Re: Has anyone read . .

"Mary H Healey" <mhhealey@iastate.edu> wrote in message
news:411D432F.9080807@iastate.edu...
> LeeCharlesKelley wrote:
> > ... The canine
> > brain is simply not equipped to make distinctions based on
rank, status,
> > and authority. Without the cognitive ablility to engage in
symbolic,
> > mathematical, and conceptual thinking, there can be no
structure based on
> > rank and status.
>
> Nonsense, but an interesting case of faulty logic. You presume
> rank/status recognition is based on cognitive functions
seemingly not
> present in dogs, and conclude that rank/status recognition
cannot
> therefore exist. But if rank/status is not recognized in the
way you
> posited, then they may well exist among dogs.
>
> > ... But as I said before, I know more about
> > how the brain works than he does. I'm sorry, but it's true.
>
> Assertion don't make it true. Pony up, boy-o.
>
> > Dunbar is mistaken.
>
> Or your underlying assertion is.

Here's your TRUSTED SAR TRAINER lying "I LOVE
KOEHLER" lynn and your long time pal tricia666:

Lynn K.:
In a talk on dog-dog aggression on 5/27.
Given his propensity for repeating himself
verbatim, I'll bet he's also written it somewhere :-)

My biggest take-home from that evening actually
came from a brief conversation with Tricia999 &
some co-workers afterwards.

They confirmed my experience that "growl classes"
don't have a lasting impact on the reactivity of dog
aggressive dogs.

Our common experience was that the desensitization
only lasted for the session and didn't carry forward."

So you see DOG LOVERS, YOUR METHODS
DON'T WORK and YOUR EXXXPERTS ARE
FRAUDS LIARS DOG ABUSERS COWARDS
and ACTIVE LONG TERM INCURABLE MENTAL
CASES and IT'S IN BLACK AND WHITE and html.

	#1
The Puppy Wizard	Re: Has anyone read . . "Mary H Healey" <mhhealey@iastate.edu> wrote in message news:411D432F.9080807@iastate.edu... > LeeCharlesKelley wrote: > > ... The canine > > brain is simply not equipped to make distinctions based on rank, status, > > and authority. Without the cognitive ablility to engage in symbolic, > > mathematical, and conceptual thinking, there can be no structure based on > > rank and status. > > Nonsense, but an interesting case of faulty logic. You presume > rank/status recognition is based on cognitive functions seemingly not > present in dogs, and conclude that rank/status recognition cannot > therefore exist. But if rank/status is not recognized in the way you > posited, then they may well exist among dogs. > > > ... But as I said before, I know more about > > how the brain works than he does. I'm sorry, but it's true. > > Assertion don't make it true. Pony up, boy-o. > > > Dunbar is mistaken. > > Or your underlying assertion is. Here's your TRUSTED SAR TRAINER lying "I LOVE KOEHLER" lynn and your long time pal tricia666: Lynn K.: In a talk on dog-dog aggression on 5/27. Given his propensity for repeating himself verbatim, I'll bet he's also written it somewhere :-) My biggest take-home from that evening actually came from a brief conversation with Tricia999 & some co-workers afterwards. They confirmed my experience that "growl classes" don't have a lasting impact on the reactivity of dog aggressive dogs. Our common experience was that the desensitization only lasted for the session and didn't carry forward." So you see DOG LOVERS, YOUR METHODS DON'T WORK and YOUR EXXXPERTS ARE FRAUDS LIARS DOG ABUSERS COWARDS and ACTIVE LONG TERM INCURABLE MENTAL CASES and IT'S IN BLACK AND WHITE and html.