| #1 | |
|
|
"Handsome Jack Morrison" <handsomemorrison@thedetonatorearthlink.net> wrote in message news:7160lvsh701frepjokqudgce82gcdvvmn0@4ax.com... > On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 02:27:44 GMT, Handsome Jack Morrison > <handsomemorrison@thedetonatorearthlink.net> wrote: > > >No ocean, stream, creek, lake, pond, pool, puddle? > > Okay, how 'bout a bathtub? > > http://tinyurl.com/loax > > You can't get any safer than that, right? ![]() RIGHT! Unless the dog bites you for HURTIN him: Koehler's usefulness: Critique--Digging (4) ">>>If you come home and find your dog has dug a hole, fill the hole brimful of water. With the training collar and leash, bring the dog to the hole and shove his nose into the water; hold him there until he is sure he's drowning. If your dog is of any size, you may get all of the action of a cowboy bull-dogging a steer. Stay with it. I've had elderly ladies who'd had their fill of ruined flower beds dunk some mighty big dogs. A great many dogs will associate this horrible experience with the hole they dug. It is not necessary to *catch the dog in the act* in any of the above instances of correction. Be consistent in your corrections and your dog will come to find the smell of freshly dug earth quite repugnant. p. 200).<<<" The Koehler Method of Dog Training (1962). New York: Howell Book House. Critique 4: Aversives used are excessive. The method described by Koehler for curbing digging behavior involves the use of excessive discomfort that may not be necessary to obtain aversion. Koehler offers no alternatives to dunking the dogs nose under water (other than staking the dog next to the hole on a two foot chain--a procedure that will more likely than not stimulate additional digging, certainly while the dog is thus restrained). The necessity of dunking the dog for 6 days (as recommended), allowing the dog to watch the preparation, etc., would seem overbearing and extremely inefficient. --RDK "Who is cruel to a dog, is more cruel thereby to his own soul." =================== |