YourWorstFreakinNightmare@InBox.Com

HOWEDY racetrack silly,

sighthounds & siberians wrote:
>
> Here are just a few things to take into consideration

Sez you, a lying dog abusing punk thug coward mental case.

> when being advised to read

By The Amazing Puppy Wizard's 100% CONSISTENTLY NEARLY
INSTANTLY SUCCESSFUL FREE WWW Wits' End Dog Training
Method Manual Students from ALL OVER The WHOWEL WILD
WORLD who REPORT 100% CONSISTENT NEARLY INSTANT SUCCESS
for ALL dogs and ALL behaviors and ALL handlers in ALL
fields <{); ~ ) >

> the 'manual'

The Amazing Puppy Wizard's FREE WWW Wits' End Dog
Training Method Manual <{); ~ ) >

> written by the 'Puppy Wizard',

You mean Jerry Howe, The Amazing Puppy Wizard <{) ; ~ ) >

> or follow his 'advice':

The Amazing Puppy Wizard doesn't GIVE ADIVCE, racetrack silly.
The Amazing Puppy Wizard's 100% CONSISTENTLY NEARLY INSTANTLY
SUCCESSFUL FREE WWW Wits' End Dog Training Method Manual Students
ALL OVER The WHOWEL WILD WORLD GET 100% CONSISTENTLY NEARLY
INSTANT SUCCESS on accHOWENT of The Amazing Puppy Wizard teaches
them a PRECISE, NON PHYSICAL, SCIENTIFIC and PSYCHOLOGICAL conditioning
techniques that trains ALL dogs NEARLY INSTANTLY.

> - His beliefs/opinions about dogs -

The SCIENCE of BEHAVIOR is NOT a matter of OPINION or BELIEF,
racetrack silly. The Amazing Puppy Wizard has CITED scientific
peer reviewed INFORMATION EXXXPLAINING HOWE COME punishment
and bribery DO NOT WORK, AS EVIDENCED by your own POSTED CASE
HISTORY of HURTING INTIMIDATING and MURDERING dogs and LYING
abHOWET it, racetrack silly <{); ~ ) >

You and your MENTALLY ILL lying dog abusing punk thug coward
active acute long term incurable mental case pals can kick
and scream all the way back to the MENTAL HOWES but you CANNOT
DENY your own POSTED CASE HISTORIES of HURTING INTIMIDATING
and MURDERING dogs and LYING abHOWET it, racetrack silly.

> - he's said that he doesn't like dogs,

WON NEED NOT LIKE dogs to know enough NOT TO HURT THEM,
racetrack silly. You HURT INTIMDIATE and MURDER dogs on
accHOWENT of YOU LOVE THEM. You HURT THEM for their own
good, to stop them from GETTIN MURDERED BY YOU <{); ~ ) >

You can't post here abHOWETS nodoGgamenedMOORE, you and
your lying dog abusing punk thug coward active acute long
term incurable MENTAL CASE PALS, racetrack silly <{); ~ ) >

HOWE COME do you think your pal lying "I LOVE KOEHLER" lynn
and lying frosty dahl and booby maida and captain arthur
haggerty and professor SCRUFF SHAKE dermer DON'T POST HERE
abHOWETS nodoGgamenedMOORE, racetrack silly?

On accHOWENT of The Amazing Puppy Wizard has DISCREDITED
them by QUOTING THEIR OWN WORDS, JUST LIKE HOWE HE DONE
you, racetrack silly <{) ; ~ ) >

> and it does not appear that he has dogs

WON need not own dogs or have children to know
HOWE to pupperly handle raise and train them.

> and is not clear that he ever had dogs.

That's on accHOWENT of this AIN'T abHOWET The Amazing
Puppy Wizard's dogs. HEEL, any "trainer" can train a
demo dog. The Amazing Puppy WIzard's DEMO dogs are HIS
100% CONSISTENTLY NEARLY INSTANTLY SUCCESSFUL FREE WWW
Wits' End Dog Training Method Manual Students all over
the WHOWEL WILD WORLD who REPORT their 100% CONSISTENT
NEARLY INSTANT SUCCESS RIGHT HERE.

You and your mentally ill lying dog abusing punk thug
coward long term incurable active acute MENTAL PATIENTS
CALL THEM LIARS and their posts FORGERIES by The Amazing
Puppy Wizard <{) : ~ ) >

HEEL, EVEN IF that was TRUE, HOWE would you diminish
the FACT the you hurt intimidate and murder dogs that
The Amazing Puppy Wizard's 100% CONSISTENTLY NEARLY
INSTANTLY SUCCESSFUL FREE WWW WIts' End Dog Training
Method Manual Students ALL OVER The WHOWEL WILD WORLD
have REPORTED CURING NEARLY INSTANTLY, racetrack silly?

> He believes that a dog is a dog is a dog

That's correct. They handle and train up JUST LIKE KIDS.

> and that there is no difference between the temperaments
> and learning styles

That's correct. The Amazing Puppy Wizard's 100% CONSISTENTLY
NEARLY INSTANTLY SUCCESSFUL METHODS WORK on ALL critters on
accHOWENT of:

"Whelan illustrates the simple nature or the
learning process by referring to Ferster's
engaging study of two three year old
chimpanzees taught mathematics through
simple procedures. Whelan carries this
EVIDENCE a step futher by pointing HOWET
it's applicability to disturbed children."

ON ACCHOWENT OF:

"The Methods, Principles, And Philosophy Of Behavior
Never Change,
Or They'd Not Be Scientific And Could Not Obtain
Consistent, Reliable, Fast, Effective Results
For All Handler's And All Dogs,
ALL OVER THE WHOLE WILD WORLD,
NEARLY INSTANTLY,
As Taught In Your FREE Copy Of The Puppy Wizard's
FREE WWW Wits' End Dog Training Method Manual,"
The Puppy Wizard. <{} ; ~ ) >

AND THAT'S HOWE COME:

You Get The Critter You Trained

ON ACCHOWENT OF:

A Dog Is A Dog
As A Kat Is A Kat
As A Birdie Is A Birdie
As A Child Is A Child
As A SP-HOWES Is a SP-HOWES.

