It's Only Alimentary, Dear Watson

HOWEDY tara o. aka tee,

Tee wrote:
> "Alison" <alison@XYZallofus2.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:cve0o1$jut$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
> >
> > I don't think a "good" trainer would use a choke chain.

No MOORE than they'd shock or spray aversives
in their dog's faces or lock them in boxes and offer
and withhold bribes attention affection and rewards
on accHOWENT of that'll make their dogs fearful
and deathly ill, like most of the lying dog abusing
punk thug coward mental cases dogs we got here.

> I think a "good trainer" is someone who knows how to:

YOU MURDERED YOUR OWN DEAD DOG Summer
for FEAR AGGRESSION on accHOWENT of you couldn't
stop HURTING her. You RECENTLY MURDERED your
mini DaschHOWEN on accHOWENT of it was DYIN from
STRESS INDUCED AUTO-IMMUNE DIS-EASE aka The
Puppy Wizard's SYNDROME <{) : ~ ( >

> 1. use every tool available

You mean jerk choke shock and spray aversives into ITS
face like HOWE you done to your own DEAD DOGS whom
YOU MURDERED on accHOWENT of you couldn't stop
TORMENTING them, REMEMBER tara o. aka tee?

> *and* 2. assess each dog as an individual

You mean to determine if they can handle as much
PAIN FEAR FORCE and INTIMDIATION as you NEED
to use to suit their individual PREFERENCE.

> and use the training tool

You mean a pain fear and force inflicting device.

> most effective for the individual dog

Like your own DEAD DOGS, tara o. aka tee.

> IMO everything today has gone cookie-cutter.

Perhaps that's on accHOWENT of your anti psychotic
medication befuddling your tiny sick fearful mind, tara
o. aka tee? Your daughter in first grade is takin ANTI
PSYCHOTIC medication on accHOWENT of you're an
abuser.

> That used to be, and still is to some respect,
> something attributed to choke collar trainers.

That so? You wouldn't HURT a dog to train it
on accHOWENT of you KNOW that makes
dogs fear aggressive and self mutilate like
your own two DEAD DOGS you MURDERED
for the same same same reason <{) : ~ ( >

> There are still classes that hand them out
> as standard issue and demand you use them
> regardless of your dog's personality type,
> responsiveness or other important factors.

Like your own POSTED CASE HISTORY, tara o. aka tee?

> There are also a growing number of feel-good
> trainers who refuse to use anything physical on
> a dog

On accHOWENT of THAT'S HOWE COME dogs
GET FEAR AGGRESSIVE of SMALL CHILDREN
despite that your own FEAR AGGRESSIVE DEAD
DOG was RAISED with children... and for the same
reason your DascHOWEND was MURDERED for
SELF MUTILATING from STRESS INDUCED AUTO-
IMMUNE DIS-EASE aka The Puppy Wizard's SYNDROME
<{) ; ~ ) >

> but for some reason find Gentle Leaders (my hunch
> is that because they're called "gentle" they must be ok)

EITHER THAT, or IT'S A LIE.

> acceptable.

No, they AIN'T acceptable UNLESS you're
willin to use EVERY TOOL you got to hurt
and intimidate dogs to make them fear
aggressive and self mutilate themselves
till you MURDER THEM, tara o. aka tee.

> Don't scold,

RIGHT. On accHOWENT of dogs that get
SCOLDED MUTILATE THEMSELVES and
become FEAR AGGRESSIVE and then you
MURDER THEM like HOWE you done your
own two DEAD DOGS. REMEMBER tara o?

> don't use any kind of collar that may cause undue discomfort

RIGHT. DECENT PEOPLE DO NOT
HURT INNOCENT DUMB CRITTERS.

>*as a means of a split-second training correction*,

You mean inflicting pain fear force and intimidation
to make your dog naturally want to do any thing you
ask of IT, isnt' that correct, tara o. aka tee.

> don't forget to overload them with yummies

Offering fearful dogs bribes makes them FEAR AGGRESSIVE.

> (which can make them fat & expectant of
> such things in order to obey) and a host of
> other problems.

BRIBERY is NOT 'positive' reinforcement.

> All dogs aren't responsive to such techniques.

