. You could talk to your neighbor about splitting the cost of whichever alternative you both find most acceptable. -- Tara ================= From: Tara O. (nos...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: Containment Collars Date: 2003-03-11 07:12:57 PST I know people who have electric fences and it works very well for them. I know people who have them and whose dogs escape and refuse to come back in. From the details I know of all involved, I wouldn't use an e-fence on: 1. An adult dog that wasn't raised with the fence from a puppy 2. A dog with a high prey drive 3. A very stubborn dog If I put my female out in an e-fence, the very first kid, cat, dog or squirrel she sees would have her bolting through the barrier shock or not. When she finally loses interest in whatever has caused her to leave and her adrenalin has diminished, she will think rationally and realize she's not willing to come back into the yard because she knows the shock would get her. you have a dog who just has to go after or up to any and everything that walks down the street then I'd definitely not recommend one of these systems. The people I know who it works for installed them when their dogs were pups so they were brought up trained to it. Two of the ones I know it didn't work for have adult adopted dogs who weren't raised with this kind of invisible barrier. =================== From: Tara O. (tara29...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: escape artist, thunder, aggression questions Date: 2001-05-12 07:56:04 PST Since he got a taste of freedom and knows he can get out I doubt you'll be able to stop him short of tethering him or using a more sophisticated device like an e-fence but I wouldn't recommend going the electronic fence route without first doing your homework on the pros and cons of them and understand that they are not fool-proof. ========================= MacKenzie's First Pinch Collar Class Date: 2003-07-08 13:54:19 PST I consider myself to be a pretty good basic obed. trainer of Boxers with some learned but not necessarily practiced, advanced training knowledge. I think this because not only have I worked with all the dogs I've had at my house but I'm also the one in charge of all the dogs in our rescue, their behavioral issues (identifying and working with), basic training (done in the foster home) and a host of other things. I'm the one who gives the advice and walks the foster volunteers through alot of things. Now I don't believe, for a second, that I would be successful at teaching basic obedience to other dogs in a class environment. Maybe I would but probably not. Other trainers with class experience may think I have no clue what I'm doing because my experience has been primarily hands-on and with only one breed. ========================= |