ON ACCHOWENT OF:

ALL Critters Only Respond In
PREDICTABLE INNATE NORMAL NATURAL INSTINCTIVE
REFLEXIVE Ways
To Situations And Circumstances Of Their Environment
Which We Create For Them.


Damn The Descartean War of
"Nature Vs Nurture."
We Teach By HOWER Words And Actions
And GET BACK What We TAUGHT.


In The Problem Animal Behavior BUSINESS
FAILURE MEANS DEATH.
SAME SAME,
For The Problem Child Behavior BUSINESS.

SEE?:

Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:41:01 -0500
From: "George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D."
<drv...@mindspring.com>
Subject: "time-out"

Dan, my own firm hatred of punishment has
recently been intensified by meeting The
Puppy Wizard, Jerry Howe, whose work with
dogs is marvelous.

There is a literature on harms caused by time
out, and perhaps you'd like to look at
http://www.dogydoright.com
George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D., F.R.S.H.

"As Sam Corson (Pavlov's last student) demonstrated for
nearly 50 years at Ohio University (Oxford, O.) there
is no treatment more useful for dogs than tender loving
care."

George von Hilsheimer, Ph. D., F. R. S. H., Diplomate,
Academy of Behavioral Medicine

From: "George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D." <drv...@mindspring.com
To: <d...@arcane-computing.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 5:38 PM
Subject: Doggy advice

Scott, Jerry Howe forwarded me the letter below.
I'm glad that you referred negatively to Jerry's
habit of CAPITALIZING and HOWEING everything.

I personally hate this habit of his. I think it is his
way of diluting his authority - IME he is a very modest
fellow. However, contrary to your sneer, he is very
competent at living with dogs.

I thought I'd list a series of actions which I found
on the list, folk asking advice on what to do about
dogs doing this and that, for example:

whining,
humping, hunching,
pacing,
self mutilation - paw licking, side sucking,
spinning,
prolonged barking, barking at shadows,
overstimulated barking,
fighting, bullying other dogs,
compulsive digging,
compulsive scratching,
compulsive chewing,
frantic behavior,
chasing light, chasing shadow,
stealing food,
digging in garbage can,
loosing house (toilet) training.
inappropriate fearfulness
aggression.

The thing that is fascinating to me, as an ethologist who
graduated from college 50 years ago and has spent all of
the intervening time working with animals (including the
human animal), is that you never see any of these behaviors in wild
dingoes, jackals, coyotes or wolves, you don't even see these behaviors


in hyenas (who aren't dog related).

You see these behaviors in human managed animals,
especially animals who live with neurotic hysterical humans.

As Sam Corson (Pavlov's last student) demonstrated for
nearly 50 years at Ohio University (Oxford, O.) there is no treatment
more useful for dogs than tender loving care.

George von Hilsheimer, Ph. D., F. R. S. H., Diplomate,
Academy of Behavioral Medicine


> of breeds

That's IRRELEVENT. A DOG IS A DOG.

LIKE THIS:

"If chimpanzees CAN LEARN mathematics
through step by step learning AT THEIR OWN
PACE, reinforced primarily by CORRECT
ANSWERS rather than with "fruit loops and
rasins", we can assume that even developmentally
RETARDED or CONfHOWENDED children CAN LEARN as well.

From: "George von Hilsheimer, Ph.D."

<drv...@mindspring.com>
To: <pdd-aspy...@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:31 AM
Subject: How does diagnosis shape treatment?

How does diagnosis shape treatment?

Nearly every week I have a visit from Jerry Howe, who
publicizes himself as The Puppy Wizard. Jerry is a
master at behavioral modification of dogs.

His fundamental bedrock is the work Pavlov's last student,
the late Sam Corson, Ph.D., did at the U of Ohio (at Oxford,O).

Sam always pointed out if the dog stopped working for
you in the lab, Pavlov and he always took the dog away
from the lab, and put him in a loving home and gave him
TLC for a couple of months, and then started, very carefully,
over again.

Jerry believes that reward and constraint focused training
is immoral. I've watched him in one short session calm
impossible dogs, just about to be murdered (oops "put to
sleep") because of their "incorrigibly" violent behavior.

Sam was one of the first people to apply amphetamine to
hyperactivity (he searched the Middle West for hyperactive
dogs); but he never lost sight of the fundamental reality
that a dog is not a human, but does respond, doggily, to
dog love.

You might be surprised to go to B. F. Skinner's
"Cumulative Record" and read the essay by Breland
and Breland, "The Misbehavior of Organisms".

Animals cannot be successfully trained unless the
trainer attends to the evolutionary history, the
individual's developmental history, and the environmental
niche of the animal being trained.

Yep, right there in Skinner's last and summary book.
Even with behavior mod, you must know the animal.

Dogs or little boys, you have to know the individual
history, and the nature of he disorder.

Dr. Von

PS if you are interested in dogs, then take a
look at Jerry's work, TheAmazingPuppyW...@Mail.Com

> that have been bred for generations to do a particular job.

Oh? Is that HOWE COME your punk thug coward SADIST
pals jerk and choke and shock and beat them with
sticks and pinch and twist their ears tail and toes?:

"Many People Have Problems Getting The Pinch
Right, Either They Do Not Pinch Enough, Or They
Have A Very Stoic Dog. Some Dogs Will Collapse
Into A Heap. About The Ear Pinch: You Must Keep
The Pressure Up," sindy "don't let the dog SCREAM"
mooreon, author of HOWER FAQ's pages on k9 web.

You think HURTING a HUNTING DOG to
MAKE IT HUNT is NECESSARY???

"Well, Jack Did Hit My Dog. Actually I'd Call It
A Sharp Tap Of The Crook To The Nose. I Know
Jack Wouldn't HaveDone It If He Thought Solo
Couldn't Take It. I Still Crate Him Because
Otherwise I Fear He Might Eat My Cat," melanie.