You mean to being bribed...

> Alot of strong-willed dogs,

You mean dogs you gotta HURT to INTIMIDATE.

> and entire breeds (possibly),

A dog is a dog you dog murderin lying mental case.

> will walk all over an owner who tries
> to train them in that manner.

S-HOWENDS like your INFERIORITY COMPLEX talkin, tara.

> Its also not necessarily a "good" or "best" way to
> train certain dogs if you spend forever on the training
> with little to no results.

Like leah and melanie done?

> Of all the training tools available,

You mean the pain fear force and
intimidation devices you PREFER.

> the ones that scare me most,

Seems LOTS of STUFF scares you dog lovers... like dogs.

> in the hands of JQP, are the GL and the e-collar.

On accHOWENT of J.Q. Pubic don't know HOWE
to PUPPERLY HURT and INTIMIDATE dogs like
HOWE EXXXPERTS like you and tommy and bigb.

> For all their "gentleness" the
> GL can be dangerous on lunging dogs.

The PROBLEM ain't from LUNGING, tara o. aka
tee. The PROBLEM starts when you put the GL
NECK TWISTER on tight enough to RESTRAIN
the dog you automagickally trigger the opposition /
fight / flight reflexes and then you gotta HURT the
dog someMOORE to make it LIKE bein with you.

> For all their effectiveness the e-collar

The shock collar is NOT effective it HURTS
and INTIMDIATES dogs and teaches them
they can ONLY BE HURT if their shock collar
is ON and WITHIN RANGE of you HURTIN
them someMOORE. THAT'S HOWE COME
your pal susan fraser's BREED LEASE SHOWE
puppy FAILED and was sold to a REAL HUNTER.

> can be dangerous in the wrong hands

You mean in the hands of a mental case who'd HURT
their dog to train IT, like yourself, tara o. aka tee.

> and/or on a dog who is very soft or easily spooked.

Ahhh, the hallmark of a dog abusing mental case...

> My novel-length point is that any kind of teacher
> can only be good when he/she is fully educated
> and makes decisions based on individual learning
> abilities not what looks/sounds/is perceived as bad.

RIGHT. Like your own posted case history of
hurting intimidating and murdering your own
dogs on accHOWENT of you're a dog abusing
lying mental case:

> Tara


"Tending To Agree With The Positive Reinforcement Method"?

HOWEDY People,

Hello Tara,

"Tara O." <tara29401@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:n%Zy6.30496$BC6.8869056@e3500-chi1.usenetserver.co
m...

> I tend to agree with the positive reinforcement
> method.

Oh, that's nice. I tend to think people who tend to
agree with positive reinforcement methods tend to be
pulling our chains... That's what I tend to think,
based on my experience working with people who tend to
agree with positive reinforcement who TEND TO
hurt their dogs when their tendencies to use positive
methods are outweighed by their tendencies to run out
of information or intellect and TEND to get frustrated
and TEND NOT to do the things they TEND TO believe are
right, when they TEND to be frustrated, or TEND to be
at a loss for INTELLECT, and TEND TO resort to
violence because they TEND to be shy on BRAINS... I
TEND TO view those folks as hypocrites, that's what I
TEND to do because I just happen to TEND to be HONEST,

> IMO, shock collars should be used only after normal
> obedience training methods have failed.

If your NORMAL obedience training TENDED to properly
train dogs, there would be a TENDENCY to have well
trained dogs. But that's not the case, becasuse NORMAL
obedience training TENDS to provoke, intimidate, and
confound your dog and inhibit his ability to think
and learn to want to work and think and learn... SEE?

That's what I TEND to think about NORMAL obedience
training which TENDS to FAIL because it TENDS to
resort to VIOLENCE instead of TENDING TOWARDS
THE MOST EFFECTIVE SCIENTIFIC METHODS AVAILABLE.

> It just bothers me to imagine shocking my dog, even
> at a very low frequency.

It bothers me less to think of shocking the dog than
thinking about what punishment and confrontation can
do to a dog's temperament. That's what I tend to think
based on my thirty eight years professional experience
training dogs.

> I will definitely admit that there are many dogs who
> either can't or won't benefit from training without
> such things as e-collars.