You think allowing a "FEAR AGGRESSIVE MAN
SHY" dog to be BEATEN by a strange male trainer
is INTELLIGENT BEHAVIOR for a DOG LOVER?

"Warning: Sometimes The Corrections Will Seem
Quite Harsh And Cause You To Cringe. This Is A
Normal Reaction The First Few Times It Happens,
But You'll Get Over It."mike duforth, author:
"Courteous Canine."

You think HURTIN dogs and CRINGING is COURTEHOWES?


"I have heard advice stating that you should pre-load
your dog for Bitter Apple for it to work as
efficiently as possible. What does this mean?

When you bring home the Bitter Apple for
the first time, spray one squirt directly into
the dog's mouth and walk away. The dog
won't be too thrilled with this but just ignore
him and continue your normal behavior."

--Mike Dufort
author of the zero selling book
"Courteous Canines"

You think HURTING your dog is NORMAL BEHAVIOR?

> He claims that all misbehaviors and illnesses
> are caused by mishandling or abuse.

Would it make you FEEL better if HE just claimed
that the DEAD DOGS YOU'vE HURT INTIMIDATED and
MURDERED was MISHANDLED and ABUSED by you?

> These opinions are not supported by the literature.

HOWE abHOWET your own POSTED CASE HISTORY, racetrack silly?

You cannot deny it no matter HOWE much you kick
and scream and call on your kibo pals to obsfucate
the discussion. THREE HOWETA FOUR of your own dogs
got PSYCHOGENIC SEIZURES on accHOWENT of YOU ABUSE
THEM, racetrack silly <{);~ ) >

> - His claim that he can train any dog in the world

AS REPORTED BY C-HOWENTLESS 100% NEARLY INSTANTLY
SUCCESSFUL FREE WWW Wits' End Dog Training Method
Manual Students <{) ; ~ ) >

> while sitting naked in front of his computer,

Nuthin but these doGgamened paper slippers. GAWD I
HATE THOSE THINGS. Don't you too, racetrack silly?

> without personally assessing said dog.

Oh. THAT'S on accHOWENT of A DOG IS A DOG, racetrack
silly. HOWE COME you think The Amazing Puppy Wizard's
100% CONSISTENTLY NEARLY INSTANTLY SUCCESSFUL FREE
WWW Wits' End Dog Training Method Manual Students ALL
OVER The WHOWEL WILD WORLD REPORT 100% CONSISTENTLY
NEARLY INSTANT SUCCESS, racetrack silly?

IT AIN'T LUCK, racetrack silly <{); ~ ) >

> This is simply not credible.

You mean on accHOWENT of it don't JIVE with
YOUR OWN PERSONAL EXXXPERIENCE of jerking
choking shocking bribing crating and murderin
your own DEAD and DEATHLY ILL DOGS, racetrack
silly <{) ; ~ ) >

> Additionally, he appears to spend all of
> his time posting to various newsgroups,

Thanks to V.P. Al Gore INVENTING the WWW
The Amazing Puppy Wizard can train ALL
dogs ALL OVER The WHOWEL WILD WORLD from
settin right here, stark ravin nekkid,
all EXXXCEPT for these doGgamened paper
slippers <{) : ~ ) >

AND, FOR FREE, TO BOOT <{); ~ ) >

ASK ANY WON, racetrack silly. Ask Lucy.

> some of which have nothing to do with dogs;

Oh? You mean the parenting and child raising groups.
NOT TO WORRY, racetrack silly. Parents of dysfunctional
children respond THE SAME SAME as dog abusers do,
racetrack silly, FOR THE SAME SAME SAME SAME REASONS.

> he digs up and responds to old posts,

You mean, LIKE THIS?:

HERE's you, racetrack silly:

"After Numerous Training Classes, Behavioral
Consultations, And Hundreds Of Dollars In Vet
Bills, I Killed My Dalmatian Several Years Ago
Due To Extreme Dog-Aggressiveness.

Either she was going to kill Tasha, my
Siberian with the rock steady
temperament, or Tasha was going to
kill her, right in front of us.

My DH's first dog, and still the canine
love of his life," racetrack silly <{) : ~ ( >

> responds to his own posts himself,

Oh, well THAT'S on accHOWENT of you punk
thug coward MENTAL CASES WON'T REPLY when
The Amazing Puppy Wizard QUOTES YOUR OWN
POSTED CASE HISTORY to PROVE you're a lyin
dog abusing MENTAL CASE PUNK THUG COWARD:


"I'll bet you don't know a thing about me. I volunteered
as assistant to the euthanasia tech at our local shelter
for a while, and I know a bit about overpopulation and
unwanted animals.

This however has nothing at all to do with responsible
breeders, because responsible breeders don't contribute
to that problem," Mustang Sally.


"Sally Hennessey" <greyho...@ncweb.com> wrote in message
news:54nuetsqgkhp26qqv128jnumgmb2m27opr@4ax.com...
Nope. No more than you'd convince Patch that
prongs and e-collars, in the right hands, are not
intrinsically abusive; or that dogs trained properly
with prongs or e-collars are not fearful, in pain, or
intimidated; or that any one of us here knows our
own dogs and their reactions better than someone
who has never seen them or us...hmmm.

I'm starting to see some similarities here.

Sally Hennessey

Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:23:46 +0100
Local: Mon, Apr 9 2001 5:23 am
Subject: Re: shock collars

Sally Hennessey <greyho...@ncweb.com> wrote in message
news:b8m1dtsv6vuiblo63h8ekqiforibadrff2@4ax.com...

Aside from being incredibly offensive and self-righteous,
this post shows and absence of knowledge in the differences
in dogs' temperaments, or perhaps a lack of ability to perceive
same. The fact that you, Alison, have never met a dog to whom
corrections and discomfort, even pain, were unimportant does
not mean that such dogs do not exist.

What it means is that you don't know as much about dogs
as you think you do, and you surely don't know a damn
thing about Harlan or anyone else's dog here.

I had a Dalmatian that would instigate fights with one
of her housemates; that dog had no fear or anything,
and pain incurred during a fight meant nothing to her.

I know that that dog is not unique, and I'm sure many
people here can tell similar stories. The fact that you,
Alison, continue to say things to people such as what
you said to Theresa about causing her dog to suffer
(at least I guess that's what you meant by "you cause
your dog suffers" - - must be the King's English you
guys talk about over there) means that you are an
ignorant, arrogant, insensitive person who is not worth
further notice.
Sally Hennessey

-------------------

What the heel do you think The Amazing Puppy
Wizard EXXXPECTS you to reply to that kinda
INSANITY, racetrack silly?

> posts and cross-posts sometimes hundreds
> of posts a day and all through the night.

The Amazing Puppy Wizard has invested over
forty years specializing in CURING ALL
temperament and behavior problems NEARLY
INSTANTLY on accHOWENT of HE works HARDER
than anyWON else in the WHOWEL WILD WORLD
on accHOWENT OF HE DON'T HURT INTIMDIATE
and MURDER DOGS, like HOWE you do, racetrack
silly <{) ; ~ ) >

> This suggests that he's not spending much
> time actually training dogs.

You mean IN PERSON, like the EXXXPERTS who
heelped you train your DH's first dog the
DROP DEAD COMMAND, racetrack silly <{) : ~ ) >

BWEEEEEEEEEEEEAAHAHAHAHHAAAAA!!!

> - His reputation, or lack of same -

The Amazing Puppy Wizard's 100% CONSISTENTLY
NEARLY INSTANTLY SUCCESSFUL FREE WWW Wits'
End Dog Training Method Manual Students ALL
OVER The WHOWEL WILD WORLD REPORT 100% CONSISTENT
NEARLY INSTANT SUCCESS, and THAT IS The Amazing
Puppy Wiard's REPUTATION and CASE HISTORY DATA
PROVING you and your punk thug coward mental
cases HURT INTIMDIATE and MURDER dogs ON ACCHOWENT
OF YOU HURT INTIMIDATE and MURDER DOGS ON ACCHOWENT
OF THAT'S WHAT LYING DOG ABUSING PUNK THUG COWARD
MENTAL CASES DO when they AIN'T GOT the INTELLECT
to HOWEtwit the cunning of the domestic puppy dog.

AIN'T THAT CORRECT, racetrack silly? You can
SEE FOR YOURSELF if you peruse The Amazing
Puppy Wizard's Archives on Google.

> - though he claims to be a well-known dog trainer,

The Amazing Puppy WIzard is known ALL OVER The
WHOWEL WILD WORLD, racetrack silly <{); ~ ) >

> no one who lives in the area where he lives
> has ever heard of him.

On accHOWENT of The Amazing Puppy Wizard is NEW to the AREA.

> - His behavior on this newsgroup.

The Amazing Puppy Wizard came here to IDENTIFY
EXXXPOSE and DISCREDIT you and your lying dog
abusing punk thug coward active acute long term
incurable MENTAL CASE PALS as liars dog abusers
cowards and active acute long term incurable
MENTAL CASES, racetrack silly.

The Amazing Puppy Wizard AIN'T EXXXPECTING you
to LOVE HIM, HE EXXXPECTS you and your punk thug
coward mental case pals TO DO WHAT YOU KNOW HOWE
TO DO, as THAT is the NATURE of a lying dog abusing
punk thug coward MENTAL CASE, racetrack silly <{) : ~ ) >

The Amazing Puppy Wizard can ONLY work with what HE got.

> He follows people around, often emailing them personally,
> harassing them about extremely painful things such as a
> dog's chronic or terminal medical problems or having
> to euthanize a dog for temperament problems.

On accHOWENT of you hurt intimdidate and murder
innocent critters on accHOWENT of THAT is your
HUMAN NATURE, racetrack silly. THAT'S HOWE COME
you bums can't post here abHOWETS nodoGgamenedMOORE.

REMEMBER NHOWE, racetrack silly?

> He responds to people he knows have killfiled him

On accHOWENT of The Amazing Puppy Wizard doesn't
write to the DOG ABUSERS, HE Posts to folks who
are new here abHOWETS to EMBARRASS you dog abusers

>because of his abusive behavior,

The Amazing Puppy Wizard has PROVEN you hurt
intimdiate and murder dogs on accHOWENT of
you're a mental case a liar and dog abuser
and THAT'S ALL we can EVER EXXXPECT from you
and your pals here abHOWETS.

You'll notice the SMART DOG ABUSERS have left
The Amazing Puppy Wizard's FREE WWW Wits' End
Dog Training Method Forums ages ago, on accHOWENT
of they was EMBARRASSED TO DEATH. That AIN'T gonna
happen with the remaining HARD CORE DOG ABUSING
MENTAL CASES, like yourself, racetrack silly.

> reposting miles of old material

QUOTES of you and your mental case pals HURTING
INTIMIDATING and MURDERING dogs and LYIN abHOWET it.

> and inserting inane comments.

And MOORE OLD POSTS showin HOWE COME you dog
abusing mental cases GOT the PROBLEMS you got.

> He is constantly abusive to regulars

You mean the MENTAL CASES HE QUOTES, racetrack silly?

> on this newsgroup,

You mean The Amazing Puppy Wizard's FREE WWW Wits'
End Dog Training Method Manual Forums and SCHOOL
Of HARD KNOCKS and HUMAN BEHAVIOR RESEARCH LABORATORY.

> many of whom have had little if any contact with him,

WHAT do you EXXXPECT them to say when they're QUOTED
LYING abHOWET HURTIN INIMTIDATING and MURDERING dogs?

> and makes up slanderous lies about them.