Is that based on your thirty eight years of experience
specializing in temperament and behavior problems and
protection training in giant breed dogs? Or is that
based on your TENDANCY to believe incompetent dog
abusing Thugs who tell you they TEND to get excellent
results from HURTING dogs to train them because they
TEND NOT TO be intelligent enough to outwit the
cunning of the domestic puppy dog???

OR IS IT BASED ON YOUR TENDENCY TO MURDER
YOUR OWN DEAD DOG Summer?

> I just hope its a last-resort, not a first.

And I just hope you figure out why your pals here who
hurt dogs to train them TEND to claim they have me in
their killfiles, because they TEND NOT TO be able to
answer my questions in good conscience...That's what
they TEND to do around here because our lying dog
abusing Thugs TEND to be INCOMPETENT, IMMORAL,
UNETHICAL, UNPRINCIPLED, DOG ABUSING COWARDS.

Like yourself.

That's what I tend to think.

Your pal, Jerry "The PHONY," Howe. j;~}
The Amazing Puppy Wizard. <{) ; ~ ) >


<ThePuppyWiz...@EarthLink.Net>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:12:11
GMT Local: Thurs, Oct 7 2004 10:12 am

Subject: "I'm Shocked That I Shocked" tara o. aka tee,
NC Boxer Rescue Abuse

HOWEDY People

Here's WON of HOWER MENTAL CASES
hurtin dogs and lying abHOWET it again.

"I'm shocked that I shocked"

"Tara O." <nos...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bh9f81$vrac2$1@ID-92443.news.uni-berlin.de...

> Due to someone reprimanding Jar-Jar & the word
> "rescue" in the post, I decided to read down and see
> what he was spewing now. I was able to learn that
> besides choking, pinching, crating, abusing and
> murdering my dog, I also shocked her. I must be
> suffering from amnesia.

> Can someone point me to a post where I said
> I shocked my dog, or any dog, or that I even
> know *how* to use an e-collar....assuming I had one
> which must have been stolen at the same time I lost
> my memory.

> One would think Jerry would be happy with the
> "murder" part and all my other training sins but
> evidently not.
> --
> Tara

HOWEDY tara o.,

You didn't HURT INTIMIDATE and MURFDER
your own DEAD DOG Summer:

Date: 2003-04-28 18:09:04 PST

> "Tara O." wrote:

> > Labs are a breed that are normally trained for
> > field work with ear pinches, e-collars and other
> > forms of physical interaction without making them
> > fearful or aggressive.


==============

From: Tara O. (tara29...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: Dane hyper when passing other dogs
Date: 2001-04-21 12:07:54 PST

I think its pertinent to mention that I've never had
any dogs who exhibited signs of aggression or were in
any way, shape, or form resistent to whatever
"training" I did with them.

I would not feel comfortable relying on my past
experience or a book to train a dog to stop biting,
snapping or growling.
--
Tara O.

===================

From: Tara O. (tara29...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: Canine Behaviors For Dummies
Date: 2001-06-11 19:42:23 PST

"joshua" <jos...@ycsi.net> wrote in message
news:9g3uoi$sc7$0@63.90.193.133...

> I cant seem to understand why people believe prong
> collars are cruel and inhumane. They do nothing more
> than pinch, getting the attention of the animal.

> Choke collars, on the other hand, do permanent
> damage. They bruise the esophagus.

> Shock collars will eventually destroy nerve endings,
> much the same as electric fencing.

Joshua, you have just reopened a can of worms
that can quickly cause infestation here lol
--
Tara O.

===============

From: Tara O. (tara29...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: jerry howe
Date: 2001-04-04 11:58:06 PST

> People are tired of being abused and insulted simply
> for saying they use a prong collar, or a choke
> collar, or an e-collar, or a crate, etc. If you want
> to LEARN more about dog training and dog behavior,
> then listen to what they have to say, too.

"I've never not listened to what people say here.
I use a crate, am about to begin with a choke collar,
I'm not the bad guy here." tara o.

======================

From: Tara O. (tara29...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: Electronic Training Collars
Date: 2001-05-11 17:29:33 PST

""Twzl, Sligo and Roy Happy Together"" wrote

> BTW, this is one of the frequent topics on obedience
> email lists. When people say that they haven't used
> corrections, it turns out that they feel that if
> they do it, it's not a real correction.