CITES please, racetrack silly? YOU MURDERED your
own DEAD DOG on accHOWENT of you couldn't stop
HURTIN INTIMDIATING and MURDRING on accHOWENT of
THAT is your HUMAN NATURE, racetrack silly <{); ~ ) >

> He is often immediately abusive to newbies

DECENT PEOPLE DO NOT POST HERE abHOWETS lookin
for the INFORMATION that GOT YOUR OWN DEAD DOG
DEAD, racetrack silly <{); ~ ) >

> who have never had any contact with him,

The Amazing Puppy Wizard reads their posted
case histories, racetrack silly, and CITES
their PRYOR lies and abuses, racetrack silly.

> and he never answers their questions with any information

What do you WANT The Amazing Puppy Wizard to SAY?
EVERY THING YOU NEED TO KNOW is IN your FREE COPY
of The Amazing Puppy Wizard's FREE WWW Wits' End
Dog Training Method Manual, racetrack silly <{) ; ~ ) >

> other than to advertise his 'manual'

You mean The Amazing Puppy Wizard's FREE WWW Wits'
End Dog Training Method Manual, racetrack silly <{) :~ ) >

Had you READ it you wouldn't of MURDERED your own DEAD DOG.

> and claim that it will fix anything.

And it's been VERIFIED by The Amazing Puppy Wizard's
100% CONSISTENTLY NEARLY INSTANTLY SUCCESSFUL FREEE
WWW Wits' End Dog Training Method Manual Students
ALL OVER The WHOWEL WILD WORLD who REPORT their 100%
CONSISTENTLY NEARLY INSTANT SUCCESS RIGHT HERE.

You and your MENTAL CASE PALS CALL THEM LIARS.

> -His writing style -

You mean, QUOTING OLD POSTS, racetrack silly?

> - he rants and raves,

You mean when HE IDENTIFIES EXXXPOSES and DISCREDITS
the lying dog abusing punk thug coward mental cases
like professor SCRUFF SHAKE dermer and professora
"CHIN CHUCK DON'T MEAN SLAP THE DOG" gingold or
captain arthur haggerty or dr mark plonsky, racetrack
silly?

> often incoherently;

Well, you'd have to be familiar with the entire
case histories of all the mentally ill lying dog
abusing punk thug cowards to know HOWE COME some
of them OLD POSTS are being QUOTED, racetrack silly.

Like those of yours tellin his HOWE some dogs DON'T
RESPOND to PAIN FEAR FORCE and INTIMDIATION <{); ~ ) >

SO YOU MURDER THEM INSTEAD.

> misspells words to insert his name,

That IS annoyin anyHOWE, ain't it, racetrack silly.

> other people's names,

Like yours...

> or words such as "troll"; he makes up names for
> people and/or makes fun of their names.

But you don't read HIS posts on accHOWENT of HE
is in your killfile so you NEVER EVER even got
to THINK abHOWET The UNMENTIONABLE WON <{); ~ ) >

> This is, at best, unprofessional.

Yeah... like shockin chokin bribing crating
and murdering innocent dogs, like HOWE you
and your mentally ill lying dog abusing punk
thug coward pals PREFER, based on your own
POSTED CASE HISTORIES.

> Mustang Sally

THAT'S HOWE COME The Amazing Puppy
Wizard SEZ DECENT PEOPLE DO NOT
POST HERE abHOWETS <{) ; ~ ) >

THAT INCLUDES YOURSELF as PROVEN
by your own POSTED CASE HISTORY.

"When you POST HERE abHOWETS The Amazing
Puppy Wizard will NO HOWET IDENTIFY EXXXPOSE
and Discredit and leave you TURNED HOWET and
F'd OFF for the last remnants of your dignity
and self respect, if you EVER THOUGHT you EVER
had any and YOUR OWN WORDS will IDENTIFY EXXXPOSE
and DISCREDIT YOURSELF to your friends business
associates and kin for the rest of your life
and for generations to come... on accHOWENT of
EVERY THING is indellibly archived FOREVER in
The Amazing Puppy Wizard's Archives <{) ; ~ ) >

From: TooCool (larrym...@hotmail.com)
The Puppy Wizard's Wits End Training Method


I have studied canine behavior and dog training for
years. I have a huge library that covers every system
of training.


The Puppy Wizard's (Jerry Howe's) Wits' End Training
Method is by far the most scientific, the most advanced,
the kindest, the quickest and the most effective training
method yet discovered.


It is not an assortment of training tips and tricks; it is
a logically consistent system. Every behavior problem
and every obedience skill is treated in the same logically
consistent manner.


Please study his manual carefully. Please endeavor to
understand the basis of his system and please follow
his directions exactly. His manual is a masterpiece.
It is dense with theory, with explanation, with detailed
descriptions about why behavior problems occur and
how their solution should be approached.


One should not pick and choose from among his methods
based upon what you personally like or dislike. His is not
a bag of tricks but a complete and integrated system for not
only training a dog but for raising a loving companion.
When I once said to Jerry that his system creates for
you the dog of your dreams, his response was that it
produces for your dog the owner of his dreams.


You see, Jerry has discovered that if you are gentle
with your dog then he will be gentle with you, if you
praise your dog every time he looks at you, then you
will become the center of your dogs world, if you use
Jerry's sound distraction with praise, then it takes
just minutes-sometimes merely seconds-to train your
dog to not misbehave (even in your absence) (Just 15
seconds this morning to train my 10 week old puppy to
lie quietly and let me clip his nails).


Using Jerry's scientific method (sound distraction /
praise / alteration / variation) it takes just minutes to
train you dog to respond to your commands.


What a pleasure it was for me to see my 6 week old
puppy running as fast has his wobbly little legs would
carry him in response to my recall command-and he
comes running every time I call no matter where we are
or what he is doing.


At ten weeks old now, my puppy never strains upon
his leash thanks to Jerry's hot & cold exercises and
his Family Pack Leadership exercises.


Jerry has discovered that if you scold your dog, if you
scream at him, if you intimidate him, if you hurt him,
if you force him then his natural response is to oppose
you.


Is Jerry a nut?


It doesn't make any difference to me whether he is or not.
It is a logical fallacy to judge a person's ideas based
upon their personality. As far as dogs are concerned, Jerry wears his
heart upon his sleeve. It touches him
deeply when he hears of trainers forcing, intimidating,
scolding or hurting dogs.


More than that, he knows that force is not effective
and that it will certainly lead to behavior problems;
sometime problems so severe that people put their
dogs down because of those problems.


I believe that it is natural for humans to want to control
their dog by force. Jerry knows this too. We have all been
at our wits' end, haven't we?


Dogs have a natural tendency to mimic. In scientific
literature it is referred to allelomimetic behavior. Dogs
respond in like kind to force; they respond in like kind
to praise.


Don't bribe your dog with treats; give him what he
wants most-your kind attention. Give him your praise.
You will be astonished at how your dog 's anxiety will
dissipate and how their behavior problems will dissipate
along with their anxiety.


Treat Jerry Howe's (The Puppy Wizard) Wits' End
Training Method as a scientific principle just as you
would the law of gravity and you will have astounding
success.


Dog behavior is just as scientific as is gravity.


If you follow Jerry's puppy rules you will get a sweet
little Magwai; if you don't you will surely get a little
gremlin (anyone see The Gremlins?). --Larry


From: Mike (m.bidd...@ns.sympatico.ca)
Subject: Re: Info. on the puppy wizard?
Date: 2004-07-18 14:27:02 PST



> > Oh, and did I mention his methods work, ya nuff said.
> > Mike
> Ok Mike which part worked for you?


It helped clear problems from my dogs in the
field using the can penny distraction technique.

Works like a charm.


My dogs get distracted easy from their jobs ie,
retrieving or training to find lost people, oh did
I mention that I am a Search and Rescue Team
Leader.


Sorry that slipped my mind.


I have read volumes of training books and don't
know where people get that Jerry copied others
work as I have NEVER come across his methods
before. I would like to see proof.


Just like Jerry outlined I eliminated problems one
at at time as they arose. I used to try and train to
the way I wanted them but this is backward, you
train out the problems leaving what you want left over.


Funny part is the second dog who had the same
problems as the other didn't need correcting for
some of his habits after I cleared it from the first
dog.


Seemed he learned through osmosis.


Nice side benefit there.


It nearly came to giving them up to a 3rd party
trainer as they were not performing well. The
VAST majority of working dog trainers are
agressive in their actions with the dogs.


I tried it and it didn't work and guess what I
was at my "Whits End" then someone I new
turned me onto Jerry and the rest is history.


I referred friends and families to Jerry's manual
and all have had great results. Starting puppies
out on the distraction technique is especially
good because they never develop the habit.


I had my sisters dog healing, sitting and down
stay reliably at 8-9 weeks. The first night home
following Jerrys advice we ditched the crate and
put the pup on the floor beside the bed and after
2 whimpers NOT A SOUND OUT OF THAT DOG
FOR 6 HRS! first night, that has never happened
in all my days.


Sorry, the man understands dogs its that simple.


Mike


Dr. George VonHilsheimer writes in
"Is there a SCIENCE of BEHAVIOR?":


"Valette 1966 is a complete trivialization of
scientific findings. It overstates the case for
reinforcement theory. No careful researcher
would contend that operant techniques CAN
ANY THING MORE than modify SHORT TERM
BEHAVIOR in a highly controlled and limited
environment with a large number of skillful
experimenters. Certainly the most elaborate
studies have shown that the withdrawal or
temprary inefficiency of the reward system is
immediately followed by CESSATION of the
programmed behavior.


In fortunate contrast to this depressing paper
is the research reported by Whelan (1966) who
makes the simple but profHOWEND caveat that
"It is only through CORRECT, EFFICIENT APPLICATION
(of operant principles) that children's behavor can
be changed to the extent that they can subsequently
contribute to the REAL WORLD in which they live." "


"The Methods, Principles, And Philosophy Of Behavior
Never Change,
Or They'd Not Be Scientific And Could Not Obtain
Consistent, Reliable, Fast, Effective Results
For All Handler's And All Dogs,
ALL OVER THE WHOLE WILD WORLD,
NEARLY INSTANTLY,
As Taught In Your FREE Copy Of The Puppy Wizard's
FREE WWW Wits' End Dog Training Method Manual,"
The Puppy Wizard. <{} ; ~ ) >


Dr. Von continues:


"Whelan illustrates the simple nature or the
learning process by referring to Ferster's
engaging study of two three year old
chimpanzees taught mathematics through
simple procedures. Whelan carries this
EVIDENCE a step futher by pointing HOWET
it's applicability to disturbed children."


You Get The Critter You Trained


A Dog Is A Dog
As A Kat Is A Kat
As A Birdie Is A Birdie
As A Child Is A Child
As A SP-HOWES Is a SP-HOWES.


ALL Critters Only Respond In
PREDICTABLE INNATE NORMAL NATURAL INSTINCTIVE
REFLEXIVE Ways
To Situations And Circumstances Of Their Environment
Which We Create For Them.


Damn The Descartean War of
"Nature Vs Nurture."
We Teach By HOWER Words And Actions
And GET BACK What We TAUGHT.


In The Problem Animal Behavior BUSINESS
FAILURE MEANS DEATH.
SAME SAME,
For The Problem Child Behavior BUSINESS.


Dr. Von continues:


"If chimpanzees CAN LEARN mathematics
through step by step learning AT THEIR OWN
PACE, reinforced primarily by CORRECT
ANSWERS rather than with "fruit loops and
rasins", we can assume that even developmentally
RETARDED or CONfHOWENDED children CAN LEARN as well.


Moreover, Whelan makes the EXXXTREMELY important point
that while most teachers assume that learning takes place
verbally, primarily it is a non verbal
process..


Unfortunately Whelan limits himself to the problem
that "teachers must not only modify or remove specific
deviant behaviors, but must also develop socially
acceptable behavior patterns in the classroom and
classroom conditioned goals, NOT LEARNING.