That makes sense in a weird sort of way. I don't
honestly think that its humanly possible to train
anyone or anything without correction. Its human
nature to say 'no' or to stop a behavior by doing
something. I used a tin can with coins to correct
Summer's bad puppy behaviors and the cold shoulder
to correct her other less desirable behaviors. I
have said 'no' so many times that I probably sound
like a broken record. Amie can attest to that
lol.

It seems to me that some people are automatically
equating the term correction with punishment. I
guess they can go hand in hand since my tin can
wasn't something Summer liked. My ignoring her
when she's misbehaving is also something she
doesn't like. Therefore it can be viewed as
punishment? And that term is 100% negative.

Maybe if more people saw it as correction and not
the total negative, they'd be less inclined to
want to be PP.

Don't know if the way I wrote that made sense, it
makes sense in my head but then again the men with
the white coats could come a'knockin at any
moment.

Tara O.

===================

From: Tara O. (nos...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: Any hope? rage?
Date: 2003-03-26 05:46:02 PST

Yes I see and understand your point. There's no such
thing as 100% vigilence 100% of the time IMO. You
could call an e-fence company to find out if its
possible to wire only your front door so that if she
gets within a certain range of that front door the
collar will start working. I'd think there would be a
way to work that and it may be inexpensive to do
so.

There are also items called Scat Mats that you place
in front of doors or any area you don't want your dog
to proceed through. When stepping on the mat, it gives
off a vibration, something which most dogs hate.
They'll stay far away from the mats. I believe you can
buy them from
--
Tara

==================

Tara O. (nos...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: Need advice--barking dog
Date: 2003-08-06 17:38:14 PST

you could consider installing an invisible fence just
inside the fence line so he cannot get too close. You
could talk to your neighbor about splitting the cost
of whichever alternative you both find most
acceptable.

--
Tara

=================

From: Tara O. (nos...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: Containment Collars
Date: 2003-03-11 07:12:57 PST

I know people who have electric fences and it works
very well for them. I know people who have them and
whose dogs escape and refuse to come back in. From
the details I know of all involved, I wouldn't use an
e-fence on:

1. An adult dog that wasn't raised with the fence from
a puppy
2. A dog with a high prey drive
3. A very stubborn dog

If I put my female out in an e-fence, the very first
kid, cat, dog or squirrel she sees would have her
bolting through the barrier shock or not. When she
finally loses interest in whatever has caused her to
leave and her adrenalin has diminished, she will think
rationally and realize she's not willing to come back
into the yard because she knows the shock would get
her.

you have a dog who just has to go after or
up to any and everything that walks down the street
then I'd definitely not recommend one of these
systems. The people I know who it works for installed
them when their dogs were pups so they were brought up
trained to it. Two of the ones I know it didn't work
for have adult adopted dogs who weren't raised
with this kind of invisible barrier.

===================

From: Tara O. (tara29...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: escape artist, thunder, aggression
questions Date: 2001-05-12 07:56:04 PST

Since he got a taste of freedom and knows he can
get out I doubt you'll be able to stop him short
of tethering him or using a more sophisticated
device like an e-fence but I wouldn't recommend
going the electronic fence route without first
doing your homework on the pros and cons of them
and understand that they are not fool-proof.

=========================

MacKenzie's First Pinch Collar Class
Date: 2003-07-08 13:54:19 PST

I consider myself to be a pretty good basic obed.
trainer of Boxers with some learned but not necessarily
practiced, advanced training knowledge.

I think this because not only have I worked
with all the dogs I've had at my house but I'm also
the one in charge of all the dogs in our rescue, their
behavioral issues (identifying and working with),
basic training (done in the foster home) and a host of
other things. I'm the one who gives the advice and
walks the foster volunteers through alot of things.

Now I don't believe, for a second, that I would be
successful at teaching basic obedience to other dogs
in a class environment. Maybe I would but probably
not. Other trainers with class experience may think I
have no clue what I'm doing because my experience
has been primarily hands-on and with only one breed.


=========================