Other researchers have emphasized the importance
ofadult behaviors in conditioning classroom behavior.
An EXXXCELLENT review of this researchshowd that
tantrum behavior, excessive crawling and dependency,
isolated play, passivity, spelling failure, and other
problem behaviors can be managed by altering habitual
adult responses to children (Harris, Wolf and Baer, 1964) .


Such RESEARCH holds GREATER PROMISE in that
alteration of the conditioning social environment seems
to provide more STABLE and LASTING CHANGES than
"M and M's". Moreover, a great deal of work has been
done developing EFFECTIVE techniques of behavior
modificaton through the conditioning social environment
of peers (Hartup, 1964). These directions would seem
more PRODUCTIVE than a simple minded trainslation
of the Skinner cage to the classroom.


Skinner (1963) pointed HOWET that operant techniques
can "be utilized fully ONLY IF we REDEFINE the GOALS
of education and the CONDITIONS in the educational
environment under which those goals may be reached...
(through) a DIFFERENT KIND of educational research
which is much more closely concerned with the immediate
dimensions of the student's behavior than with gross
changes such as IMPROVED PERFORMANCES."


UNFORTUNATELY, neither Skinner nor ANY OTHER
learning theorist has provided us with a working
model of a school or research enterprise based
on systemic and thorough-going APPLICATION of
LEARNING PRINCIPLES.


Skinner (1948, 1953) approaches a definition of the
philosophical issues involved, and provides an utopian
model of a school, but generally psychologists seem
STUCK at a level of MANAGEMENT of an aggressively
disturbing child in the classroom, through peer approval,
or the aplication of accelerating CONsequences in the
classroom, or scientifically S-HOWENDING tactics like
"TIME HOWET" (which we used to know more simply
as "sendin the kid to the cloakroom").


Hobbs (op. cit.) claims that the classroom is a
natural environement for the child. Thelen (1965)
contends that "classroom practices are UNnatural,
UNreasonable, and 'against NATURE.' ". This
would seem the central issue for the philosophy of
education. Mere trivial application of research findings
to an institution essentially unchanged from Sumerian
academies (Kramer, 1962) will NOT create useful
teaching for human beings.


It seems relevant to ask EXXXACTLY WHAT do we
know abHOWT the learning situation in which HOWER
children find themselves, and why, in the light of HOWER
knowledge, do we do any of the things that schools do?"


We know that there is little agreement among adults
as to what it is they are SUPPOSED to be DOING,
what something to do could be that MIGHT be
EFFECTVE, and what it IS that other people who
have authority over children ought to be doing (Mc-
Eachern and Taylor, 1967). Wherefor the child's
CONfusiHOWEN?


It is NO WONDER hat the marked changes in
deviant behavior of children can be achieved
through brief, simple educative routines with
their mothers which modify the mother's
social behaviors shaping the child (Whaler,
1966). Some clinics have reported ELIMINATION
ofthe need for child THERAPY through changing
the clinical emphasis from clinical to parental
HANDLING of the child (Szrynski 1965). A large
number of cases improved sufficiently after
preliminary contact with parents that NO treatment
of children was required, and almost ALL cases
SHOWE a remarkably shortened period for therapy.
Quite severe cases of anorexia nervosa have been
treated in own to five months by simply REPLACING
the parents temporarily with EFFUSIVELY LOVING
SUBSTITUTES (Groen, 1966).


Probably the most absurd figure in Amaerican mass
media is the TEACHER (Gerbner, 1966). HOWE can
we EXXXPECT children to LEARN responsible P-HOWER
from models of IMPOTENCE? We KNOW that LEARNING
a complex ritualized social role, is facilitated by observation of an
INTELLIGIBLE MODEL much more effectively than by
trial and error with REINFORCEMENT.


Roles which are relatively arbitrary and senseless are
the most difficult to learn (Luchins, 1966). Do we make
ANY EFFORT as teachers to CORRECT the massive impact of
media?


HOWE can the ARBITRARINESS and SENSELESSNESS
of IMPOTENT ADULT MODELS be redeemed by anything
short of RELEVANCE and COMMITMENT?


As an engaging final comment on the PROFESSION
let me mention the little study by Dittman et al (1965)
tha when 15 psychotherapists and 9 professional dancers
evaluated facial and bodily expressons for effect the
dancers ere much MOORE accurate. Need we say
MOORE abHOWET the training of therapists?


THE OPERANT FALLACY


Programs utilizing the "contingencies of reinforcement
model" proposed by Skinner (1963) ar no more well
established in research than the various dynamic
therapists. Research in four areas : 1) direct evaluation
of programmed systems for elarning; 2) reinforcement;
3) cognitive dissonance; and 4) motivation, MOST SURELY
DEMOLISH the claims of operant programers.


The 190 studies annotated by Schramm (1964) when
inspected display NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES
in SUCCESS among approaches and modifications.
Programmed instruction is no worse than conventional
instruction, and takes less time, but time reductions in
conventional instruction has frequently been shown
possible without detrimental effects. If you draw your
controls cagily you can always show the superiority of
your PET technique.


Moore and Smit (1964) compared variations on
programmed materials, machines, texts, written
responses, merely reading, free response, multiple
choice, and iving or not giving the students results.
There were NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES despite
Skinner's insistence on the importance of the
CONTINGENCY of REINFORCEMENT. Carpenter
and Greenhill (1963) could find NO DIFFERENCE
in RESULTS even after eliminating the self-pacing
feature by presenting the materials by TV or Video.


Krumboltz and Kiesler (1965) reported that a two month
follow up test showed NO DIFFERENCE between students
given a variety of reinforcement schedules. Mayo and
Longo (1966) report that naval and marine trainees
saved 30% of time in learning electronics fundamentals
through a programed course witrh superior scores on one
measure but not on another, and with no follow-up reported.


The same authors reported a reductionj from 26 HOWERS
to 19 HOWERS in instruction time through the use of
program with NO DIFFERENCE in test scores, except
that as longer blocks of materiallearned through programmed means were
tesed the scores DECREASED.


When the control instruction is manipulated an entirely
DIFFERENT picture emerges Jacobs and Kulkarni (1966)
assignedstudents in three different schools to classes
with standard programmed material giving immediate
knowledge of results to classes without results and to
classes with the order of sections of the program inverted.


In two schools the groups without knowledge of results
and the groups with inverted material SCORED HIGHER.
In one school there was NO DIFFERENCE. So much for
THEORY. Reid and Taylor (1965) presented a linear
program on paper-making to 60 paid undergrads with
a 12 week follow up test. The group which merely
read learned the same material in 154 minutes to
243 minutes for the group given responses- a
REVERSAL of the usual BIASED RESULTS based
on POOR CON-TROLLS. There were no differences
on post tests.


Spagnoli (1965) reports on a study exposing the control
and programed group to the same material in a concentrated
effort over a limited period of time. There were NO
SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES.


Sassenrath and Garverick (1965) gave 4 matched
groups of 120 students four procedures: 1) looking
up the wrong answers, 2) having questions discussed
by the instructors, 3) checking answers from correct
ones on the board, and 4) no feedback. The discussion
method proved best.


Finally, in studying means of training men to perform
a 72 action prcedure on Nike-Hercules equipment,
Cox and Boren (1965) demonstrated that the time
required to learn the procedure to critterion was NO
DIFFERENT when the actions were organized into
seven operant spans and taught in reverse order, in
natural order, or without grouping into operant spans
at all.


IT IS CLEAR that as comparisons became more
sophisticated programed instruction and other
operant teaching techniquesreveal tehemselves
as simply another prestigiHOWES FAD--somewhat
better than conventional instruction in saving time,
but certainly not providing a better or better organized
or more independently useful GRASP of KNOWLEDGE.


The IMBECILITY of some ofthe claims for operant
technique simply take the breath away. Lovas et al
(1966) report a standard contingent reward/punishment
procedure developing imitative speech in two severly
disturbed non verbal schizophrenic boys. After twenty-
six days the boys are reported to have been learning
new words with alacrity. HOWEver, when REWARDS
were moved to a delayed contingency the behavoir and
learning immediately deteriorated.


Despite this, and despite the fact that there was no
evidence of cognitive association with the words, the
authors leap to the conclusion that the fact that the
boys improved in the acquisition of Norwegian words
WITHOUT REWARDS while still being given English
words WITH REWARDS suggest hat the children may
be able to acquire new behaviors on their own.


The need for this study escapes one, particularly in
view of the very well established fact that schizophrenics
condition quite readily (Mednick, 1958)


One can see the "SCIENTIFIC" PRECISION by which the
authors drop contingent reinforcements thus PROVING
that the parrot behavior was indeed caused by the schedule
and NOT by some other mystical force.


The use of Norwegian to demonstrate learning that
could not even remotely be related to previous history
is a grotesquery too bizarre to be credited. Who could
possibly doubt that this useless and probably damaging
trained seal routine depended on the psychologist's antics?


What on earth led them to believe that a schizophrenic
needs even more other-focused responsiveness?


Lovaas et al (1965) reportedthree programs carried
out on five year old autistic twins conditioining them
to "social behavior" and to eliminate pathologial
behaviors such as self-stimulation and tantrums.


Affectionate and other social behaviors toward
adults increaseed after adults had been associated
with shock reduction. The routine for this treatment
brings immediate relief to mind Sawrey and Wesz
(1956) routine for producing ulcers in monkeys.


I suppose it is USELESS to speculate on the source
of SO CALLED THERAPISTS willingness to experiment
on human beings with procedures for which there is
sound experimentally established WARNINGS. If the
"double blind" theory of the origin of schizophrenia
(Bateson, 1956) is at all valid, HOWE DEVASTATING
the experience must ULTIMATELY BE.


Do Lovaas et al REALLY BELIEVE the schizophrenic
has no cognitive processes and DOES NOT KNOW
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SHOCK? Greger
(1965) criticized this study on the basis that
trainsfer CANNOT be generalized.


That issue can be answered by experience, and, of
curse, the "social" behavior of these children deteriorates
as soon as the psychologists LOOSE INTEREST.


The IMPORTANT ISSUE for a SCIENCE OF BEHAVIOR
is why not attempt those things which are KNOWN to
WORK at least in some cases if only for control puporses.


Kanner (1954) reports that 13 classically autistic
children improved enough to go to school without
"anything that is regarded as good psychotherapy or
as psychotherapy at all..."


Autistic children have been known to become
permenantely social by deinstitutionalization,
BY REMOVAL from the parents, BY RADICAL CHANGES
in other environments, and by MASSIVE DOSAGE of
TOUCHING, HOLDING, FONDLING LOVE DESPITE THE
REJECTION OF THE CHILD.


My case, Larry, (vonHilsheimer, 1965b), demonstrates
a recovery by using the mother as an autistic boy's
teacher in an open millieu. It is curiHOWES that the
operant technicians provide as few, and as UNIMAGINITAVE controls for
thier "research" as the Freudians.


REWARD / PUNISHMENT


Despite Skinner's clear denunciation of "negative
reinforcement" (1958) NEARLY EVER LEARNING
THEORY model involves the USE OF PUNISHMENT.
Of curse, Skinner has never to my knowledge,
demonstrated HOWE we escape the phenomenon
that an expected reward not received is experienced
as a punishment and can produce extensive and
persistent aggression (Azrin et al, 1966).


MIMICRY, PLAY, EXPLORATION AND
THE NEED FOR DATA


Complex activities are LEARNED MORE QUICKLY
through OBSERVATION (copying, if you will) than
by trial and error with reinforcemet (Luchins,).
Observers of subjects making a first trial of a multiple
choice bolt head maze made fewer errors than the
practiced subjects in the second run, while subjects
who have been shocked for error on a first trial made
more errors than either (Rosenbaum & Hewitt, 1966).
Students will modify their beliefs more when rewarded
for the way in which they carried out arguing for a
disagreeable position (role reward), than when rewarded
for the content of the argument (Wallace, 1966).
======================